Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Less liable to segregation
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Workability has several facets—consistency, mobility, cohesiveness, and finishability. Among these, cohesiveness reflects the concrete’s resistance to separation of coarse aggregate from mortar. Understanding how cohesiveness influences stability helps field engineers tune mixes to minimize defects such as honeycombing and non-uniform strength.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Higher cohesiveness arises from adequate fines, optimized grading, appropriate paste content, and sometimes admixtures. A cohesive mix keeps aggregate suspended within paste, reducing the likelihood of segregation. Conversely, very low cohesiveness (e.g., very lean or very wet mixes with poor fines) magnifies segregation and bleeding risks.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Define target behavior: we want particles to remain uniformly distributed.Recognize that increased cohesiveness improves “stickiness” of mortar, limiting aggregate slippage and settlement.Therefore, increased cohesiveness makes concrete less liable to segregation.Bleeding and frost scaling depend more on water content, finishing, air entrainment, and curing; cohesiveness alone does not increase those risks.
Verification / Alternative check:
Field checks: well-graded sand and optimized fines reduce segregation at a given slump; SCC concepts demonstrate high cohesion with anti-segregation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Chasing high slump by adding water (reducing cohesion); neglecting fines and admixtures needed for pumping or congested reinforcement.
Final Answer:
Less liable to segregation
Discussion & Comments