Question 1

In a company where the 2nd and 4th Saturdays and every Sunday are official holidays, how many working days are there in a 31-day month that begins on a Friday?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This is a typical calendar and working-days problem. We are given a particular pattern of holidays (second and fourth Saturdays plus every Sunday) and asked to count working days in a month with 31 days that starts on a Friday. Such questions test your ability to track weekdays across dates and to distinguish between holidays and working days carefully. Given Data / Assumptions: Length of the month = 31 days. The month begins on a Friday (day 1 is Friday). Holidays: 2nd and 4th Saturdays, and every Sunday. All other days are working days. Concept / Approach: First we assign weekdays to each date in the 31-day month starting from day 1 as Friday. Then we identify all Saturdays and Sundays. Among the Saturdays, only the 2nd and 4th Saturdays are holidays; the other Saturdays remain working days. All Sundays are holidays. Finally, we subtract total holidays from 31 to obtain the number of working days. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Assign weekdays to dates. Day 1: Friday. Day 2: Saturday. Day 3: Sunday. Day 4: Monday, and so on, repeating every 7 days. Saturdays in the month: days 2, 9, 16, 23, 30. Sundays in the month: days 3, 10, 17, 24, 31. Step 2: Identify holidays. 2nd Saturday: day 9 (holiday). 4th Saturday: day 23 (holiday). All Sundays (3, 10, 17, 24, 31) are holidays. Total holiday Saturdays = 2. Total holiday Sundays = 5. Total holidays in the month = 2 + 5 = 7 days. Step 3: Compute working days. Total days in month = 31. Working days = 31 − 7 = 24 days. Verification / Alternative check: We can quickly verify by counting non-working dates: {3, 9, 10, 17, 23, 24, 31}. There are exactly 7 distinct holidays. All other dates (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, ... , 30 except 30 being a working Saturday) are working days, giving 24 in total. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 23: Would mean 8 holidays, but we found only 7. 22 or 25 or 26: Each of these implies miscounting either an extra holiday or missing one, often due to treating all Saturdays as holidays or forgetting a Sunday. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often mistakenly treat all Saturdays as holidays, or forget that only the 2nd and 4th Saturdays are off. Another common error is mis-aligning the weekdays after the first week and assigning wrong weekday labels to mid-month dates. Final Answer: The number of working days in such a month is 24.

Question 2

If today is Saturday, what day of the week will it be exactly 350 days from today, assuming a standard 7-day weekly cycle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This is a straightforward modular arithmetic calendar question. When asked what day it will be a certain number of days from now, we use the fact that days of the week repeat every 7 days. The key is to reduce the given number of days modulo 7 and then shift the weekday accordingly. Given Data / Assumptions: Today's day: Saturday. Number of days ahead: 350 days. Week has 7 days and repeats cyclically. Concept / Approach: The day of the week after N days is determined by N modulo 7, because every block of 7 days brings you back to the same weekday. If N is exactly divisible by 7, then the weekday after N days will be the same as today. If there is a remainder r, then we move r days forward in the weekly cycle. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute N modulo 7. N = 350 days. 350 ÷ 7 = 50 with remainder 0. So 350 ≡ 0 (mod 7). Step 2: Interpret the remainder. A remainder of 0 means that 350 days equals exactly 50 full weeks. After any whole number of weeks, the day of the week is unchanged. Step 3: Apply to the starting day. Starting on Saturday and moving ahead exactly 50 weeks, we return to Saturday. Verification / Alternative check: You can check with a smaller example: after 7 days from a Saturday, it is again Saturday; after 14 days, also Saturday, and so on. 350 is simply a larger multiple of 7 (7 * 50), so the same logic applies. This confirms that the weekday does not change. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Friday, Sunday, Monday, Thursday: These would all be correct only if the total days ahead left a remainder of 1, 2, 3, or 4 when divided by 7. Since 350 leaves no remainder, there is no shift from Saturday. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students try to move forward week by week manually or miscalculate 350 ÷ 7, leading to an incorrect remainder. Always reduce the number of days modulo 7 to avoid errors and save time. Final Answer: 350 days from a Saturday will again be a Saturday.

Question 3

If a person was born in the year 1995, what would be that person's age in completed years in the year 2019 (ignoring the exact months and days)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Age calculation questions are very common in aptitude tests and often test simple subtraction and understanding of completed years. Here we are asked to find the age in 2019 of a person who was born in 1995, with the usual assumption that we are only interested in completed years and not in the exact date within the year. Given Data / Assumptions: Year of birth = 1995. Year for which age is asked = 2019. We ignore the specific birth date and day, and assume the person has completed all years up to 2019. Concept / Approach: The simplest way to approximate age in years is to subtract the birth year from the given year. This gives the age the person will have during that year, assuming the birthday in that year has already occurred. As the question does not mention months or days, the standard exam convention is to use this subtraction directly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Subtract the birth year from the given year. Age in 2019 ≈ 2019 − 1995. Compute the difference: 2019 − 1995 = 24. So the person would be 24 years old in 2019 in terms of completed calendar years. Verification / Alternative check: We can think logically: from 1995 to 2005 is 10 years, from 2005 to 2015 is another 10 years, and from 2015 to 2019 is 4 years. Summing gives 10 + 10 + 4 = 24 years. This matches our direct subtraction and confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 22 or 23: These correspond to subtracting incorrect spans (for example, if one mistakenly used 2017 or 2018 instead of 2019). 25 or 26: These would mean subtracting 1995 from 2020 or 2021, not 2019. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overthink the problem and worry about months and days even though the question clearly uses only years. Another mistake is miscalculating the subtraction, especially under exam pressure. Writing the numbers plainly and subtracting carefully avoids such errors. Final Answer: The person's age in 2019 would be 24 years.

Question 4

The calendar of the leap year 2024 (same sequence of days and dates) can be reused without any change in which of the following future years?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This question asks when the calendar for 2024 can be used again unchanged. Since 2024 is a leap year, the future year must also be a leap year and must start on the same day of the week. Calendar repetition questions commonly appear in aptitude exams and rely on understanding leap-year patterns and weekday shifts. Given Data / Assumptions: Base year: 2024. 2024 is a leap year (divisible by 4 and not a century year). We need the earliest future year among the options where the day-date pattern is identical. Concept / Approach: In the Gregorian calendar, each non-leap year shifts the starting weekday of the next year by 1 day, while each leap year shifts it by 2 days. For a calendar to repeat, the total shift in weekdays from the base year must be a multiple of 7, and the candidate year must have the same leap/non-leap status as the base year. Leap year calendars often repeat after 28 years, but depending on the century pattern, sometimes other intervals appear; here, we primarily look at the standard 28-year cycle. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check that 2024 is a leap year. 2024 ÷ 4 = 506 with no remainder, and it is not divisible by 100, so it is a leap year. Step 2: Consider the standard repetition interval. Leap year calendars commonly repeat every 28 years because of the 7-day week and the 4-year leap cycle. Adding 28 years to 2024 gives 2024 + 28 = 2052. Step 3: Check that 2052 is a leap year. 2052 ÷ 4 is an integer and it is not a century year, so it is also a leap year. Step 4: Conclude that 2024 and 2052 share the same day-date arrangement. The weekday of 1 January and all other dates aligns exactly when the 28-year cycle condition is met and both years are leap years. Verification / Alternative check: If we examine an actual calendar for 2024 and 2052, we would see that the weekdays for all dates match exactly (for example, 1 January is on the same weekday and 29 February exists in both years). This empirical check supports our theoretical reasoning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2030, 2036, 2048, 2060: Even if some of these years are leap years, their starting weekdays do not line up correctly with that of 2024, so the full calendar is not identical. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to pick the next leap year (such as 2028 or 2032) without verifying the weekday alignment. Another is to forget that non-leap and leap years behave differently, so they cannot share identical calendars. Final Answer: The calendar of 2024 can be used again in 2052.

Question 5

Ignoring special holidays and only considering the weekly cycle, what is the day of the week exactly two weeks from today relative to today's day?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This is a simple but fundamental calendar question that uses the concept of weeks and the repeating 7-day cycle. The phrase "two weeks from today" refers to a span of time covering a certain number of days, and we must determine how that affects the day of the week. Given Data / Assumptions: We start from an unspecified day called "today". One week contains exactly 7 days. Two weeks therefore contain 14 days. We want the weekday exactly 14 days from today. Concept / Approach: Because days of the week repeat every 7 days, we can use modular arithmetic. Moving ahead by N days shifts the weekday by N modulo 7. If N is a multiple of 7, the day of the week does not change. So we simply compute 14 modulo 7 to understand the weekday shift after two weeks. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert two weeks into days. Two weeks = 2 * 7 = 14 days. Step 2: Reduce the day count modulo 7. 14 ÷ 7 = 2 with remainder 0. So 14 ≡ 0 (mod 7). Step 3: Interpret the remainder. A remainder of 0 indicates that the weekday after 14 days is exactly the same as the weekday today. Therefore, if today is Monday, two weeks from today is also Monday; if today is Friday, two weeks from today is also Friday, and so on. Verification / Alternative check: You can quickly test this with a concrete example. If today is Sunday, then after one week it is again Sunday, and after two weeks it is still Sunday. This confirms that moving in whole weeks does not change the weekday, regardless of the starting day. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Previous day or next day: These would be correct only if the offset in days left a remainder of −1 or +1 modulo 7, which is not the case for 14. Two days later: This would correspond to a remainder of 2 modulo 7, not 0. None: Incorrect, because there is a clear and simple relationship; the weekday remains the same. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse "two weeks" with "a few days" and forget the role of modulo 7. Others may overcomplicate the question by trying to track specific dates instead of using the simple week cycle property. Final Answer: Two weeks from today, it will be the same day of the week as today.

Question 6

It was a Sunday on 1 January 2006. Using this information and standard calendar rules, what was the day of the week on 1 January 2010?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This is a multi-year calendar question. We are given the weekday for 1 January 2006 and asked to find the weekday for 1 January 2010. Such questions test your understanding of how leap years and non-leap years shift weekdays over several years. Given Data / Assumptions: 1 January 2006 is Sunday. We need the weekday on 1 January 2010. We consider years 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 leading up to 2010. We use standard leap-year rules. Concept / Approach: Each non-leap year has 365 days, which is 1 more than a full number of weeks (364 = 7 * 52), so it shifts the weekday of the next year by +1 day. Each leap year has 366 days, which is 2 more than a full number of weeks, so it shifts by +2 days. By counting how many non-leap and leap years occur between 2006 and 2010, we can determine the total shift in weekdays. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List the years from 2006 to 2009. 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 are the years completed before reaching 1 January 2010. Step 2: Identify leap years. A year is leap if divisible by 4 (and not a century year that is not divisible by 400). Among these, 2008 is a leap year. 2006, 2007, 2009 are non-leap years. Step 3: Compute total weekday shift. Each non-leap year shifts by +1 day: 3 non-leap years ⇒ +3 days. The single leap year (2008) shifts by +2 days ⇒ +2 days. Total shift = 3 + 2 = 5 days. Step 4: Apply the shift to the starting weekday. Start: 1 January 2006 = Sunday. Move forward 5 days: Sunday → Monday (1), Tuesday (2), Wednesday (3), Thursday (4), Friday (5). So, 1 January 2010 is a Friday. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by building a small table year by year: 1 Jan 2007 (Monday), 1 Jan 2008 (Tuesday), 1 Jan 2009 (Thursday) due to the leap year in 2008, and finally 1 Jan 2010 (Friday). This matches our total shift approach. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sunday, Saturday, Wednesday, Monday: Each of these would correspond to a wrong total shift of 0, 6, 3, or 1 days from Sunday, respectively, which does not match the actual shift of 5 days produced by the sequence of leap and non-leap years. Common Pitfalls: Common mistakes include forgetting to treat leap years as +2-day shifts or miscounting which years in the interval are leap years. Some candidates also forget that we count complete years between the two dates, not including the final year as a full year if we are going to its first day. Final Answer: 1 January 2010 fell on a Friday.

Question 7

Suppose that today is Friday. In standard calendar arithmetic, what day of the week will it be exactly 65 days from today?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This problem asks for the weekday 65 days from a known weekday, Friday. It is a typical example of using the modulo 7 concept for calendar calculations, because the days of the week repeat every 7 days. Given Data / Assumptions: Today: Friday. Days ahead: 65 days. We use a 7-day repeating weekly cycle. Concept / Approach: The weekday after N days is obtained by moving forward N modulo 7 positions in the weekday cycle. That is, we compute the remainder when N is divided by 7. If the remainder is r, then we move r days forward from the starting day to find the target day of the week. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute 65 modulo 7. 65 ÷ 7 = 9 with remainder 2 (since 7 * 9 = 63). So 65 ≡ 2 (mod 7). Step 2: Interpret the remainder. A remainder of 2 means that 65 days correspond to 9 full weeks plus 2 extra days. Full weeks do not change the weekday; only the extra 2 days matter. Step 3: Move 2 days forward from Friday. Friday + 1 day = Saturday. Saturday + 1 day = Sunday. Thus, 65 days from Friday is Sunday. Verification / Alternative check: We can cross-check with a smaller equivalent number of days. Since 65 ≡ 2 (mod 7), the weekday 65 days from Friday is the same as the weekday 2 days from Friday. Counting 2 days ahead gives Sunday, confirming our result without enumerating all 65 days. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Saturday: This would be correct for a remainder of 1, not 2. Friday: This would require a remainder of 0 (a full number of weeks). Thursday: This corresponds to moving back by 1 day from Friday, not forward by 2. Monday: This would require a remainder of 3, not 2. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes miscalculate 65 ÷ 7 or mistakenly move backward instead of forward in the weekday cycle. Others forget that any multiple of 7 days does not change the weekday, so they overcomplicate the problem instead of focusing on the remainder. Final Answer: 65 days from Friday, it will be Sunday.

Question 8

Assuming a non-leap year of 365 days each, how many seconds are there in a continuous period of 10 years?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Time-conversion questions often appear in aptitude tests to check basic arithmetic and unit conversion skills. Here we are asked to compute the total number of seconds in 10 years, assuming each year has 365 days. This involves converting years to days, days to hours, hours to minutes, and minutes to seconds. Given Data / Assumptions: Number of years = 10. Each year is assumed to have 365 days (ignoring leap years). 1 day = 24 hours. 1 hour = 60 minutes. 1 minute = 60 seconds. Concept / Approach: The basic idea is to convert years to days, then multiply by 24 to get hours, multiply by 60 to get minutes, and again by 60 to get seconds. In formula form: Total seconds = years * days-per-year * 24 * 60 * 60. We must perform the multiplication carefully to avoid arithmetic errors. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert years to days. 1 year = 365 days. 10 years = 10 * 365 = 3650 days. Step 2: Convert days to hours. 1 day = 24 hours. 3650 days = 3650 * 24 hours. 3650 * 24 = 3650 * (20 + 4) = 3650 * 20 + 3650 * 4 = 73000 + 14600 = 87600 hours. Step 3: Convert hours to minutes. 1 hour = 60 minutes. 87600 hours = 87600 * 60 minutes = 5,256,000 minutes. Step 4: Convert minutes to seconds. 1 minute = 60 seconds. 5,256,000 minutes = 5,256,000 * 60 seconds. 5,256,000 * 60 = 315,360,000 seconds. Therefore, total seconds in 10 years = 315,360,000 seconds. Verification / Alternative check: We can use a compact formula directly: Seconds in 1 year = 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 = 31,536,000. Seconds in 10 years = 10 * 31,536,000 = 315,360,000 seconds. This matches the previous result exactly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 31523500 sec and 315354000 sec: These values are close but result from incorrect multiplications or misplacing zeros. 315423000 sec: Slight overestimation, likely from using 366 days somewhere or miscalculating. 314496000 sec: This corresponds to 9.98 years or using 364 days per year, which is not the assumption given. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates slip by forgetting a factor of 10 when scaling up from 1 year to 10 years or by mis-multiplying 365 by 24. Keeping track of zeros carefully and breaking the multiplication into simpler parts helps avoid mistakes. Final Answer: There are 315,360,000 seconds in 10 years under the given assumption.

