Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Capacity test (e.g., Kelsey–Sykes)
Explanation:
Introduction:
Choosing a disinfectant for hospital practice requires tests that mimic real-world conditions: organic soil, repeated contamination, and realistic contact times. Some laboratory assays are good for comparison or research but do not reflect practical use.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The Kelsey–Sykes capacity test challenges a disinfectant repeatedly in the presence of organic matter to assess its sustained activity, simulating real hospital conditions (e.g., contaminated surfaces, added soil). In contrast, the phenol coefficient is a historic comparative index against phenol under controlled lab conditions, not a working simulation. MIC measures growth inhibition in broth and is for antibiotics/biocides under standardized conditions, not practical disinfection on surfaces. Simple suspension tests show time–kill but lack repeated challenge.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify which test includes repeated inoculation and soil load: capacity (Kelsey–Sykes).
Recognize phenol coefficient as comparative, not practical simulation.
Exclude MIC and basic suspension tests for lacking real-use features.
Choose the capacity test as the best simulation of hospital conditions.
Verification / Alternative check:
Standards texts describe the capacity test as assessing sustained efficacy under repeated contaminations, aligning with hospital practice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming the oldest or most cited test (phenol coefficient) is automatically the most realistic.
Final Answer:
The capacity test (Kelsey–Sykes) best simulates hospital use.
Discussion & Comments