Question 1

Wheelset geometry: The distance between the inner faces of a railway wheelset’s flanges relative to the track gauge is kept…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Safe and smooth wheel–rail interaction depends on precise clearances. The “back-to-back” distance between the inner faces of a wheelset’s flanges must accommodate the running gauge and provide clearance for rail head and check rails. This question targets the standard relationship between that flange spacing and the nominal gauge. Given Data / Assumptions: Conventional railway track with fixed gauge. Wheelsets with coned treads and flanges. Need for operational clearance to avoid flange binding. Concept / Approach: The inner faces of flanges cannot be exactly equal to the gauge—some clearance is essential to prevent tight running, allow curving (angle of attack), and accommodate manufacturing tolerances and thermal/elastic movements. Therefore, the flange inner face spacing is kept slightly less than the track gauge. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize the need for clearance between the wheel flanges and rail gauge faces.Conclude that back-to-back spacing must be marginally less than nominal gauge. Verification / Alternative check: Railway standards specify a defined back-to-back tolerance that is less than gauge to ensure safe passage through curves and switches without flange climb. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Equal to gauge: Leaves no clearance; risks binding and accelerated wear. Slightly more than gauge: Excessive clearance; poor guidance and potential hunting. None of these / midway statement: Not relevant to flange spacing specification. Common Pitfalls: Confusing gauge (rail spacing) with back-to-back (wheel flange spacing). Ignoring tolerances essential for curving and thermal effects. Final Answer: slightly less than the gauge distance

Question 2

Permanent way on sharp curves: What is the standard clearance between the inner running rail and its check rail provided on sharp curves?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Check rails (guard rails) are installed on sharp curves and at special trackwork to control flange movement and prevent flange climb. The clearance between the inner running rail and the check rail must be carefully selected to guide the wheelset without excessive contact or wear. Given Data / Assumptions: Sharp curve installation requiring a check rail. Standard practice values for check rail clearance in millimetres. Concept / Approach: Too small a clearance causes continuous rubbing and rapid wear; too large a clearance defeats the guiding function. Typical railway practice prescribes about 44 mm on sharp curves to balance guidance and clearance. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the function of a check rail: control flange path and protect against derailment.Select the commonly specified clearance used on sharp curves: ≈ 44 mm. Verification / Alternative check: Standard exam references and maintenance manuals list ~44 mm as the typical check rail clearance for sharp curves, with slight adjustments for gauge and traffic conditions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 40 or 42 mm: Can be too tight, increasing wear and noise. 46 or 50 mm: May be too loose to provide reliable flange guidance. Common Pitfalls: Not distinguishing between straight track check rail use (rare) and sharp curve practice. Confusing check rail clearance with flangeway clearance at level crossings. Final Answer: 44 mm

Question 3

Ballast maintenance terminology: In routine track upkeep, “boxing of ballast” is carried out primarily at which location relative to the rails and sleepers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Track maintenance includes operations like packing, tamping, and boxing of ballast. “Boxing” refers to shaping, trimming, and dressing the ballast profile so that the shoulders at the rail seats and the cribs between sleepers are properly formed to provide lateral stability and correct drainage. Given Data / Assumptions: Ballasted track with sleepers and rails in standard configuration. Objective is to maintain profile and resistance against track movement. Concept / Approach: Ballast must be dressed to a defined cross-section. At the rails (near rail seats and shoulders), correct boxing prevents rail roll, enhances lateral resistance, and protects sleeper ends. Although ballast also exists between sleepers and rails, “boxing” in common usage highlights shaping at the rails and shoulders to maintain the “box” profile. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize that boxing includes trimming ballast shoulders at rail seats and leveling cribs.Identify the most precise location keyword: “at the rails,” i.e., around rail seats and shoulders. Verification / Alternative check: Maintenance manuals depict the boxed ballast section with distinct shoulders adjacent to rails, indicating where shaping is critical for stability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Under rails: Packing/tamping occurs beneath sleepers; “boxing” refers more to surface shaping. In between two rails only / between sleepers only: Too narrow a description; boxing concerns the full ballast profile at rails and cribs. Below subgrade: Not a maintenance activity termed boxing. Common Pitfalls: Equating boxing with tamping under sleepers; they are distinct operations. Ignoring the importance of shoulder height for lateral resistance and drainage. Final Answer: at the rails (forming and dressing ballast shoulders/cribs)

