Question 1

4.036 divided by 0.04 equals:

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Compute 4.036 ÷ 0.04. Concept/Approach Dividing by 0.04 is multiplying by 25 (since 1/0.04 = 25). Step-by-step calculation 4.036 ÷ 0.04 = 4.036 × 25 = (4 × 25) + (0.036 × 25) = 100 + 0.9 = 100.9 Verification/Alternative Move decimals: 4.036/0.04 = 403.6/4 = 100.9 (same result). Final Answer 100.9

Question 2

Evaluate [(0.96)³ − (0.1)³] ÷ [(0.96)² + 0.096 + (0.1)²].

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Compute the value of the fraction where the numerator is a3 − b3 with a = 0.96, b = 0.10, and the denominator is a2 + ab + b2. Given data a = 0.96 b = 0.10 ab = 0.096 Concept/Approach Use the identity a3 − b3 = (a − b)(a2 + ab + b2). Dividing (a3 − b3) by (a2 + ab + b2) simplifies to a − b. Step-by-Step calculation [(0.96)3 − (0.10)3] ÷ [(0.96)2 + (0.96)(0.10) + (0.10)2] = 0.96 − 0.10= 0.86 Verification/Alternative Direct substitution into the identity confirms immediate cancellation of the common factor. Common pitfalls Computing all powers numerically instead of recognizing the factorization shortcut. Final Answer 0.86

Question 3

Which of the following is equal to 3.14 × 10⁶?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Convert 3.14 × 106 from scientific notation into a standard number. Concept/Approach Multiplying by 106 moves the decimal point 6 places to the right. Step-by-Step calculation 3.14 × 106 = 3,140,000 Verification/Alternative 3.14 million equals 3,140,000. Common pitfalls Shifting the decimal the wrong number of places (e.g., 5 or 7 places). Final Answer 3,140,000

Question 4

How many digits appear to the right of the decimal point in the product 95.75 × 0.02554?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Determine the number of decimal places in the product of two terminating decimals. Given data 95.75 has 2 decimal places. 0.02554 has 5 decimal places. Concept/Approach The product of two terminating decimals has, before simplification, a number of decimal places equal to the sum of the decimal places of the factors. Any common factors of 2 or 5 between numerator and denominator can reduce trailing zeros, but here the net decimal places remain 7. Step-by-Step calculation 2 + 5 = 7 decimal places Verification/Alternative Write 95.75 = 3829/40 and 0.02554 = 2554/100000. Product = (3829 × 2554) / 4,000,000. After canceling a single factor of 2 with the even numerator 2554, the denominator still has 2756, so the equivalent denominator 107 yields 7 decimal places. Common pitfalls Forgetting that cancellation only reduces trailing zeros, not the total internal precision logic; in this case, cancellation preserves 7 places. Final Answer 7

Question 5

Evaluate [(2.39)² − (1.61)²] ÷ (2.39 − 1.61).

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Simplify a difference of squares divided by the corresponding difference. Concept/Approach Use a2 − b2 = (a − b)(a + b). Dividing by (a − b) leaves (a + b). Step-by-Step calculation [(2.39)2 − (1.61)2] ÷ (2.39 − 1.61) = 2.39 + 1.61= 4.00 Verification/Alternative Direct computation of squares is unnecessary once the identity is recognized. Common pitfalls Expanding both squares numerically instead of applying the identity. Final Answer 4.00

Question 6

Find ? such that 3889 + 12.952 − ? = 3854.002.

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Solve for the missing number in a simple linear equation involving decimals. Concept/Approach Rearrange to isolate ? on one side. Step-by-Step calculation 3889 + 12.952 − ? = 3854.002⇒ −? = 3854.002 − 3901.952 = −47.95⇒ ? = 47.95 Verification/Alternative Check: 3889 + 12.952 − 47.95 = 3901.952 − 47.95 = 3854.002. Common pitfalls Sign errors when transposing terms or mishandling decimal subtraction. Final Answer 47.95

Question 7

Evaluate (5 × 1.6 − 2 × 1.4) ÷ 1.3.

