For pick-and-place industrial robots, what is a plausible best-case positioning accuracy achievable on high-precision systems?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: + 0.0005 inches

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Accuracy and repeatability are critical specifications for pick-and-place robots used in electronics assembly, metrology, and micro-manufacturing. Best-in-class systems can position parts within microns, enabling tasks such as die bonding or precision inspection. The question asks you to recognize a realistic best-case figure in inches.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • We are referring to high-precision, well-calibrated systems under controlled conditions.
  • Accuracy and repeatability are often specified separately; values may differ.
  • Environmental controls (temperature, vibration) and calibration influence results.


Concept / Approach:
Top-tier Cartesian or SCARA pick-and-place platforms can deliver positioning accuracy and repeatability on the order of tens of micrometers. The value +0.0005 inches corresponds to about 12.7 micrometers, which is within the realm of precision assembly robots. Larger figures (e.g., 0.05 inches) are suited to less precise handling and do not represent “as good as” capability.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Convert candidate values to micrometers to sanity-check magnitudes. 0.0005 in ≈ 12.7 µm; 0.008 in ≈ 203 µm; 0.05 in ≈ 1270 µm. Select the smallest credible error for best-case high-precision systems. Choose +0.0005 inches.


Verification / Alternative check:
Vendor datasheets for precision pick-and-place and SCARA arms list repeatability in the 5–20 µm range, consistent with the +0.0005 inches figure as a plausible best case.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

B: +0.05 inches is far too coarse for precision pick-and-place. C: 0.008 inches is much larger than best-case specifications. D: A percentage error is not a standard absolute positioning specification here. E: Not applicable since a credible figure exists.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing accuracy with repeatability; a robot may be very repeatable yet less accurate without calibration or vision correction.


Final Answer:
+ 0.0005 inches

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion