Q: Find the decimal value of the fraction 16/3.

Introduction / Context: This question examines your ability to divide an improper fraction and express the result as a decimal. Such conversions appear frequently in word problems, average calculations and financial computations. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 16/3. We must express 16/3 as a decimal. The options provide decimal approximations rounded to two decimal places. Concept / Approach: An improper fraction has a numerator larger than its denominator. To convert it to a decimal, we perform long division of the numerator by the denominator. Since 3 is not a factor of a power of 10, the decimal will be repeating. We only need a correct approximation up to two decimal places. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Divide 16 by 3: 3 goes into 16 five times (5 * 3 = 15) with a remainder of 1.Step 2: Write 5 as the whole part and carry the remainder to the decimal part.Step 3: Bring down a zero to make 10. 3 goes into 10 three times (3 * 3 = 9) with a remainder of 1 again.Step 4: The pattern of remainder 1 repeats, so the decimal 5.3333... continues indefinitely.Step 5: Rounding 5.3333... to two decimal places gives 5.33. Verification / Alternative check: We can write 16/3 = 15/3 + 1/3 = 5 + 1/3. Since 1/3 is 0.3333..., adding it to 5 gives 5.3333..., which agrees with the division approach and again rounds to 5.33. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 6 is too large because 18/3 = 6, and 16/3 is less than that. Values 5.74 and 5.68 do not correspond to simple thirds and are far from the true repeating decimal 5.3333..., so they are approximations with no basis in the actual division. Common Pitfalls: Some test takers mistakenly round 5.3333... to 5.3 or 5.4. When rounding to two decimal places, always look at the third decimal digit to decide whether to round up or not. Here the third digit is 3, so 5.33 remains unchanged. Final Answer: The decimal equivalent of 16/3, correct to two decimal places, is 5.33.

Q: Express the fraction 2/3 as a decimal number.

Introduction / Context: This problem focuses on converting the fraction 2/3 into its decimal representation. Mastering such conversions is important for questions on percentages, ratios and proportional reasoning. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 2/3. We must find its decimal form. Options are rounded decimals, so we must round correctly. Concept / Approach: To convert a fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator by the denominator: here 2 ÷ 3. Because 3 does not divide an exact power of 10, the result is a repeating decimal. We will then round to two decimal places since the options are given that way. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Perform the division 2 ÷ 3.Step 2: 3 goes into 2 zero times, so write 0. and consider 2.000.Step 3: 3 goes into 20 six times (6 * 3 = 18) with remainder 2, giving 0.6 so far.Step 4: Bring down another 0 to again get 20. The same pattern repeats, giving another 6. The decimal is 0.6666..., a repeating decimal.Step 5: Rounding 0.6666... to two decimal places yields 0.67. Verification / Alternative check: We know that 1/3 = 0.3333... and that 2/3 = 2 * (1/3) = 0.6666.... This provides a quick mental check and again confirms that rounding to two decimal places gives 0.67. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.47 is too small and does not relate to thirds. 6.77 is a number greater than 6, while 2/3 is less than 1, so it is impossible. 0.07 is far smaller than the true value. Only 0.67 is a reasonable approximation of 0.6666... Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes mistakenly round 0.6666... to 0.66, but the third decimal digit is 6, so the second decimal place should be rounded up to 7. Another confusion arises when people misplace the decimal point and think 2/3 is 2.3 or 0.23. Always remember 2/3 is less than 1 but greater than 0.5. Final Answer: The decimal form of 2/3, rounded to two decimal places, is 0.67.

Question 1

Find the missing number in the equation: 138.009 + 341.981 − 146.305 = 123.600 + ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests your ability to handle decimal addition and subtraction and to solve for an unknown value in a simple equation. Accurate decimal arithmetic is essential in financial calculations, measurements, and data analysis. Given Data / Assumptions: Given identity: 138.009 + 341.981 − 146.305 = 123.600 + ?. We must find the value of the missing number represented by the question mark. All values are decimals with three decimal places, and we assume exact arithmetic. Concept / Approach: We first simplify the left hand side by performing decimal addition and subtraction. The simplified result is the total value on the left side. Then we set this equal to 123.600 plus the unknown and rearrange the equation to solve for the unknown. This is a standard linear equation technique: unknown = total − known part. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the sum of 138.009 and 341.981. Step 2: 138.009 + 341.981 = 479.990. Step 3: Subtract 146.305 from 479.990: 479.990 − 146.305 = 333.685. Step 4: So the left hand side equals 333.685. Step 5: The equation is now 333.685 = 123.600 + ?. Step 6: Rearrange to find the unknown: ? = 333.685 − 123.600. Step 7: Perform the subtraction: 333.685 − 123.600 = 210.085. Verification / Alternative check: Substitute ? = 210.085 back into the right hand side. Compute 123.600 + 210.085 = 333.685. This matches the simplified left hand side, which confirms that the equation is balanced. Therefore 210.085 is the correct value for the missing number. We can also check that decimal alignment was handled correctly in each step, especially in subtraction where mistakes are common. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 199.570 would give 123.600 + 199.570 = 323.170, which is too small compared to 333.685. 295.050 gives 123.600 + 295.050 = 418.650, which is much larger than 333.685. 120.085 gives 243.685, which again does not match the left side. Common Pitfalls: A frequent error is misaligning decimal points when adding or subtracting, which leads to incorrect results. Another issue is subtracting the smaller number from the larger without carefully tracking the correct order. Always write decimals with the same number of decimal places and subtract column by column. Final Answer: The missing number that balances the equation is 210.085.

Question 2

What is the decimal representation of the fraction 1/5, written as a terminating decimal number?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to convert the fraction 1/5 into an exact decimal. Fractions with a denominator that divides a power of 10 yield terminating decimals, and recognizing these common conversions makes many calculations much faster. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 1/5. We must express 1/5 as a decimal. Standard base 10 decimal representation is used. Concept / Approach: To convert 1/5 to decimal, we divide 1 by 5. A shortcut is to notice that 5 goes into 10 exactly 2 times, and therefore 1/5 is equal to 2/10, which is 0.2. We then write this decimal with three decimal places if needed, as 0.200, which has the same value as 0.2. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the fraction as division: 1/5 means 1 divided by 5. Step 2: Because 5 does not divide 1 directly, consider 1.0 instead. Step 3: 5 goes into 10 exactly two times, so 1/5 = 0.2. Step 4: Writing 0.2 as 0.200 does not change its value, it only changes the number of decimal places. Step 5: Therefore, as a decimal with three decimal places, 1/5 equals 0.200. Verification / Alternative check: Multiply 0.200 by 5 to confirm. 0.200 * 5 = 1.000, which matches the original numerator. This confirms that 0.200 is the correct decimal representation. Additionally, many learners remember that 20 percent corresponds to 1/5, and 20 percent as a decimal is 0.20 or 0.200. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.333 is close to 1/3, not 1/5. 0.666 is close to 2/3, which is much larger than 1/5. 0.452 does not have any simple fraction equivalent like 1/5 and does not match when multiplied back by 5. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse 1/5 with 1/4 and think of 0.25, or they attempt long division but misplace the decimal. Another mistake is to assume 1/5 equals 0.5, which is 1/2. Always check by multiplying the decimal candidate by the denominator to see if you get the original numerator. Final Answer: The decimal representation of 1/5 is 0.200.

Question 3

Express the decimals 0.875 and 0.375 as fractions in simplest form and choose the correct pair.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your ability to convert two terminating decimals into fractions and then simplify those fractions. It is a direct extension of basic decimal to fraction conversion and is useful when working with ratios, probabilities, and percentage calculations. Given Data / Assumptions: First decimal: 0.875. Second decimal: 0.375. We must express both as fractions in simplest form and then select the correct pair. Concept / Approach: For a decimal with three digits after the decimal point, we can initially write it as a fraction over 1000 and then simplify by dividing numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor. We apply this procedure separately to 0.875 and 0.375 and then match the results with the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert 0.875 to a fraction. It has three decimal places, so write 0.875 as 875/1000. Step 2: Simplify 875/1000. Both 875 and 1000 are divisible by 125. 875 / 125 = 7 and 1000 / 125 = 8, so 0.875 = 7/8. Step 3: Convert 0.375 to a fraction. It also has three decimal places, so write 0.375 as 375/1000. Step 4: Simplify 375/1000. Both are divisible by 125. 375 / 125 = 3 and 1000 / 125 = 8, so 0.375 = 3/8. Step 5: Therefore, the correct pair is 7/8 and 3/8. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by reconverting the fractions to decimals. 7/8 equals 0.875, because 1/8 is 0.125 and 7 times that is 0.875. Similarly, 3/8 equals 0.375, since 3 times 0.125 is 0.375. This confirms that the pair 7/8 and 3/8 is correct. None of the other answer choices correspond to these decimal values when converted back. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 3/11 and 7/11 are repeating decimals with denominators 11 and do not equal 0.875 or 0.375. 7/9 and 9/13 give different decimal values far from 0.875 and 0.375. 7/9 and 9/11 also do not match the given decimals and do not simplify to eighths. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to divide 875 and 1000 by 25 or 5 but not continue simplification, leaving the fraction not fully reduced. Another issue is miscounting decimal places and writing 0.875 as 875/100 or 875/10000. Always match the number of decimal digits with the correct power of 10 in the denominator and then simplify completely. Final Answer: The correct pair of fractions is 7/8 and 3/8.

Question 4

When the decimal 0.46 is written as a fraction in simplest form, what is the sum of the numerator and denominator?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Here you are asked to convert a decimal into its simplest fraction form and then compute the sum of the numerator and denominator. This type of question checks both conversion skills and your ability to simplify fractions correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: Decimal given: 0.46. We must convert 0.46 to a fraction and simplify it. Finally, we add the numerator and denominator of the simplified fraction. Concept / Approach: A decimal with two places can be written as a fraction over 100. Then we reduce this fraction by dividing numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor. After finding the simplest fraction, we add its numerator and denominator to answer the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write 0.46 as a fraction with denominator 100. Since there are two decimal places, 0.46 = 46/100. Step 2: Find the greatest common divisor of 46 and 100. Both are divisible by 2. Step 3: Divide numerator and denominator by 2: 46 / 2 = 23 and 100 / 2 = 50. Step 4: The simplest form of 0.46 is therefore 23/50. Step 5: Now add the numerator and denominator: 23 + 50 = 73. Verification / Alternative check: To verify that 23/50 is correct, convert it back to decimal. Compute 23 ÷ 50. Multiply numerator and denominator by 2 to see that 23/50 = 46/100, which is 0.46. This confirms that our simplified fraction is correct and that the sum of numerator and denominator is indeed 73. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 69 would require a different pair of numerator and denominator such as 19/50, which does not equal 0.46. 96 might come from miscalculations such as 46 + 50 or incorrect simplification steps. 41 could arise if someone incorrectly simplified 46/100 to 21/20 or another wrong fraction, which does not match 0.46. Common Pitfalls: Some learners attempt to cancel by 5 or 10 first and stop early, not reaching the simplest fraction. Others may mistakenly write 0.46 as 46/1000. Always match the decimal places to the correct power of 10 and then reduce by the largest common factor. Double check by converting back to decimal if unsure. Final Answer: The sum of the numerator and denominator in simplest form is 73.

Question 5

If 6.46 represents the recurring decimal 6.464646..., which of the following fractions is exactly equal to this recurring decimal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question involves converting a recurring decimal into an exact fraction. Recurring decimals are common in division results and understanding how to express them as fractions is a key concept in number systems and aptitude exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Recurring decimal: 6.464646..., where the block 46 repeats. We must write this recurring decimal as an exact fraction. The repeating block has two digits, namely 46. Concept / Approach: For a recurring decimal with repeating block of length two, we can use an algebraic method. Let x be the recurring decimal. By multiplying x by 100, we shift the decimal point two places to the right, aligning the repeating parts, and then subtract the original x. This eliminates the repeating part and leaves a simple equation in x that we can solve. Finally, we simplify the resulting fraction. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let x = 6.464646... Step 2: Since the repeating block has two digits, multiply x by 100: 100x = 646.464646... Step 3: Subtract the original x from this equation: 100x − x = 646.464646... − 6.464646... Step 4: The repeating parts cancel, leaving 99x = 640. Step 5: Solve for x: x = 640 / 99. Step 6: Therefore the recurring decimal 6.464646... equals the fraction 640/99. Verification / Alternative check: We can perform a rough decimal check by dividing 640 by 99. The result is a value a little above 6.46, and the digits 46 repeat, which matches the given repeating decimal. Since the algebraic method is standard and the arithmetic is straightforward, 640/99 is confirmed as the correct fraction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 640/90 simplifies to 64/9, which is about 7.11, not 6.46 recurring. 64000/99 is roughly 646.46, which is much larger than 6.46. 640/9 equals about 71.11, which again does not match the given decimal. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to treat 6.46 as a terminating decimal instead of a recurring one and write it as 646/100. Another error occurs if you multiply by 10 rather than 100 for a two digit repeating block. Always match the length of the repeating block with the power of 10 used in the multiplication step. Final Answer: The recurring decimal 6.464646... is exactly equal to 640/99.

Question 6

Given that 52416 ÷ 312 = 168, what will be the quotient when 52.416 is divided by 0.0168?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of how scaling both the dividend and the divisor of a division problem by the same factor affects the quotient. It also involves decimal placement and powers of ten, which are key in simplifying decimal division. Given Data / Assumptions: Known quotient: 52416 ÷ 312 = 168. We must find the value of 52.416 ÷ 0.0168. All values are exact, and we assume standard decimal arithmetic. Concept / Approach: Dividing two numbers does not change if we multiply both numbers by the same non zero factor. In decimal division, we often choose a power of ten to remove decimals. Here we can express 52.416 and 0.0168 in a way that relates them to 52416 and 312 by an appropriate scaling factor. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Observe that 52.416 is 52416 divided by 1000. In other words, 52.416 = 52416 / 1000. Step 2: Observe that 0.0168 is 16.8 divided by 1000, and 16.8 equals 168/10, so 0.0168 = 168 / 10000. Step 3: Write the division: 52.416 ÷ 0.0168 = (52416 / 1000) ÷ (168 / 10000). Step 4: Rewrite the division as multiplication: (52416 / 1000) × (10000 / 168). Step 5: Simplify the powers of ten: (52416 / 1000) × (10000 / 168) = 52416 × (10 / 168). Step 6: Notice that 52416 ÷ 312 = 168 is given. Rearranging, 52416 = 168 × 312. Step 7: Replace 52416 with 168 × 312 in our expression and simplify; the calculation leads to a final quotient of 3120. Verification / Alternative check: We can directly compute 52.416 ÷ 0.0168 by scaling both numbers by 1000 to remove decimals in the divisor. Multiply numerator and denominator by 1000 to get 52416 ÷ 16.8. Multiply by 10 again to remove the remaining decimal in 16.8, obtaining 524160 ÷ 168. Now use the given relation 52416 ÷ 312 = 168 to see that 524160 ÷ 168 equals 3120. This confirms our result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 32.10 is too small and does not match the effect of dividing by a very small number like 0.0168. 321.0 is also too small; the quotient should increase significantly when dividing by a small decimal. 3.120 is far too small and results from a misunderstanding of decimal placement and scaling. Common Pitfalls: Common mistakes include dividing 52.416 by 16.8 directly without properly accounting for the shift in decimal places or thinking that both numbers should be scaled differently. Always remember that multiplying both dividend and divisor by the same non zero number leaves the quotient unchanged and can greatly simplify decimal division. Final Answer: The quotient when 52.416 is divided by 0.0168 is 3120.

Question 7

Evaluate the expression (10.3 × 10.3 × 10.3 + 1) ÷ (10.3 × 10.3 − 10.3 + 1) and give the result as a decimal.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem uses a special algebraic identity involving cubes and squares. Even though the numbers are decimals, the structure still follows the identity. Recognizing such patterns is very helpful in simplifying complicated looking expressions without heavy computation. Given Data / Assumptions: Numerator: 10.3 × 10.3 × 10.3 + 1, which is 10.3^3 + 1. Denominator: 10.3 × 10.3 − 10.3 + 1, which is 10.3^2 − 10.3 + 1. We must compute (10.3^3 + 1) / (10.3^2 − 10.3 + 1). Concept / Approach: The algebraic identity a^3 + 1 = (a + 1) * (a^2 − a + 1) holds for any real number a, including decimals. Here, a is 10.3. This means the numerator factors nicely, and the denominator is exactly the quadratic factor in that identity. Therefore, dividing the numerator by the denominator simply leaves the factor a + 1, which is 10.3 + 1. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let a = 10.3. Step 2: Recognize the identity a^3 + 1 = (a + 1) * (a^2 − a + 1). Step 3: The numerator is a^3 + 1 = 10.3^3 + 1. Step 4: The denominator is a^2 − a + 1 = 10.3^2 − 10.3 + 1. Step 5: Therefore, (a^3 + 1) / (a^2 − a + 1) = (a + 1) * (a^2 − a + 1) / (a^2 − a + 1). Step 6: The factor (a^2 − a + 1) cancels, leaving simply a + 1. Step 7: Compute a + 1 = 10.3 + 1 = 11.3. Verification / Alternative check: We could also perform an approximate numerical check. Compute 10.3^2 ≈ 106.09 and 10.3^3 ≈ 1092.727. Then the numerator is approximately 1092.727 + 1 = 1093.727 and the denominator is about 106.09 − 10.3 + 1 = 96.79. Dividing 1093.727 by 96.79 gives a value near 11.3, which confirms the algebraic result and shows that the identity works correctly for decimals. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 12.3 would correspond to a different identity or arithmetic result and is larger than the actual value. 13.3 and 14.3 are progressively larger and do not match the simplified expression a + 1 for a = 10.3. Common Pitfalls: Learners who do not recognize the identity may try to compute 10.3^3 and 10.3^2 exactly, increasing the risk of decimal errors. Others may misremember the identity a^3 − 1 instead of a^3 + 1. Always verify the pattern of signs in the identity before applying it and remember that it works equally well for decimal values. Final Answer: The expression evaluates to 11.3.

Question 8

By how much is the decimal number 0.127 greater than the fraction 1/8?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem combines decimal and fraction arithmetic. You need to compare a decimal value with a fraction and express their difference as another fraction. This is useful in accuracy analysis and error calculations where small differences are often expressed as fractions. Given Data / Assumptions: Decimal given: 0.127. Fraction for comparison: 1/8. We must find 0.127 − 1/8 and express the result as a fraction in simplest form. Concept / Approach: We can either convert the fraction 1/8 to a decimal and subtract, or convert the decimal 0.127 to a fraction and subtract fractions. Since 1/8 has a known decimal 0.125, comparing 0.127 and 0.125 is straightforward. The difference can then be written as a decimal and further converted to a fraction by recognizing its place value. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert 1/8 to decimal. From earlier questions, 1/8 = 0.125. Step 2: Compute the difference between the decimals: 0.127 − 0.125. Step 3: Subtraction gives 0.002. Step 4: Now express 0.002 as a fraction. There are three decimal places, so 0.002 = 2/1000. Step 5: Simplify 2/1000 by dividing numerator and denominator by 2, obtaining 1/500. Step 6: Therefore, 0.127 is greater than 1/8 by 1/500. Verification / Alternative check: We can confirm by converting 1/500 back to decimal. 1/500 equals 0.002 because 1 divided by 500 can be written as 2 divided by 1000. Adding this difference to 0.125 gives 0.125 + 0.002 = 0.127, which matches the given decimal. Thus, the fractional difference 1/500 is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1/100 equals 0.01, which is much larger than the small difference of 0.002. 1/1500 is approximately 0.000666, which is smaller than 0.002 and does not match the difference. 1/2 equals 0.5, which is far too large and clearly incorrect in this context. Common Pitfalls: A common error is misplacing the decimal when subtracting 0.127 and 0.125 and getting 0.012 or 0.02. Another pitfall is writing 0.002 as 2/100 or 1/50, which misrepresents the place value. Always count the number of decimal digits to write the correct power of 10 in the denominator and then reduce the fraction carefully. Final Answer: The number 0.127 is greater than 1/8 by 1/500.

Question 9

Evaluate the expression (25.7322)^2 − (15.7322)^2 and choose the correct value rounded to two decimal places.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question uses the difference of squares identity to simplify an expression involving squares of decimals. Instead of squaring both numbers directly and subtracting, we can apply the algebraic identity to save time and reduce arithmetic complexity. Given Data / Assumptions: Expression: (25.7322)^2 − (15.7322)^2. We must compute the result and match it with the closest value among the options. The decimals are given with four decimal places, and we work with standard arithmetic. Concept / Approach: We use the identity a^2 − b^2 = (a − b) * (a + b). This identity holds for all real numbers, including decimals. Here a = 25.7322 and b = 15.7322. The identity reduces the need for two separate squarings and a subtraction, and instead turns the expression into a product of a simple difference and sum of the two numbers. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let a = 25.7322 and b = 15.7322. Step 2: Apply the identity a^2 − b^2 = (a − b) * (a + b). Step 3: Compute a − b: 25.7322 − 15.7322 = 10.0000. Step 4: Compute a + b: 25.7322 + 15.7322 = 41.4644. Step 5: Now compute the product: (a − b) * (a + b) = 10.0000 * 41.4644. Step 6: Multiplying by 10 shifts the decimal point one place, giving 414.644. Step 7: Rounding 414.644 to two decimal places gives 414.64. Verification / Alternative check: As a rough check, we can approximate the numbers. 25.7322 is near 25.73 and 15.7322 is near 15.73. Their difference is still about 10 and their sum is about 41.46, giving a product close to 414.6. This matches our more precise calculation. Therefore the option 414.64 is consistent with both exact algebraic reasoning and approximate numerical checks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 214.64 is about half the correct value and corresponds to an incorrect difference or sum in the identity. 314.64 is closer but still significantly below the accurate result of about 414.64. 412.64 is close but does not match the exact product of 10 and 41.4644 rounded to two decimal places. Common Pitfalls: Without the identity, many learners attempt to compute each square directly, which is lengthy and prone to decimal errors. Others may subtract first and then square, incorrectly computing (a − b)^2 instead of a^2 − b^2. Always read the expression carefully and apply the appropriate identity to simplify the work. Final Answer: The value of (25.7322)^2 − (15.7322)^2, rounded to two decimal places, is 414.64.

Question 10

In the equation 54.?3 + 543 + 5.43 = 603.26, what digit should replace the question mark to make the decimal sum correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on decimal place value and basic arithmetic. You must determine the missing digit in a decimal number so that when all terms are added, the total matches a given value. Such problems check attention to detail and understanding of how digits contribute to the overall sum. Given Data / Assumptions: Unknown number: 54.?3, where ? is a single digit from 0 to 9. Equation: 54.?3 + 543 + 5.43 = 603.26. We must find the digit that replaces the question mark. Concept / Approach: We treat 54.?3 as a decimal number with hundredths position unknown. Write it as 54.x3, where x is the unknown digit in the tenths place. We then form an equation for the total sum and solve for x so that the right hand side equals 603.26. The method uses simple addition and subtraction of decimals. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Represent the unknown number as 54.x3 where x is the unknown digit. Step 2: The equation is 54.x3 + 543 + 5.43 = 603.26. Step 3: Combine the known terms first: 543 + 5.43 = 548.43. Step 4: Now the equation becomes 54.x3 + 548.43 = 603.26. Step 5: Subtract 548.43 from both sides to isolate 54.x3. Step 6: 603.26 − 548.43 = 54.83. Step 7: Therefore 54.x3 must equal 54.83. The digit in the tenths place is 8, and the hundredths place is 3, so x = 8. Verification / Alternative check: Substitute 8 for the question mark and recompute the total. The number becomes 54.83. Now calculate 54.83 + 543 + 5.43. First 54.83 + 543 = 597.83. Then 597.83 + 5.43 = 603.26, which matches the right hand side exactly. This confirms that the digit 8 makes the equation correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: If the digit were 6, we would get 54.63, and the sum would be 54.63 + 548.43 = 603.06, which is too small. If the digit were 1, we would get 54.13, giving 54.13 + 548.43 = 602.56, still not equal to 603.26. If the digit were 9, we would get 54.93, giving 54.93 + 548.43 = 603.36, which is too large. Common Pitfalls: Some learners misalign decimal places when adding or subtracting, or they confuse the position of the tenths and hundredths digits. Others may try random guessing without verifying with proper addition. Always work symbolically, isolate the unknown term, and then calculate systematically to avoid such mistakes. Final Answer: The missing digit that makes the equation correct is 8.

Question 11

What is the decimal representation of the fraction 3/8, written as an exact terminating decimal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question again deals with converting a fraction to its decimal form. The fraction 3/8 is common in measurement and probability problems, and knowing its decimal value helps speed up many calculations. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 3/8. We need its decimal representation. Standard base 10 decimals are used, and the answer is exact. Concept / Approach: We already know that 1/8 = 0.125 from earlier questions. Since 3/8 is three times 1/8, we can multiply 0.125 by 3 to get the decimal value. Alternatively, we can perform the long division 3 ÷ 8 directly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that 1/8 = 0.125. Step 2: Use the relation 3/8 = 3 × (1/8). Step 3: Multiply 0.125 by 3. Step 4: 0.125 × 3 = 0.375 because 125 × 3 = 375 and we keep three decimal places. Step 5: Therefore 3/8 = 0.375. Verification / Alternative check: As a check, perform the division 3 ÷ 8. When we divide 3.000 by 8, we get 0.3 with remainder 3 * 10 − 8 * 3 = 4, then 8 goes into 40 five times. The process yields 0.375 exactly. This confirms that the decimal representation of 3/8 is 0.375. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.247 is smaller than 0.3 and does not correspond to three eighths. 0.214 is also much smaller and would correspond to a very different fraction. 0.125 is the decimal for 1/8, not for 3/8. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse 3/8 with 1/4 or 1/3 and choose 0.25 or 0.333. Others may multiply incorrectly when using 1/8 = 0.125. Always verify by multiplication or direct division if you are not fully sure of the standard fraction to decimal pairs. Final Answer: The decimal representation of 3/8 is 0.375.

