Analogy — Comets : Meteors\nChoose the option that maintains “class : related members/phenomena” with correct taxonomy.

Introduction / Context:
The pair “Comets : Meteors” parallels two distinct but related astronomical phenomena, not a class–member relation in a strict taxonomic sense. We must identify an option that mirrors an appropriate relation (closely related phenomena), or else conclude none fits adequately.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Comets and meteors are both celestial phenomena, but one is not the class of the other.
• We look for similarly paired, non-taxonomic but related natural phenomena.

Concept / Approach:
Test each option for parallel structure (two peer phenomena of the same domain) rather than cause/effect, container/content, or attribute/behavior mismatches.

Step-by-Step Evaluation:

Verification / Alternative check:
Since none captures “two peer natural phenomena” within the same scientific domain (like “earthquakes : volcanoes”), the best choice is “None of these.”

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Books : Knowledge — container–content.
• Hawk : Crow — two species; the original are event/phenomena types.
• Stars : Fortune — metaphorical/astrology.
• Reptiles : Crawl — class–behavior mismatch.

Common Pitfalls:
Accepting any two related nouns without checking relational parity (phenomenon ↔ phenomenon).

Final Answer:
None of these