Question 1

Intermittent furnace operation: which refractory brick type should be avoided because of poor thermal-shock tolerance during frequent heat-up and cool-down cycles?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Furnaces that are cycled on and off impose severe thermal shocks on linings. Some refractories tolerate rapid temperature changes better than others. Selecting bricks with good shock resistance is essential to avoid spalling and premature failure. Given Data / Assumptions: Intermittent operation leads to steep thermal gradients. Materials with inversion-related expansion or brittle behavior are disadvantaged. Silica bricks have characteristic phase inversions. Concept / Approach: Silica bricks undergo volume changes associated with transformations among silica polymorphs. Under rapid cycling, these changes concentrate stresses and can cause spalling. In contrast, many high-alumina, sillimanite, or SiC refractories show better thermal-shock resistance, making silica bricks ill-suited for frequently cycled furnaces. Step-by-Step Solution: Assess thermal-shock risk of cycled operation.Recall silica’s phase-change-related expansion behavior.Compare with shock-tolerant materials (e.g., SiC, certain alumino-silicates).Select silica bricks as the type to avoid. Verification / Alternative check: Thermal shock indices (like quench tests) consistently rate silica poor for cycling compared with SiC or selected alumina bricks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fireclay/High-alumina/Sillimanite/SiC: generally better shock resistance than silica for cyclic duty. Common Pitfalls: Assuming high refractoriness automatically means good thermal-shock resistance; it does not. Final Answer: Silica bricks

Question 2

Which industry is the largest consumer of refractories worldwide when measured by tonnage installed and replaced?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Refractories are used wherever processes run at high temperature. However, consumption patterns are dominated by sectors with large, hot-surface areas and frequent relining cycles. Identifying the biggest consumer helps contextualize material development and supply chains. Given Data / Assumptions: Refractory consumption is judged by tonnage installed and replaced. Iron and steel plants operate multiple large furnaces continuously. Turnover frequency and unit size matter. Concept / Approach: The metallurgical sector—particularly iron and steel—runs blast furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, electric arc furnaces, ladles, tundishes, and reheating furnaces. These demand vast amounts of shaped and monolithic refractories and experience steady wear from heat, slag, abrasion, and thermal cycling. Hence, this sector leads global consumption by a wide margin. Step-by-Step Solution: List high-temperature industries and their unit sizes.Compare continuous operation intensity and relining frequency.Select iron and steel metallurgy as the largest user. Verification / Alternative check: Industry reports consistently rank the steel industry as the predominant refractory consumer by tonnage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cement/Power/Fertiliser/Glass: significant users but smaller total tonnage than steel sector. Common Pitfalls: Mixing up value with volume; some sectors buy premium materials but in lower tonnage. Final Answer: Metallurgical (iron and steel) industry

Question 3

Creating porosity in insulating refractories: which additive is a classic pore former that decomposes or burns out during firing to leave a fine, insulating pore network?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Insulating refractories rely on controlled porosity to reduce thermal conductivity. Pore formers are combustible or decomposable additives that volatilize during firing, leaving behind a tailored pore structure. Given Data / Assumptions: Pore formers must leave minimal residue and produce uniform pores. We compare typical additives used in practice. Focus on a well-known, classical choice. Concept / Approach: Powdered naphthalene is a textbook pore former. It sublimates/burns out on heating without contaminating the matrix excessively, creating a fine porosity that lowers heat flow. Ammonium salts are sometimes used for gas release in certain mixes, but they can cause processing issues and are not as universally cited as naphthalene, sawdust, rice husk, or polystyrene beads. Calcium phosphate is commonly a bonding or setting agent in phosphate-bonded refractories, not primarily a pore former. Step-by-Step Solution: Define the requirement: clean burnout to form pores.Recognize classic choices: naphthalene, sawdust, rice husk.Evaluate alternatives: ammonium salts and calcium phosphate are not standard pore formers across the board.Choose powdered naphthalene. Verification / Alternative check: Manufacturing notes for insulating bricks frequently list naphthalene/sawdust as primary pore-forming additives. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ammonium salts: niche use; may cause efflorescence or gas-evolution defects.Calcium phosphate: used for bonding, not porosity creation per se.All of the above/Water glass only: overbroad or incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any decomposable additive is ideal; residue chemistry and pore morphology matter. Final Answer: Powdered naphthalene