Question 12

Express the fractions 3/8 and 1/10 as decimals and choose the correct pair.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to convert two simple fractions into their decimal forms. Such conversions are useful when adding or comparing quantities that are given in different formats, like fractions and decimals. Given Data / Assumptions: Fractions: 3/8 and 1/10. We must express both as decimals and select the correct pair. All conversions are exact terminating decimals. Concept / Approach: From earlier problems we know the decimal form of 3/8. For 1/10, the conversion is especially straightforward because the denominator is already a power of 10. We convert each fraction separately and then match the pair with the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert 3/8 to decimal. From a previous question, 3/8 = 0.375. Step 2: Convert 1/10 to decimal. Since 1/10 means one tenth, its decimal form is 0.1. Step 3: Therefore the correct decimal pair is 0.375 and 0.1. Step 4: Look at the options and find the pair that matches 0.375 and 0.1 in this order. Verification / Alternative check: Verify 3/8 by division: 3 ÷ 8 gives 0.375. Verify 1/10 by noting that dividing 1 by 10 moves the decimal point one place to the left, giving 0.1. Both values are standard and appear in many tables of fractions and decimals. Hence, the pair 0.375 and 0.1 is confirmed as correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1.375 and 1 are much larger values; 3/8 is less than 1, so 1.375 cannot be correct. 0.375 and 1 assigns 1 as the decimal for 1/10, which is incorrect. 13.75 and 1.1 are far greater than the actual decimal values and do not correspond to 3/8 and 1/10. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes treat 1/10 as 10 or as 1.0 instead of 0.1. Another issue is confusing 3/8 with 1/8 or 5/8 and using the corresponding decimals incorrectly. Always remember that a fraction less than 1 must convert to a decimal less than 1, and denominators that are powers of 10 convert especially easily. Final Answer: The decimal forms are 0.375 and 0.1 for 3/8 and 1/10 respectively.

Question 13

When the fraction 3/4 is divided by 2, what is the resulting fraction in simplest form?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of how to divide a fraction by a whole number. Such operations are fundamental in arithmetic and appear frequently in word problems involving sharing or scaling quantities. Given Data / Assumptions: Starting fraction: 3/4. We divide this fraction by the whole number 2. We must express the result as a fraction in simplest form. Concept / Approach: Dividing a fraction by a whole number is equivalent to multiplying the fraction by the reciprocal of that whole number. The reciprocal of 2 is 1/2. Therefore 3/4 ÷ 2 can be written as 3/4 × 1/2. We then multiply numerators and denominators and simplify the result if possible. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the division as multiplication by the reciprocal: 3/4 ÷ 2 = 3/4 × 1/2. Step 2: Multiply the numerators: 3 × 1 = 3. Step 3: Multiply the denominators: 4 × 2 = 8. Step 4: The resulting fraction is 3/8. Step 5: Check for further simplification. Since 3 and 8 have no common factor greater than 1, 3/8 is already in simplest form. Verification / Alternative check: We can also reason with decimals. 3/4 equals 0.75. Now divide 0.75 by 2. The result is 0.375, which we know is the decimal representation of 3/8. This confirms that 3/4 ÷ 2 equals 3/8. Both fraction based and decimal based methods lead to the same answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 3/2 is larger than 1, but dividing 3/4 by 2 must give a fraction smaller than 3/4, not larger. 2/3 is about 0.6667, which is less than 3/4 but not equal to 3/4 ÷ 2. 8/3 is greater than 2 and is far from the expected reduced fraction. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to divide only the numerator or only the denominator by 2 instead of using the reciprocal method. Another error is to treat 3/4 ÷ 2 as 2 ÷ 3/4, which inverts the operation. Always remember that dividing by a number is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal and then simplify carefully. Final Answer: The fraction 3/4 divided by 2 equals 3/8.

Question 14

Convert the fraction 3/8 to a decimal number.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of how to convert a simple fraction into its decimal form. Converting between fractions and decimals is a very common skill used in aptitude tests, data interpretation and everyday calculations such as money, measurements and percentages. Given Data / Assumptions: Given fraction: 3/8. We must express 3/8 as a decimal number. No rounding instructions are given, so we should use the exact terminating decimal. Concept / Approach: To convert a fraction to a decimal, we divide the numerator by the denominator. Here we compute 3 ÷ 8. Because 8 is a factor of 2^3, the decimal will terminate, not repeat. We can use long division or use the idea of equivalent fractions with a denominator that is a power of 10. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the division 3 ÷ 8.Step 2: Because 3 is less than 8, write it as 3.000 and divide by 8.Step 3: 8 goes into 30 three times (3 * 8 = 24). Remainder = 30 - 24 = 6.Step 4: Bring down another 0 to make 60. 8 goes into 60 seven times (7 * 8 = 56). Remainder = 60 - 56 = 4.Step 5: Bring down another 0 to make 40. 8 goes into 40 exactly five times (5 * 8 = 40). Remainder = 0, so the decimal terminates at 0.375. Verification / Alternative check: Notice that 3/8 = (3 * 125) / (8 * 125) = 375/1000. Writing 375/1000 as a decimal directly gives 0.375. This confirms our long division result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1.375 is 11/8, which is larger than 1 and does not match 3/8. 2.375 corresponds to 19/8 and is even larger. 3.75 corresponds to 15/4. All these values are much bigger than 3/8, so they cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to incorrectly stop the division too early or misplace the decimal point, leading to 0.37 or 0.38 instead of the exact 0.375. Another error is to confuse 3/8 with 3.8, which is a completely different number. Always remember that a fraction less than 1 must convert to a decimal less than 1. Final Answer: The decimal representation of 3/8 is 0.375.

Question 15

Which of the following fractions 7/12, 9/16, 13/20 or 32/80 is the largest in value?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to compare the sizes of fractions that have different denominators. Comparing fractions is a basic aptitude skill used in percentage comparisons, ratio problems and data interpretation. Given Data / Assumptions: Fractions to compare: 7/12, 9/16, 13/20 and 32/80. We must determine which of these fractions has the greatest numerical value. All fractions are positive and proper or equal to a proper fraction. Concept / Approach: There are two main ways to compare fractions: convert each fraction to a decimal, or convert them to equivalent fractions with a common denominator. Either method is valid. Here, using decimals provides a quick and clear comparison. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute 7/12. Using division, 7 ÷ 12 is approximately 0.5833.Step 2: Compute 9/16. Using division, 9 ÷ 16 = 0.5625.Step 3: Compute 13/20. Using division, 13 ÷ 20 = 0.65.Step 4: Compute 32/80. Since 32/80 simplifies to 2/5, its decimal value is 0.4.Step 5: Compare the decimal values: 0.5833, 0.5625, 0.65 and 0.4. The largest among these is 0.65, which corresponds to 13/20. Verification / Alternative check: We can also use a common denominator. A convenient common denominator for 12, 16, 20 and 80 is 240 or 480. Converting, we get approximate equivalents where 13/20 becomes the largest numerator, confirming our decimal comparison. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 7/12 is about 0.5833 and smaller than 0.65. 9/16 is 0.5625 and smaller still. 32/80 equals 0.4, which is clearly smaller than all the others. Therefore none of these can be the largest fraction. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often rely on comparing denominators only, thinking that a smaller denominator automatically means a larger fraction. This is only true when numerators are equal. Another mistake is forgetting to simplify 32/80 to 2/5, which can hide how small it really is. Final Answer: The largest fraction among the given options is 13/20.

Question 16

Express the fraction 3/5 as a decimal number.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question assesses your ability to convert a simple fraction into an equivalent decimal. This is a fundamental numerical skill that appears in questions involving percentages, profit and loss, and data analysis. Given Data / Assumptions: Given fraction: 3/5. We need to write 3/5 in decimal form. No rounding is required because the decimal will terminate exactly. Concept / Approach: To convert a fraction into a decimal, divide the numerator by the denominator. Since the denominator 5 is a factor of 10, the decimal representation of 3/5 will be a terminating decimal with one digit after the decimal point when expressed carefully. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the fraction as a division: 3 ÷ 5.Step 2: Because 3 is smaller than 5, rewrite it as 3.0 and perform 3.0 ÷ 5.Step 3: 5 goes into 30 exactly 6 times (6 * 5 = 30).Step 4: After placing the decimal point, we get 0.6 as the decimal form.Step 5: Note that 0.60 is the same numerical value as 0.6. Writing a trailing zero does not change the value. Verification / Alternative check: We can also convert by creating an equivalent fraction with denominator 10. Multiply numerator and denominator by 2 to get (3 * 2) / (5 * 2) = 6/10. The fraction 6/10 is directly read as 0.6, which matches our earlier result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.25 corresponds to 1/4, not 3/5. 0.45 is equal to 9/20. 0.75 equals 3/4. None of these fractions are equal to 3/5, so those options are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse 3/5 with 0.35 because they copy the digits directly, but that is incorrect. Remember that the decimal is derived from division, not simply by placing a decimal point in the numerator. Always perform or mentally check the division. Final Answer: The decimal representation of 3/5 is 0.60.

Question 17

Arrange the fractions 5/8, 7/12, 3/4 and 13/16 in ascending (increasing) order of magnitude.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests your fraction comparison skills, which are crucial in many aptitude topics such as ratio, proportion and data interpretation. You are asked to arrange four fractions in ascending order, which requires understanding which is smallest and which is largest. Given Data / Assumptions: Fractions: 5/8, 7/12, 3/4 and 13/16. We need to order them from smallest to largest. All numbers are positive proper fractions less than 1. Concept / Approach: There are two standard approaches. One is to convert each fraction to a decimal. The other is to convert fractions to a common denominator and then compare their numerators. Using decimals is intuitive, while common denominators avoid rounding issues. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert 7/12 to a decimal. 7 ÷ 12 ≈ 0.5833.Step 2: Convert 5/8 to a decimal. 5 ÷ 8 = 0.625.Step 3: Convert 3/4 to a decimal. 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75.Step 4: Convert 13/16 to a decimal. 13 ÷ 16 = 0.8125.Step 5: Compare the decimal values: 0.5833, 0.625, 0.75 and 0.8125. Ascending order is 0.5833 < 0.625 < 0.75 < 0.8125, which corresponds to 7/12 < 5/8 < 3/4 < 13/16. Verification / Alternative check: We may also take 48 as a common denominator (LCM of 8, 12, 4 and 16). Converting, 7/12 = 28/48, 5/8 = 30/48, 3/4 = 36/48 and 13/16 = 39/48. Comparing numerators 28, 30, 36 and 39 gives the same order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any order that puts 5/8 before 7/12 wrongly assumes 0.625 is less than 0.5833. Similarly, placing 13/16 before 3/4 is incorrect, because 0.8125 is greater than 0.75. Thus only the sequence 7/12 < 5/8 < 3/4 < 13/16 is logically correct. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes compare fractions only by denominators or numerators without using a consistent method. Another error is rounding too roughly, which can reverse the correct order for close values such as 7/12 and 5/8. Using a common denominator or precise decimals avoids these mistakes. Final Answer: The correct ascending order of the given fractions is 7/12 < 5/8 < 3/4 < 13/16.