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Compute the value of a linear combination of decimals divided by 1.3. Step-by-Step calculation Numerator = 5×1.6 − 2×1.4 = 8.0 − 2.8 = 5.2Quotient = 5.2 ÷ 1.3 = 4 Common pitfalls Arithmetic slips with decimals or dividing by 1.3 incorrectly. Final Answer 4

Question 8

The value of 489.1375 × 0.0483 × 1.956 is closest to:

Accepted Answer

46.21

Question 9

For which value of x is (11.98 × 11.98 + 11.98 × x + 0.02 × 0.02) a perfect square?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Find x so the expression matches the identity (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2 with a = 11.98 and b = 0.02. Given data a = 11.98, b = 0.02 Target middle term = 2ab = 2 × 11.98 × 0.02 = 0.4792 Concept/Approach The middle term in the given expression is 11.98 × x, which must equal 0.4792 for a perfect square. Step-by-Step calculation 11.98 × x = 0.4792x = 0.4792 ÷ 11.98 = 0.04 Verification/Alternative Substitute x = 0.04: expression becomes 11.982 + 2(11.98)(0.02) + 0.022 = (11.98 + 0.02)2 = 122. Common pitfalls Using x = 2b (0.04) without checking the coefficient with a (must satisfy 11.98 × x = 2ab). Final Answer 0.04

Question 10

Convert the recurring decimal 0.232323… into a fraction in lowest terms.

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Express 0.232323… (repeating block 23) as a rational fraction. Concept/Approach If x = 0.232323…, then 100x = 23.232323…; subtract x to eliminate the repeating part. Step-by-Step calculation Let x = 0.232323…100x = 23.232323…99x = 23x = 23 / 9923/99 Verification/Alternative 23/99 = (0.23)/(0.99) ≈ 0.232323…; irreducible since 23 is prime and does not divide 99. Common pitfalls Writing 23/90 (incorrect denominator for a two-digit repetend; it must be 99). Final Answer 23/99

Question 11

Which of the following is the least value?

Accepted Answer

0.091

Question 12

What decimal part of an hour is one second?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Convert 1 second into the decimal fraction of 1 hour. Given data 1 hour = 60 minutes = 3600 seconds. Concept/Approach Express 1 second as a fraction of 1 hour, then write that fraction in decimal form. Step-by-Step calculation Fraction of an hour = 1 second / 3600 seconds = 1/3600 Decimal = 1 ÷ 3600 = 0.000277... Verification/Alternative Since 1/36 = 0.027777..., dividing by 100 gives 0.00027777... (7 repeats). Common pitfalls Using 1/60 (minutes) instead of 1/3600 (seconds). Final Answer 0.000277...

Question 13

Compare the products: which is larger, 0.0203 × 2.92 or 0.0073 × 14.5 × 0.7?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Evaluate both decimal products and decide which is greater. Given data LHS = 0.0203 × 2.92 RHS = 0.0073 × 14.5 × 0.7 Concept/Approach Compute each product carefully by splitting into simpler pieces or using place-value reasoning. Step-by-Step calculation LHS = 0.0203 × 2.92 = 0.0203 × (3 − 0.08) = 0.0609 − 0.001624 = 0.059276 RHS = 0.0073 × 14.5 × 0.7 = 0.0073 × (10 + 4.5) × 0.7 = (0.073 + 0.03285) × 0.7 = 0.10585 × 0.7 = 0.074095 Comparison: 0.059276 < 0.074095 Verification/Alternative Even rough bounds show RHS is bigger: 0.0073 × 14.5 ≈ 0.105 → × 0.7 ≈ 0.0735 > 0.059. Common pitfalls Dropping decimal places when multiplying (especially with three factors on RHS). Comparing by rounding too early; compare to at least three decimal places. Final Answer 0.0073 × 14.5 × 0.7 is larger

Question 14

Compute: 0.002 × 0.5 = ?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Multiply two decimals: 0.002 and 0.5. Concept/Approach Multiplying by 0.5 halves the number. Step-by-Step calculation 0.002 × 0.5 = 0.001 Verification/Alternative Count decimal places: 2 × 5 = 10 → 2/1000 × 5/10 = 10/10,000 = 0.001. Common pitfalls Shifting the decimal in the wrong direction when halving small decimals. Final Answer 0.001