Question 9

Given that 9 August 2016 falls on a Saturday (assumed for this problem), what was the day of the week on 9 August 1616, using standard Gregorian calendar reasoning?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This problem links two dates that are exactly 400 years apart: 9 August 1616 and 9 August 2016. We are told that 9 August 2016 is a Saturday, and we must determine the weekday on 9 August 1616. Questions involving 400-year gaps are well suited to applying the special properties of the Gregorian calendar. Given Data / Assumptions: 9 August 2016 is assumed to be Saturday. We are to find the day on 9 August 1616. We assume the proleptic Gregorian calendar for both dates (as is common in aptitude exams). Concept / Approach: In the Gregorian calendar, a span of 400 years corresponds to exactly a whole number of weeks. Specifically, there are 97 leap years and 303 non-leap years in 400 years. The total number of days in 400 years is 146,097, and 146,097 is divisible by 7. Therefore, the day of the week for a given date repeats every 400 years. So any date and the same date exactly 400 years apart fall on the same weekday. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the length of a 400-year cycle. Leap years in 400 years = 97. Non-leap years = 400 − 97 = 303. Total days = 97 * 366 + 303 * 365. 97 * 366 = 97 * (365 + 1) = 97 * 365 + 97. So total days = (97 * 365 + 97) + 303 * 365 = (97 + 303) * 365 + 97 = 400 * 365 + 97 = 146,000 + 97 = 146,097 days. Step 2: Check divisibility by 7. 146,097 ÷ 7 = 20,871 exactly, so it is an integer. Therefore, 400 years correspond to an integral number of weeks with no leftover days. Step 3: Apply to the given dates. The time from 9 August 1616 to 9 August 2016 is exactly 400 years. Since 400 years shift the calendar by a whole number of weeks, the weekday repeats exactly. Thus, the day for 9 August 1616 is the same as for 9 August 2016, namely Saturday. Verification / Alternative check: Any algorithm for days of the week that accounts correctly for the Gregorian 400-year pattern (for example, Zeller's congruence adapted to the proleptic Gregorian calendar) will also yield Saturday for both dates, confirming the theory-based reasoning above. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sunday, Friday, Monday, Wednesday: These alternatives would require that 400 years correspond to an offset of 1, 2, 3, or 4 days, but we have shown that 400 years equal an exact number of weeks, so there is zero offset in weekday. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates forget the special property of the 400-year Gregorian cycle and try to count leap years and non-leap years manually, often leading to mistakes. Others may mistakenly think that 100-year or 200-year intervals reset the weekday exactly, which is not true unless you consider the full 400-year cycle. Final Answer: The day of the week on 9 August 1616 was also Saturday.

Question 10

According to the leap-year rules of the Gregorian calendar, which one of the following years is not a leap year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: Leap-year questions test your knowledge of the Gregorian calendar rules. Some years that are divisible by 4 are leap years, but for century years (like 1900 or 2000), there is an additional rule involving divisibility by 400. Here, we must identify which of the given years is not a leap year. Given Data / Assumptions: Years given: 2000, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2016. We assume the standard Gregorian leap-year rules. Concept / Approach: In the Gregorian calendar: 1. A year is a leap year if it is divisible by 4. 2. However, if the year is a century year (ends with 00), it is not a leap year unless it is also divisible by 400. So, for each year, we check divisibility by 4, and for century years, also check divisibility by 400, to decide whether it is a leap year or not. Step-by-Step Solution: Check 2000: 2000 is divisible by 100, and also divisible by 400 (2000 ÷ 400 = 5). Therefore, 2000 is a leap year. Check 2008: 2008 ÷ 4 = 502 with no remainder, and it is not a century year. So, 2008 is a leap year. Check 2009: 2009 ÷ 4 leaves a remainder; it is not divisible by 4. Therefore, 2009 is not a leap year. Check 2012: 2012 ÷ 4 = 503 exactly, and it is not a century year. Hence, 2012 is a leap year. Check 2016: 2016 ÷ 4 = 504 exactly, and again not a century year. So, 2016 is also a leap year. Verification / Alternative check: We can recall that the sequence of leap years around this period includes 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, and so on, with 2009 clearly appearing between two leap years (2008 and 2012) and hence not being a leap year. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2000: Special century year that is divisible by 400, so it is a leap year. 2008, 2012, 2016: All are simple multiples of 4 and are known leap years. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates misremember that century years are never leap years, forgetting the exception for those divisible by 400 (like 2000). Others mix up nearby years and may incorrectly pick 2008 or 2012. Always apply both rules carefully. Final Answer: The year that is not a leap year is 2009.

Question 11

In a standard year, considering weekends as Saturday and Sunday, how many weekend days (total number of Saturdays plus Sundays) are there in one full year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This question checks your understanding of how weeks and weekends fit into a year. A weekend is usually defined as Saturday and Sunday, so we need to count the total number of weekend days (not the number of distinct weekends) in a standard year. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider a standard year with 365 days. Each week has 7 days: Monday to Sunday. Weekend days are Saturday and Sunday. We must find the total number of weekend days in the year. Concept / Approach: In one week, there are exactly 2 weekend days (Saturday and Sunday). To find the number of weekend days in a year, we first calculate how many full weeks a year contains. Since 365 ÷ 7 = 52 weeks with 1 extra day, there are 52 full weeks. Each of these 52 weeks has 2 weekend days, so we multiply accordingly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the number of full weeks in a year. 365 ÷ 7 = 52 weeks with a remainder of 1 day. So there are 52 complete weeks and 1 extra day. Step 2: Count weekend days in full weeks. Each week has 2 weekend days (Saturday and Sunday). Number of weekend days in 52 weeks = 52 * 2 = 104. Step 3: Consider the remaining 1 extra day. The remaining 1 day could be any day of the week depending on which day the year starts, but it belongs to some weekday and may or may not be a weekend. However, regardless of this extra day, we already have 104 weekend days from the 52 complete weeks. Therefore, the minimum total number of weekend days is 104, and the question options clearly point to this interpretation. Verification / Alternative check: You can think of the year as 52 copies of the same 7-day pattern. Each pattern includes exactly 1 Saturday and 1 Sunday, yielding 2 weekend days per week. Multiplying gives 52 * 2 = 104 weekend days per year, which matches our earlier computation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 52 or 53: These might refer to the number of weekends or count only one of the weekend days, not both. 103 or 105: These arise from miscounting the extra day or mistakenly altering the number of weekends in some weeks. The core pattern of 52 weeks with 2 weekend days each ensures a base of 104. Common Pitfalls: A typical confusion is between the number of weekend days and the number of weekends. While the year has around 52 weekends (sometimes 53 in terms of counting Saturdays or Sundays separately), the total weekend days are counted as 2 per week, making 104. Final Answer: There are 104 weekend days (Saturdays and Sundays combined) in a standard year.

Question 12

If 17 March 1997 was a Monday, what day of the week was 17 March 1996, using standard leap-year and weekday-shift rules?

Accepted Answer

Introduction: This problem asks us to find the day of the week for a specific date one year earlier, given the weekday for the same calendar date one year later. It involves recognising that the type of year (leap or non-leap) and whether the 29 February falls in between are important factors in calculating the weekday shift. Given Data / Assumptions: 17 March 1997 is Monday. We must find the weekday on 17 March 1996. We use standard leap-year rules. 1996 is divisible by 4, so 1996 is a leap year. Concept / Approach: The day of the week advances by 1 day after a non-leap year (365 days = 52 weeks + 1 day) and by 2 days after a leap year (366 days = 52 weeks + 2 days). Here we are moving backwards in time from 17 March 1997 to 17 March 1996. The year 1996 is a leap year, and the date 17 March is after 29 February, so the full leap-year shift must be taken into account. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the relationship between the dates. We move from 17 March 1996 to 17 March 1997: this interval includes the entire leap year 1996 and part of 1997, but for weekday purposes, we focus on the full-year shift from the date to the same date next year. Step 2: Identify year type. 1996 is a leap year (divisible by 4 and not a century year). For dates after 29 February, the same date in the next year is shifted by 2 weekdays compared with the previous year. Step 3: Apply the weekday shift. Let D1996 be the weekday on 17 March 1996. Then 17 March 1997, being one year after 17 March 1996 in a leap-year context (after 29 February), will be D1996 + 2 days. We are given that 17 March 1997 is Monday. So D1996 + 2 = Monday. Therefore, D1996 = Monday − 2 days. Counting backwards: Monday → Sunday (−1) → Saturday (−2). So 17 March 1996 was a Saturday. Verification / Alternative check: We can explicitly trace the sequence just around those dates. Since 1996 is a leap year with 29 February, and 17 March occurs after the extra day, the shift from 17 March 1996 to 17 March 1997 must be 2 days forward. Thus, if 1996 had Saturday, 1997 has Monday, which matches the given information. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Monday: This would imply a shift of 0 days, which is impossible across a full year. Tuesday or Wednesday: These correspond to incorrect backward shifts (−6, −5, or similar), not the required 2-day backward difference. Sunday: This would mean only a 1-day shift instead of 2, ignoring the leap-year effect. Common Pitfalls: Many learners forget that leap years cause a 2-day shift only for dates after 29 February. Others may mistakenly apply only a 1-day shift between the same dates in consecutive years, regardless of leap-year status. Always check whether the date is before or after 29 February in the leap year. Final Answer: The day of the week on 17 March 1996 was Saturday.

Question 13

In a 30-day month that begins on a Saturday, all Sundays and every second Saturday (that is, the 2nd and 4th Saturdays) are holidays. How many working days are there in that month?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Calendar-based aptitude questions often ask you to count weekends or specific off days in a given month. Here, you have to work out how many days are actually working days when all Sundays and every second Saturday (2nd and 4th Saturday of the month) are holidays in a 30-day month starting on a Saturday. Given Data / Assumptions: The month has exactly 30 days. Day 1 of the month is a Saturday. All Sundays are holidays. Every second Saturday (2nd and 4th Saturdays of the month) is also a holiday. All other days are working days. Concept / Approach: We first lay out the sequence of days of the week for the entire 30-day month. Then we identify which dates are Sundays and which dates are the 2nd and 4th Saturdays. These dates are counted as holidays. Finally, we subtract the total number of holidays from 30 to obtain the total number of working days. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List weekdays for the first week. Day 1: Saturday, Day 2: Sunday, Day 3: Monday, Day 4: Tuesday, Day 5: Wednesday, Day 6: Thursday, Day 7: Friday. Step 2: Continue the pattern up to Day 30. Saturdays: Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29. Sundays: Days 2, 9, 16, 23, 30. Step 3: Identify holiday Saturdays. Every second Saturday means the 2nd and 4th Saturdays, which are Days 8 and 22. Step 4: Count all holidays. Holiday Sundays: 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 (5 days). Holiday Saturdays: 8, 22 (2 days). Total holidays = 5 + 2 = 7 days. Step 5: Compute working days. Working days = 30 - 7 = 23. Verification / Alternative check: You can quickly verify by noting there are 4 complete weeks (28 days) plus 2 extra days. In 4 weeks, there are exactly 4 Sundays and 4 Saturdays. With the 30-day pattern, one additional Saturday (Day 29) and one additional Sunday (Day 30) appear, giving 5 Sundays and 5 Saturdays total. Among the Saturdays, only 2 (2nd and 4th) are counted as extra holidays beyond Sundays, giving exactly 7 holidays overall. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 22 or 24 working days would assume either one fewer or one more holiday than actually present. 25 working days would require only 5 holidays (just Sundays) and ignore the given second-Saturday rule. Common Pitfalls: Many learners misinterpret “every second Saturday” as every alternate Saturday starting from the first Saturday, which would change the count. Others forget to include the fifth Sunday that appears when the month starts on a Saturday. Carefully writing out the weekday sequence prevents these errors. Final Answer: The month has 23 working days.

Question 14

In calendar calculations, the calendar of the year 1897 will repeat exactly (same weekdays on the same dates) in which of the following future years?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A common type of calendar aptitude question asks in which later year an earlier year’s calendar will repeat exactly. Two years have the same calendar if both are either leap years or non-leap years and if the weekday pattern for all dates matches. Here, we must find which year shares the same calendar as 1897. Given Data / Assumptions: Year in question: 1897 (a common, non-leap year). Candidate years: 1901, 1903, 1908, 1926. A year repeats a calendar if: - It has the same leap/non-leap status, and - The total day shift from 1 January 1897 to 1 January of that year is a multiple of 7. We use the Gregorian leap-year rule (multiples of 4, excluding centuries not divisible by 400). Concept / Approach: Each ordinary year shifts the starting weekday of the next year by 1 day; each leap year shifts it by 2 days. The total shift in weekdays between 1897 and a later year Y is: Shift = (number of common years) * 1 + (number of leap years) * 2 (mod 7). If this shift is 0 (mod 7) and both years are non-leap, the calendars match. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that 1897 is not divisible by 4, so it is a non-leap year. Step 2: Count leap years between 1897 and 1926. Leap years in this interval (excluding 1900 as it is not a leap year) are: 1904, 1908, 1912, 1916, 1920, 1924. Number of leap years = 6. Step 3: Count total years from 1897 up to 1926. Total years = 1926 - 1897 = 29. Step 4: Compute the total weekday shift. Common years = 29 - 6 = 23. Shift = 23 * 1 + 6 * 2 = 23 + 12 = 35 days. Since 35 mod 7 = 0, the weekday cycle returns to the same starting day. Step 5: Confirm year type. 1926 is not divisible by 4, so it is also a non-leap year, matching 1897. Verification / Alternative check: You can also rule out the other options quickly. For 1901 and 1903, fewer years have passed, and the cumulative shift is not a multiple of 7. For 1908, the shift still does not come back to 0 mod 7. Only by 1926 does the total shift equal exactly 35 days, which is 5 full weeks, ensuring the same pattern of weekdays. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1901 and 1903 are non-leap years but do not produce a total shift that is a multiple of 7 days, so their 1 January weekdays differ from that of 1897. 1908 is a leap year, while 1897 is not, so their calendars can never be identical even if the weekday shift matched. Common Pitfalls: Learners often assume the calendar repeats every 11 or 28 years without checking for leap-year adjustments. Another common error is incorrectly counting 1900 as a leap year; it is not, because it is divisible by 100 but not by 400. Always apply the Gregorian rule carefully. Final Answer: The year with the same calendar as 1897 is 1926.

Question 15

The second day of a certain month falls on a Sunday. The very next month has 31 days. What will be the day of the week on the last day of that next month?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Calendar questions often require reasoning about how weekdays shift between months. In this problem, you are told that the 2nd day of one month is a Sunday and that the following month has 31 days. You are asked to find the weekday on the last day of that next month. The twist is that the length of the first month is not given explicitly. Given Data / Assumptions: Day 2 of Month 1 is Sunday, so Day 1 of Month 1 is Saturday. Month 2 is the next month after Month 1 and has 31 days. The exact length of Month 1 is not specified; it could be 28, 29, 30, or 31 days depending on which month it is. We assume the standard Gregorian calendar month lengths. Concept / Approach: The weekday of the first day of Month 2 depends on how many days Month 1 has, because the weekday advances by (length of Month 1) mod 7. Once we know the weekday of Day 1 of Month 2, the weekday of its last day (Day 31) is 30 days later, so it shifts by 30 mod 7 = 2 days. If different valid lengths for Month 1 give different starting weekdays for Month 2, then the last day of Month 2 cannot be uniquely determined. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Determine Day 1 of Month 1. If Day 2 is Sunday, then Day 1 is Saturday. Step 2: Consider possible lengths of Month 1. Month 1 could have 28, 29, 30, or 31 days (examples: February, April, June, August, etc.). Step 3: Compute weekday of Day 1 of Month 2 for each case. If Month 1 has 28 days: shift = 28 mod 7 = 0, so Month 2 starts on Saturday. If Month 1 has 29 days: shift = 1, so Month 2 starts on Sunday. If Month 1 has 30 days: shift = 2, so Month 2 starts on Monday. If Month 1 has 31 days: shift = 3, so Month 2 starts on Tuesday. Step 4: Find the last day of Month 2 in each case. Month 2 has 31 days, so Day 31 is 30 days after Day 1, i.e., weekday shift = 30 mod 7 = 2 days. Starting Saturday → last day Monday; starting Sunday → last day Tuesday; starting Monday → last day Wednesday; starting Tuesday → last day Thursday. Verification / Alternative check: You can match these possibilities to actual month pairs (e.g., February–March, April–May) and see that, depending on which month pair you choose, the last day of the 31-day month can be different weekdays. Therefore, more than one answer is consistent with the given information, confirming that the weekday is not uniquely determined. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Choosing Friday, Saturday, or Sunday assumes a unique specific weekday, but we have shown that the last day could be Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday depending on the length of Month 1. None of the fixed weekday options can be guaranteed. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume a particular month (for example, March or January) without being told, and then solve using that single assumption. Another error is to forget that 29-day February can occur in leap years, adding another case. Always check whether the data uniquely determine the answer; if different plausible scenarios give different results, the correct conclusion is that it cannot be determined uniquely. Final Answer: The weekday of the last day of the next month cannot be fixed; it is not uniquely determined from the given information.