Question 4

Maximum volumetric shrinkage during firing of dried refractories: approximately how high can the shrinkage be in severe cases?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: During firing, dried refractory shapes densify as pores close and bonds form. Linear and volumetric shrinkage depend on composition, particle size distribution, and firing schedule. Understanding upper-bound shrinkage helps in setting allowances and mould sizes. Given Data / Assumptions: Shrinkage discussed here is volumetric after drying, during firing. Worst-case shrinkage may occur in fine, plastic, high-clay mixes. Figures are approximate guidance. Concept / Approach: While typical linear shrinkage might be a few percent to low double digits, volumetric shrinkage can be substantially larger. In severe cases—fine-bodied, highly sinterable formulations—volumetric shrinkage up to roughly 30 percent has been documented. Such cases require careful mould oversizing and controlled firing to prevent warpage and cracking. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall relation: volumetric shrinkage ≈ 3 × linear shrinkage (approximate).Consider highly sinterable bodies with glassy phases → larger shrinkage.Identify 30 percent as an upper-bound figure used in practice. Verification / Alternative check: Manufacturing manuals caution about large volumetric shrinkage in plastic-bonded bodies, citing values approaching 30 percent under aggressive firing schedules. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5–20 percent: common for many products, but the question asks maximum in severe cases. Common Pitfalls: Confusing linear with volumetric shrinkage; the latter can be much higher numerically. Final Answer: 30 percent

Question 5

Softening temperature determination using Seger (pyrometric) cones: which furnace atmosphere is appropriate during the test?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Pyrometric (Seger) cones are standardized compositions that bend at characteristic equivalent temperatures, allowing comparison of softening behavior. The atmosphere during testing can influence surface reactions and readings if improperly chosen. Given Data / Assumptions: Goal is to assess softening behavior without unintended chemical reduction. Oxidising or neutral atmospheres are typical for lab furnaces. Reducing atmospheres can alter chemistry of cones. Concept / Approach: Either oxidising or neutral atmospheres are acceptable, as both avoid undesired reduction of cone constituents. Strongly reducing atmospheres may change the cone composition or surface, corrupting the effective cone equivalent temperature. Hence, laboratories generally use air (oxidising) or neutral gas conditions for reliable, comparable results. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify atmospheres that preserve composition: oxidising/neutral.Exclude reducing: may alter cone chemistry.Conclude that either oxidising or neutral is suitable. Verification / Alternative check: Test standards and kiln practice notes endorse air or neutral atmospheres for cone work unless a special study requires otherwise. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Reducing only: not standard and can distort results.Neither: impractical; a furnace atmosphere must be one or the other. Common Pitfalls: Running tests in mixed or fluctuating atmospheres that cause variability in results. Final Answer: Either (a) or (b)

Question 6

Applications of magnesite–chrome bricks: where are these basic refractories commonly installed in steel-heating practice?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Magnesite–chrome bricks combine basic MgO with Cr2O3 to deliver high hot strength and resistance to basic slags. They are staples in heavy-duty steel plant thermal units. Given Data / Assumptions: Service involves basic atmospheres and slags. Thermal and mechanical loads are severe. Roof and hearth zones require durable basic linings. Concept / Approach: In basic open-hearth roofs, reheating furnaces, and soaking pits, slag and scale chemistry favors basic refractories. Magnesite–chrome’s combination improves corrosion/erosion resistance and hot load-bearing capacity, leading to widespread use across these units. Step-by-Step Solution: Match slag chemistry (basic) to MgO–Cr2O3 bricks.Recognize roof/pit/reheat exposure to hot scale and gases.Select “All (a), (b) and (c).” Verification / Alternative check: Plant lining schedules routinely specify magnesite–chrome for these applications, with variations depending on emission and environmental regulations. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Single selections understate the material’s common deployment.Glass tank crowns typically use silica or AZS, not MgO–Cr2O3. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “chrome–magnesite” vs “magnesite–chrome”; compositions vary but the application family is similar. Final Answer: All (a), (b) and (c)

Question 7

Ganister (a siliceous rock) is primarily a source of which refractory-forming oxide?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Raw materials for refractories include natural minerals and rocks rich in the target oxides. Ganister is a traditional term in refractory practice—knowing what oxide it provides helps understand historic silica-lining practice. Given Data / Assumptions: Ganister is siliceous (high SiO2 content). Used historically in acid linings. Question asks for the principal oxide supplied. Concept / Approach: Ganister is a hard, fine-grained silica rock used as a source of SiO2 for acid refractories. It has been used for silica bricks and ramming mixes in acid steelmaking applications. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify ganister as siliceous → supplies SiO2.Exclude MgO and CaO: those are basic oxides from different raw materials.Select Silica (SiO2). Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks list ganister among silica sources for acid refractories. Why Other Options Are Wrong: MgO/CaO/Al2O3: not the main constituents of ganister.None of these: incorrect since SiO2 applies. Common Pitfalls: Confusing ganister with gahnite or other similarly named minerals. Final Answer: Silica (SiO2)

Question 8

Typical cold crushing strength (CCS) range for standard fireclay bricks is approximately how many kgf/cm²?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cold crushing strength (CCS) is a common quality metric for refractories, capturing the compressive load-bearing capacity at room temperature. For fireclay bricks, CCS falls in a characteristic range useful for quick specification checks. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard fired fireclay bricks (not ultra-lightweight or ultra-dense grades). Measured at ambient temperature per common test methods. Typical values required, not extremes. Concept / Approach: Manufacturers and handbooks list fireclay CCS commonly between about 200 and 400 kgf/cm², depending on density, porosity, and firing regime. Very low-density insulating bricks will be far weaker; special high-density or high-alumina bodies can exceed this. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall the common specification band for general-purpose fireclay.Select the 200–400 kgf/cm² range. Verification / Alternative check: Vendor data sheets and standard references cluster fireclay CCS within this band for regular grades. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 50–150: too low for typical dense fireclay.500–1000 or higher: more typical of dense high-alumina or special grades. Common Pitfalls: Confusing insulating firebrick values with dense fireclay brick values. Final Answer: 200–400 kgf/cm²

Question 9

Definition check: in refractory engineering, “spalling” refers to which failure phenomenon?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spalling is a major cause of premature refractory failure, especially in units that cycle frequently or face steep temperature gradients. Correctly defining spalling helps diagnose root causes and choose preventive measures. Given Data / Assumptions: Thermal cycling or local hot spots are present. Material exhibits cracking, flaking, or shelling. Definition sought, not a test method. Concept / Approach: Spalling is the cracking and detachment of surface layers caused by thermal stresses arising from non-uniform expansion or sudden temperature changes. It is distinct from softening, chemical corrosion, or creep. Materials with low thermal expansion, controlled porosity, and microcrack networks resist spalling better. Step-by-Step Solution: Relate thermal gradients to internal stresses.Connect stresses to crack initiation at flaws/pores.Define the observed outcome: flaking/fracture of the hot face. Verification / Alternative check: Thermal shock tests (quench cycling) quantify spalling resistance and correlate with service outcomes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Softening is a separate rheological response.Load resistance and chemical resistance are different property domains. Common Pitfalls: Equating any crack with chemical attack; spalling is a mechanical/thermal phenomenon. Final Answer: Fracture or flaking due to uneven expansion at high temperature (thermal shock)

Question 10

High-alumina refractories: identify the typical applications among the following industrial furnaces where these bricks are used.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: High-alumina bricks combine good refractoriness, hot strength, and corrosion resistance for a range of severe services. The question checks recognition of common industrial uses across ironmaking, steelmaking, and glass sectors. Given Data / Assumptions: Service temperatures are high and atmospheres variable. Mechanical/thermal loads are significant (especially in roofs/crowns). Chemical exposure may include alkalis and slags. Concept / Approach: In stove domes, EAF roofs, and parts of glass furnaces (e.g., superstructures, ports), high-alumina refractories are widely used thanks to their hot strength and better shock resistance than silica in cycling zones. Glass furnace tanks still use silica/AZS in many areas, but high-alumina is common in selected zones where its properties are advantageous. Step-by-Step Solution: Match high-temperature roofs/crowns to high-alumina strengths.Account for thermal shock in EAF roofs and stove crowns.Include glass furnace zones where alumina is preferred.Choose “All (a), (b) and (c).” Verification / Alternative check: Application charts from suppliers routinely list these installations for high-alumina products. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Limiting to one application under-represents usage.Domestic fireplaces are not representative of heavy-duty alumina brick service. Common Pitfalls: Assuming glass tanks use only silica; high-alumina is used in several auxiliary zones. Final Answer: All (a), (b) and (c)

