Statement–Argument (Ban on Professionals Seeking Jobs Abroad): Statement: Should India impose a complete ban on Indian professionals taking jobs abroad after being educated in India? Arguments: I) Yes, it is the only way to sustain the current pace of technological development domestically. II) No, Indians abroad remit substantial foreign exchange, aiding reserves. III) No, experience gained overseas helps India’s economy when knowledge returns or networks form. Choose the strongest evaluation.

Introduction / Context:
Labour mobility has costs (brain drain) and benefits (remittances, skill/knowledge inflows). A blanket ban is extreme and likely counterproductive.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Remittances bolster foreign exchange reserves.
• Global exposure can transfer skills, networks, and capital back to India.
• “Only way” claims should be treated skeptically when alternatives exist.

Concept / Approach:
II and III present concrete, economy-wide benefits from mobility. I asserts exclusivity without evidence and ignores incentives/retention policies.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: False necessity; ignores scholarships-with-service or R&D incentives ⇒ weak.II: Remittance channel is real and material ⇒ strong.III: Knowledge/innovation spillovers via diaspora ⇒ strong.

Verification / Alternative check:
Many countries leverage diaspora networks rather than bans; this supports II and III.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Including I validates an extreme, unjustified claim; “None” ignores clear benefits.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming mobility only causes loss; ignoring circular migration.

Final Answer:
Only II and III are strong.