Question 16

It is given that 1.12.91 (1 December 1991) falls on a Tuesday and this is the first Tuesday of the month. Which date is the fourth Thursday of December 1991?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Date-and-day questions often ask you to find the weekday or date of a specific repetition, such as the 3rd Monday or 4th Thursday in a month. In this problem, you are told that 1 December 1991 is a Tuesday, and you must find which date is the fourth Thursday of that same month. Given Data / Assumptions: 1 December 1991 is a Tuesday. We want the date of the 4th Thursday in December 1991. Each week repeats the sequence of weekdays after 7 days. The month of December has 31 days, but we mainly need its first few weeks. Concept / Approach: Start from the known weekday (1 December is Tuesday) and list out the weekdays for subsequent dates. Identify the first Thursday, then add 7-day intervals to find the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Thursdays. Because the weekly pattern repeats every 7 days, every nth Thursday is exactly 7*(n-1) days after the first Thursday. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List the first few days of December 1991. 1 Dec: Tuesday 2 Dec: Wednesday 3 Dec: Thursday (this is the 1st Thursday). Step 2: Use the 7-day repetition to find subsequent Thursdays. 2nd Thursday = 3 + 7 = 10 December. 3rd Thursday = 10 + 7 = 17 December. 4th Thursday = 17 + 7 = 24 December. Thus, the fourth Thursday falls on 24.12.91. Verification / Alternative check: We can cross-check by listing the weekdays around 24 December. From 1 December (Tuesday), we get: 8 December (Tuesday), 15 December (Tuesday), 22 December (Tuesday). Therefore, 5 December is Thursday +2 days (Saturday), 12 December is Thursday +2 days, and so on. Counting properly, you will see that 24 December aligns with the fourth occurrence of Thursday. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 22.12.91 and 23.12.91, based on the pattern, fall earlier in the week and do not correspond to a Thursday when 1 December is Tuesday. 25.12.91 is the Thursday after 24.12.91 only if the pattern were shifted, but with 1 December fixed as Tuesday, 25 December becomes a Wednesday, not Thursday. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mistakenly take 1 December as the first Thursday itself or forget to count the first occurrence properly, leading them to pick the 3rd or 5th Thursday instead. Keeping a small table of dates and weekdays or using the idea that each same weekday recurs after every 7 days helps avoid confusion. Final Answer: The fourth Thursday of December 1991 falls on 24.12.91.

Question 17

If the third day of a particular month falls on a Tuesday, then which day of the week will be the 25th day of that same month?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This type of calendar problem checks your understanding of how weekdays shift by a fixed pattern through a month. If you know the weekday for one date, you can determine the weekday for another date by counting the difference in days modulo 7, since the weekly cycle repeats every 7 days. Given Data / Assumptions: The 3rd day of a month is a Tuesday. We need to find the weekday on the 25th day of that month. A week has 7 days and weekday patterns repeat every 7 days. The month is long enough to include at least 25 days (which is always true for standard calendar months). Concept / Approach: The key idea is to calculate the number of days between the 3rd and 25th of the month. Then, compute this difference modulo 7 to see how many weekday steps we move forward from Tuesday. Adding that many steps to Tuesday gives the weekday for the 25th. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute the difference in dates. From the 3rd to the 25th is 25 - 3 = 22 days. Step 2: Reduce this difference modulo 7. 22 divided by 7 gives 3 complete weeks (21 days) and a remainder of 1 day. So, 22 mod 7 = 1. The weekday advances by 1 day. Step 3: Move 1 weekday forward from Tuesday. After Tuesday comes Wednesday. Therefore, the 25th day will be a Wednesday. Verification / Alternative check: You can list a few days to reassure yourself. If the 3rd is Tuesday, then the 10th (7 days later) is also Tuesday, the 17th is Tuesday, and the 24th is Tuesday. Therefore, the 25th, which is one day after the 24th, must be Wednesday. This confirms the modular arithmetic result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tuesday would be correct only for dates that differ by a multiple of 7 from the 3rd (like 10th, 17th, or 24th), not the 25th. Monday and Sunday are backward shifts from Tuesday, whereas we move one day forward when going from the 3rd to the 25th, so those cannot be right. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to count both the 3rd and 25th when computing the difference, giving 23 instead of 22 days and hence the wrong weekday. Another slip is to forget to use modulo 7 and instead shift too far ahead. Always compute the date difference correctly and then reduce it by multiples of 7. Final Answer: The 25th day of the month will fall on Wednesday.

Question 18

For purposes of calendar repetition, which is the next year after 2003 that has exactly the same calendar (same weekdays on the same dates) as the year 2003?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Some aptitude questions ask about when a calendar year repeats exactly, meaning every date falls on the same weekday as in the original year. Two years have the same calendar if they are both leap years or both common years and if the total weekday shift between them is a multiple of 7 days. Given Data / Assumptions: Base year: 2003. We are asked for the next year after 2003 that has the same calendar. Options: 2024, 2014, 2009, 2020. Leap-year rule (Gregorian): - Years divisible by 4 are leap years, except centuries not divisible by 400. 2000 is a leap year; 1900 was not; 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020 are leap years. Concept / Approach: Each common (non-leap) year shifts the starting weekday of the following year by 1 day; a leap year shifts it by 2 days. To find when the calendar repeats, we calculate the cumulative shift in days from 1 January 2003 to 1 January of the candidate years. If the total shift is a multiple of 7 and the candidate year is also a common year, the calendars match exactly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that 2003 is not divisible by 4, so it is a common year. Step 2: Check year 2009. Leap years between 2003 and 2009: 2004, 2008 (2 leap years). Total years from 2003 to 2009: 6. Common years = 6 - 2 = 4. Shift = 4 * 1 + 2 * 2 = 4 + 4 = 8 → 8 mod 7 = 1, so calendar does not match. Step 3: Check year 2014. Leap years from 2003 to 2014: 2004, 2008, 2012 (3 leap years). Total years = 11. Common years = 11 - 3 = 8. Shift = 8 * 1 + 3 * 2 = 8 + 6 = 14 → 14 mod 7 = 0. 2014 is not divisible by 4, so it is also a common year. Therefore, 2014 has the same calendar as 2003. Verification / Alternative check: We can quickly see that 2020 and 2024 are leap years (both divisible by 4), while 2003 is not. Leap and non-leap years can never share an identical calendar. 2009 is closer but we already found the shift is 1 weekday, not 0, so it fails. Only 2014 gives a total shift of exactly 14 days, which is two complete weeks, keeping every date on the same weekday. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2009 has a one-day shift in the starting weekday compared to 2003, so their calendars differ. 2020 and 2024 are leap years; they will have 29 days in February whereas 2003 had 28, making the calendars incompatible. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often apply a simple “6 or 11 years later” rule without counting leap years carefully. Another mistake is ignoring leap-year status and assuming all patterns are purely 7-year cycles. You must always combine leap-year counting with the weekday shift calculation. Final Answer: The next year after 2003 with the same calendar is 2014.