Question 4

Turnout geometry: If α is the switch angle and R is the radius of the turnout curve, what is the approximate length of the tongue rail?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the design of railway turnouts (switches), the tongue rail must develop the required lateral divergence smoothly. For small switch angles, simple geometric relations give an estimate of the tongue length in terms of turnout radius R and switch angle α. Given Data / Assumptions: Turnout curve approximated by a circular arc of radius R. Small-angle trigonometry is applicable for α (typical in practice). Length sought is the effective length of tongue from toe to where full switch angle is achieved. Concept / Approach: Relating the lateral set (offset) to the developed angle in a circular arc gives the approximation: length along the tongue required to generate angle α is proportional to tan(α/2) for small angles when constructing the geometric triangle of divergence. Step-by-Step Solution: Construct the triangle with radius R and half-angle α/2.For small α, the chordal development relates to R * tan(α/2).Hence, length of tongue rail ≈ R tan(α/2). Verification / Alternative check: Turnout handbooks commonly use R tan(α/2) as a first-order estimate; more exact layouts refine with actual switch geometry and offsets. Why Other Options Are Wrong: R tan α: Overestimates length for small angles. R sin α or R sin(α/2): Not the standard relation tied to the lateral divergence triangle for switch layout. R cos(α/2): Unrelated to length development here. Common Pitfalls: Applying large-angle trigonometry without small-angle context. Confusing lead length of turnout with tongue length. Final Answer: R tan(α/2)

Question 5

Joint detail in continuously welded rail (CWR): A welded rail joint is generally arranged to be…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Even in welded track, field welds join rail lengths. The position of a weld relative to sleepers affects local stiffness and stress concentration. Good practice avoids placing the weld directly over a support to minimize impact loads and reduce the risk of cracking. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard sleeper spacing with elastic fastening systems. Field or flash-butt welds used to create long welded rails. Concept / Approach: Placing the weld midspan (suspended) between two sleepers avoids the abrupt stiffness change that would occur if the weld coincided with a support. This reduces dynamic impacts and thermal stress concentration at the joint. Step-by-Step Solution: Consider stiffness profile of rail-on-sleeper system.Identify that support points create maxima in contact forces.Select suspended weld location to spread stresses and improve fatigue life. Verification / Alternative check: Track standards typically mark weld positions at a defined distance from sleeper centers, ensuring a suspended joint. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Supported on sleeper/plate/chair: Increases stiffness discontinuity and impact, undesirable for weld longevity. None of these: Incorrect because a standard practice exists—suspended position. Common Pitfalls: Confusing fish-plated joints (supported) with welded joints in CWR practice. Final Answer: suspended between adjacent sleepers

Question 6

Rail fastenings: For holding the rail in position, chairs are not used with which rail section?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Different rail sections require different fastenings. Traditional bull-head rails use cast iron chairs to support and locate the rail. Flat-footed (flat-bottom) rails, however, are fastened directly to sleepers via baseplates and clips, eliminating the need for chairs. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard rail sections: flat-footed vs. bull-headed/double-headed. Conventional fastening systems and historical practice. Concept / Approach: Chairs are characteristic of bull-head track to cradle the rail and maintain alignment. Flat-footed rails have a wide base and are secured with spikes/clips and baseplates, making separate chairs unnecessary. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the fastening method for each rail type.Flat-footed → baseplates/clips; Bull-headed/Double-headed → chairs.Therefore, chairs are not used with flat-footed rails. Verification / Alternative check: Modern permanent way largely uses flat-bottom rails with elastic fastenings, confirming chair-less practice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bull-headed and Double-headed rails: Historically require chairs; stating otherwise is incorrect. Both (a) and (b): Wrong because bull-headed needs chairs. None of these: Incorrect because (a) is correct. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single fastening system fits all rail sections. Final Answer: Flat-footed rails

Question 7

Cast-iron “pot” sleepers: Which configuration correctly describes the arrangement of bowls (pots) and tie bars in pot-type sleepers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Before widespread adoption of concrete sleepers, many systems used cast-iron “pot” sleepers on ballasted track. Understanding their physical arrangement helps in recognizing historic track forms and their limitations. Given Data / Assumptions: Pot (bowl) elements made of cast iron. Tie bar connects individual pots to maintain gauge. Concept / Approach: Pot sleepers typically consist of two separate cast-iron pots placed beneath the two rails. A tie bar connects them to preserve the gauge and transmit loads, while packing is done under each pot. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify how many pots per rail are used.Recognize tie bar function—holding gauge between the two rail supports.Select the configuration: two bowls under each rail, joined by a tie bar. Verification / Alternative check: Historic track diagrams show two pots aligned under the rail seats with a transverse tie bar. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Multiple bowls chained by one tie bar: Not the standard pot sleeper arrangement. Two bowls plus one central: Not a recognized conventional configuration. Single bowl with twin bars: Does not provide stable two-rail support. Common Pitfalls: Confusing pot sleepers with CST-9 and other cast-iron sleeper types with different geometry. Final Answer: Two bowls placed under each rail and connected together with a tie bar

Question 8

Track fastenings and sleeper preparation: Which of the following statements about laying rails on timber sleepers and associated fittings is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Laying track on timber sleepers requires appropriate surface preparation and fittings to ensure proper seating and load transfer. Different timber hardnesses call for different accessories, and rail section type dictates the fastenings used. Given Data / Assumptions: Hard vs. soft wood sleepers behave differently under spikes and loads. Bull-headed rail sections need chairs; flat-bottom rails use baseplates and clips/spikes. Concept / Approach: All four statements reflect standard practices: (a) spikes fix rails to timber; (b) adzing provides a level, shaped seat for the rail; (c) bearing plates spread load on softer timber and reduce crushing; (d) chairs cradle bull-headed rails and hold gauge. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate each statement against accepted track-laying practice.Confirm that each item (a–d) is correct and widely used where applicable.Therefore, the collective correct choice is “All the above.” Verification / Alternative check: Track manuals and historical practice align with all four statements in their respective contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any single statement alone omits other equally correct practices; only the combined option is fully correct. Common Pitfalls: Assuming one fitting (e.g., baseplate) applies to all rail types and sleeper hardnesses. Final Answer: All the above

Question 9

Track geometry check using three-axle level readings: Consecutive axles A, B, and C are 1.8 m apart with rail levels 100.505 m, 100.530 m, and 100.525 m respectively. What is the unevenness value (mid-chord deviation at B)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Rail unevenness over a short base is commonly assessed by comparing the middle level with the mean of the two end levels (three-point or mid-chord offset method). This measure indicates the local vertical deviation responsible for rough riding and dynamic wheel loads. Given Data / Assumptions: Axle spacing (A–B and B–C) = 1.8 m each. Rail levels: A = 100.505 m, B = 100.530 m, C = 100.525 m. Unevenness at B is taken as the absolute mid-chord deviation: |B − (A + C)/2|. Concept / Approach: For three equal stations, the mid-chord deviation at the middle station is computed by subtracting the average of the two end levels from the middle level. This corresponds to the versine-like deviation used in track quality indices. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute mean of end levels: (A + C)/2 = (100.505 + 100.525)/2 = 100.515 m.Compute deviation at B: Δ = B − mean = 100.530 − 100.515 = 0.015 m.Take absolute value (unevenness is a magnitude): 0.015 m. Verification / Alternative check: The second-difference A − 2B + C = −0.030 m corroborates curvature; the corresponding mid-chord deviation equals 0.015 m (half the magnitude of the second difference for equal spacing). Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.035, 0.045, 0.055, 0.065 m: Do not match the mid-chord computation and would imply much larger local irregularity. Common Pitfalls: Confusing total level differences with mid-chord deviation. Using maximum minus minimum level (0.025 m) instead of the defined unevenness at the center point. Final Answer: 0.015 m

