Question 1

Latitude–pole altitude relationship: how are the geographic latitude (λ) of an observation site and the observed altitude (α) of the celestial pole related?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One of the most elegant results in positional astronomy is that the elevation of the celestial pole above the horizon equals the observer’s geographic latitude. This provides a direct observational route to determining latitude using stellar observations. Given Data / Assumptions: Celestial sphere model with Earth’s rotation axis extended to the celestial poles. Observer located at latitude λ on Earth. Altitude α is measured from the local horizon to the pole (typically the north celestial pole in the Northern Hemisphere). Concept / Approach: Consider the astronomical triangle formed by the celestial pole, zenith, and the observed body. For the pole itself, the geometry simplifies: the zenith distance of the pole equals the co-latitude (90° − λ). Consequently, the pole’s altitude α equals 90° − (90° − λ) = λ. Step-by-Step Solution: Define co-latitude = 90° − λ.Relate pole altitude to zenith distance: α = 90° − (zenith distance of pole).Zenith distance of pole = co-latitude → α = 90° − (90° − λ) = λ. Verification / Alternative check: At the equator (λ = 0°), the pole lies on the horizon (α = 0°). At the geographic pole (λ = 90°), the celestial pole is at the zenith (α = 90°). These limiting cases confirm the formula. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Expressions involving 90° − α or α − 90° contradict the standard geometry. λ = 180° − α is not meaningful in this context. Common Pitfalls: Mixing up declination of Polaris (≈ current NCP vicinity) with exact pole location; Polaris is near, not exactly at, the pole. Failing to correct for atmospheric refraction when observing low altitudes. Final Answer: λ = α

Question 2

In positional astronomy and surveying, which of the following statements about sidereal time is accurate? Choose the most comprehensive option that correctly links sidereal time with the first point of Aries, the local meridian, and a star at upper …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sidereal time is a fundamental concept in geodesy, astronomy, and celestial navigation used to relate the Earth’s rotation to the apparent motion of the stars. Examinations in civil engineering surveying often test whether candidates can connect sidereal time to right ascension, hour angle, and the first point of Aries (the vernal equinox). Given Data / Assumptions: The First Point of Aries is the zero of right ascension (RA). Local sidereal time (LST) is measured along the celestial equator. Upper transit means a celestial object crossing the local meridian. Concept / Approach: By definition: LST at a site equals the hour angle of the First Point of Aries. Also, when a star is on the local meridian (upper transit), its hour angle is 0, hence LST equals the star’s right ascension. These relationships tie sidereal time to RA and to the meridian passage condition. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) LST = hour angle of ♈ (First Point of Aries).2) The right ascension of the local meridian equals the LST.3) At upper transit of a star, hour angle = 0, so LST = RA of that star. Verification / Alternative check: Check any star chart: when an object culminates, its RA reads directly as the LST at that instant. This matches all three statements simultaneously. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B, and C are individually true but incomplete by themselves; D combines all true relations.Option E is false because the listed relations are standard definitions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing solar time with sidereal time; mixing up hour angle (measured westward from the meridian) with right ascension (measured eastward from Aries). Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 3

In photogrammetry and perspective geometry, the “perspective centre” corresponds to which type of projection used to form an image from a point source?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding the perspective centre is crucial in photogrammetry, camera modeling, and engineering surveying. The perspective centre (also called the projection centre) is the notional point from which straight lines are drawn to the object and then intersect the image plane to form an image. Given Data / Assumptions: Camera behaves as a pinhole (idealized model). Image plane is finite and fixed relative to the pinhole. Object points are projected along straight lines. Concept / Approach: In the pinhole model, each object point connects to the image plane via a straight line through a single point (the perspective centre). This is the definition of central projection, as opposed to parallel/orthogonal projection where projecting rays are mutually parallel and do not pass through a single point. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Define perspective centre: unique point source for rays.2) For each object point P, draw line PC (C = perspective centre).3) Intersection of PC with the image plane gives the image of P. Verification / Alternative check: Camera calibration equations use central perspective: x = f*(X/Z), y = f*(Y/Z) in a camera-fixed system, showing the dependence on a single projection centre and focal length f. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Parallel and orthogonal projections use parallel rays, not a single centre.Cylindrical projection maps onto a cylinder via different construction, not a single point source. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “central” with “cylindrical” or assuming orthogonal projection is used in cameras. Real cameras approximate central projection. Final Answer: Central projection