Question 19

In a certain year, the festival Holi was celebrated on 6th March at 9:00 AM, and Deepawali (Diwali) was celebrated on 11th November at 8:00 PM of the same year. What was the total time interval between these two events, expressed in hours?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Time-interval questions between two dates and times combine calendar knowledge with hour calculations. Here, both festivals occur in the same year: Holi on 6 March at 9:00 AM and Deepawali on 11 November at 8:00 PM. We must find the total interval between them in hours, assuming a common (non-leap) year. Given Data / Assumptions: Holi: 6 March, 9:00 AM. Deepawali: 11 November, 8:00 PM (20:00 hours), same year. Year is treated as a normal year (February has 28 days). We need the time difference in hours from 6 March 9:00 AM to 11 November 8:00 PM. Month lengths in a common year: - March 31 days, April 30, May 31, June 30, July 31, August 31, September 30, October 31, November 30. Concept / Approach: A clean method is to compute the difference in days between the two dates at the same time of day (9:00 AM), then adjust for the extra time from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM on 11 November. Once we have the total number of days and extra hours, we convert everything to hours and sum up. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Count days from 6 March to 11 November, same time (9:00 AM). Ordinal day of 6 March in a common year = 65 (assuming 31 days in January and 28 in February). Ordinal day of 11 November = 315. Difference in days = 315 - 65 = 250 days. Step 2: Convert these 250 days to hours. Each day has 24 hours, so hours = 250 * 24 = 6000 hours. Step 3: Adjust for the time difference on 11 November. We moved from 6 March 9:00 AM to 11 November 9:00 AM in 250 days. From 11 November 9:00 AM to 11 November 8:00 PM is an additional 11 hours. Step 4: Add these hours. Total time interval = 6000 + 11 = 6011 hours. Verification / Alternative check: Instead of using ordinal days, you can break the period into segments: from 6 March to 31 March (25 days), then full months April to October, and finally the first 11 days of November. Summing these gives 25 + 30 + 31 + 30 + 31 + 31 + 30 + 31 + 11 = 250 days, agreeing with the ordinal calculation. Converting 250 days to 6000 hours and adding the extra 11 hours again gives 6011 hours, confirming the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2101, 4125, and 5124 hours correspond to significantly shorter intervals than the period from early March to mid-November. These values would imply much fewer days than actually lie between 6 March and 11 November, so they are not consistent with the calendar. Common Pitfalls: Typical mistakes include miscounting the days in one or more months, forgetting that February has only 28 days in a non-leap year, or neglecting the extra 11 hours from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM on the final day. Another pitfall is mixing up inclusive and exclusive counting of days; using date differences or ordinal-day approaches helps keep the calculation precise. Final Answer: The time interval between Holi and Deepawali is 6011 hours.

Question 20

In general calendar calculations, considering a typical block of 4 consecutive years that includes one leap year and three ordinary years, how many days are there altogether in those 4 years?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: An understanding of leap years and the total number of days over multiple years is fundamental in calendar arithmetic. This question asks for the total number of days in a block of 4 consecutive years, assuming the standard Gregorian pattern of three common years and one leap year within every 4-year cycle (ignoring century exceptions for this basic calculation). Given Data / Assumptions: We consider 4 consecutive years in the usual pattern: 3 are common (ordinary) years and 1 is a leap year. A common year has 365 days. A leap year has 366 days (because February has 29 days instead of 28). Century exceptions (like 1900 not being a leap year) are ignored for this basic count, as is common in aptitude questions unless specified. Concept / Approach: The total number of days in 4 consecutive years is simply the sum of the days in the 3 ordinary years and the 1 leap year. So we calculate 3 * 365 for the ordinary years and 1 * 366 for the leap year, then add them together to get the total. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compute days in the ordinary years. Each common year has 365 days. Total days from 3 common years = 3 * 365 = 1095 days. Step 2: Compute days in the leap year. A leap year has 366 days. Total days from the one leap year = 366 days. Step 3: Add all days together. Total days in 4 years = 1095 + 366 = 1461 days. Verification / Alternative check: You can check with an actual sequence, for example from 2017 to 2020. Years 2017, 2018, and 2019 are common years with 365 days each, and 2020 is a leap year with 366 days. Summing them: 2017 (365) + 2018 (365) + 2019 (365) + 2020 (366) = 1461 days, which confirms the formula result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1460 days would correspond to 4 common years without a leap year, which contradicts the usual 4-year cycle that includes one leap year, except under special century rules not suggested here. 1462 and 1459 days would imply two leap years or fewer than the correct number of days, respectively, and do not match the standard pattern of three years of 365 days and one year of 366 days. Common Pitfalls: Some learners forget that the leap year adds only one extra day and mistakenly treat the entire 4-year block as 4 * 365 = 1460 days, ignoring the +1 for the leap year. Others may overcomplicate the problem by worrying about special cases like century years. Unless explicitly stated, you can safely assume the normal 4-year pattern here. Final Answer: The total number of days in 4 consecutive years (with one leap year) is 1461 days.

Calendar Questions