Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both Statements I and II together are not sufficient.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Determine the tallest using partial orderings among six people. DS checks whether a unique maximal element is forced.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Consolidate known relations and see whether anyone is shown to dominate all others.
Step-by-Step Solution:
From II: Sadhana is taller than Shipa, Meeta, and Deepa. From base, Geetha > Shipa (but no relation between Geetha and Sadhana).I only adds Sadhana > Sunita. After combining I+II+base, we still lack a comparison between Sadhana and Geetha.Thus, either Sadhana is tallest (if Sadhana > Geetha) or Geetha is tallest (if Geetha > Sadhana). Both possibilities satisfy all statements.Verification / Alternative check:Construct models: (1) Sadhana > Geetha > Deepa > Meeta > Shipa > Sunita; (2) Geetha > Sadhana > Deepa > Meeta > Shipa > Sunita. Both are consistent.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Assuming transitive links that are not stated (e.g., inferring Geetha > Deepa without basis).
Final Answer:D — Together not sufficient (tallest could be Sadhana or Geetha).
Discussion & Comments