In C, printf return value in an if-condition with an empty C-string literal element.
#include
int main()
{
int i;
char a[] = "\0"; /* a[0] == 0, array is a valid empty string */
if (printf("%s", a))
printf("The string is empty
");
else
printf("The string is not empty
");
return 0;
}
-
AThe string is empty
-
BThe string is not empty
-
CNo output
-
D0
-
EUndefined behavior at runtime
Answer
Correct Answer: The string is not empty
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This tests a subtle C behavior: printf returns the number of characters printed. When you pass an empty string to printf("%s", a), nothing is printed, and printf returns 0. The if-condition uses that return value directly.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- a is an array with the contents "\0". It is a valid empty C-string (first char is 0).
- printf("%s", a) prints zero characters and returns 0.
- The if-else chooses the branch based on this return value.
Concept / Approach:In C, printf returns an int: the count of characters printed (or a negative value on error). Therefore, if (printf(...)) executes the then-branch only if at least one character was printed. For an empty string, it will execute the else-branch.
Step-by-Step Solution:Evaluate printf("%s", a) with a = "" → prints nothing → returns 0.Condition if (0) is false → else-branch runs.Program prints: "The string is not empty".
Verification / Alternative check:Change a to "X". printf will return 1, and the then-branch will run, printing "The string is empty". This demonstrates the dependence on printf’s return value.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:(a) would require a nonzero return. (c) There is output from the else-branch. (d) The program prints a string, not the number 0. (e) Nothing undefined occurs; the code is valid standard C.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming if(printf(...)) tests whether the string is empty; forgetting that printf returns a count, not a boolean.
Final Answer:The string is not empty