Question 1

Utilities classification: Which of the following programs is not considered a system utility (i.e., a support tool rather than an end-user application)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: System utilities are support programs that aid in development, maintenance, and operation of a computer system. They differ from applications by serving system-level or developer-oriented tasks such as editing, debugging, printing, and resource management. This question asks you to identify which listed item is not a utility. Given Data / Assumptions: Debugger: tool to examine and control program execution for defects. Editor: tool to create and modify text, code, and configuration files. Spooler: background service to queue and manage print jobs. Concept / Approach: All three listed items are standard examples of utilities or utility-like services. A debugger assists developers; an editor is a foundational utility used by admins and programmers; a spooler is a system service that queues output for devices (notably printers). Therefore, none of the options is a non-utility—the correct choice is “None of the above”. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate each item’s purpose relative to system support.Debugger: system/developer utility—yes.Editor: general-purpose utility—yes.Spooler: system utility/service—yes.Therefore, no item is “not a utility”. Verification / Alternative check: Operating systems ship with text editors (ed/vi/notepad), debuggers (gdb, windbg), and spoolers (print spooler service), all classified as utilities or system services in documentation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Debugger, Editor, Spooler (individually): Each one is indeed a utility. All of the above: Would claim none are utilities, which is false. Common Pitfalls: Confusing end-user applications with utilities; thinking “spooler” is purely hardware rather than an OS-managed service; assuming only command-line tools count as utilities. Final Answer: None of the above

Question 2

Machine language fundamentals Which statement best describes machine language in computer systems?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Machine language is the most fundamental level of software representation. Every processor executes instructions encoded as patterns of bits. Understanding what machine language is, and how it differs from algorithms, flowcharts, or higher level representations, is core knowledge for computer organization and operating systems courses. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks which statement is true about machine language. Machine language refers to binary opcodes and operands interpreted directly by a CPU. Other choices describe programming concepts that are not machine language. Concept / Approach: A CPU decodes instruction words composed of fields such as opcode, addressing mode, and operand. These fields are binary numbers. Although assemblers and higher level languages provide human readability, they must ultimately translate to these binary encodings for execution. Therefore the defining characteristic of machine language is direct communication with hardware using 1s and 0s. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the definition: machine language equals binary instruction codes executed by hardware.Compare each option to this definition.Observe that options a, b, and c describe programming constructs (loops, data flow diagrams, algorithms) rather than binary encodings.Select the choice that states the binary nature of machine language. Verification / Alternative check: Assembler listings show mnemonics side by side with hex or binary opcodes. Disassemblers convert binary back to mnemonics, confirming that executable code is stored and executed as binary digits. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Repeated execution (a) is a behavior pattern. Data flow depiction (b) is documentation. An algorithm (c) is language independent and not specific to binary encoding. Common Pitfalls: Confusing algorithmic steps or pseudocode with actual machine instruction formats; assuming hexadecimal is different from binary (hex is only a compact representation of binary). Final Answer: The language which communicates with the computer using only the binary digits 1 and 0.

Question 3

Assembly language vs. machine language Which advantages do assembly languages have over raw machine code?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Assembly language provides a thin, human readable layer over machine code. It keeps the programmer close to hardware while reducing the cognitive burden of writing long binary or hexadecimal instructions and absolute addresses. This question reviews the common benefits of using assembly rather than raw binary. Given Data / Assumptions: Mneumonics like MOV, ADD, and JMP substitute for numeric opcodes. Labels and symbolic addresses are resolved by an assembler at build time. Directives (for example, DB, DW) allow structured data definition. Concept / Approach: Assemblers translate human readable mnemonics and symbols into machine instructions and relocation information. By allowing labels and expressions, they free developers from manual page boundary calculations and absolute addresses. They also support easier data definition and macro facilities for repetitive patterns, improving maintainability and readability. Step-by-Step Solution: Compare each option with typical assembler features.Option a: mnemonics improve readability and reduce errors.Option b: symbolic labels let the assembler compute final addresses, aiding relocation and modularity.Option c: assembler directives and initializers simplify embedding constants, tables, and strings.Since all three are valid, choose “All of the above”. Verification / Alternative check: Assembler listings map mnemonics and labels to final opcodes and addresses. Relocatable object files further demonstrate that symbolic references are resolved at link time. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “None of the above” is incorrect because each listed advantage is real and widely used. Common Pitfalls: Assuming assembly is portable like high level languages; conflating symbolic addressing with dynamic memory allocation; overlooking that assembly still requires architectural knowledge. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 4

