Inventory control: which managerial action will <em>reduce</em> the average inventory level held by a firm, all else being equal?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: decreasing the order quantity

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Average inventory influences working capital, storage costs, and service levels. In classic Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) logic and cycle stock analysis, average on-hand is driven primarily by order quantity and demand variability.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Deterministic demand, constant usage rate (EOQ assumptions).
  • Replenishment in batches (lot sizing).
  • We are isolating impact on average inventory, not safety stock alone.


Concept / Approach:
Average cycle stock in a simple lot-size model equals Q / 2, where Q is the order quantity. Reducing Q reduces the average on-hand. Reorder point and lead time affect when to order and influence safety stock or pipeline inventory more than the basic cycle stock component.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Define cycle stock average: Avg = Q / 2 under steady usage and instantaneous replenishment.Assess each lever's effect on Q: decreasing Q lowers Q / 2 directly.Note that lowering reorder point or lead time reduces safety or pipeline components, but the dominant cycle stock driver remains Q.


Verification / Alternative check:
EOQ formula Q* = sqrt( (2 * D * S) / H ). Reducing Q via smaller lots (e.g., through setup reduction) lowers both Q and average inventory.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Lowering the reorder point: can reduce safety stock slightly, but not the cycle stock component defined by Q.
  • Increasing usage rate: tends to increase order frequency and may not lower average on-hand; can increase pipeline inventory.
  • Decreasing vendor lead time: reduces pipeline/safety stock, but without changing Q, average cycle stock remains Q / 2.


Common Pitfalls:
Conflating safety stock and cycle stock; the most direct lever for average inventory is order quantity.



Final Answer:
decreasing the order quantity

More Questions from Management Information Systems

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion