Q: Fluid properties in petroleum products: As the density of a petroleum fraction increases (keeping other conditions comparable), how does its viscosity typically change?

Introduction: Understanding the relationship between density and viscosity helps engineers select, pump, heat, and atomise petroleum products safely and efficiently. The question asks how viscosity generally trends as density increases for comparable petroleum fractions. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider typical petroleum liquids (e.g., gas oil, lube base stocks, residual fuels). Comparison is at similar temperature and pressure conditions. “Increase in density” implies a heavier, more complex hydrocarbon mixture. Concept / Approach: Heavier petroleum streams contain larger, more complex molecules with stronger intermolecular interactions. These interactions resist flow, leading to higher viscosity. While temperature strongly affects viscosity, for a fixed temperature, heavier (denser) fractions are typically more viscous than lighter (less dense) ones. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify property trend: heavier fractions (higher density) tend to display higher viscosity.Control for temperature: compare at similar temperatures to isolate the effect of composition/density.Select the option that matches this physical trend: viscosity increases with density. Verification / Alternative check: Empirical property tables for refinery streams show increasing density alongside increasing kinematic viscosity from naphtha → kerosene → gas oil → residual fractions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Decreases: Opposite to the common trend for comparable fractions. Remains the same: Ignores well-established composition effects. Either (a) or (b) depending only on temperature: Temperature changes viscosity, but the underlying composition/density trend remains. Becomes negligible: Viscosity cannot vanish in liquids under normal conditions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing temperature effects (warming cuts viscosity) with composition effects (heavier cuts are denser and more viscous at the same temperature). Final Answer: Increases

Q: Fuel oils terminology and use: About LSHS (a common residual fuel oil), which statement correctly characterises it for industrial furnace service?

Introduction: Industrial firing applications often specify residual fuel oils by sulphur and viscosity classes. LSHS is a widely referenced term in Indian industry and examinations. The question checks accurate expansion and practical suitability for furnaces. Given Data / Assumptions: LSHS is a residual/heavy fuel oil grade. HVFO denotes high-viscosity furnace oil grade(s). Metallurgical furnaces are sensitive to sulphur from a pollution and refractory/metal quality standpoint. Concept / Approach: LSHS literally expands to low sulphur heavy stock. Compared with generic furnace oils, its key selling point is reduced sulphur, which helps lower SOx emissions and scale or corrosion risks. Viscosity depends on exact blend/grade; LSHS need not be more viscous than oils explicitly sold as high-viscosity furnace oil (HVFO). Step-by-Step Solution: Confirm the acronym: “low sulphur heavy stock” is correct.Consider application: lower sulphur content makes it attractive for furnaces concerned with emissions and product quality.Evaluate viscosity claim: labeling something HVFO implies higher viscosity than typical residual stocks; claiming LSHS is more viscous than HVFO is not generally true. Verification / Alternative check: Fuel oil purchasing specs separate sulphur content (LS vs HS) from viscosity classes (e.g., 80–380 cSt @ 50°C). LS and viscosity are independent levers; “HVFO” signals higher viscosity explicitly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (a): Not generally correct; HVFO grades are, by definition, very viscous. (d): Cannot be true since (a) is not broadly valid. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “low sulphur” automatically implies “high viscosity” or vice versa; they are specified separately. Final Answer: Only (b) and (c)

Q: Gasoline knock resistance: Among major hydrocarbon families, which generally exhibits the highest octane number (best knock resistance) in spark-ignition engines?

Introduction: Octane number measures resistance to autoignition in spark-ignition engines. Hydrocarbon family strongly influences base octane. The question asks which family exhibits the highest octane among typical gasoline-range species. Given Data / Assumptions: Comparison is across families: aromatics, isoparaffins, naphthenes, olefins, and n-paraffins. We consider typical gasoline boiling range compounds. Concept / Approach: Aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., toluene, xylene) possess inherently high octane numbers due to ring stability and slower low-temperature chain branching. Isoparaffins also have high octane, but lower than aromatics on average. Normal paraffins are poorest. Olefins and naphthenes sit in between depending on structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Rank families by knock resistance: Aromatics > Isoparaffins > Olefins ≈ Naphthenes > n-Paraffins (approximate trend).Select the family at the top of this ordering: Aromatics. Verification / Alternative check: Gasoline blending literature consistently shows reformate (aromatic-rich) with very high RON, while straight-run paraffinic streams have low RON and require upgrading. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Isoparaffins: High octane but typically less than aromatics. Naphthenes: Moderate octane. Olefins: Variable; usually below aromatics and top isoparaffins. n-Paraffins: Lowest octane in family comparisons. Common Pitfalls: Equating “clean burning” or stability with “highest octane”; octane is a knock metric, not a cleanliness metric. Final Answer: Aromatics