Question 10

Railway engineering materials — which timber species is considered the best overall choice for wooden sleepers used in Indian permanent way practice?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Wooden sleepers (ties) transfer wheel loads from rails to the ballast and maintain correct gauge. Selecting the most suitable timber is crucial for durability, resistance to decay and insects, and the ability to hold fastenings under cyclic rail loads. In Indian railway practice, certain indigenous hardwoods have proven superior in the field. Given Data / Assumptions: The comparison is among commonly referenced Indian timbers: chir, deodar, sal, teak, and shesham. Key performance criteria include strength, hardness, resistance to wear, decay and termites, spike-holding capacity, and economy/availability. Sleepers are used under standard gauge loads and climatic exposures typical to India. Concept / Approach: Ideal sleeper timber should be hard and dense with good resistance to biological attack, must retain spikes well (high holding power), and exhibit minimal splitting. In practice, sal has consistently offered an excellent balance of strength, durability, and spike-holding capacity, making it the preferred choice in many Indian applications. Teak is durable but expensive; others often fall short in some critical property or economy. Step-by-Step Solution: List candidate timbers and compare on strength, durability, spike-holding, and cost.Teak: high durability but costly; sal: very strong, durable, excellent spike-holding, more economical.Deodar and chir: softer and less durable; shesham: good in furniture use, less common in sleepers.Select the timber that best satisfies performance and economy → sal. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Field records and Indian railway manuals historically list sal as a primary sleeper timber due to its hardness and long service life under heavy traffic, confirming the choice over costlier teak in mass use. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chir and deodar lack the hardness and wear resistance of sal. Teak is excellent but often prohibitive in cost and prioritized for special uses. Shesham is not a standard sleeper timber in large-scale permanent way practice. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Equating “best” solely with durability (leading to teak) without considering economy and widespread availability; overlooking spike-holding performance, which is crucial to track integrity. Final Answer: sal

Question 11

Track speed on curves — determine the safe speed on a Broad Gauge curve of radius 970 m with two transition curves provided.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Safe speed on railway curves depends on cant (super-elevation), permissible cant deficiency, curve radius, and provision of transition curves. With transition curves on Broad Gauge (BG), standard design relationships allow quick estimation of the safe speed for passenger comfort and track forces. Given Data / Assumptions: Gauge: Broad Gauge (BG). Curve radius R = 970 m; two transition curves are provided. Use typical Indian practice values: design cant (Ea) ≈ 165 mm and permissible cant deficiency (Eu) ≈ 75 mm for passenger routes (representative values used in many exam problems). Speed formula (km/h): V ≈ 0.27 * sqrt( (Ea + Eu) * R ), with Ea and Eu in mm and R in m. Concept / Approach: Cant (Ea) balances centrifugal force, and cant deficiency (Eu) allows slightly higher speed than perfect equilibrium. With transitions, comfort and safety are improved, making the combined limit (Ea + Eu) applicable in the standard speed formula. Substituting typical values yields the best matching choice among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Assume Ea ≈ 165 mm, Eu ≈ 75 mm → Ea + Eu = 240 mm.Use V = 0.27 * sqrt( (Ea + Eu) * R ).Compute inside: (Ea + Eu) * R = 240 * 970 = 232800.sqrt(232800) ≈ 482.5; V ≈ 0.27 * 482.5 ≈ 130.3 km/h → closest option is 132 km/h. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Sensitivity check: modest changes in Ea or Eu shift V slightly; among the discrete options, 132 km/h is the nearest realistic speed for R ≈ 1 km with transitions on BG. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 112 and 122 km/h undervalue the allowable deficiency; 142 km/h is optimistic for R = 970 m under typical Ea/Eu limits; 102 km/h is too conservative given transitions and BG practice. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Forgetting to include cant deficiency; mixing units (mm vs m); using the equilibrium-speed-only formula without Eu; not recognizing that transitions permit higher comfort speeds. Final Answer: 132 km/h

Question 12

Permanent way layout terminology — the arrangement provided to divert a train from one track to another is called:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding permanent way terminology is foundational in railway engineering. Devices used to move trains between tracks combine “points (switches)” and “crossings” into a standard assembly known to all track engineers and operators. Given Data / Assumptions: We are naming the standard track layout that diverts trains from one track to another. Focus is on the complete arrangement, not just an individual component. Concept / Approach: A turnout is the complete assembly that includes switches (points), stock rails, crossings (frogs), check rails, and connecting rails to guide a wheelset safely from one track to another. The term “point” alone refers to the switch blades; “crossing” refers to the V-frog element; “junction” is a broader term for a location where routes diverge or converge and can include many turnouts. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the complete diversion arrangement → turnout (switch + crossing + closure rails + check rails).Distinguish from parts: “points” (switch blades) and “crossing” (frog) are components only.“Junction” is a site with multiple turnouts, not the specific assembly. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Any standard track diagram labelling confirms that a diverging route is achieved through a turnout, consisting of switches and a crossing. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Railway point and railway crossing are partial elements; railway junction is a location type; “none of these” does not apply since “turnout” is standard. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Calling the entire assembly “points”; forgetting that a crossing (frog) must also be provided to complete the diversion. Final Answer: turnout

Question 13

Metallurgy for rails — by which steelmaking processes are rails commonly manufactured in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Rail steel demands high strength, toughness, and controlled impurities to withstand repeated heavy axle loads. Historically, Indian rail manufacturing has relied on specific steelmaking processes that ensure these properties and consistent quality. Given Data / Assumptions: The question references manufacturing practice in India for rail sections. We consider established steelmaking processes historically used for rails. Concept / Approach: Both the open hearth and duplex processes have been employed for producing rail steel, enabling control over composition (especially carbon and manganese) and cleanliness. While modern plants may use basic oxygen furnaces and continuous casting, exam-oriented conventional answers emphasize the coexistence of open hearth and duplex in India’s rail-making history. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify processes associated with rail steel → open hearth and duplex.Recognize historical Indian practice → both processes were utilized.Select “both (a) and (b)”. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Consultation of older production records and standard textbooks confirms both processes for Indian rails before wide adoption of BOF routes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Limiting to a single process ignores historical practice; “neither” is incorrect; “Bessemer basic only” does not reflect mainstream Indian rail production. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Assuming only modern BOF/LD processes; overlooking the long service era of open hearth and duplex routes in India. Final Answer: both (a) and (b)

Question 14

Railway triangle (wye) — what is the principal purpose of providing a track triangle in a yard or terminal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A track triangle (also called a wye) is a triangular arrangement of turnouts and connecting tracks. It is an economical alternative to a turntable for turning locomotives or entire trains, used especially where space allows but turntables are not practical or available. Given Data / Assumptions: A standard three-leg wye with turnouts enabling forward movement through the triangle. Locomotive or rake can enter, run forward along legs, and emerge reversed (180° turned). Operational need: changing direction rather than simple crossovers or sidings. Concept / Approach: By traversing the three legs in sequence, a locomotive effectively turns around. While triangles may incidentally facilitate shunting, their principal design purpose is directional reversal. Crossovers specifically connect parallel tracks; branch divergence uses dedicated turnouts but not necessarily a full triangle. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify movement pattern: enter leg 1 → leg 2 → leg 3 → emerge reversed.Contrast with crossover (parallel track transfer) and simple turnout (branch divergence).Select function focused on 180° direction change. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Operational manuals and yard schematics show triangles used primarily to reverse locomotive orientation without lifting or rotating machinery. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Branch line divergence uses a single turnout, not a full triangle. Crossing between parallels is a crossover. Shunting is a general yard activity, not the core reason for a triangle. Balancing axle loads is unrelated. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Confusing triangles with crossovers; assuming triangles are mainly for general shunting rather than turning. Final Answer: changing direction of engines through 180°

