Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: declarations
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In VHDL-based digital design, reusability and clear separation of concerns are vital. A key mechanism enabling this modularity is the package, which collects items that need to be visible across multiple entities and architectures within a project or library. Understanding exactly what belongs in a package prevents name collisions, reduces duplication, and makes testbenches and implementations consistent.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A VHDL package aggregates declarations: type and subtype declarations, constants, signals (rare in practice), records, arrays, function/procedure headers and bodies (if in a package body), and component declarations. These declarations can then be made visible by using a use clause (for example, use work.my_pkg.all;). Placing declarations in one package avoids copying definitions across multiple files and ensures that changes propagate predictably.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Industrial and academic code bases standardize on packages (for example, numeric_std) that provide shared declarations such as numeric types and overloaded arithmetic functions, confirming the role of packages as holders of declarations rather than concrete instances or timing data.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“vectors” are specific type instances; packages hold the declaration of a vector type, not a particular signal vector. “instances” are created in architectures via component/entity instantiation, not stored in packages. “timing models” and “configuration bits” are tool- or device-specific artifacts, not VHDL package contents.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing declarations with objects (signals/variables). Packages typically hold declarations, while actual objects live in architectures or blocks. Another pitfall is scattering type definitions across many files, causing maintenance issues.
Final Answer:
declarations
Discussion & Comments