Cascading adders: result of two 4-bit blocks If you cascade two standard 4-bit binary adders (properly connecting carry-out to carry-in), what width of a parallel adder can you construct?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 8-bit parallel-adder circuit

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Modular design allows wider arithmetic units to be built from smaller ICs. A classic example is using two 4-bit adder ICs (such as 74xx83) with the carry chain properly linked to realize an 8-bit adder. Understanding cascading is fundamental to building scalable datapaths.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Each IC implements a 4-bit parallel adder with carry-in and carry-out.
  • Carry-out of the lower nibble feeds carry-in of the upper nibble.
  • Inputs and sums are arranged to form a continuous 8-bit addition.


Concept / Approach:
Parallel adders add all bits of each operand simultaneously, with the carries rippling from least significant to most significant positions. By chaining two 4-bit blocks, you extend the operand width to 8 bits, preserving the same arithmetic behavior with a longer carry path.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Take two 4-bit adders: lower handles bits 3..0, upper handles bits 7..4.Connect CO (lower) → CI (upper) to propagate carries.Wire operand bits accordingly and collect an 8-bit sum plus a final carry-out.Resulting function: an 8-bit parallel-adder circuit.


Verification / Alternative check:
Timing analysis shows ripple-carry delay accumulates across both devices; this matches expectations for an 8-bit adder built from two 4-bit blocks.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

16-bit adder: would require four 4-bit adders.Full-adder circuit: each 4-bit IC already contains multiple full adders; cascading yields a wider parallel adder, not a single full adder.Arithmetic-logic unit: an ALU includes more than addition (logic ops, shifts); two adders alone are insufficient.


Common Pitfalls:
Forgetting the carry chain; without CO→CI linkage the upper nibble ignores carries.



Final Answer:
8-bit parallel-adder circuit

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion