Statement–Assumption — “Despite strong opposition, the Prohibition of Forcible Conversion of Religion Bill was passed by the Tamil Nadu Assembly.” Assumptions: I. Conversions (especially forcible) can inflame passions and trigger communal clashes. II. Conversions only lead to isolation of the converted. III. Strong opposition typically hinders a bill’s progress toward becoming law.

Introduction / Context:
The news note emphasizes passage “despite strong opposition,” signaling that the subject is socially sensitive and that opposition ordinarily poses hurdles.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Forcible conversion is politically and socially contentious.
• Legislative opposition usually reduces a bill’s chances.

Concept / Approach:
What must be assumed for the headline to be meaningful? (a) That conversions can create communal tensions (making the bill salient), and (b) that strong opposition is an obstacle (making the “despite” clause informative). The claim that conversions “only” lead to isolation is an extreme overgeneralization not required.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I aligns with the perceived rationale for such a bill (public order concerns) and underlies the newsworthiness.2) II uses “only,” asserting isolation as the sole outcome; the report does not commit to this and does not need it.3) III explains why “despite strong opposition” is noteworthy—opposition usually hinders passage—therefore implicit.

Verification / Alternative check:
Headline framing conventions highlight unusual outcomes (passage in face of headwinds).

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Including II adds an unnecessary absolute claim; excluding I or III erases core reasons the passage is highlighted.

Common Pitfalls:
Accepting “only” statements as necessary when the report is neutral.

Final Answer:
Only I and III