Question 1

Kerosene quality: The smoke point test of kerosene primarily expresses which combustion characteristic of the fuel?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Smoke point is a classic lamp-fuel test for kerosene and aviation turbine fuels. It measures the maximum flame height without visible smoke under standardized wick and draft conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: We refer to the standardized smoke point apparatus and method. Kerosene composition varies in aromatics and paraffins. Higher smoke point indicates better, cleaner luminosity. Concept / Approach: Aromatics tend to produce soot and smoke. Thus, fuels with lower aromatic content generally have higher smoke points and burn with cleaner, non-smoking luminous flames. Smoke point thus indicates the luminosity/smoking behavior rather than a direct quantitative aromatic percentage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall definition: height at which flame begins to smoke.Step 2: Connect aromatics → soot formation → lower smoke point.Step 3: Conclude that smoke point expresses luminosity characteristics. Verification / Alternative check: Fuel specifications for jet/kerosene link minimum smoke point to combustion quality and combustor smokeless burning performance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Burning characteristics in general: Too broad; smoke point specifically relates to smokeless luminosity. Aromatic content directly: Correlated but not a direct quantitative measure. Lamp wick wetting: That is a property of surface tension/viscosity, not smoke point. Common Pitfalls: Interpreting smoke point as an exact aromatics analyzer; it is an indirect indicator via combustion behavior. Final Answer: Luminosity characteristics (tendency to smoke during burning)

Question 2

Fuel composition: For the following fuels, which has the highest carbon-to-hydrogen ratio by weight—gasoline, kerosene, light gas oil, or heavy fuel oil?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio by weight is a useful indicator of fuel heaviness and combustion characteristics. As hydrocarbon chains become heavier and more aromatic, the C/H ratio typically increases, affecting energy content, smoke tendency, and emissions. Given Data / Assumptions: We compare typical petroleum products: gasoline, kerosene, light gas oil (LGO), and heavy fuel oil (HFO). We assume conventional refinery specifications without unusual additives. C/H ratio is by weight. Concept / Approach: Lighter distillates (gasoline, kerosene) have higher hydrogen-to-carbon relative content and more paraffinic composition. As products get heavier (LGO → HFO), average molecular weight increases, aromaticity often rises, and the hydrogen fraction drops, raising the C/H ratio. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Order the products by typical boiling range: gasoline < kerosene < LGO < HFO.Step 2: Recognize that the heaviest product generally exhibits the highest C/H ratio.Step 3: Select heavy fuel oil as having the maximum C/H by weight. Verification / Alternative check: Elemental analyses of refinery streams consistently show heavier residual fuels with lower hydrogen content (by wt%), hence higher C/H ratios than lighter distillates. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Light gas oil: Heavier than kerosene/gasoline but lighter than HFO; C/H lower than HFO. Kerosene: Mid-distillate with higher hydrogen fraction than LGO/HFO. Gasoline: Lightest among the four; typically the lowest C/H ratio. Common Pitfalls: Confusing H/C atomic ratio with C/H weight ratio; regardless of expression, heavier residual fuels have relatively less hydrogen. Final Answer: Heavy fuel oil

Question 3

Fluid properties in petroleum products: As the density of a petroleum fraction increases (keeping other conditions comparable), how does its viscosity typically change?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Understanding the relationship between density and viscosity helps engineers select, pump, heat, and atomise petroleum products safely and efficiently. The question asks how viscosity generally trends as density increases for comparable petroleum fractions. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider typical petroleum liquids (e.g., gas oil, lube base stocks, residual fuels). Comparison is at similar temperature and pressure conditions. “Increase in density” implies a heavier, more complex hydrocarbon mixture. Concept / Approach: Heavier petroleum streams contain larger, more complex molecules with stronger intermolecular interactions. These interactions resist flow, leading to higher viscosity. While temperature strongly affects viscosity, for a fixed temperature, heavier (denser) fractions are typically more viscous than lighter (less dense) ones. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify property trend: heavier fractions (higher density) tend to display higher viscosity.Control for temperature: compare at similar temperatures to isolate the effect of composition/density.Select the option that matches this physical trend: viscosity increases with density. Verification / Alternative check: Empirical property tables for refinery streams show increasing density alongside increasing kinematic viscosity from naphtha → kerosene → gas oil → residual fractions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Decreases: Opposite to the common trend for comparable fractions. Remains the same: Ignores well-established composition effects. Either (a) or (b) depending only on temperature: Temperature changes viscosity, but the underlying composition/density trend remains. Becomes negligible: Viscosity cannot vanish in liquids under normal conditions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing temperature effects (warming cuts viscosity) with composition effects (heavier cuts are denser and more viscous at the same temperature). Final Answer: Increases

Question 4

Fuel oils terminology and use: About LSHS (a common residual fuel oil), which statement correctly characterises it for industrial furnace service?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Industrial firing applications often specify residual fuel oils by sulphur and viscosity classes. LSHS is a widely referenced term in Indian industry and examinations. The question checks accurate expansion and practical suitability for furnaces. Given Data / Assumptions: LSHS is a residual/heavy fuel oil grade. HVFO denotes high-viscosity furnace oil grade(s). Metallurgical furnaces are sensitive to sulphur from a pollution and refractory/metal quality standpoint. Concept / Approach: LSHS literally expands to low sulphur heavy stock. Compared with generic furnace oils, its key selling point is reduced sulphur, which helps lower SOx emissions and scale or corrosion risks. Viscosity depends on exact blend/grade; LSHS need not be more viscous than oils explicitly sold as high-viscosity furnace oil (HVFO). Step-by-Step Solution: Confirm the acronym: “low sulphur heavy stock” is correct.Consider application: lower sulphur content makes it attractive for furnaces concerned with emissions and product quality.Evaluate viscosity claim: labeling something HVFO implies higher viscosity than typical residual stocks; claiming LSHS is more viscous than HVFO is not generally true. Verification / Alternative check: Fuel oil purchasing specs separate sulphur content (LS vs HS) from viscosity classes (e.g., 80–380 cSt @ 50°C). LS and viscosity are independent levers; “HVFO” signals higher viscosity explicitly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (a): Not generally correct; HVFO grades are, by definition, very viscous. (d): Cannot be true since (a) is not broadly valid. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “low sulphur” automatically implies “high viscosity” or vice versa; they are specified separately. Final Answer: Only (b) and (c)

Question 5

Gasoline knock resistance: Among major hydrocarbon families, which generally exhibits the highest octane number (best knock resistance) in spark-ignition engines?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Octane number measures resistance to autoignition in spark-ignition engines. Hydrocarbon family strongly influences base octane. The question asks which family exhibits the highest octane among typical gasoline-range species. Given Data / Assumptions: Comparison is across families: aromatics, isoparaffins, naphthenes, olefins, and n-paraffins. We consider typical gasoline boiling range compounds. Concept / Approach: Aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., toluene, xylene) possess inherently high octane numbers due to ring stability and slower low-temperature chain branching. Isoparaffins also have high octane, but lower than aromatics on average. Normal paraffins are poorest. Olefins and naphthenes sit in between depending on structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Rank families by knock resistance: Aromatics > Isoparaffins > Olefins ≈ Naphthenes > n-Paraffins (approximate trend).Select the family at the top of this ordering: Aromatics. Verification / Alternative check: Gasoline blending literature consistently shows reformate (aromatic-rich) with very high RON, while straight-run paraffinic streams have low RON and require upgrading. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Isoparaffins: High octane but typically less than aromatics. Naphthenes: Moderate octane. Olefins: Variable; usually below aromatics and top isoparaffins. n-Paraffins: Lowest octane in family comparisons. Common Pitfalls: Equating “clean burning” or stability with “highest octane”; octane is a knock metric, not a cleanliness metric. Final Answer: Aromatics

Question 6

Diesel ignition quality: The cetane number requirement for high-speed diesel (HSD) fuels used in automotive engines must be at least how much?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Cetane number measures ignition quality in compression-ignition (diesel) engines. High-speed diesel used in automotive applications requires a minimum cetane number to ensure quick ignition delay, smooth running, and low noise. Given Data / Assumptions: Context is typical exam/industry baseline for HSD. We distinguish between minimum specification values and premium/modern regional norms. Concept / Approach: Historically and in many standard question banks, the minimum acceptable cetane for HSD is set at or above 45. Some modern specifications in various jurisdictions target higher values (e.g., around 51) to reduce emissions and enhance cold starting, but the canonical minimum often cited for HSD is 45. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall baseline HSD spec commonly quoted in classical petroleum questions: 45.Compare with distractors: 30 is too low, 75/95 are unrealistically high for commercial diesels, and 51 reflects newer norms but is not the classic baseline minimum in such questions. Verification / Alternative check: Older BIS/API style texts and refinery training materials frequently reference a 45 minimum for HSD, with improved grades exceeding this. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 30: Poor ignition quality, unsuitable for HSD. 75 or 95: Far above commercial diesel ranges. 51: Regionally common newer target, not the classic minimum asked here. Common Pitfalls: Mixing up contemporary regional specs with the baseline figures used in standard MCQs. Final Answer: 45