Question 11

Blast-furnace hearth carbon blocks: which property chiefly helps avoid “skull” formation (adherent frozen metal/slag) when the hearth cools?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Carbon blocks are used in blast-furnace hearths for their chemical compatibility and thermal properties. When the furnace cools, skulls (adherent frozen layers) can form. The question asks which property of carbon blocks helps prevent this adhesion. Given Data / Assumptions: Molten iron/slag contact the hearth lining. Cooling may cause solidification at the interface. Adhesion depends on wetting behavior. Concept / Approach: Non-wetting behavior reduces adhesion of melts to the lining. Carbon exhibits low wettability by molten iron and many slags, so frozen layers detach more readily and are less likely to bond strongly. While high thermal conductivity is beneficial for heat flow and temperature control, it does not by itself ensure non-adherence. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify skull formation as an adhesion/wetting issue.Recall carbon’s low wettability to iron/slag.Select non-wetting characteristics as the key property. Verification / Alternative check: Operational notes highlight carbon’s non-wetting property as a reason for its use in hearth zones exposed to hot metal. Why Other Options Are Wrong: High thermal conductivity/density/low porosity: beneficial for other reasons but not the primary anti-skull mechanism.Electrical resistivity: not directly related. Common Pitfalls: Confusing heat flow control with adhesion control; both matter but address different failure modes. Final Answer: Non-wetting characteristics toward molten iron/slag

Question 12

Chemical resistance of magnesite bricks: they exhibit poor resistance when attacked by which type of slag?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Refractory selection hinges on matching brick chemistry to slag chemistry. Basic bricks like magnesite perform best against basic slags, but not against acidic ones. The question asks you to identify the mismatch scenario for MgO bricks. Given Data / Assumptions: Magnesite bricks are MgO-rich (basic). Acid slags are rich in SiO2. Chemical dissolution is the failure mechanism of interest. Concept / Approach: In contact with acid slags, MgO can form low-melting silicates, accelerating wear. Conversely, with basic, CaO-rich slags, MgO is compatible and used intentionally. Therefore, magnesite’s poor resistance is to acid (silica-rich) slags. Step-by-Step Solution: Classify slag: acid vs basic.Match brick chemistry: MgO is basic; compatible with basic slag, incompatible with acid slag.Select “Acid slag (silica-rich).” Verification / Alternative check: Steelmaking practice uses MgO where slags are basic, avoiding acid environments. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Basic/lime slags: usual application for MgO bricks.Neutral phosphate only/None: do not reflect standard compatibility. Common Pitfalls: Overlooking that slag chemistry dominates refractory corrosion behavior. Final Answer: Acid slag (silica-rich)

Question 13

Apparent porosity range of standard silica bricks typically falls in which percentage band?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Apparent porosity affects thermal conductivity, corrosion resistance, and strength. For silica bricks used in crowns and high-temperature structures, porosity is controlled within a characteristic range. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard dense silica bricks, not insulating types. Typical manufacturing routes (pressed, fired). We seek the common specification band. Concept / Approach: Silica bricks generally exhibit apparent porosity around 20–30 percent, balancing strength with acceptable thermal properties. Much higher porosity levels are characteristic of insulating bricks; much lower values are unusual for standard dense silica products. Step-by-Step Solution: Exclude very low porosity bands (e.g., 5–10%).Exclude very high porosity typical of IFB (45–75%).Select 20–30 percent as the standard band. Verification / Alternative check: Supplier datasheets and handbooks cite porosity values most often in the 20–30 percent range for dense silica bricks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5–10 or below 3: too low for typical dense silica.45–75: far too high; typical of insulating grades, not dense bricks. Common Pitfalls: Confusing dense bricks with insulating silica bricks designed for low conductivity. Final Answer: 20–30 percent

Question 14

Exclusive application of carbon refractories: in which of the following furnace zones are carbon blocks used essentially as the standard lining?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Carbon refractories provide unique benefits—low wettability by hot metal and strong resistance to many slags—making them the go-to choice for certain high-duty zones. The question asks for the zone where carbon is essentially the standard lining. Given Data / Assumptions: Focus on where carbon blocks are “exclusive” or standard. Consider contact with molten iron and slag. Longevity and chemical compatibility are critical. Concept / Approach: The blast furnace hearth contains molten iron and slag at very high temperatures. Carbon blocks excel here due to non-wetting behavior and chemical compatibility. By contrast, coke oven walls and regenerators predominantly use silica and fireclay; soaking pits/portions of cement kilns rely on other refractory families, not bulk carbon linings. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the zone with prolonged molten metal contact → BF hearth.Confirm carbon’s advantages (non-wetting, chemical stability) for hearth service.Exclude other listed zones where silica/alumino-silicates are standard. Verification / Alternative check: BF lining designs universally specify carbon blocks in the hearth region, with safety/backup layers outside. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Coke ovens/regenerators: silica/fireclay dominate.Soaking pits/cement kilns: other refractory types are standard. Common Pitfalls: Generalizing carbon use beyond the BF hearth where its benefits are unique. Final Answer: Hearth of blast furnace