Question 4

In geodesy and cartography, which single statement always holds true for places that have the same geographic latitude?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Latitude and longitude define positions on Earth. Questions often test whether candidates can distinguish what “same latitude” guarantees versus what it does not (e.g., meridian or time). Given Data / Assumptions: Latitude is angular distance north or south of the equator. Parallels are circles of constant latitude. Local solar time depends primarily on longitude, not latitude. Concept / Approach: Any two points with the same latitude lie on the same parallel, a small circle parallel to the equator. This is the only universally true statement among common misconceptions about meridians and time. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) By definition, “same latitude” ⇒ same parallel.2) Meridians are lines of constant longitude; same latitude does not imply same longitude.3) Equal local solar time requires equal longitude, not latitude.4) Being equidistant from both poles is only true at the equator; elsewhere distances differ. Verification / Alternative check: On a globe, draw any parallel (say 30°N); cities along it share that latitude but span many longitudes and time zones. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B/E: Same latitude does not fix longitude or meridian.Option C: Only the equator is equidistant from both poles.Option D: Local solar time varies with longitude. Common Pitfalls: Assuming shared climate or time zones from latitude alone; these depend on longitude and other factors. Final Answer: They lie on the same parallel of latitude.

Question 5

On the celestial sphere used in astronomy and surveying, what is the name of the point that lies directly underneath the observer (i.e., vertically below the observer's position)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The celestial sphere model identifies two special points relative to an observer: the zenith and the nadir. Correct identification of these terms is essential for celestial observations and astronomical surveying. Given Data / Assumptions: Observer stands at a point on Earth. Vertical line through the observer defines up (zenith) and down (nadir). Other options are standard astronomical terms. Concept / Approach: The zenith is the point on the celestial sphere directly overhead; the nadir is the point directly beneath the observer. Celestial poles are the projections of Earth’s rotation axis; equinoctial points are where the ecliptic crosses the celestial equator. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the definition that matches “vertically below the observer”.Nadir exactly matches that description. Verification / Alternative check: Draw the local vertical line; the upper intersection with the celestial sphere is zenith, the lower is nadir. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Zenith is overhead, not below.Celestial pole and equinoctial points are unrelated to the observer’s vertical direction. Common Pitfalls: Confusing zenith and nadir due to their opposite meanings along the local vertical. Final Answer: Nadir

Question 6

Longitude – standard geodetic definition Longitude of a place is the angular distance between the meridian of that place and which reference meridian?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Longitude and latitude form the fundamental coordinate system for positions on Earth. Longitude measures east–west angular distance from a universally agreed reference meridian, ensuring consistency across countries and maps. Given Data / Assumptions: Geodetic convention using the Prime Meridian at Greenwich, 0° longitude. Longitude measured east or west from 0° to 180°. Time-zone meridians are administrative and do not redefine longitude. Concept / Approach: By definition, longitude is the angle between the plane of the meridian through the point and the plane of the Greenwich meridian. National standard meridians are used to set local times (for example, IST at 82.5° E) but do not alter the geodetic definition. The international date line approximates 180° longitude but is politically adjusted and is not the reference for defining longitude. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the global reference → Greenwich meridian.Eliminate distractors: time-zone meridians and date line are not the defining references.Select option C. Verification / Alternative check: All modern charts and GPS systems express longitude relative to Greenwich, ensuring interoperability worldwide. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (a) applies to civil timekeeping; (b) is a political boundary near 180°; (d) mixes an administrative meridian with the geodetic reference and is therefore incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Assuming local time meridians determine longitude; confusing the date line with a geodetic baseline. Final Answer: The Greenwich (Prime) Meridian

Question 7

Nautical Mile – equivalent definitions and values Which statements correctly describe a nautical mile?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The nautical mile is a navigation unit tied to Earth geometry, facilitating conversion between angular measurements on charts and linear distances travelled. It is widely used in marine and aerial navigation along with the knot (nautical miles per hour). Given Data / Assumptions: Traditional geodetic definition linked to Earth’s great circles. Rounded imperial and metric equivalents commonly used in surveying texts. Concept / Approach: A nautical mile corresponds to one minute of arc along a great circle on the Earth, conventionally taken along a meridian for practical measurement. While the modern SI definition fixes it at exactly 1852 m, many surveying references cite values around 1852–1855 m and about 6080 ft, depending on Earth model approximations and historical usage. Since the options reflect these common statements, the comprehensive choice is “All of the above”. Step-by-Step Solution: Relate to angular measure: 1 minute of arc of a great circle → correct.Meridional minute: practical embodiment → correct.Imperial/metric values: ≈ 6080 ft and ≈ 1852–1855 m appear in many texts → acceptable. Verification / Alternative check: Navigation standards use 1 nautical mile = 1852 m exactly; older figures in feet and alternative meters persist in legacy documents but are close enough for the purpose of this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: None of the individual statements is wrong in the examination context; thus the collective “All of the above” best captures accepted definitions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing statute miles (1609 m) with nautical miles; ignoring that knots are nautical miles per hour. Final Answer: All of the above

Question 8

Stellar Parallax with Earth’s Diameter – order of angular difference The nearest star is so distant that the directions to it, observed simultaneously from two diametrically opposite points on Earth, differ by less than which of the following angula…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Parallax is the apparent change in direction to an object when observed from two separated points. In astronomy, stellar parallax is tiny even with Earth’s orbital diameter as the baseline. Using the much smaller baseline of Earth’s diameter drastically reduces the angle still further. This problem tests order-of-magnitude reasoning for angular measurement in arcseconds. Given Data / Assumptions: Baseline considered: approximately one Earth diameter (~12,742 km). Nearest star parallax with 1 AU baseline is about 0.77 arcsecond for Proxima Centauri (for order-of-magnitude context). Small-angle approximation: parallax scales roughly with baseline length. Concept / Approach: Since parallax angle is proportional to the observing baseline, reducing the baseline from 1 AU (~149.6 million km) to one Earth diameter reduces the angle by the same factor. Ratio = Earth diameter / 1 AU ≈ 1.2742×10^4 km / 1.496×10^8 km ≈ 8.5×10^-5. Multiplying 0.77 arcsecond by 8.5×10^-5 gives roughly 6.5×10^-5 arcsecond, which is less than 0.0001 arcsecond. Step-by-Step Solution: Estimate scaling factor: k ≈ 1.27×10^4 / 1.496×10^8 ≈ 8.5×10^-5.Apply to ~0.77″: 0.77 * 8.5×10^-5 ≈ 6.5×10^-5″.Compare with options: less than 0.0001″ (1×10^-4″) → choose 0.0001 second as the appropriate bound. Verification / Alternative check: Even brighter/closer stars exhibit parallax well below 1″; shrinking the baseline to Earth’s diameter guarantees a sub-0.0001″ difference, far below visual detection and demanding space-grade instrumentation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.01″ and 0.001″ are too large by orders of magnitude for the given baseline; “None of these” is incorrect because 0.0001″ provides a correct upper bound; 0.1″ is even more unrealistic. Common Pitfalls: Confusing Earth’s orbital baseline (1 AU) with Earth’s diameter; forgetting linear proportionality of small parallax angles with baseline. Final Answer: 0.0001 second

Question 9

Aerial Photography – identify the incorrect statement about high oblique photographs Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding high oblique aerial photographs?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Oblique aerial photographs are captured with the camera axis tilted away from the vertical. High oblique photographs, in particular, are intentionally inclined enough that the horizon appears in the image. Understanding these classes is important for reconnaissance, mapping limits, and relief displacement interpretation. Given Data / Assumptions: High oblique implies a significant tilt (commonly up to a few tens of degrees). Horizon visibility is the distinguishing feature from low oblique photographs. Statements are assessed for general correctness used in photogrammetry instruction. Concept / Approach: Low oblique photos are tilted but do not show the horizon; high obliques do show the horizon. Typical tilts can reach around 30° (varies with altitude and lens). Because horizon inclusion is the defining characteristic of a high oblique, any statement claiming a high oblique may not include the horizon is incorrect. Step-by-Step Solution: Check option A: Plausible—tilts of the order of tens of degrees are common.Check option B: True—horizon is visible in high obliques.Check option C: False—excludes the defining feature, hence incorrect.Check option E: True—high obliques are intentionally inclined to capture broader context. Verification / Alternative check: Training manuals classify obliques explicitly: low oblique (no horizon), high oblique (horizon visible). This confirms the status of each statement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B, and E are consistent with accepted definitions; option D (“None of these”) is invalid because one statement (C) is indeed incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Confusing tilt magnitude with altitude effects; assuming any tilted photo is “high oblique” even if no horizon appears. Final Answer: They may not include the image of the horizon

Question 10

Flight planning for vertical aerial photography: For an area with average ground elevation of 1000 m above datum, you need photographs on a scale of 1:30,000 using a camera with focal length 30 cm. What is the required flying height above datum (not…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Flight altitude for vertical aerial photography is chosen to achieve a target photo scale. This problem tests the basic camera geometry relation between focal length, flying height above ground, and map/photo scale, then converts it to height above a reference datum by adding average ground elevation. Given Data / Assumptions: Photo scale S = 1:30,000. Focal length f = 30 cm = 0.30 m. Average ground elevation h_ground = 1000 m above datum. Vertical photograph (tilt neglected) and uniform terrain for scale computation. Concept / Approach: For a truly vertical photograph over approximately level ground, the photo scale S is given by S = f / H_g, where H_g is the flying height above ground. Therefore H_g = f / S. Height above datum H_datum is then H_datum = H_g + h_ground. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute H_g: H_g = f / S = 0.30 m / (1/30,000) = 0.30 * 30,000 = 9,000 m.Convert to height above datum: H_datum = H_g + h_ground = 9,000 + 1,000 = 10,000 m.Select the option closest to 10,000 m. Verification / Alternative check: A useful mnemonic: H_g (in m) ≈ f(cm) * 300 when S = 1:30,000, because 30 cm * 30,000 = 900,000 cm = 9,000 m. Adding average elevation gives the height above datum. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 9,000 m: height above ground, not above datum.9,500 m / 8,500 m / 11,000 m: do not satisfy the scale computation with the given f and ground elevation. Common Pitfalls: Confusing flying height above ground with flying height above datum, and mixing centimetres with metres when using f and S. Always convert f to metres (or keep everything in centimetres consistently) and then add the ground elevation to obtain the datum-referenced height. Final Answer: 10,000 m.

Question 11

National mapping framework: For mapping an entire country, which sequence correctly describes the geodetic control hierarchy and its purpose?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Large-scale national mapping requires a robust geodetic control network. The quality and accuracy of maps depend on the hierarchy of control from the highest-order framework down to the densification networks supporting detail surveys. Given Data / Assumptions: A national mapping program spanning large areas and varied terrain. Triangulation networks are established in hierarchical orders of accuracy. Lower-order networks provide control to plane-table, photogrammetric, or total-station detail surveys. Concept / Approach: The logic is top-down: first create the most accurate, wide-span geodetic framework (first-order geodetic triangulation or GNSS-based control). Then densify accuracy in manageable steps (second, third, fourth order), ensuring that each lower-order network is constrained by and inherits accuracy from the higher order. Step-by-Step Solution: Establish first-order network with long baselines and strong geometry for high precision.Densify to second-order triangles covering intermediate areas.Further densify into third- and fourth-order control for regional/local mapping.Use these control points to anchor detailed cartographic and engineering surveys. Verification / Alternative check: Modern programs supplement or replace triangulation with GNSS networks, but the hierarchical principle remains identical: high-order reference, then densification. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options (a), (b), and (c) are each correct individually; selecting only one ignores the required sequence. Common Pitfalls: Attempting detail surveys without adequate control leads to distortions and misfits when adjoining sheets are compiled. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 12

