Question 1

For producing the same overall draught in a furnace–stack system, the power required by a forced-draught fan compared with an induced-draught fan is generally:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Draught systems move air and flue gases through furnaces and heat-recovery equipment. Choosing forced vs. induced draught impacts fan duty, energy consumption, and control strategy. Given Data / Assumptions: Same draught (pressure difference) must be achieved. Forced-draught fan handles cold, dense air; induced-draught fan handles hot, expanded flue gases. Concept / Approach: Fan power ~ (flow * pressure rise) / efficiency. For equal draught, the induced-draught fan often moves a much larger volumetric flow because hot flue gases are less dense, increasing power requirement relative to a forced-draught fan that moves denser, lower-volume cold air. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize density effect: V_hot > V_cold for the same mass flow.At equal pressure rise, higher volumetric flow raises fan power on the induced side.Therefore, forced-draught power is generally less than induced-draught power for the same draught. Verification / Alternative check: Compare typical fan curves and system curves; induced fans frequently have larger casings/motors due to hot-gas volume and higher losses downstream. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Same or more: contradicts usual density/volume effect. Depends solely on flue-gas density: while density matters, under comparable systems forced draught typically needs less power. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring temperature’s impact on volumetric flow; neglecting additional pressure losses on the gas-side path. Final Answer: less

Question 2

Identify the furnace that is NOT directly fired (i.e., the charge is not in direct contact with flame or combustion products).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Directly fired furnaces expose the charge to flame or hot combustion gases, while indirectly fired units heat through walls or heat exchangers. Correct classification guides materials selection, flue-gas handling, and product quality control. Given Data / Assumptions: By-product recovery coke ovens heat coal in narrow chambers separated by flues. Open-hearth and many calcination/sintering units are directly fired. Concept / Approach: In a by-product coke oven, coal is carbonized with heat supplied through refractory walls from adjacent combustion flues. The charge does not contact flame or combustion products, making it indirectly heated (not directly fired). Step-by-Step Solution: Define direct vs. indirect firing based on exposure to combustion products.Analyze each option’s process path.Select the unit where heat crosses walls to the charge: the by-product coke oven. Verification / Alternative check: Typical battery diagrams show separate flues and charging/withdrawal sides with heat transmission through silica or silica-alumina walls. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Calcination kiln, sintering furnace, open-hearth: all commonly involve direct exposure to hot combustion gases. Common Pitfalls: Generalizing from one sintering variant; some processes can be indirectly heated, but the classic, widely referenced non-direct case is the by-product coke oven. Final Answer: By-product coke oven

Question 3

Recoverable heat from furnace flue gases primarily depends on which set of factors in an industrial heating operation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Heat recovery reduces fuel use and stack losses. The extent to which useful heat can be reclaimed from flue gases depends on furnace performance and flue-gas characteristics. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard furnace with a recuperator/regenerator or waste-heat boiler. Objective: maximize useful heat recovered without condensation/corrosion issues unless designed for it. Concept / Approach: Recoverable heat ∝ mass flow rate * specific heat * temperature drop. Higher furnace efficiency helps by lowering excess air and optimizing heat transfer, while more flue-gas flow and a larger temperature drop across recovery equipment increase the available sensible heat. Step-by-Step Solution: Consider energy balance: Q_recovered = m_dot * Cp * (T_in - T_out).m_dot depends on combustion stoichiometry/excess air and load.T_in and T_out are set by furnace outlet and recovery approach temperature limits. Verification / Alternative check: Practical sizing of recuperators uses the same relationship; higher gas temperature and flow permit more recovery but are constrained by materials limits and fouling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each individual factor matters; omitting any one underestimates recoverable energy. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring acid dew-point corrosion when pushing T_out too low; designing without considering fouling or pressure drop. Final Answer: all (a), (b) and (c)

Question 4

In very high-temperature industrial furnaces, which mode of heat transfer delivers the maximum portion of heat to the load?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Heat transfer in furnaces involves conduction, convection, and radiation. At elevated temperatures, radiative exchange dominates and dictates lining choices, burner placement, and surface treatments. Given Data / Assumptions: Temperatures high enough that T^4 dependence of radiative flux is significant. Typical industrial furnace with a clear line of sight between hot gases/linings and the load. Concept / Approach: Radiation heat flux scales strongly with absolute temperature and surface emissivity. As temperature rises, radiative transfer rapidly overtakes convective mechanisms, making emissivity and view factors critical design parameters. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify temperature regime: above roughly 800–900°C, radiation becomes predominant.Assess surfaces: high-emissivity linings and hot gas radiation improve load heating.Conclude that radiation is the primary mode at very high temperatures. Verification / Alternative check: Operational experience shows furnace fuel reductions when emissivity coatings are used—consistent with radiation dominance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Conduction is limited to contact points; convection contributes but not as strongly at extreme temperatures compared with radiation. Common Pitfalls: Underestimating the impact of scale/soot on emissivity and view factors; these can reduce radiative effectiveness. Final Answer: radiation

Question 5

To reduce stack (exhaust) heat losses from an industrial furnace, which heat-recovery strategies are appropriate?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Stack losses represent sensible heat carried away by hot flue gases. Capturing part of this energy lowers fuel consumption and improves thermal efficiency in furnaces and kilns. Given Data / Assumptions: Flue-gas temperature is above the practical recovery threshold without causing corrosion/condensation issues. Suitable heat-recovery hardware is available. Concept / Approach: Three proven strategies: (1) Preheat the charge via recuperative/regen systems or indirect exchangers; (2) Preheat combustion air to raise adiabatic flame temperature; (3) Generate steam via a waste-heat boiler for use elsewhere in the plant. Step-by-Step Solution: Quantify recoverable heat: Q = m_dot * Cp * (T_stack - T_exit).Select utilization path matching process needs: charge, air, or steam.Implement control and corrosion safeguards (e.g., maintain temperatures above acid dew point if not designed for condensing service). Verification / Alternative check: Energy audits typically identify these three avenues as primary opportunities for stack-loss reduction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Each option is valid; picking only one underutilizes potential recovery. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring fouling/soot deposition in exchangers; failing to account for increased pressure drop across recovery equipment. Final Answer: all (a), (b) and (c)

Question 6

In furnace design and operation, what provides direction and control to the internal circulation of hot gases to achieve uniform heating and efficient combustion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Gas circulation patterns in a furnace determine temperature uniformity, scale formation, and fuel economy. Properly directing flow enhances heat transfer and minimizes cold spots. Given Data / Assumptions: Industrial reheating/processing furnace with burners, ports, and load. Ability to manipulate flow using mechanical and geometric means. Concept / Approach: Flow direction is influenced by (1) fan action (forced or induced draught, internal recirculation), (2) geometric obstructions such as how the stock is arranged, and (3) placement of ports, burners, and exhausts which set the primary flow paths. Step-by-Step Solution: Use fans to establish bulk flow and pressure differentials.Arrange stock to promote even gas distribution and avoid dead zones.Place burners and outlets to shape circulation loops and ensure adequate residence time of hot gases near the load. Verification / Alternative check: Computational fluid dynamics and temperature mapping in operating furnaces confirm the influence of these three levers on flow patterns. Why Other Options Are Wrong: None individually suffices universally; optimal circulation typically requires all three. Common Pitfalls: Overlooking the impact of stock arrangement on local velocities; assuming fans alone can fix maldistribution caused by poor port layout. Final Answer: all (a), (b) and (c)

Question 7

Industrial furnaces—zone design and function Which furnace type is specifically designed with three distinct regions—preheating, main heating, and soaking zones—for uniform reheating of metal stock prior to hot-working?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Modern steelworks and forging shops require controlled temperature profiles before rolling or shaping. Industrial furnaces are therefore built with functional zones to raise, equalize, and homogenize temperature. Understanding which furnace employs preheating, heating, and soaking zones is central to thermal processing and product quality. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns common metallurgical furnaces used for ingots, slabs, billets, and blooms. Zone names: preheating (recovering heat from flue gases), main heating (rapid heat input), and soaking (equalization at setpoint). Focus is on typical industrial practice rather than niche designs. Concept / Approach: Reheating furnaces (walking beam, pusher, or walking hearth) are purpose-built with three zones. Stock enters the preheating zone, passes to the higher-temperature heating zone, and then resides in the soaking zone to even out core-surface temperatures before hot working. Soaking pits, open-hearth furnaces, and cupolas have different primary purposes or configurations. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify furnaces that process continuous stock prior to rolling: reheating furnaces.Recall the standard zoning: preheating to recover sensible heat, heating for rapid ramp-up, and soaking for uniformity.Eliminate alternatives based on function: soaking pits equalize at one level, open-hearth is for steelmaking, cupola is a shaft furnace for cast iron.Select the furnace explicitly designed with all three zones: reheating furnace. Verification / Alternative check: Process flow diagrams of walking-beam furnaces show counter-current flue gas flow in preheat and high firing in the heating zone, followed by a soak region near the discharge end. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Soaking pit: primarily a soaking chamber without staged preheat and reheat zones. Open-hearth furnace: historical steelmaking furnace, not a reheater. Cupola: vertical shaft melting furnace for cast iron; no soak zone arrangement as described. Common Pitfalls: Equating 'soaking' in a pit with the three-zone layout. Soaking pits operate at near-uniform temperature, lacking the distinct preheat/heating stages of reheaters. Final Answer: Reheating furnace

Question 8

Steel slab reheating (walking-beam type)—typical thermal efficiency For a modern steel slab reheating furnace of the walking-beam type, the overall thermal efficiency is approximately what percentage under good operating practice?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Thermal efficiency expresses how effectively a furnace converts the chemical energy of fuel into useful heat in the load. Walking-beam reheating furnaces are common in rolling mills because they provide uniform heating and minimize skid marks. Knowing typical efficiency helps benchmark fuel usage and stack losses. Given Data / Assumptions: Furnace type: walking-beam reheating furnace for slabs/billets. Normal operation with regenerative/recuperative heat recovery and good combustion control. Steady-state, well-maintained refractories and low air infiltration. Concept / Approach: Industrial references report that modern reheating furnaces achieve about 60–75% thermal efficiency with effective heat recovery, depending on charge temperature, exhaust temperature, and excess air. Values far below imply high stack losses; values much higher are rare in practice due to radiation, convection, and exhaust constraints. Step-by-Step Solution: Define thermal efficiency: useful heat to stock / fuel heat input * 100%.Consider typical stack temperatures and excess air for a walking-beam furnace with regeneration.Select the approximated central value consistent with industry practice (around 70%).Reject unrealistically low (15%, 40%) or very high (85%) figures for this furnace class. Verification / Alternative check: Heat balances of well-tuned reheaters commonly show 25–35% losses via exhaust and shell, which corresponds to ~65–75% efficiency, aligning with 70% as a representative figure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 15% and 40%: indicate severe inefficiencies; inconsistent with modern reheaters. 85%: unusually high for continuous furnaces due to inevitable exhaust/shell losses. Common Pitfalls: Confusing burner efficiency (combustion) with overall furnace thermal efficiency; the latter includes all heat losses and load recovery factors. Final Answer: 70

