Statement: Prices of essential commodities have risen alarmingly due to a prolonged transport strike.\nCourses of Action:\nI. The Government should order the transporters’ association to withdraw the strike immediately or face severe consequences.\nII. Use military or alternative government vehicles to restore the supply of essential goods to the city.

Introduction / Context:
A transport strike has choked logistics, spiking prices of essentials. A valid course must ensure supply continuity within legal bounds and without escalating conflict.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Prolonged strike causing shortages and price inflation.
• Essential goods need delivery.

Concept / Approach:
II provides an operational workaround to maintain supply (use government fleets, requisition under emergency provisions, rail/air/alternative routes). I threatens coercion; compulsory strike withdrawal may be unlawful and can aggravate the dispute. Negotiation, mediation, or essential-services provisions—not blanket threats—are typical.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Implement II to stabilize supply and protect consumers.2) Avoid I’s escalation; it is neither the only nor the best first step.3) Thus, only II follows.

Verification / Alternative check:
Governments often deploy contingency fleets for essentials during strikes to prevent public hardship.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I risks legal and industrial-relations issues; “Both” endorses an unnecessary threat.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing resolution (negotiation) with coercion; ignoring immediate consumer impact.

Final Answer:
Only II follows.