Relocatable program forms Which statement correctly characterizes a relocatable program?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Relocation is central to modular software and modern operating systems. Object modules produced by assemblers and compilers include metadata that allows a linker or loader to adjust addresses when placing code and data into memory. This question distinguishes between absolute, relocatable, and self relocating forms. Given Data / Assumptions: Absolute programs contain fixed addresses and must load at a specific location. Relocatable programs carry relocation records so addresses can be adjusted. Self relocating programs include routines that modify their own references during loading or start up. Concept / Approach: A relocatable program is best defined as code plus relocation information that an external loader or linker uses to compute final addresses. This enables the same object module to load at different base addresses without recompilation. By contrast, an absolute program (option a) is not relocatable, and a self relocating program (option c) is a specialized case distinct from standard relocatable objects. Step-by-Step Solution: Eliminate option a because it describes absolute code.Recognize option c as a different category: self relocating, not the generic definition.Select option b, which matches standard object module practice. Verification / Alternative check: Examine typical object file formats (for example, COFF, ELF, OMF). They store relocation entries that a linker or loader applies, evidencing option b. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: contradicts the idea of relocation. c: describes a specific mechanism, not the general definition. d: cannot be true because a is false. e: not applicable because b is correct. Common Pitfalls: Confusing position independent code with relocatable objects; assuming self relocation is the norm in modern systems where loaders handle relocation. Final Answer: It consists of a program plus the information needed for relocation by a loader or linker.

Question 5

Software documentation practice Which statement is NOT true about documentation for information systems projects?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Documentation covers requirements, designs, code comments, operating procedures, and user guides. Good documentation improves maintainability, reduces onboarding time, and mitigates risk when staff changes occur. This item asks you to identify the statement that is not true. Given Data / Assumptions: Quality documentation should be clear and direct. Documentation helps stakeholders understand the problem and solution. Maintenance cost is a major lifecycle concern. Concept / Approach: Maintenance dominates total cost of ownership in most systems. Clear specifications and records reduce defects, speed debugging, and assist change management. Therefore documentation tends to reduce, not increase, maintenance time and cost when performed at an appropriate level and kept up to date. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate option a: best practice recommends clarity and directness; this is true.Evaluate option c: better understanding is a primary goal of documentation; this is true.Option b claims documentation increases maintenance time and cost; in general practice the opposite is true, so b is not true.Therefore select option b as the statement that is not true. Verification / Alternative check: Industry studies show that structured documentation and traceability reduce rework and defect leakage, supporting the conclusion that maintenance effort decreases when documentation quality is high. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a and c describe benefits of documentation. d cannot be correct because not all statements are true. e is incorrect because one statement is indeed not true. Common Pitfalls: Confusing poor or outdated documents with the concept of documentation itself; over documenting trivial details, which can create noise. The remedy is right sizing and continuous updates. Final Answer: Documentation increases the maintenance time and cost.

Question 6

Round-robin (RR) CPU scheduling Which statement best captures the core property of round-robin scheduling?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Round-robin (RR) scheduling is widely used in time sharing systems to provide fairness and responsiveness. The CPU cycles among ready processes, giving each a time slice. This question seeks the defining feature of RR. Given Data / Assumptions: All ready tasks receive a fixed quantum in cyclic order. Context switching overhead is nonzero but assumed acceptable. Preemption occurs at quantum expiration. Concept / Approach: RR is fundamentally about fairness. Each task gets a turn within a bounded time, so no task can starve. While RR benefits interactive workloads by frequent preemption, its primary property is equal treatment over time, independent of CPU burst length. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the essential RR rule: cycle through ready tasks, allocate equal time quanta.Map options to properties: fairness (c) is the core property; improved interactivity (a) is a consequence, not the definition.Reject statements that contradict fairness or add complexity claims without basis.Choose option c. Verification / Alternative check: Queue based models show each process receives CPU at least once every N quanta, where N is the number of ready processes, satisfying fairness. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: often true in practice, but it is a benefit rather than the defining property. b: RR is conceptually simple; implementation is straightforward with a ready queue. d: RR does not privilege processor bound tasks; all tasks get equal quanta. Common Pitfalls: Choosing a quantum that is too small (excessive context switches) or too large (poor responsiveness). Assuming RR optimizes throughput; it primarily optimizes fairness and response time. Final Answer: Gives each task the same chance at the processor.

Question 7

Core functions of a file system Which of the following describes core responsibilities commonly provided by an operating system file system?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: File systems organize, store, and protect data. They expose naming conventions, access controls, and robustness features that allow users and applications to create, locate, share, and survive failures. This item checks recognition of typical file system responsibilities. Given Data / Assumptions: Modern file systems support hierarchical names and permissions. They manage storage tiers and policies for performance versus cost. They provide reliability features such as journaling and snapshots. Concept / Approach: Each option captures a real aspect of file system design: naming and sharing (a), data persistence and space management (b), and fault tolerance (c). Taken together they outline the scope of responsibilities delivered by file systems in mainstream operating systems. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate (a): directory trees and ACLs enable naming freedom and controlled sharing.Evaluate (b): disks, SSDs, and even cloud tiers are managed to balance cost and performance.Evaluate (c): journaling, copy on write, and checksums protect against crashes and corruption.All three are valid; therefore select “All of the above”. Verification / Alternative check: Examples: ext4 and NTFS use journaling for crash recovery; ZFS and btrfs add checksums and snapshots; POSIX permissions and extended ACLs implement controlled sharing. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each individual statement is true, so “None of the above” is wrong. Common Pitfalls: Assuming hardware RAID alone provides data integrity; ignoring the file system role in metadata consistency and recovery. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 8

Basic categories of operating systems Which pair names two fundamental historical categories of operating systems?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Operating systems evolved from early batch processors, which ran jobs without user interaction, to time sharing systems that enabled multiple users to interact concurrently. Recognizing these categories helps place modern multitasking and interactive systems in historical context. Given Data / Assumptions: Batch systems collect jobs and process them without direct interaction. Time sharing systems slice CPU time among users for interactivity. Terminology varies, but time sharing is the canonical historical counterpart to batch. Concept / Approach: Batch versus time sharing emphasizes the presence or absence of interactive, preemptive scheduling with rapid context switches. Interactive is a broader term that includes time sharing; however, the historically precise pairing is batch and time sharing as two foundational modes of operation. Step-by-Step Solution: Check each option for widely accepted terminology.Recognize that “sequential” and “direct” are not standard OS categories.Note that “batch and interactive” is close, but the textbook phrasing is “batch and time sharing”.Select option b. Verification / Alternative check: Classic OS texts describe the evolution from batch to multiprogramming to time sharing. The term time sharing captures CPU preemption and user terminals. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a and c use nonstandard category names. d is imprecise; interactive encompasses time sharing but is not the canonical paired term in most curricula. Common Pitfalls: Equating time sharing strictly with modern desktop multitasking; forgetting that batch systems remain relevant for high throughput job processing. Final Answer: Batch and timesharing.