Relief displacement on a vertical aerial photograph: A triangulation station has R.L. = 500 m. On a truly vertical photo taken from altitude 2000 m above datum, its image lies 4 cm from the principal point. What is the relief displacement (radial) o…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Relief displacement is the radial shift of an image point from the principal point on a vertical aerial photograph caused by terrain elevation. Understanding this displacement is essential in planimetric corrections, radial line plotting, and height extraction. Given Data / Assumptions: Vertical photograph (tilt neglected). Altitude above datum H = 2000 m. Point elevation h = 500 m (above datum). Radial distance of image from principal point r = 4 cm. Concept / Approach: For a vertical photo, the relief displacement d (measured radially outward) is approximated by d = (r * h) / H, with r and d in the same photo units. Positive h causes displacement away from the principal point. Step-by-Step Solution: Use d = (r * h) / H.Substitute r = 4 cm, h = 500 m, H = 2000 m.Compute the ratio h/H = 500/2000 = 0.25.Compute d = 4 cm * 0.25 = 1.0 cm = 10 mm. Verification / Alternative check: If the point had zero elevation (h = 0), displacement would be zero. Here, positive elevation produces a positive outward displacement, consistent with field experience. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2–8 mm underestimate the computed displacement; 10 mm matches the formula exactly with the given numbers. Common Pitfalls: Mixing datum-referenced altitude with height above ground, or mixing units (centimetres on photo vs metres on ground) without using the dimensionless ratio h/H. Final Answer: 10 mm.

Question 13

Determining photographic scale: A vertical photograph is taken from a flying height of 300 m above ground with a camera of focal length 15 cm. Assuming level terrain and negligible tilt, what is the photo scale?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Photographic scale relates the focal length to the flying height above ground for vertical photos. Quick estimation of scale is vital for flight planning and for converting photo measurements to ground distances. Given Data / Assumptions: Focal length f = 15 cm = 0.15 m. Flying height above ground H_g = 300 m. Flat terrain and negligible tilt; scale uniform across the photo. Concept / Approach: For a vertical photograph over level ground, scale S = f / H_g. The ratio should be expressed as 1 : (H_g / f). Careful unit handling is necessary to avoid order-of-magnitude errors. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute S = f / H_g = 0.15 / 300 = 0.0005.Express as a representative fraction: 1 : (1 / 0.0005) = 1 : 2,000.Hence, the photograph has a scale of approximately 1 : 2,000. Verification / Alternative check: In centimetre units: f = 15 cm, H_g = 30,000 cm; S = 15/30,000 = 1/2,000, confirming the same result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1:1,500 and 1:2,500/1:3,000 are off the exact calculation; 1:10,000 would require a much higher flying height or shorter focal length. Common Pitfalls: Using flying height above datum instead of above ground, and failing to keep f and H in consistent units. Final Answer: 1 : 2,000.

Question 14

Photogrammetric geometry: The point where the vertical line (plumb line) through the perspective centre intersects the photograph plane is called

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Several special points are defined on an aerial photograph: the principal point, nadir (plumb) point, and isocentre. Correctly identifying these is foundational for tilt correction, orientation, and relief displacement analysis. Given Data / Assumptions: Vertical or slightly tilted photograph. Perspective centre (exposure station) projects onto the photo plane. Terminology equivalences are recognized in practice. Concept / Approach: The nadir point on the photograph is the intersection of the plumb line through the camera perspective centre with the photo plane. Many texts synonymously call it the “photo nadir” or “plumb point.” The principal point is the orthogonal foot of the perspective centre onto the photo plane along the camera axis, and the isocentre lies on the bisector of the angle between the camera axis and vertical (midway between principal point and nadir for small tilts). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the defining line: true vertical through the perspective centre.Locate its intersection with the photo plane: this is the nadir (plumb) point.Therefore, choose “Nadir point.” Verification / Alternative check: Under zero tilt, principal point and nadir coincide; with tilt, they separate, and the isocentre falls on the line joining them. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Isocentre: defined by angle bisector, not vertical.Principal point: perpendicular projection along camera axis, not along the plumb line unless tilt is zero.“Photo plumb point” is a synonym often used for the nadir; we adopt the standard term “Nadir point.” Common Pitfalls: Confusing principal and nadir points on tilted photos; assuming they always coincide. Final Answer: Nadir point.

Question 15

Types of aerial photographs and scale variation: Which statements correctly describe vertical vs. oblique aerial photos and their mapping use?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Aerial photography is broadly classified into vertical and oblique based on camera orientation. The classification influences scale stability, relief displacement, and suitability for precise mapping versus reconnaissance. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard frame cameras and stable flight conditions. Vertical photos have minimal tilt; oblique photos have deliberate or incidental tilt. Accuracy refers to planimetric mapping needs. Concept / Approach: Vertical photographs minimize tilt-induced distortions and provide more uniform scale, which is ideal for precise mapping and photogrammetry. Oblique photographs, taken with the optical axis intentionally tilted, are useful for perspective views and reconnaissance but suffer from large and uneven scale variation. Step-by-Step Solution: Confirm that aerial photos may be vertical or oblique → true.Vertical photo definition → camera axis pointing downward → true.Accurate mapping → vertical photos preferred → true.Scale variation → larger in oblique photos → true.Hence, all listed statements are correct. Verification / Alternative check: Photogrammetric block adjustment assumes near-vertical images with limited tilt to keep scale variation manageable and predictable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Selecting any single statement ignores the full set of correct descriptions. Common Pitfalls: Using oblique images for measurements without appropriate rectification leads to large planimetric errors. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 16

Principal plane in photogrammetry: The principal plane is associated with which elements or points of an aerial photograph?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding special points and planes on an aerial photograph is essential for interior and exterior orientation. The “principal plane” is particularly important when a photograph is tilted, as key points lie in this plane along the direction of tilt. Given Data / Assumptions: Single-exposure frame camera. Slightly tilted photograph so that principal point and nadir do not coincide. Standard definitions from classical photogrammetry. Concept / Approach: The principal plane is the plane that contains the principal axis (through the perspective centre normal to the photo plane) and the vertical (plumb) line when the photo is tilted; its intersection with the photograph defines the principal line. Important points such as the principal point, isocentre, and nadir all lie along this plane/line in the direction of tilt. Step-by-Step Solution: Principal axis and principal line define the plane’s orientation.On a tilted photograph, the principal point, isocentre (bisector point), and nadir align along the principal line within the principal plane.Therefore, the principal plane is associated with all listed elements. Verification / Alternative check: Graphical tilt correction procedures plot principal point, isocentre, and nadir along the principal line; this construction relies on the principal plane geometry. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each element is correctly associated; omitting any gives an incomplete picture of the geometry. Common Pitfalls: Assuming principal and nadir points are identical on all photos; they coincide only when tilt is zero. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 17

Adjustment of a geodetic quadrilateral: If both diagonals are observed, which independent condition equations are applied during figure adjustment?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In geodetic surveying, a quadrilateral figure is strengthened by observations on sides, angles, and (optionally) diagonals. The number and nature of condition equations govern the least-squares adjustment and the internal consistency of the measurements. Given Data / Assumptions: Quadrilateral with all station angles observed. Both diagonals measured. Objective: determine the appropriate set of independent conditions. Concept / Approach: Closure conditions enforce geometric consistency. In a quadrilateral, angle conditions capture angular closures around the figure (including spherical excess as applicable), while side conditions enforce that diagonal lengths computed from adjacent triangles agree with the measured diagonals. Having both diagonals available yields two independent side conditions (one for each diagonal) in addition to angular closure relations. Step-by-Step Solution: Establish angular closure relations for the figure → two independent angle equations.Form length consistency for each diagonal (computed from either triangle pair sharing the diagonal) → two independent side equations.Total independent condition equations = 4: two angles + two sides. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook treatments show that a quadrilateral without diagonals has two angle conditions; adding one diagonal adds one length condition; adding the second diagonal adds the second length condition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: One angle + three sides or three angles + one side miscount the independent relations for the observed configuration. Common Pitfalls: Confusing the number of measured quantities with the number of independent conditions; independence must be checked to avoid redundant equations in adjustment. Final Answer: Two angle equations and two side (length) equations.

Question 18

The First Point of Aries (astronomy and geodesy): Which statements correctly describe this reference point on the celestial sphere?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The First Point of Aries is a fundamental reference in spherical astronomy and geodesy. It is used as the origin for measuring right ascension and as a key node for defining celestial coordinate systems. Given Data / Assumptions: Celestial equator and ecliptic are known great circles. Coordinate conventions in astronomy (Greek-letter notation) are recognized. Sky landmarks (Pegasus and Andromeda) help identify the region. Concept / Approach: The First Point of Aries is the vernal equinox point: the ascending node where the Sun crosses the celestial equator from south to north. Historically denoted by γ, it presently lies in Pisces due to precession, close to the recognizable rectangles of Pegasus and Andromeda as sky guides, even though the historical name persists. Step-by-Step Solution: Define the point: intersection of ecliptic and celestial equator at the ascending node.Recognize notation: traditionally marked with γ.Locate region: near Pegasus/Andromeda asterisms in the modern sky due to precession.Therefore, all listed statements are correct in descriptive terms. Verification / Alternative check: Star atlases show the vernal equinox point offset into Pisces, yet the nomenclature “First Point of Aries” remains standard. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Selecting any single statement ignores the complete and internally consistent description. Common Pitfalls: Assuming the point still lies within Aries; due to precession, the coordinates drift over centuries, but the historical name is retained. Final Answer: All of the above.

Question 19

Basic physical astronomy — lunar orbital period used in civil calendars In practical (civil) astronomy, the Moon's apparent revolution around the Earth that determines the interval between successive new moons is approximately how many days?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Lunar months used in calendars and tide predictions are based on the Moon’s synodic period, the time between successive phases (e.g., new moon to new moon). This differs slightly from the sidereal period because Earth is moving around the Sun while the Moon orbits Earth. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns the commonly used month for phases (synodic month), not the sidereal orbital period. Mean values are accepted; small fluctuations due to orbital eccentricity are ignored. Concept / Approach: The synodic month is the cycle of lunar phases observed from Earth. Because Earth advances in its orbit during a lunar orbit, the Moon must travel a bit more than one sidereal revolution to catch up with the Sun–Earth line, lengthening the observed period to about 29.53 days. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify target period → synodic (phase-to-phase) month.Mean synodic month ≈ 29.53 days.Therefore choose 29.53 days. Verification / Alternative check: Almanacs and astronomical constants list mean synodic month ≈ 29.5306 days. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 29, 29.35, and 30 days are approximations; they do not match the widely accepted mean value. Common Pitfalls: Confusing the synodic month (≈29.53 d) with the sidereal month (≈27.32 d). Final Answer: 29.53 days.

Question 20

Earth geometry — variation of one degree of longitude and latitude with latitude Which statement correctly describes how the ground distance represented by one degree changes from equator to poles?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Surveying and cartography rely on how angular measures map to ground distances on a spherical or spheroidal Earth. Understanding this helps with scale and convergence effects. Given Data / Assumptions: Earth approximated as a sphere/spheroid. “Value” refers to linear ground distance corresponding to one degree. Concept / Approach: Lines of longitude converge at the poles and are widest apart at the equator. Therefore, the ground distance per degree of longitude is maximum at the equator and diminishes to zero at the poles. By contrast, spacing of parallels (latitude) is nearly constant, so one degree of latitude is approximately the same distance everywhere (minor variation with ellipsoid flattening). Step-by-Step Solution: Longitude spacing ∝ cos(latitude) → maximum at 0°, zero at 90°.Latitude degree length ≈ constant (about 111 km).Hence option (a) is correct. Verification / Alternative check: Meridian arc tables show ~110.6–111.7 km per degree latitude; longitude is ~111.32 km at the equator and 0 at the poles. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b) and (c): contradict convergence of meridians. (d) and (e): misstate latitude degree behavior (nearly constant). Common Pitfalls: Confusing distances along meridians versus along parallels. Final Answer: One degree of longitude has its greatest ground distance at the equator.

Advanced Surveying Questions