Question 7

Reading specific gravity in fuels: Specific gravity (or density) of a petroleum product primarily indicates which aspect of the hydrocarbon mixture?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Specific gravity (or density) is a key bulk property for fuels and lubricants. While it correlates with many behaviours, the question asks what it primarily indicates about composition. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider typical liquid petroleum streams. We are not changing temperature in comparisons. Concept / Approach: Denser petroleum liquids tend to be richer in aromatic/naphthenic structures, while lighter ones are more paraffinic. Thus, specific gravity gives a broad clue to hydrocarbon type distribution (aromaticity vs paraffinic content). It does not precisely reveal sulphur content or refine history and is not a direct predictor of atomisation across all nozzle/temperature scenarios. Step-by-Step Solution: Link density to family: higher density typically implies more aromatics; lower density implies more paraffins.Eliminate properties not directly inferable from density alone (sulphur, exact flash point).Acknowledge atomisation depends strongly on viscosity and temperature; density alone is insufficient. Verification / Alternative check: Refinery assays show aromatic-rich streams exhibit higher density and often lower hydrogen-to-carbon ratio, consistent with this interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Degree of refinement: Needs distillation/contaminant data, not just density. Ease of atomisation: Depends on viscosity, surface tension, temperature, nozzle design. Exact sulphur content: Requires compositional analysis; density is not a sulphur meter. Flash point: Empirical and compositional; cannot be read off density alone. Common Pitfalls: Treating density as a single-property predictor for all handling/combustion behaviours. Final Answer: Hydrocarbon family character (more aromatic vs more paraffinic)

Question 8

Lubricant additives – detergents: In automotive engine oils, what is the primary function of the detergent additive system?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Modern engine oils contain additive packages that include detergents and dispersants to manage deposits, soot, and oxidation by-products. This question asks for the primary role of the detergent function. Given Data / Assumptions: Context is multi-additive automotive engine oils. Detergents are typically metallic sulfonates, phenates, or salicylates. Concept / Approach: Detergents help neutralise acidic species and keep surfaces clean, while the overall detergent-dispersant system keeps contaminants finely divided and suspended so they do not plate out as deposits and can be transported to the filter or drained. Although antioxidants, corrosion inhibitors, and viscosity index improvers exist, those are different additive families. Step-by-Step Solution: Associate “detergent” with cleaning/neutralisation and aiding suspension with dispersants.Identify the most accurate overarching effect: maintain contaminants in suspension to prevent deposits and enable removal.Exclude functions that belong mainly to other additives (antioxidants, anti-rust agents, VI improvers). Verification / Alternative check: Oil datasheets and additive literature describe detergent/dispersant systems as central to piston cleanliness and sludge control. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Reduce deposits by dissolving varnish only: Too narrow; detergents act earlier to prevent deposition and neutralise acids. Increase oxidation stability: Antioxidants do this, not detergents. Prevent rusting: Primarily corrosion inhibitors. Thicken the oil: Viscosity index improvers and base oil selection govern this. Common Pitfalls: Confusing the detergent function with antioxidants or VI improvers; in practice detergents and dispersants are paired but have distinct chemistries. Final Answer: Keep contaminants and insolubles in suspension for removal by flow/filters