Question 9

Operating systems that react in actual time What is the name of an operating system that reads inputs and reacts within strict time constraints (actual time)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Real time operating systems (RTOS) are designed for deterministic response. They are used in embedded control, aerospace, medical devices, and industrial automation where missing a deadline can degrade quality or cause failure. This question asks for the correct term for such systems. Given Data / Assumptions: Deterministic timing is required, not merely high throughput. Deadlines may be hard (must meet) or soft (prefer to meet). OS must provide predictable scheduling and interrupt handling. Concept / Approach: An RTOS schedules tasks based on deadlines and priorities to guarantee bounded latency. This differs from time sharing, which optimizes fairness and interactivity but not strict deadlines, and from batch systems, which optimize throughput without interactive or real time guarantees. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the need: respond within specified time constraints.Map the definition to the standard term “real time system”.Reject alternatives that lack deterministic timing semantics. Verification / Alternative check: Examples include VxWorks, QNX, FreeRTOS, and RT Linux variants. Their documentation emphasizes bounded interrupt latency and priority based preemptive schedulers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: batch focuses on throughput. b: “quick response” is a vague description without deterministic guarantees. d: time sharing provides responsiveness but not hard deadlines. Common Pitfalls: Confusing fast average response with deterministic worst case response; ignoring that real time systems can be low power and small footprint. Final Answer: Real time system.

Question 10

Assemblers and immediate execution Which system program skips producing an object file, generates absolute machine code, loads it, and executes immediately after assembly?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Development workflows can assemble code to an object file for later linking, or assemble and execute immediately for rapid testing. Load and go assemblers streamline short edit assemble run cycles, especially in educational and embedded contexts. Given Data / Assumptions: We compare standard assemblers with a variant that loads and runs immediately. Object code and absolute code are different products. Immediate execution implies an integrated load step. Concept / Approach: A load and go assembler translates source to memory resident absolute code and jumps to it without writing an intermediate object module. A two pass assembler typically emits relocatable object modules for a linker. Macroprocessors expand macros but do not assemble or execute. Compilers translate high level languages into object or executable files, not immediate execution of assembled code. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the essential behavior: assemble → load → execute in one step.Match this to the term “load and go assembler”.Eliminate other tools that either produce object files or do not execute. Verification / Alternative check: Historical educational systems and monitors provided load and go assemblers for quick turn programming, confirming the definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: two pass assemblers typically output relocatable objects. c: macroprocessors perform text substitution only. d: compilers translate high level code and usually require linking. Common Pitfalls: Confusing a monitor or debugger with an assembler; assuming all assemblers require linking steps. Final Answer: Load-and-go assembler.

Question 11

Virtual storage (virtual memory) behavior Under a virtual storage system, which statement describes how primary memory is used?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Virtual storage, commonly called virtual memory, decouples the logical address space of a process from physical memory. The operating system and hardware collaborate to load and evict pages so that programs can run even when their total size exceeds available RAM. Given Data / Assumptions: Paged virtual memory is assumed. Page tables map virtual pages to frames in physical memory. The working set idea says that only currently needed pages must reside in RAM. Concept / Approach: Virtual memory loads only active pages into RAM, keeping inactive parts on secondary storage. Page faults trigger on demand loading, while replacement algorithms such as LRU choose victims to evict. This allows large programs and multiple processes to coexist, giving the illusion of large contiguous memory. Step-by-Step Solution: Define virtual storage: separation of virtual and physical address spaces.Identify the core behavior: RAM holds the current working set of active pages.Select the option that states this precisely: only active pages reside in primary storage. Verification / Alternative check: Operating systems literature describes demand paging and working set models; tools like task managers display commit versus working set sizes, illustrating that only active portions are resident. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: describes multiprocessing, not virtual storage. b: can be true even without virtual memory and is not the defining behavior. d: good isolation prevents interprogram interference in virtual memory systems. Common Pitfalls: Assuming all of a program must be loaded to run; confusing swapping entire processes with paging of small units. Final Answer: Only the active pages of a program are stored in primary storage.