Question 15

Rail sections on Metre Gauge — identify the rail section that is not used on Indian Metre Gauge (MG) tracks.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Indian railways historically used designated rail sections (e.g., 30 R, 35 R, 40 R) on Metre Gauge (MG). Knowledge of which sections belong to MG versus Narrow Gauge (NG) or specific older practices is a standard objective-type topic in permanent way examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: Common MG rail sections: 30 R, 35 R, 40 R. Very light sections like 25 R are typically associated with lighter-duty applications, often NG or older, low-traffic lines. We identify the section not used on MG from the given list. Concept / Approach: Metre Gauge requires sufficient rail weight to handle axle loads and speeds typical of MG operations. 30 R, 35 R, and 40 R have been mainstream on MG. The 25 R section is undersized for most MG permanent way standards and is traditionally not adopted for Indian MG tracks in regular service. Step-by-Step Solution: List MG-standard sections → 30 R, 35 R, 40 R.Contrast with 25 R → too light, more aligned to NG/light track.Therefore, 25 R is the rail section not used on MG. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Older Indian railway manuals and exam syllabi consistently quote 30 R/35 R/40 R for MG; 25 R is absent from MG listings. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 30 R, 35 R, and 40 R are well-known MG sections. 45 R is not a standard MG section but is not among the original options identified as “used”. Among the main four provided, 25 R is clearly the “not used”. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Assuming all small-numbered sections are NG; overlooking that MG has specific well-documented section series. Final Answer: 25 R

Question 16

History of Indian Railways — the first line in India was opened to traffic in which year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Historical milestones are often tested in railway engineering exams. The first Indian railway line marks the beginning of organized rail transport in the subcontinent and is a key date to remember. Given Data / Assumptions: We are identifying the launch year of the first operational railway line in India. Bombay (Mumbai) to Thane is the reference inaugural route. Concept / Approach: The first passenger train in India ran between Bombay and Thane over a distance of about 34 km. This event is widely cited as occurring in 1853, establishing the foundational date for Indian Railways’ operational history. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall the inaugural route and date → Bombay–Thane → 1853.Match with options; select 1853. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Multiple authoritative histories and textbooks list 16 April 1853 as the first passenger train run in India. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1775, 1804, 1825, and 1876 do not correspond to the Indian first-line opening; 1825 is notable for England’s Stockton–Darlington, not India. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Confusing Indian milestones with British or other international dates; misremembering the decade. Final Answer: 1853

Question 17

Formation protection — moorum blanket is primarily used to prevent percolation into which problematic subgrade?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Moorum (a lateritic gravelly material) is widely used as a blanket layer in railway formation to control infiltration and improve drainage. Its use is particularly important over expansive soils that undergo large swell–shrink cycles with moisture changes, threatening track stability. Given Data / Assumptions: We seek the subgrade type where moorum blanket is most essential to prevent moisture ingress. Moorum provides a capillary break, better drainage, and reduced volumetric changes in the subgrade. Concept / Approach: Black cotton soil (expansive clay) exhibits high swell and shrinkage due to montmorillonite content. Percolation into such subgrades triggers heave in wet seasons and shrinkage in dry, causing differential settlements and track geometry defects. Moorum blanket reduces water entry, moderates moisture variation, and improves bearing performance. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify expansive soil → black cotton soil (high plasticity, swell potential).Role of moorum → drainage, capillary cutoff, reduced moisture fluctuation.Hence moorum blanket is primarily targeted at black cotton soils. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Design manuals recommend subgrade improvement/blanketing over expansive soils specifically; case studies show reduced maintenance where moorum blankets are provided over black cotton formations. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sandy soils drain readily and need less capillary control; generic clayey soils may need improvement but the classic critical case is black cotton soils. “All the above” is too broad for the primary use case asked. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Treating all subgrades as equally problematic; underestimating swell–shrink risks of expansive clays. Final Answer: black cotton soil