Question 15

Compare the products: (0.1667)(0.8333)(0.3333) versus (0.2222)(0.6667)(0.1250). Which is larger?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Decide which of the two given decimal products has the greater value. Given data A = 0.1667 × 0.8333 × 0.3333 B = 0.2222 × 0.6667 × 0.1250 Concept/Approach Estimate each term to familiar fractions (0.1667 ≈ 1/6, 0.8333 ≈ 5/6, 0.3333 ≈ 1/3, 0.2222 ≈ 2/9, 0.6667 ≈ 2/3, 0.1250 = 1/8), or compute directly with careful decimals. Step-by-Step calculation A ≈ 0.1667 × 0.8333 = 0.1389 (approx), then × 0.3333 ≈ 0.0463 B ≈ 0.2222 × 0.6667 = 0.1481 (approx), then × 0.1250 ≈ 0.0185 Therefore, A ≈ 0.0463 and B ≈ 0.0185 ⇒ A > B Verification/Alternative Fractional check: (1/6)(5/6)(1/3) = 5/108 ≈ 0.046296, while (2/9)(2/3)(1/8) = 4/216 = 1/54 ≈ 0.018519. Left is clearly larger. Common pitfalls Assuming equality because both look like products of small decimals. Rounding too coarsely; here the order of magnitude differs by about 2.5×. Final Answer Left product is larger

Question 16

Express 6.46 as a fraction in lowest terms.

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Convert the terminating decimal 6.46 into a simplified fraction. Concept/Approach Write 6.46 as an integer plus hundredths, then reduce the fraction by common factors. Step-by-Step calculation 6.46 = 646/100 Divide numerator and denominator by 2: 646/100 = 323/50 323 is prime with 50 ⇒ fraction is in lowest terms Verification/Alternative 323/50 = 6 + 23/50 = 6 + 0.46 = 6.46 (exact). Common pitfalls Leaving the answer as 646/100 without simplifying. Final Answer 323/50

Question 17

Which of the following fractions is greater than 3 and less than 5?

Accepted Answer

13/4

Question 18

Compute: 0.04 × 0.0162 = ?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Multiply two decimals: 0.04 and 0.0162. Concept/Approach Multiply as whole numbers and then place the decimal using total decimal places (2 + 4 = 6 places), or use place-value reasoning. Step-by-Step calculation 4 × 162 = 648 Total decimal places = 2 (from 0.04) + 4 (from 0.0162) = 6 Therefore, 0.04 × 0.0162 = 0.000648 Verification/Alternative 0.04 = 4/100, 0.0162 = 162/10,000 ⇒ product = (4×162)/(100×10,000) = 648/1,000,000 = 0.000648. Common pitfalls Using 5 or 7 decimal places instead of 6. Final Answer 0.000648

Question 19

Compare the decimals: 0.009 ? 0.01

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Decide the correct comparison symbol between 0.009 and 0.01. Concept/Approach Pad decimals to the same number of places and compare digit by digit. Step-by-Step comparison 0.009 = 0.0090 0.01 = 0.0100 Compare thousandths: 9 < 10 (i.e., 0.0090 < 0.0100) Verification/Alternative As fractions: 0.009 = 9/1000; 0.01 = 1/100 = 10/1000 ⇒ 9/1000 < 10/1000. Common pitfalls Thinking more digits means a larger number; value depends on place value, not digit count. Final Answer 0.009 < 0.01

Question 20

Compute: 3.87 − 2.59 = ?

Accepted Answer

Problem restatement Subtract two decimals: 3.87 minus 2.59. Concept/Approach Align decimal points and subtract placewise. Step-by-Step calculation Hundredths: 7 − 9 ⇒ borrow 1 tenth: (17 − 9) = 8 Tenths: After borrowing, 7 − 5 = 2 Units: 3 − 2 = 1 Result = 1.28 Verification/Alternative Compute differences by parts: (3.87 − 2.87) + (2.87 − 2.59) = 1.00 + 0.28 = 1.28. Common pitfalls Forgetting to borrow across decimal places, leading to 1.26 or 1.18 type errors. Final Answer 1.28

Decimal Fraction Questions