Question 12

Operating Systems Basics  Which of the following are major operating systems commonly used on computers (historical and contemporary examples)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Operating systems are the fundamental software layer that manages hardware resources and provides common services for applications. Familiarity with representative operating systems helps learners connect historical platforms to modern descendants such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. Given Data / Assumptions: The examples listed (MS-DOS, OS/2, UNIX) refer to families of operating systems used on personal computers and workstations. “Major” means widely used or historically influential in computing development. We evaluate whether each candidate qualifies as a major OS family. Concept / Approach: Determine the historical impact, user base, and technological influence of each system. If each item meets the criteria, then the most inclusive option is correct. Step-by-Step Solution: MS-DOS: Dominated early IBM-PC compatibles; provided the basis for early Windows versions.OS/2: IBM/Microsoft project later driven by IBM; important in enterprise desktops and ATM/industrial systems.UNIX: A seminal multiuser, multitasking OS; foundation for many variants (AIX, Solaris, HP-UX) and UNIX-like systems (Linux, BSD, macOS).Since each item is a notable OS lineage, the comprehensive choice is “All of the above”. Verification / Alternative check: Look at software ecosystems and standards: POSIX traces to UNIX; the PC software boom started on MS-DOS; OS/2 influenced later Windows NT concepts and lived long in niche domains. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Individual selections (MS-DOS, OS/2, UNIX alone) omit other valid examples.“None of the above” is incorrect because all three are legitimate OS families. Common Pitfalls: Thinking “major” must mean “current market share only.” Historical importance also matters. Confusing UNIX with Linux; Linux is UNIX-like but influenced heavily by UNIX. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 13

Peripherals and Buses  In computer I/O, a “daisy chain” arrangement is primarily used for what purpose?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Daisy chaining is a classic hardware technique where multiple peripherals share a single controller or bus using a serial or cascading connection. It appears in interfaces such as SCSI (older generations), IEEE-488 (GPIB), and some modern display/Thunderbolt topologies. Given Data / Assumptions: Daisy chain implies a sequence: controller → device 1 → device 2 → … Only one controller initiates bus transactions; devices respond per addressing/priority rules. We are not describing a many-controller mesh network. Concept / Approach: Identify the topology: a chain off a controller, often with address or ID assignment and termination rules. Evaluate which option correctly describes that topology. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize “daisy chain” as a single-controller, multiple-device arrangement.Confirm that each device links to the next, sharing the bus and signals.Conclude that the accurate description is connecting many devices to one controller. Verification / Alternative check: Historically, SCSI chains required terminators at physical ends and unique device IDs, precisely matching “many devices on one controller”. GPIB allows multiple instruments on one controller in a chain or star-like formation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Connecting many controllers to one device (Option A) reverses the relationship.A full mesh of multiple controllers and devices (Option C) is not a daisy chain; it needs switches or hubs.“All of the above” is invalid because only one description fits. Common Pitfalls: Confusing daisy chaining with hub/switch-based star networks. Forgetting required termination or unique addressing in chained buses. Final Answer: Connecting a number of devices to a single controller.

Question 14

Multiprogramming Concepts  Which of the following is NOT an advantage of multiprogramming?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Multiprogramming allows multiple jobs/processes to share system resources by overlapping CPU and I/O. It generally improves utilization and throughput, but it also introduces management overhead in the operating system. Given Data / Assumptions: We compare typical outcomes of multiprogramming against single-program systems. Overhead includes context switches, scheduling, synchronization, and memory management. Concept / Approach: Evaluate each statement according to classical OS theory. Identify which statement contradicts expected effects of multiprogramming. Step-by-Step Solution: Increased throughput: true—CPU stays busy while another process waits for I/O.Shorter response time: often improved under balanced load, especially for interactive systems with proper scheduling.Decreased OS overhead: false—more processes require more scheduling, memory management, and synchronization work.Priority assignment: supported in many multiprogramming OSes to meet differing service goals. Verification / Alternative check: Empirical performance studies show higher CPU utilization and throughput with multiprogramming, but also measurable costs from context switching and paging—evidence that overhead does not decrease. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B, and D describe real advantages or capabilities of multiprogramming.“None of the above” is incorrect because one option (reduced overhead) is not an advantage. Common Pitfalls: Assuming response time always improves; under overload, response time can degrade. Ignoring that overhead rises with concurrency management. Final Answer: Decreased operating-system overhead.

Question 15

Performance Diagnosis  Which conditions commonly cause poor response times in a computer system?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Response time is the delay between a user request and the system’s reply. Poor response time can arise from multiple bottlenecks. Recognizing typical culprits is a key troubleshooting skill in systems administration and performance engineering. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider CPU, I/O subsystem, and memory/virtual memory as primary resource domains. High utilization or contention in any domain can slow end-to-end transactions. Concept / Approach: Map a user request’s path through the system and identify which subsystem can introduce queuing delays. If several subsystems are overloaded, the combined effect worsens latency drastically. Step-by-Step Solution: CPU-bound: If the CPU is saturated, ready-queue length grows and tasks wait longer.I/O-bound: High device utilization (disks, network) adds queuing and service delays.Memory pressure: Excess paging produces page faults and disk thrashing, delaying execution.Any single factor—or a combination—can cause poor response time, so the inclusive answer applies. Verification / Alternative check: Monitoring tools (perf counters, iostat, vmstat, sar) routinely correlate spikes in CPU usage, I/O wait, or page faults with increased response time observed by users or benchmarks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A, B, C each identifies a real cause, but alone they are incomplete—hence D is correct.“None of the above” contradicts well-established performance analysis principles. Common Pitfalls: Tuning the wrong subsystem (e.g., adding CPU when the real issue is disk latency). Overlooking the multiplicative effect when multiple bottlenecks coincide. Final Answer: Any of the above.

Question 16

Memory Management Knowledge Check  Which of the following statements is TRUE?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Operating systems rely on page-replacement algorithms, virtual memory management, and storage performance analysis. Distinguishing correct statements from common misconceptions helps solidify foundational knowledge. Given Data / Assumptions: LRU stands for Least Recently Used, a common approximation of optimal replacement. Thrashing can occur under poor working-set management but is not inevitable. Seek analysis examines disk head movement and latency—tied to device behavior. Concept / Approach: Validate each statement against standard OS theory and storage performance practice. Select the single statement that is unambiguously true. Step-by-Step Solution: LRU: By definition, evicts the page whose last use is farthest in the past (i.e., not used recently). This statement is true.Thrashing: Not a “natural consequence”; it results when the total working set of active processes exceeds available frames, causing excessive paging. Proper controls prevent it.Seek analysis: Targets disk device performance (seek and rotational delays), not primarily control-unit busy conditions. Hence this statement, as phrased, is false. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook definitions and OS labs demonstrate LRU behavior and show thrashing can be avoided by adjusting the degree of multiprogramming or by using working-set models. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B exaggerates; virtual memory does not mandate thrashing.Option C misattributes seek analysis to controller bottlenecks rather than disk mechanics.“All of the above” fails because B and C are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Confusing LRU with MRU (Most Recently Used). Assuming thrashing is unavoidable instead of workload- and configuration-dependent. Mixing up controller throughput and spindle/seek latencies. Final Answer: The LRU page-replacement algorithm evicts pages that have not been used recently.

Question 17

Security Fundamentals  What is the most common cause of security failures in computer systems?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Security is only as strong as its weakest link. While sophisticated attacks exist, many breaches arise from basic lapses in user behavior rather than exotic zero-day exploits. Given Data / Assumptions: Common user mistakes: weak passwords, password reuse, clicking phishing links, ignoring updates, and mishandling sensitive data. Technical controls exist but cannot fully mitigate careless actions. Concept / Approach: Assess which factor statistically accounts for the bulk of incidents. Numerous industry reports attribute a large percentage of compromises to human factors and social engineering, emphasizing training and process controls. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify typical breach vectors: phishing, credential stuffing, misconfigurations.Map them to user behavior (carelessness) versus purely technical shortcomings.Conclude that human error is the most prevalent root cause. Verification / Alternative check: Security postmortems repeatedly highlight unpatched systems, weak credentials, and phishing success rates as dominant factors—which are preventable with better user practices and governance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Depending on passwords (Option B) is not inherently wrong; using strong, unique passwords with MFA is effective.Overemphasis on physical access (Option C) does not itself cause most breaches.“Insufficient technology” (Option D) matters, but even strong tech cannot compensate for unsafe behavior. Common Pitfalls: Assuming technology alone solves security. Ignoring user training and phishing simulations. Final Answer: Carelessness by users (poor security hygiene).

Question 18

Origins of Operating Systems  Which operating system family was originally designed by scientists and engineers for use by scientists and engineers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: UNIX originated at Bell Labs in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It was built by researchers to support multiuser, multitasking workloads common in scientific and engineering environments, and it emphasized portability, simplicity, and powerful tools. Given Data / Assumptions: UNIX ancestry includes influential systems and standards (e.g., POSIX). Other listed OS families served different target markets: MS-DOS for PCs, OS/2 for enterprise desktops, XENIX as a Microsoft-licensed UNIX variant. Concept / Approach: Identify the OS whose design goals and early adopters were primarily in research, academia, and engineering labs. Step-by-Step Solution: UNIX: built for time-sharing, programmability, and portability.It introduced the “tools and pipelines” philosophy, conducive to scientific computing.Therefore, UNIX is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Historical documents and textbooks trace UNIX’s academic and research proliferation, later inspiring BSD, System V, and modern UNIX-like systems (Linux, macOS). Why Other Options Are Wrong: MS-DOS targeted single-user PCs with minimal multitasking.OS/2 focused on protected-mode desktop computing.XENIX was a derivative distribution, not the original research OS. Common Pitfalls: Confusing UNIX with Linux; Linux came later as a UNIX-like kernel inspired by UNIX principles. Final Answer: UNIX.

Question 19

Concurrency Control  What do we call the part of a program where shared memory or shared resources are accessed and which must execute indivisibly to avoid race conditions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Concurrent programs require coordination when accessing shared data. The code segments that manipulate shared state must be protected to prevent interleavings that cause inconsistent results, known as race conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: Multiple threads/processes may enter the same code region. Shared memory accesses inside that region must appear atomic with respect to each other. Concept / Approach: The term “critical section” denotes the code region that requires mutual exclusion. Mechanisms such as locks, semaphores, monitors, and atomic operations enforce that only one thread executes the critical section at a time. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the shared data structure (e.g., queue, counter).Wrap its access within a critical section.Use a synchronization primitive (e.g., mutex, binary semaphore) to enforce mutual exclusion.Release the primitive upon exiting to permit progress of other threads. Verification / Alternative check: Testing under high concurrency should show absence of data races and consistent results when the critical section is correctly protected. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Semaphores (Option A) are a mechanism, not the code region itself.Directory (Option B) is unrelated to concurrency control.Mutual exclusion (Option D) is the property or technique, not the region’s name. Common Pitfalls: Locking too broadly, harming performance. Forgetting to release locks on all code paths, causing deadlocks. Final Answer: Critical section.

Question 20

Compilation Artifacts  Which statement about object code is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Software toolchains transform human-readable source into machine-usable forms. Understanding the difference between object code and executable images clarifies the roles of compilers, assemblers, linkers, and loaders. Given Data / Assumptions: Object code is typically relocatable and may contain unresolved symbols. Executables are load modules with relocation resolved (or prepared for dynamic linking). Concept / Approach: Object files are intermediate artifacts. A linker combines one or more object files and libraries, resolves symbols, and produces an executable or shared library. A loader then places the program in memory and transfers control. Step-by-Step Solution: Source → compile/assemble → object (.o/.obj).Link objects → executable image (.exe, ELF, Mach-O).Loader maps the image into memory and starts execution. Verification / Alternative check: Toolchain manuals show that both compilers and assemblers emit object files, and executables are produced after linking; relocation info confirms the need for loading/relocation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A confuses object code with a final load module.Option B is false—assemblers also produce object code.Option D is incorrect; object code is processed by tools, not rewritten manually. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single object file is always runnable; many require libraries. Confusing static and dynamic linking stages. Final Answer: It must be loaded (and possibly linked/relocated) before execution.

Operating Systems Concepts Questions