Question 15

Refractoriness under load (RUL) for fireclay bricks under a load of about 2 kg/cm² is typically at what temperature?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: RUL indicates the temperature at which a refractory deforms under a specified mechanical load. It is a more realistic indicator of service capability than fusion temperature alone because load-bearing structures must resist creep and softening. Given Data / Assumptions: Material: typical dense fireclay brick. Load: around 2 kg/cm² (a standard test condition). We seek the characteristic temperature threshold. Concept / Approach: For standard fireclay bricks, RUL values usually exceed 1350 °C under the given load, depending on alumina content and glassy phases. Values far below 1000 °C would indicate very poor hot strength, whereas > 2000 °C is unrealistic for fireclay compositions. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall typical RUL band for fireclay: above 1350 °C at moderate load.Eliminate very low or unrealistically high temperatures.Select “> 1350 °C.” Verification / Alternative check: Datasheets for super-duty and high-duty fireclay list RUL values in the mid-1300s to 1400+ °C under standard loads. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 500–1000 °C: too low for sound fireclay bricks.> 2000 °C: beyond fireclay capability. Common Pitfalls: Confusing PCE with RUL; they are related but not identical. Final Answer: > 1350 °C

Question 16

Identify the material that is NOT a high-alumina refractory raw mineral among the following options.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: High-alumina refractories are derived from alumina-rich minerals such as the Al2SiO5 polymorphs and certain hydrates/oxides. Recognizing which listed material is not alumina-based helps avoid misclassification. Given Data / Assumptions: Kyanite, sillimanite, and andalusite are Al2SiO5 polymorphs. Diaspore is an alumina hydroxide mineral (AlO(OH)). Periclase is MgO (magnesia). Concept / Approach: All listed except periclase are alumina-bearing minerals used in high-alumina refractory production. Periclase is a magnesia mineral used for basic refractories, not high-alumina ones. Step-by-Step Solution: Group Al2O3-rich minerals (kyanite, sillimanite, andalusite, diaspore).Identify periclase as MgO (basic).Select periclase as the non–high-alumina material. Verification / Alternative check: Mineralogy references confirm compositions and refractory uses for each mineral listed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kyanite/Sillimanite/Andalusite/Diaspore all supply alumina for high-alumina refractories. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “basic” refractories (MgO-based) with “high-alumina” just because both handle high temperatures. Final Answer: Periclase

Question 17

Typical apparent porosity band for dense fireclay refractories falls within which percentage range?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Apparent porosity influences heat flow, corrosion resistance, and mechanical strength. For dense (non-insulating) fireclay bricks, there is a characteristic porosity window that balances properties and cost. Given Data / Assumptions: Densely fired fireclay, not insulating firebrick. Pressed or extruded and fired under conventional schedules. Typical values requested. Concept / Approach: Dense fireclay products commonly show apparent porosity between 25 and 35 percent. Lower than ~10–15 percent is unusual for standard grades, while > 50–60 percent indicates insulating bricks rather than dense structural fireclay. Step-by-Step Solution: Exclude very low values typical of special high-density products.Exclude very high values typical of insulating firebrick.Choose 25–35 percent as the representative band. Verification / Alternative check: Reference data sheets for general-purpose fireclay list porosity in the mid-20s to low-30s percent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5–10 or 10–25: typically too low for common dense grades.35–50 or over 60: trending toward insulating categories or special porosity designs. Common Pitfalls: Mixing values for dense bricks with those for insulating firebrick (which are deliberately porous). Final Answer: 25–35 percent