Question 18

Rail selection factors — the weight per metre of rails adopted on a route depends upon which design considerations?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Choosing the rail section (weight per metre) is a fundamental step in permanent way design. Heavier rails better resist bending and wear but cost more. The optimum choice balances traffic demands, support conditions, and economics, considering multiple interacting factors. Given Data / Assumptions: Factors listed: track gauge, train speed, sleeper spacing (support density), and traffic nature (axle loads, volume). Heavier rail sections are typically adopted for heavier, faster traffic with wider sleeper spacing. Concept / Approach: Rail is a beam on elastic supports. Bending moments and contact stresses rise with axle load, speed, and support spacing. Wider gauge routes often carry higher loads. Therefore, all listed factors inform the selection of an adequate rail weight to ensure acceptable stress, deflection, and service life. Step-by-Step Solution: Gauge influences rolling stock size/loads → heavier gauge often → heavier rails.Speed increases dynamic effects → require stiffer/heavier sections.Sleeper spacing affects span between supports → larger spacing → higher bending in rail.Traffic nature (axle loads, tonnage) directly affects required rail strength and wear resistance.Hence, selection depends on all the above. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Design charts and empirical rules in permanent way manuals relate rail section to axle load, speed, sleeper density, and expected tonnage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Focusing on a single factor ignores the multi-parameter nature of rail selection; no single factor suffices across all routes. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Overemphasizing gauge or speed alone; neglecting sleeper spacing and cumulative traffic tonnage. Final Answer: all the above

Question 19

CST-9 sleeper components — which of the following correctly describes the elements that make up a standard CST-9 cast-iron sleeper assembly?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: CST-9 sleepers (cast-iron pot sleepers) were widely used on Indian railways. Knowing their parts helps in inspection, maintenance, and exam questions focused on legacy sleeper types and fastenings. Given Data / Assumptions: CST-9 consists of two separate cast-iron “pots” connected by a tie arrangement. Central seat and keying arrangements secure the rail foot. Standard fastening set includes tie bar and cotters. Concept / Approach: A typical CST-9 has two cast-iron pot plates placed on either side of the rail seat. A central plate with key box accommodates a key to hold the rail. The two pots are tied together by a steel tie bar, commonly secured with four cotters. The key arrangement ensures gauge side restraint of the rail. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify component pots → inverted triangular pots (two).Central plate/key box → provides rail seat and key location.Tie bar with cotters → connects and maintains spacing between pots.Two-way/gauge-side key → clamps rail to sleeper.Collectively, all listed items describe CST-9 → select “all the above”. Verification / Alternative check (if short method exists): Standard drawings of CST-9 assemblies illustrate each of these items, confirming the completeness of the description. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any single statement alone is incomplete; the sleeper assembly includes all these components working together. Common Pitfalls (misconceptions, mistakes): Confusing CST-9 pot sleepers with wooden or PSC sleepers; overlooking the tie bar and cotters as essential connectors. Final Answer: all the above

Question 20

Historical permanent-way design: Which rail section was first adopted on Indian Railways during the early era of track construction?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding the evolution of rail sections helps students of railway engineering appreciate how track technology migrated from earlier British practices to modern flat-footed rails. The first section historically used on Indian Railways reflects that heritage and the fastening systems available at the time. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks for the earliest rail section adopted on Indian Railways. Candidates include double headed, bull headed, and flat footed rails. Context is historical adoption, not current practice. Concept / Approach: Early Indian tracks followed British permanent-way practice. Initially, double-headed (DH) rails were seated in cast-iron chairs to be reversible after head wear. In practice, the “bottom” also suffered damage (“secondary head” theory proved impractical). This led to bull-headed (BH) rails still using chairs, and eventually to flat-footed (FF) rails which use base-plates or direct fastening systems, offering better economy and simplicity. Step-by-Step Solution: List chronological adoption: Double headed → Bull headed → Flat footed.Identify which came first in Indian tracks based on British influence: Double headed.Select 'double headed' as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Historic permanent-way texts and early Indian Railways records indicate DH rails in chairs were the initial standard before BH and later FF became prevalent. This matches the typical British sequence exported to colonies at the time. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bull headed: Adopted later than double headed, still with chairs, after the drawbacks of reversing DH were recognized. Flat footed: A later development, widely adopted in the 20th century for economy and simpler fastenings. (a) and (b) simultaneously: Not historically accurate; DH preceded BH. Common Pitfalls: Confusing the most common modern section (flat footed) with the earliest historical section. Assuming BH preceded DH due to its apparent design improvement. Final Answer: double headed

Railways Questions