Question 9

Reforming feed selection: Which stream is most commonly used as the primary feedstock to a catalytic reforming unit to make high-octane reformate and hydrogen?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Catalytic reforming increases octane by dehydrogenating naphthenes to aromatics and isomerising paraffins, while producing valuable hydrogen. The choice of feedstock is critical to yield and unit performance. Given Data / Assumptions: Objective: produce high-octane reformate and hydrogen. Candidate feeds: naphtha-range vs much heavier/residual stocks. Concept / Approach: Reforming targets naphtha boiling range hydrocarbons (roughly 70–180°C) rich in naphthenes/paraffins. Straight-run naphtha from crude distillation is therefore the standard feed. Heavier oils are unsuitable for reforming and are instead cracked or hydroprocessed. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the process window: naphtha range feeds.Select the appropriate refinery stream: straight-run naphtha (often desulfurised first).Reject heavy/residual feeds that would coke and foul reforming catalysts. Verification / Alternative check: Typical refinery flow diagrams place hydrotreating before reforming, with straight-run naphtha as the routed feed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Heavy fuel oil / residuum: Too heavy; processed via cracking, visbreaking, or coking. Casing-head gasoline: Variable composition; not the standard reforming feed. Kerosene: Outside optimal reforming range; used for jet/kerosene pool or hydroprocessing. Common Pitfalls: Confusing reforming (naphtha upgrading) with cracking (heavy oil conversion). Final Answer: Straight-run gasoline (naphtha)

Question 10

Basic composition of crude: Which statement about petroleum (crude oil) is correct considering its broad natural composition?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Petroleum is a complex natural mixture of thousands of hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon species. The question probes general truths vs common misconceptions about crude composition. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider whole crude oils from conventional sources. Statements span optical activity, predominant families, and presence of asphaltics/aromatics. Concept / Approach: Natural crudes are predominantly mixtures of paraffins, naphthenes (cycloalkanes), and aromatics, plus resins and asphaltenes to varying degrees. Olefins are usually scarce in unprocessed crude due to geologic stability. Many crude components can exhibit optical activity (chiral species), and bulk crude samples often show measurable optical rotation. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate (a): Optical activity can be observed for many crude oils, making this statement acceptable.Evaluate (b): “Mainly olefins” is incorrect; olefins are minor in raw crudes.Evaluate (c) and (d): Most crudes contain both asphaltic materials and aromatics in some proportion; claiming absence is wrong.Evaluate (e): Crudes contain branched, cyclic, and aromatic species besides straight-chain paraffins. Verification / Alternative check: Crude assays and compositional overviews consistently show families PNA (paraffins-naphthenes-aromatics) with resins/asphaltenes; olefins are generated chiefly during cracking/upgrading, not present in bulk initially. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (b): Misstates the main families. (c)/(d): Overly absolute; most crudes include asphaltics and aromatics. (e): Ignores the diversity of molecular structures present. Common Pitfalls: Confusing refinery products or reaction intermediates (olefins) with native crude composition. Final Answer: It is optically active.

Question 11

LPG volatility benchmark: At atmospheric pressure (760 mm Hg), the temperature at which about 95% by volume of LPG will evaporate is closest to which value?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a mixture of light hydrocarbons (commonly propane and butane). Its volatility characteristics are important for storage, vaporisation, and appliance performance. A common benchmark is the temperature at which a specified percentage evaporates at 1 atm. Given Data / Assumptions: Pressure: 760 mm Hg (atmospheric). Target: Approximately 95% by volume evaporated. Typical LPG composition: propane-rich blends for colder climates, varying with region. Concept / Approach: Propane has a normal boiling point near −42°C, while n-butane boils near −0.5°C. A propane-leaning LPG blend shows high volatility at sub-zero temperatures. The 95% evaporated point at atmospheric pressure is therefore near the lower end of this range, close to the propane boiling point. Step-by-Step Solution: Relate LPG composition to volatility: higher propane content lowers evaporated temperature.Link 95% evaporated condition to near-complete vaporisation in a propane-rich mixture.Select the temperature closest to propane’s normal boiling point: about −40°C. Verification / Alternative check: Practical LPG handling guidelines reference rapid vaporisation near −40°C for propane-dominant mixes at 1 atm; butane-rich blends would shift the curve upward, yet −40°C remains the common benchmark answer in standard MCQs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2 or 30 or 55: Too warm for near-complete vaporisation of propane-rich LPG at 1 atm. −5: Closer to butane behaviour; not representative for 95% on typical LPG benchmarks. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single exact value for all LPG blends; composition varies, but the benchmark answer aligns with propane-rich behaviour. Final Answer: -40

Question 12

Catalytic cracking catalysts: In modern petroleum refining, which catalyst is considered the most effective and widely used for catalytic cracking (e.g., FCC)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Catalytic cracking (especially in fluid catalytic cracking, FCC) converts heavy gas oils into gasoline and lighter products. Catalyst choice determines activity, selectivity, and stability. Given Data / Assumptions: Process: FCC or related catalytic cracking units. Goal: High conversion with desired gasoline and light olefin yields. Concept / Approach: Modern FCC catalysts are based on crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites (commonly zeolite Y/USY) dispersed in a silica-alumina matrix with clays and binders. Zeolites provide strong, shape-selective acid sites and large surface area, enabling high activity and selectivity at lower temperatures than thermal cracking. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify industrial standard: zeolite-based FCC catalysts.Contrast with metals/oxides listed that act as poisons (Ni, V) or lack sufficient acidity/specificity (iron oxide, alumina alone) for FCC’s main function.Select “Zeolite.” Verification / Alternative check: Refinery operations, vendor literature, and textbooks consistently show zeolite Y-based catalysts dominating FCC service because of their acidity, stability, and regenerability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Iron oxide: Not the core FCC cracking catalyst. Nickel / Vanadium pentoxide: Typically considered contaminants/poisons in FCC feeds; they promote dehydrogenation and coke/HC gases. Alumina only: Support/matrix material; lacks the activity of zeolites. Common Pitfalls: Confusing support/matrix materials or metal contaminants with the active zeolitic component. Final Answer: Zeolite

Question 13

In petroleum product testing, the smoke volatility index (SVI) is defined numerically as the smoke point (in mm) plus a factor multiplied by the percentage distilled at 204 °C. Which factor correctly completes this industry relation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: The smoke volatility index (SVI) is a quick empirical indicator used for kerosene-range fuels to balance their smoke-forming tendency (linked to aromatics/heavies) against volatility (linked to front-end distillate recovery). A correct understanding of the SVI expression helps technicians compare jet/kerosene product quality in the lab without running advanced instruments. Given Data / Assumptions: SVI is computed from the smoke point (mm) and a fraction of the volume percent distilled at 204 °C. We are selecting the correct multiplicative factor for the 204 °C distillation percent. Units: smoke point in mm; distilled percentage in vol %. Concept / Approach: By definition in common refinery lab practice, the smoke volatility index is calculated as: SVI = smoke point (mm) + 0.42 * (% distilled at 204 °C)Higher SVI indicates a more favorable combination of lower smoke tendency and adequate volatility for clean combustion, particularly relevant for aviation/kerosene grades. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the required empirical relation for SVI.2) Recall the standard coefficient applied to the 204 °C recovery: 0.42.3) Choose the option that matches SVI = smoke point + 0.42 * (204 °C recovery). Verification / Alternative check: Refinery QA guides and petroleum testing manuals cite this empirical correlation for kerosene-type fuels to complement separate smoke point and volatility assessments. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 5 mm, 10 mm: Fixed offsets are not used in the definition.0.84 or 0.24: Incorrect coefficients; would distort comparative SVI values. Common Pitfalls: Mixing up SVI with pure smoke point or assuming a fixed additive constant instead of the correct proportional term tied to 204 °C distillation percentage. Final Answer: 0.42 * (% distilled at 204 °C)

Question 14

For hydrocarbons with the same carbon number (i.e., same molecular size range), which structural class exhibits the minimum smoking tendency during combustion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Smoking tendency reflects a fuel’s propensity to form soot and visible smoke during combustion. For hydrocarbon families of the same carbon number, structure (branching, ring formation, aromaticity) strongly influences smoke formation behaviors in burners or engine flames. Given Data / Assumptions: Comparison is at a fixed carbon number (size) to isolate structural effects. Candidate families: normal paraffins, iso-paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics, olefins. We seek the class with the lowest (minimum) smoking tendency. Concept / Approach: Empirically, smoking tendency (lowest to highest) generally follows: iso-paraffins < normal paraffins < naphthenes < aromaticsBranching promotes cleaner burning, while ring structures and aromaticity increase soot precursors. Thus, iso-paraffins produce the least smoke at the same carbon number. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Hold carbon number constant.2) Rank families by soot propensity based on structure.3) Identify the minimum: iso-paraffins. Verification / Alternative check: Smoke point testing and burner studies consistently show higher smoke for aromatics and lower for branched alkanes; refiners use isomerization to improve kerosene smoke points. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Paraffins (normal): Higher smoke than iso-paraffins.Naphthenes: Ring structures increase sooting vs paraffins.Aromatics: Highest smoking tendency among common families.Olefins: Often smoke more than paraffins due to unsaturation. Common Pitfalls: Assuming heavier = smokier without considering structural effects; aromatic content is a dominant driver of smoke formation even at the same carbon number. Final Answer: Iso-paraffins (branched alkanes)