Question 18

Among the following refractory brick types, which one contains the minimum percentage of silica (SiO2)? Choose the material that is lowest in SiO2 by typical composition ranges used in industry.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks basic materials knowledge for refractories by asking which listed brick type has the lowest percentage of silica (SiO2). Recognizing typical composition bands helps in selecting the right lining against acid/basic slags, thermal shock, and structural demands. Given Data / Assumptions: “Firebrick” refers to standard fireclay bricks, commonly ~50–60% SiO2. “Semi-silica” contains substantial SiO2, though less than pure silica bricks. Sillimanite (Al2SiO5) transforms to mullite + silica; still SiO2-bearing. Aluminous firebrick (high-alumina brick) has elevated Al2O3 and comparatively lower SiO2. Concept / Approach: Among the choices, aluminous (high-alumina) firebricks are formulated to raise Al2O3 (often >45% and up to 90%+ in special grades) while reducing SiO2. Fireclay and semi-silica products contain significantly more SiO2. Sillimanite-based bricks also generate mullite but still originate from an alumino-silicate feed with notable silica content. Step-by-Step Solution: List typical SiO2 levels: silica > semi-silica > fireclay ≫ high-alumina.Identify that aluminous firebrick minimizes SiO2 by design.Select the option with the lowest silica fraction: aluminous firebrick. Verification / Alternative check: Supplier datasheets consistently show SiO2 lowest in high-alumina refractories compared with fireclay or semi-silica grades. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Firebrick: typically ~50–60% SiO2.Sillimanite/Semi-silica: inherently silica-rich relative to high-alumina.High-silica brick: intentionally high SiO2. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “acid” vs “basic” classification with absolute silica content; the lowest SiO2 here is the high-alumina choice. Final Answer: Aluminous firebrick

Question 19

Zirconia (ZrO2) refractories: identify the application where they are generally not recommended, considering thermal cycling and service conditions.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Zirconia refractories are valued for very high refractoriness and corrosion resistance. However, their use demands attention to stability during heating and cooling. This question asks where zirconia is generally not preferred, highlighting thermal-cycling concerns. Given Data / Assumptions: Zirconia can undergo polymorphic transformations with volume changes unless stabilized. Thermal cycling can trigger stresses and cracking in poorly stabilized products. Many zirconia products are used successfully in steady high-temperature duty. Concept / Approach: Frequent rapid temperature fluctuations are risky for zirconia refractories if stabilization and microstructure are not optimized. In contrast, applications such as thermocouple sheaths, kiln linings at steady conditions, or specialized induction components may suit zirconia when temperatures are relatively stable and design accounts for its characteristics. Step-by-Step Solution: Assess which environment imposes repeated thermal shocks.Recognize zirconia’s susceptibility without perfect stabilization.Conclude that fluctuating-temperature furnaces are generally unsuitable. Verification / Alternative check: Refractory handbooks caution that zirconia’s phase changes can degrade cycling performance unless carefully stabilized and engineered, making fluctuating service a concern. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Thermocouple sheaths/kiln linings/induction components: feasible with proper grade and design. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “highest refractoriness” automatically implies the best thermal-shock resistance under severe cycling. Final Answer: Furnaces subjected to fluctuating temperature

Question 20

Effect of porosity on properties: as apparent porosity decreases in a refractory brick, which property typically decreases (rather than increases)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Porosity influences thermal, mechanical, and durability properties. Engineers must know which traits improve or worsen as porosity changes to optimize lining life for a given service environment. Given Data / Assumptions: “Porosity” refers to apparent porosity in fired refractories. Lower porosity usually means higher strength and greater thermal conductivity. Thermal-shock (spalling) resistance often benefits from some compliant microstructure. Concept / Approach: Reducing porosity densifies the brick, increasing mechanical strength and thermal conductivity. However, thermal-shock resistance typically decreases because a denser, stiffer structure cannot absorb thermal strains as effectively. Microcrack networks and controlled pores dissipate stress and delay crack propagation, so less porosity can mean lower spalling resistance. Step-by-Step Solution: Relate porosity ↓ to density ↑ and strength ↑.Recognize thermal conductivity tends to increase as solid pathways improve.Identify the property likely to decrease: spalling resistance. Verification / Alternative check: Thermal shock indices often improve with controlled porosity and microcracking; dense bricks are more crack-prone on sudden quench. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Strength/Thermal conductivity: generally increase when porosity decreases.“None of these”: incorrect, as spalling resistance usually declines. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “denser is always better”; application dictates the needed porosity balance. Final Answer: Spalling resistance

Refractory Technology Questions