Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Brick masonry relies on mortar to bond units, transfer stresses, and seal joints. Modern practice typically favors cement mortar due to its strength and durability. This assertion–reason problem probes whether the stated reason fully explains the widespread use of cement mortar.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Cement mortar does tend to provide higher bond strength and compressive capacity versus lime/mud mortars, especially under modern performance requirements. However, the “correct explanation” for adoption also includes durability in aggressive environments, early strength, standardization, and compatibility with reinforced elements—so adhesion alone does not fully explain usage.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess A: True for most modern works (cement mortar is standard).Assess R: Generally true—cement mortar bonds more strongly to well-prepared brick surfaces than weaker binders.Causation: While better adhesion is a benefit, it is not the sole or complete reason for the prevalence of cement mortar.Therefore, choose: both true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
Verification / Alternative check:
Codes and handbooks specify cement or cement–lime mortars for structural and durable masonry; lime-only mortars are used for conservation where compatibility and flexibility are prioritized.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Reducing mortar selection to adhesion only; ignoring durability and strength requirements.
Final Answer:
Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
Discussion & Comments