Question 15

The widely accepted biogenic theory of petroleum formation suggests that crude oil originated from which primary sources accumulated over geologic time?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: The origin of petroleum is central to geology and refining. The mainstream biogenic model holds that crude oil derives from ancient biological materials that underwent transformation under heat and pressure in sedimentary basins. Given Data / Assumptions: Source materials: organic remains from marine and lacustrine environments. Processes: burial, diagenesis, catagenesis. Outcome: kerogen formation and subsequent generation of oil and gas. Concept / Approach: Both microscopic plants (algae, phytoplankton) and animals (zooplankton) contribute organic detritus. Over time, oxygen-poor conditions preserve this material, forming source rocks; thermal maturation then yields hydrocarbons expelled into reservoirs. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the biogenic hypothesis: organic precursors drive petroleum formation.2) Recognize both plant and animal plankton contribute significant carbon.3) Select the option that includes both sources. Verification / Alternative check: Geochemical markers (biomarkers, isotopic signatures) trace back to biological origins, supporting the mixed plant–animal source model for most crude oils. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Plant only / animal only: Incomplete; both contribute.Neither/ inorganic: Contradicts biomarker evidence.Mineral oxides: Not organic precursors for petroleum. Common Pitfalls: Overemphasizing a single source (e.g., only algal) and ignoring zooplankton; many source rocks reflect mixed organic inputs depending on the paleoenvironment. Final Answer: Both plant and animal organic matter

Question 16

Select the correct statement about how hydrocarbon structure influences the octane number of gasoline-range fuels.

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Octane number measures knock resistance in spark-ignition engines. Molecular structure, especially branching and aromaticity, has a strong effect on octane values, guiding reforming, isomerization, and blending strategies in refineries. Given Data / Assumptions: Focus is on gasoline-range hydrocarbons (roughly C5–C10). Comparisons are at equal carbon numbers unless stated otherwise. Octane trends: branching ↑ octane, straight chains ↓ octane, aromatics often high RON. Concept / Approach: Branched isomers disrupt chain autoignition pathways, raising octane. Straight-chain paraffins (e.g., n-heptane with ON = 0 by definition) tend to knock readily. Iso-octane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane) defines 100 on the primary reference scale. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recall reference fuels: n-heptane (0), iso-octane (100).2) Branching increases octane versus straight chains at same carbon number.3) Select the statement that correctly captures this structural effect. Verification / Alternative check: Isomerization units exist precisely to convert normal paraffins to branched paraffins to boost octane in reformulated gasoline blends. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: Iso-octane is 100, not zero.b: Octane does not monotonically track only carbon number.d: Aromatics typically have high octane relative to naphthenes/paraﬃns.e: Opposite of reality; straight chains are lowest among isomers. Common Pitfalls: Confusing RON/MON specifics with the broader structural trends; both agree that branching improves knock resistance relative to straight-chain isomers. Final Answer: Branched-chain paraffins have higher octane than straight-chain paraffins of the same carbon number.

Question 17

In catalytic reforming of naphtha to improve gasoline octane and produce reformate/aromatics, what are the typical operating pressure and temperature ranges?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Catalytic reforming converts low-octane naphtha into high-octane reformate rich in aromatics and isoparaffins, also generating hydrogen. Operating severity (temperature and pressure) directly affects octane gain, aromatics formation, and catalyst life. Given Data / Assumptions: Process: Platforming/CCR or semi-regenerative reforming with Pt-based catalysts. Goal: representative operating windows, not extreme cases. Outputs: reformate octane and hydrogen co-production. Concept / Approach: Typical reforming conditions are high temperature (about 450–520+ °C) and moderate hydrogen pressure (roughly 15–45 kgf/cm2). Lower pressure favors octane/aromatics but increases coking; CCR technology manages coke by continuous regeneration. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify standard industrial ranges.2) Exclude unrealistically low T/P that would not drive dehydrogenation/cyclization.3) Select 15–45 kgf/cm2 and 450–550 °C as the representative range. Verification / Alternative check: Process licensor data and refinery texts consistently quote 450–520 °C with 10–35 bar (approx. 10–35 kgf/cm2) for conventional/semi-regenerative units; broader 15–45 kgf/cm2 captures typical practice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a/d/e: Temperatures are too low for efficient reforming chemistry.c: Pressures and temperatures are excessive and not characteristic of reforming. Common Pitfalls: Confusing reforming with hydrocracking or thermal cracking; reforming is endothermic and requires high temperature but only moderate hydrogen pressure for stability and selectivity. Final Answer: 15–45 kgf/cm2 and 450–550 °C

Question 18

In modern refineries, the catalytic cracking of heavier petroleum fractions (e.g., vacuum gas oil) is primarily carried out to maximize which valuable product stream?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Catalytic cracking, especially in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units, upgrades heavy gas oils into lighter, higher-value products. The core economic driver is the conversion of heavy feed into the gasoline pool along with LPG/propylene co-products. Given Data / Assumptions: Feed: vacuum gas oil/heavy gas oils. Process: catalytic cracking using acidic zeolite catalysts. Key KPI: gasoline yield and octane. Concept / Approach: FCC catalysts and operating conditions are tuned to maximize gasoline-range molecules with adequate octane, while also producing LPG/propylene and some light cycle oil. Heavy resid is minimized or processed upstream (e.g., hydrocracking) depending on configuration. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify target products of FCC.2) Recognize refinery economics favor gasoline production in many markets.3) Select gasoline as the primary objective. Verification / Alternative check: Typical FCC yield profiles show gasoline as the largest single product cut by volume, with LPG as a significant secondary product; diesel is not the primary target for FCC (hydrocracking is preferred for distillate mode). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Asphalt/tar: Not the purpose of catalytic cracking; those are heavy residues.Diesel: FCC does make some LCO, but not as the main objective.Sulfur: A contaminant to be removed, not a product. Common Pitfalls: Confusing FCC with hydrocracking (distillate mode) or visbreaking/coking which handle resid with different product slates. Final Answer: Gasoline (petrol)

Question 19

A crude oil shows a characterization (UOP K) factor of 12.5. Based on this value, how would you classify the crude type?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: The UOP K (characterization) factor is a classical single-number crude property indicator linking average boiling point and specific gravity. It is frequently used to infer general crude type and expected product distribution tendencies. Given Data / Assumptions: Reported K factor: 12.5. Rule-of-thumb ranges: paraffinic >~12, intermediate ~11.5–12, naphthenic/aromatic <~11.5 (approximate). Purpose: qualitative classification, not a precise composition assay. Concept / Approach: Higher K factors correspond to more paraffinic character (lighter, higher H/C), which typically yields more naphtha and paraffinic fractions; lower K factors indicate more naphthenic/aromatic content, favoring heavier distillates and lube stocks. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Compare 12.5 with rule-of-thumb thresholds.2) 12.5 lies in the paraffinic/upper intermediate regime.3) Select paraffinic as the best classification. Verification / Alternative check: Refinery planning practice: Light, paraffinic crudes often show K factors around or above ~12, confirming a paraffinic tendency for 12.5. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Naphthenic/intermediate: Would imply lower K values near ~11–12.None/aromatic-rich: Not supported by a K factor as high as 12.5. Common Pitfalls: Treating K as a precise predictor of yields; it is best used comparatively alongside assays and TBP curves. Final Answer: Paraffinic

Question 20

In hydrofining (catalytic desulfurization/sweetening) of petroleum fractions, what is the functional role of adding hydrogen to the process?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Hydrofining (hydrotreating) removes sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and metals from petroleum streams, improving product quality and protecting downstream catalysts. Hydrogen is fundamental to both the chemistry and the stability of the process. Given Data / Assumptions: Catalysts: typically CoMo/NiMo on alumina. Feeds: naphtha, kerosene, diesel, or other middle distillates. Targets: H2S formation (from organosulfur), saturation of olefins, and coke suppression. Concept / Approach: Hydrogen participates in hydrodesulfurization (HDS) converting organosulfur compounds to H2S and saturated hydrocarbons. Maintaining sufficient hydrogen partial pressure also suppresses polymerization/condensation reactions, minimizing coke on catalyst surfaces. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Recognize hydrogen’s role as a reactant in HDS/Hydrogenation.2) Understand hydrogen keeps the environment reducing, limiting coking.3) Conclude both enhancement of desulfurization and coke minimization are valid. Verification / Alternative check: Operating guidelines require adequate hydrogen-to-oil ratio to sustain activity and cycle length; low hydrogen leads to rapid deactivation due to coke and poorer desulfurization. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a or b alone: Incomplete—both benefits are realized.d/e: Contradict process fundamentals; hydrogen directly enables sulfur removal and catalyst stability. Common Pitfalls: Assuming hydrogen only improves color/smell; its primary roles are chemical conversion (HDS) and preventing deactivation via coke suppression. Final Answer: Both (a) and (b)

Petroleum Refinery Engineering Questions