Quantifying bacteria in a specimen Among the following routine methods, which is most likely to yield a quantitative result for viable bacterial numbers in a sample?
-
ASerial dilution followed by plating (viable count)
-
BGram staining of the specimen
-
CWet mount microscopy
-
DNone of these
-
EDirect fluorescent antibody stain only
Answer
Correct Answer: Serial dilution followed by plating (viable count)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Clinicians and microbiologists often need quantitative data, such as colony-forming units per milliliter, to interpret urinary tract infections, food contamination, or water quality. Different methods provide either qualitative or quantitative information; knowing which method is designed for quantitation is fundamental.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Serial dilution and plating can enumerate viable organisms.
- Gram stain provides morphology and approximate bacterial load but is not reliably quantitative.
- Wet mounts demonstrate motility or presence but not accurate counts.
Concept / Approach:The viable plate count method involves preparing tenfold dilutions of a sample, plating measured aliquots onto agar, incubating, and counting colonies. Because each colony theoretically arises from a single viable cell (or clump), the result can be expressed as CFU per mL or per gram using the formula: CFU/mL = colony count * (1 / plated volume) * dilution factor.
Step-by-Step Solution:Perform serial dilutions (for example, 10^-1 to 10^-6).Plate a known volume (for example, 0.1 mL) onto appropriate agar.After incubation, count plates with 30–300 colonies for accuracy.Compute CFU/mL using dilution factor and plated volume.
Verification / Alternative check:Results are reproducible within accepted variance and correlate with standard curves; other quantitative methods include Most Probable Number and flow cytometry, but classic dilution plating remains common.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- B: Gram stain is semi-quantitative at best.
- C: Wet mounts reveal motility but not standardized counts.
- D: Incorrect because option A is quantitative.
- E: DFA can identify organisms but is not a routine quantitative method.
Common Pitfalls:Counting plates outside the 30–300 range without adjusting dilutions; ignoring clumping which may underestimate cell numbers.
Final Answer:Serial dilution followed by plating (viable count)