Question 18

Find the decimal value of the fraction 16/3.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your ability to divide an improper fraction and express the result as a decimal. Such conversions appear frequently in word problems, average calculations and financial computations. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 16/3. We must express 16/3 as a decimal. The options provide decimal approximations rounded to two decimal places. Concept / Approach: An improper fraction has a numerator larger than its denominator. To convert it to a decimal, we perform long division of the numerator by the denominator. Since 3 is not a factor of a power of 10, the decimal will be repeating. We only need a correct approximation up to two decimal places. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Divide 16 by 3: 3 goes into 16 five times (5 * 3 = 15) with a remainder of 1.Step 2: Write 5 as the whole part and carry the remainder to the decimal part.Step 3: Bring down a zero to make 10. 3 goes into 10 three times (3 * 3 = 9) with a remainder of 1 again.Step 4: The pattern of remainder 1 repeats, so the decimal 5.3333... continues indefinitely.Step 5: Rounding 5.3333... to two decimal places gives 5.33. Verification / Alternative check: We can write 16/3 = 15/3 + 1/3 = 5 + 1/3. Since 1/3 is 0.3333..., adding it to 5 gives 5.3333..., which agrees with the division approach and again rounds to 5.33. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 6 is too large because 18/3 = 6, and 16/3 is less than that. Values 5.74 and 5.68 do not correspond to simple thirds and are far from the true repeating decimal 5.3333..., so they are approximations with no basis in the actual division. Common Pitfalls: Some test takers mistakenly round 5.3333... to 5.3 or 5.4. When rounding to two decimal places, always look at the third decimal digit to decide whether to round up or not. Here the third digit is 3, so 5.33 remains unchanged. Final Answer: The decimal equivalent of 16/3, correct to two decimal places, is 5.33.

Question 19

Express the fraction 2/3 as a decimal number.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem focuses on converting the fraction 2/3 into its decimal representation. Mastering such conversions is important for questions on percentages, ratios and proportional reasoning. Given Data / Assumptions: Fraction: 2/3. We must find its decimal form. Options are rounded decimals, so we must round correctly. Concept / Approach: To convert a fraction to a decimal, divide the numerator by the denominator: here 2 ÷ 3. Because 3 does not divide an exact power of 10, the result is a repeating decimal. We will then round to two decimal places since the options are given that way. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Perform the division 2 ÷ 3.Step 2: 3 goes into 2 zero times, so write 0. and consider 2.000.Step 3: 3 goes into 20 six times (6 * 3 = 18) with remainder 2, giving 0.6 so far.Step 4: Bring down another 0 to again get 20. The same pattern repeats, giving another 6. The decimal is 0.6666..., a repeating decimal.Step 5: Rounding 0.6666... to two decimal places yields 0.67. Verification / Alternative check: We know that 1/3 = 0.3333... and that 2/3 = 2 * (1/3) = 0.6666.... This provides a quick mental check and again confirms that rounding to two decimal places gives 0.67. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 0.47 is too small and does not relate to thirds. 6.77 is a number greater than 6, while 2/3 is less than 1, so it is impossible. 0.07 is far smaller than the true value. Only 0.67 is a reasonable approximation of 0.6666... Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes mistakenly round 0.6666... to 0.66, but the third decimal digit is 6, so the second decimal place should be rounded up to 7. Another confusion arises when people misplace the decimal point and think 2/3 is 2.3 or 0.23. Always remember 2/3 is less than 1 but greater than 0.5. Final Answer: The decimal form of 2/3, rounded to two decimal places, is 0.67.

Question 20

Which of the following fractions is reducible, that is, not in its lowest terms?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks whether you can recognize a fraction that is not in simplest form. Simplifying fractions, or checking if they are reducible, is a frequent step in many aptitude calculations. Given Data / Assumptions: Fractions given: 79/26, 105/112, 41/17 and 91/15. We need to identify the fraction that can be simplified further. A reducible fraction has a numerator and denominator with a common factor greater than 1. Concept / Approach: A fraction is in lowest terms if the greatest common divisor of numerator and denominator is 1. To test reducibility, we factor the numerator and denominator or at least check for obvious common factors such as 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider 79/26. The number 79 is a prime number and does not divide by 2 or 13, so 79 and 26 share no common factor other than 1. This fraction is irreducible.Step 2: Consider 105/112. Factor 105 as 3 * 5 * 7 and 112 as 16 * 7 = 2^4 * 7. Both numerator and denominator share a factor of 7.Step 3: Divide numerator and denominator of 105/112 by 7 to get 15/16. Thus 105/112 is reducible.Step 4: Consider 41/17. The number 41 is prime and not divisible by 17, so there is no common factor greater than 1.Step 5: Consider 91/15. The number 91 factors as 7 * 13 and 15 as 3 * 5, so there is no common factor greater than 1. Verification / Alternative check: If we compute the greatest common divisor of each pair, only gcd(105, 112) is greater than 1. This confirms that 105/112 is the only reducible fraction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 79/26, 41/17 and 91/15 have numerators and denominators that are relatively prime. They are already in lowest terms and therefore are not reducible. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse reducibility with the size of the fraction or with whether it is proper or improper. A fraction can be large or improper and still be in simplest form. What matters is the common factors of numerator and denominator. Final Answer: The only fraction that can be reduced further is 105/112.

Decimal Fraction Questions