Question 9

Stack (chimney) loss and fuel usage—interpretation A low stack loss in furnace operation is generally an indication of which condition?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Stack loss represents sensible and chemical heat carried away by flue gases. Minimizing it is a key lever to improve furnace economy. Operators track stack temperature and oxygen/CO to infer excess air and heat recovery effectiveness. Given Data / Assumptions: Steady operation with properly tuned burners. Flue gas heat recovery (regenerators/recuperators) possibly installed. No significant unburned fuel losses. Concept / Approach: Low stack loss means lower flue-gas temperature and/or optimized excess air, hence a larger fraction of fuel energy is transferred to the load rather than exhausted. While too little air can create unburned fuel or CO losses, the question focuses on the general interpretation: low stack loss correlates with better fuel utilization when combustion is adequate. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall: Stack loss ∝ flue-gas mass flow * specific heat * (Tflue − Tamb) + chemical losses.Lower stack temperature or air leakage means less energy wasted.Efficient fuel use corresponds to transferring more heat into the stock and less to the stack.Hence, choose 'Efficient use of fuel'. Verification / Alternative check: Combustion calculators show that reducing excess air from very high values to optimal ranges cuts stack losses while maintaining complete combustion (low CO). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sub-stoichiometric air: may lower stack oxygen but raises CO/unburned fuel losses. Inefficient use: contradicts the definition of stack loss reduction. Oxygen enrichment: can reduce flue volumes but does not automatically imply low stack loss without heat recovery; it is not the direct interpretation asked. Common Pitfalls: Equating low O2 with efficiency; true efficiency needs both adequate combustion and low exhaust temperature. Final Answer: Efficient use of fuel

Question 10

Hearth versus shaft furnaces—classification check Which of the following is NOT classified as a hearth-type furnace used for heating or melting on a refractory hearth?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Furnaces can be broadly categorized by geometry and how the load is supported and heated. Hearth furnaces use a refractory hearth where material rests and is heated above. Shaft (stack) furnaces operate with a vertical burden and counter-current gas flow. Knowing the class helps predict operation and heat-transfer behavior. Given Data / Assumptions: Typical industrial furnaces for steelmaking, glass melting, and reheating are considered. Definition: hearth = horizontal refractory base; shaft = vertical packed burden. Concept / Approach: Glass tank, open-hearth, and reheating furnaces are hearth types. A cupola is a vertical shaft furnace for cast iron, operating with coke and air blast, not a hearth furnace. Therefore, the exception is the cupola. Step-by-Step Solution: List hearth types: open-hearth, glass tank, reheating furnaces.Identify cupola as a shaft furnace: vertical column, coke beds, counter-current flow.Select the non-hearth option: cupola. Verification / Alternative check: Process schematics show cupola burden charged from the top; product iron is tapped at the bottom—typical shaft operation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Glass tank furnace: molten glass pool on a hearth. Open-hearth furnace: steelmaking over a refractory hearth. Reheating furnace: stock rests/moves over hearth or beams. Common Pitfalls: Confusing blast furnace and cupola with hearth designs due to both being melt units; geometry and flow direction are the key differences. Final Answer: Cupola

Question 11

Heating of coke ovens in an integrated steel plant—fuel sources Coke oven heating is commonly carried out using which fuel(s)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Coke oven batteries require steady, controllable heating to carbonize coal into metallurgical coke. Integrated steelworks generate multiple by-product gases (coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, basic oxygen furnace gas) that can be blended to fire furnaces economically. Given Data / Assumptions: An integrated plant with gas collection and mixing facilities. Objective: maintain the coking temperature profile across heating walls. Focus on typical fuels available onsite. Concept / Approach: Coke oven gas (COG) has high calorific value and is a prime fuel for heating the ovens. Blast furnace gas (BFG), although lean, is abundant and can be mixed ('mixed gas') with COG to achieve desired calorific value and flame characteristics. Electricity is generally not used for direct firing of coke oven heating flues. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify available by-product gases: COG (rich) and BFG (lean).Recognize practice of mixed-gas firing to stabilize flame and utilize surplus BFG.Select the option acknowledging both fuels: Both (b) and (c). Verification / Alternative check: Plant energy balance diagrams routinely show COG as priority fuel for batteries and BFG as a secondary/mixed component. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Electricity: not typical for this application; indirect roles limited to auxiliaries. BFG or COG alone can be used, but the best answer reflects common mixed-gas practice. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring calorific value blending; pure BFG often cannot meet flame temperature needs without enrichment. Final Answer: Both (b) and (c)

Question 12

Raising furnace temperature with lean fuel gas—what will NOT help? When firing a furnace with a lean, low-calorific-value gas, a higher furnace temperature cannot be achieved by which of the following actions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Lean fuel gases (e.g., blast furnace gas) have low heating value and high inert content, which depress adiabatic flame temperature. Operators use several strategies to raise furnace temperature. Understanding which tactics are effective avoids wasted effort and unintended cooling. Given Data / Assumptions: Fuel is low in calorific value; excess air reasonably controlled. Furnace is draft-controlled via stack dampers or ID/FD fans. Objective: increase flame/furnace temperature. Concept / Approach: Preheating the fuel gas or the combustion air raises reactant enthalpy, directly increasing flame temperature. Oxygen enrichment reduces nitrogen ballast, increasing adiabatic flame temperature. In contrast, increasing draft generally increases cold-air infiltration and flue-gas throughput, which tends to cool the furnace and increase stack losses, not raise its temperature. Step-by-Step Solution: List measures that increase reactant temperature or oxygen concentration: fuel preheat, air preheat, O2 enrichment.Analyze draft: higher draft pulls more ambient air and increases convective losses.Conclude that raising draft will not help achieve higher furnace temperature with lean gas. Verification / Alternative check: Heat balance shows furnace temperature rises with reactant preheat and O2 enrichment, but falls with increased excess air and infiltration caused by excessive draft. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Preheating fuel or air: proven methods to raise flame temperature. Oxygen enrichment: increases theoretical flame temperature by reducing nitrogen dilution. Common Pitfalls: Confusing stack draft control for combustion intensity; excessive draft often lowers residence time and raises stack temperature, degrading efficiency. Final Answer: Increasing the draft in the furnace

Question 13

Periodic (cyclic) furnaces—identify the example Which of the following installations operates on a periodic (cyclic) principle rather than a continuous steady mode?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Thermal equipment can be continuous or periodic. Periodic (cyclic) units alternate between heating the checkerwork and delivering hot air/gases, while continuous units operate at steady conditions. Recognizing the operating principle helps in energy audits and control strategies. Given Data / Assumptions: Items listed include stoves, furnaces, and kilns commonly found in ironmaking and coke production. Periodic operation implies a repeated sequence of heating and then delivering hot gas. Concept / Approach: Blast furnace stoves are classic regenerative heaters that cycle between 'on-gas' (heating checkers with fuel) and 'on-blast' (supplying hot blast air to the furnace). The blast furnace itself, coke oven chambers, and rotary kilns are continuous in their principal duty cycles (even though coke batteries are batched per oven, their heating flues run quasi-continuously across the battery). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the unit with checker-brick regeneration and switching valves: stoves.Confirm that blast furnace, rotary kilns, and flue systems of coke ovens operate essentially continuously.Select the periodic example: blast furnace stoves. Verification / Alternative check: Hot-blast systems use at least two or three stoves cycling to maintain a continuous hot blast to the furnace while individual stoves alternate modes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Blast furnace: continuous counter-current reactor. Coke oven heating chamber: maintains continuous flue firing across the battery. Rotary kilns: continuous rotary processing. Common Pitfalls: Confusing batch charging in coking with periodic heating; the heating circuit itself is not cycled like stoves. Final Answer: Blast furnace stoves

Question 14

Lime manufacture—kiln selection for calcination of limestone Calcination of limestone (CaCO3 → CaO + CO2) to produce lime is commonly carried out in which type(s) of kiln?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Lime production requires decomposing calcium carbonate at elevated temperature. The choice of kiln affects fuel efficiency, product reactivity, and capacity. Two popular industrial choices dominate due to their heat transfer characteristics and throughput flexibility. Given Data / Assumptions: Objective: industrial-scale quicklime (CaO) production. Feed: sized limestone, controlled residence time. Technology: widely practiced, not niche laboratory methods. Concept / Approach: Rotary kilns (long cylindrical, slightly inclined, rotating) provide good solids mixing and temperature control, suitable for various stone sizes and fuels. Vertical shaft kilns are energy-efficient for uniformly sized limestone with counter-current flow. Tunnel kilns are primarily used in ceramics for firing bricks/tiles rather than lime calcination. Step-by-Step Solution: List common lime kilns: rotary and vertical shaft.Evaluate tunnel kilns: continuous car-based firing; not standard for lime.Select 'Both (b) and (c)' as the correct industrial practice. Verification / Alternative check: Industry surveys show global lime output from rotary and vertical shaft kilns, with selection driven by stone size, fuel, and capacity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tunnel kiln: uncommon for limestone calcination. Single selections (b) or (c) alone omit the other widely used kiln type. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single 'best' kiln—economics and raw material sizing often dictate the choice. Final Answer: Both (b) and (c)

Question 15

Acid dew point (ADT) of sulfur-bearing flue gas—typical value For a fuel containing about 1% sulfur, the acid dew point temperature of the flue gas is typically closest to which value (°C)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Acid dew point (ADT) is the temperature at which acid vapors (mainly H2SO4 formed from SO3 and water vapor) condense from flue gases. Below ADT, severe low-temperature corrosion of carbon steel surfaces can occur. Estimating ADT guides minimum safe metal and gas temperatures at economizers, air preheaters, and stacks. Given Data / Assumptions: Sulfur content in fuel ≈ 1% by mass. Typical excess air and flue-gas moisture content for industrial furnaces/boilers. Usual SO2 to SO3 conversion levels in conventional firing. Concept / Approach: H2SO4 condensation temperature depends on partial pressure of SO3 and H2O. For common industrial conditions with around 1% sulfur and modest SO3 formation, ADT often lies near 120–140°C. Operators therefore avoid allowing cold-end surfaces to fall below this range to prevent acid corrosion and fouling. Step-by-Step Solution: Relate sulfur in fuel to SO2 and small SO3 formation.Recognize that higher SO3 or moisture increases ADT; lower values reduce it.Choose the representative value around the middle of common practice: ~130°C.Reject far lower (80°C) or much higher (180–250°C) values for the stated sulfur level. Verification / Alternative check: Field guidelines for air preheater cold-end metal temperatures commonly target > 120–130°C at 1% S fuels to avoid acid dewpoint corrosion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 80°C: too low; would risk heavy acid condensation well before this temperature. 180°C or 250°C: associated with unusually high SO3 partial pressures or atypical conditions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing water dew point with acid dew point; the latter is significantly higher in sulfur-bearing flue gases. Final Answer: 130

Question 16

Ostwald charts in combustion engineering—purpose of use Ostwald charts are primarily employed in furnace/boiler practice for which calculation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Combustion control relies on knowing how much air is supplied relative to stoichiometric requirements. Graphical tools such as Ostwald charts help quickly interpret flue-gas analysis to estimate excess air or air deficiency, enabling tuning of burners for efficiency and low emissions. Given Data / Assumptions: Flue-gas analyzer readings (e.g., O2, CO2, CO) are available. Fuel is a typical hydrocarbon/coal gas without exotic constituents. Objective: adjust air-fuel ratio to target excess air. Concept / Approach: Ostwald charts correlate measured flue-gas constituents to excess air. By plotting CO2 and O2 (and sometimes CO), operators infer whether there is too much air (high O2, lower CO2) or too little air (CO present). This supports rapid decision-making without detailed equilibrium calculations. Step-by-Step Solution: Start from measured O2/CO2 on a dry basis.Use the chart to find corresponding percent excess air.Tune dampers/burners to approach the target excess air band that balances efficiency and complete combustion. Verification / Alternative check: Comparing chart-derived excess air to computed values using mass balance typically shows good agreement within operating accuracy, validating the chart’s use. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Absolute flue-gas temperature requires energy balance, not an Ostwald chart. Full flue-gas composition from first principles involves stoichiometry and possibly equilibrium—not a simple chart lookup. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring moisture corrections (wet vs. dry basis) can misread chart inputs; always ensure data basis matches the chart. Final Answer: Computing the excess or deficiency of combustion air

Question 17

In industrial furnace engineering, what is the highest practically achievable thermal efficiency for an air and fuel-gas preheating recuperator under good design and operation conditions? Provide the closest percentage value.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Recuperators are continuous heat exchangers that recover sensible heat from hot flue gases to preheat combustion air and sometimes fuel gas. Their thermal efficiency indicates how much of the available heat in the exhaust is transferred to the incoming streams. Understanding realistic efficiency ranges is crucial for furnace design, fuel economy, and emissions control. Given Data / Assumptions: Device: air/fuel-gas preheating recuperator. Application: high-temperature industrial furnaces with clean, steady flue gas. Well-designed metallic or ceramic units with proper surface area and flow arrangement. Concept / Approach: Thermal efficiency (η_recup) is commonly defined as: heat gained by the cold stream / maximum recoverable heat from flue gas at the stack exit reference, expressed in percent. Practical limits arise from approach temperature differences, fouling, heat loss, material constraints, and pressure drop. Recuperators typically reach high, but not perfect, effectiveness; values in the 70–85% range are achievable for well-engineered systems, whereas numbers approaching 100% are not practical. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify practical upper bound for recuperator effectiveness from industry practice: often 0.75 to 0.85.2) Recognize diminishing returns beyond ~85% due to larger surface, higher cost, more pressure drop, and closer approach temperatures.3) Compare options: 50 and 65% are feasible but not the highest; 99% is unrealistic for recuperators.4) Therefore, the closest realistic maximum is 85%. Verification / Alternative check: Cross-check against typical vendor data and furnace energy audits, which commonly cite ~80–85% for high-performance recuperators, with regenerators sometimes higher but by a different mechanism (periodic heat storage). Why Other Options Are Wrong: 50%: Too conservative for modern designs.65%: Achievable but not the highest practical figure.99%: Physically unrealistic for continuous recuperators due to finite approach temperatures and losses. Common Pitfalls: Confusing recuperators with regenerators (which can show higher apparent effectiveness).Ignoring fouling and pressure drop penalties that limit efficiency gains. Final Answer: 85

Question 18

Furnace combustion control: to maintain a deliberately reducing atmosphere inside a process furnace, which flue-gas characteristic should be present?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Industrial furnaces sometimes require a reducing atmosphere to prevent oxidation, scale formation, or to promote specific metallurgical reactions. Atmosphere control is verified via flue-gas analysis. Knowing which gas indicates a reducing condition is a core skill in furnace operation and combustion tuning. Given Data / Assumptions: Fuel-fired furnace with controllable air-to-fuel ratio. Reducing atmosphere means oxygen potential is low; reducing species like CO or H2 can exist. Flue-gas sampling is representative of furnace conditions. Concept / Approach: When combustion air is sub-stoichiometric, incomplete combustion forms carbon monoxide (CO). Presence of CO signifies oxygen deficiency and a reducing environment. Conversely, measurable O2 in flue gas indicates excess air (oxidizing). High excess air further increases O2 and lowers CO, pushing conditions away from reducing. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Define reducing atmosphere: oxygen activity is low; reducing gases present (CO, H2).2) Identify indicator gas: CO presence suggests sub-stoichiometric combustion.3) Examine options: “no O2” may occur, but CO is the practical marker technicians use; “high excess air” is opposite of reducing.4) Conclude that CO in flue gas is the operational signature of a reducing furnace. Verification / Alternative check: Combustion curves (O2 vs. CO) show CO rises sharply as air is reduced below stoichiometric, confirming reducing conditions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: no O2 in flue gas: Possible, but absence alone is less reliable than positive CO presence; traces of O2 measurement error can mislead.high excess air: Produces oxidizing atmosphere, not reducing.none of these: Incorrect because CO is the standard indicator. Common Pitfalls: Relying only on O2 analyzers without CO measurement.Over-reducing, leading to efficiency loss and safety issues. Final Answer: CO in flue gas

Question 19

In blast furnace (BF) stove operation, which fuel is ordinarily fired to heat the checkerwork for hot-blast generation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: BF stoves heat combustion air (the hot blast) for ironmaking. The fuel choice impacts economy and integration of the steelworks energy system. Understanding typical fuels used in stoves is basic to iron and steel plant practice. Given Data / Assumptions: Integrated steel plant with blast furnace, coke ovens, and stoves. Avalability of by-product gases: blast furnace gas (BFG) and sometimes mixed gas (BFG blended with coke oven gas, COG). Goal: economical, stable firing of stove checkerwork. Concept / Approach: Blast furnace gas is produced in large volume with low calorific value but is ideal for continuous combustion in stoves. Plants often use BFG alone or as mixed gas (BFG + COG) to stabilize flame and calorific value, maximizing internal energy recovery and reducing purchased fuel. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify by-product gas stream: BFG is abundant and cheap.2) Recognize common practice: fire stoves on BFG; supplement or blend with COG as mixed gas if needed.3) Compare options: pulverised coal or oil can be used in special cases, but standard operation favors BFG/mixed gas.4) Select the best answer: “blast furnace gas/mixed gas.” Verification / Alternative check: Typical steelworks energy flow diagrams show BFG routed to stoves and power boilers; COG is higher CV and often blended for stability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: pulverised coal: Not the standard fuel for BF stoves.furnace oil: Possible backup, but not common primary fuel.coke oven gas: Used, but usually as a blend; “BFG/mixed gas” captures normal practice. Common Pitfalls: Confusing hot-blast stoves with boiler firing systems.Ignoring plant-wide fuel integration strategies. Final Answer: blast furnace gas/mixed gas

Question 20

Reverberatory furnace fundamentals: the charged material is heated primarily by which heat-transfer mechanism within the combustion chamber?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Reverberatory furnaces are used to melt or refine materials by reflecting (reverberating) radiant heat from the roof and walls onto the charge. Understanding the dominant heat-transfer mode drives refractory selection, burner layout, and thermal efficiency improvements. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard reverberatory design with a hot roof/arch above the charge. Flame and hot combustion products circulate above, not through, the charge. Charge is spread in a hearth exposed to thermal radiation. Concept / Approach: At high furnace temperatures, radiative heat transfer dominates due to the T^4 dependence of radiative flux. Roof and refractory surfaces, heated by the flame, radiate strongly toward the charge. Conduction is limited to solid–solid contact areas; natural convection contributes but is secondary to radiation at these temperatures. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify operating temperature regime: high, favoring radiation.2) Note geometry: roof and walls act as radiating surfaces toward the hearth.3) Evaluate options: radiation from the roof is the principal mechanism.4) Conclude the correct mechanism: radiation from roof/arch to the charge. Verification / Alternative check: Thermal balance analyses of reverberatory furnaces attribute the majority of charge heating to radiant transfer from hot refractory surfaces and flame radiation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: conduction: Minor, limited by contact.natural convection: Occurs, but contributes less than radiation at high temperatures.none of these: Incorrect because radiation from the roof is well established. Common Pitfalls: Underestimating the role of refractory emissivity.Assuming convection dominates at all temperatures. Final Answer: radiation of heat from the roof of the combustion chamber.

Furnace Technology Questions