Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should voting be made compulsory for all adults? Arguments: I. Yes. The candidates then elected would be far more representational. II. No. The citizens would thereby lose the right to not choose a representative.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong; and

Correct Answer:

Explanation:

I is strong: the more the number of voters, the better the representation. II is also strong if the concept of voting is seen analytically. When you vote, you decide to be with someone. Now, it is not necessary that you must be with someone. Such a compulsion would be going against the democratic principal .

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should subsidy on domestic LPG cylinders be stopped? Arguments: I. Yes. It leads to misuse of LPG by housewives who over- cook their food. II. No. Any subsidy cannot be stopped in a country committed to social welfare.
Statement: Should hoardings by roadside be banned? Arguments: I. Yes, they are a disturbance to traffic. II. No. it would result in a loss of revenue.
Statement: Should party X be voted to power? Arguments: I. Yes, it is the only party capable of bringing in stability. II. No. it can 't rule the country properly.
Statement: Should newspaper articles be written in a simple language? Arguments: I. Yes, they are aimed at general reader. II. No. newspaper would lose their respect if this happens.
Statement: Should bomb disposal be give cooperation by the public? Arguments: I. Yes, they are necessary to rescue people's lives. II. No, they are a nuisance to day-to-day life.
Statement: Should there be repolling at stations where there has been both -capturing? Arguments: I. Yes, What else do you think? II. No, it is a wastage of resources.
Statement: Should the Knowledge of computers be made essential for employment in offices? Arguments: I. Yes, computers are state-of-the -art devices. II. No, works in office are yet to get fully computerised.
Statement: Should the monthly quota for liquor be raised by the Ministry of Defence? Arguments: I. Yes, troops will do anything if they are promised two things-liquor and leave. II. No, consumption of too much alcohol is a medical nightmare and leads to dependency.
Statement: Should the Government bring the prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO)? Arguments: I. No, POTO endangers several constitutionally and internationally accepted human rights standards. II. Yes, terrorism has become a major threat and existing laws have proved insufficient to combat terrorism.
Statement: Should fixation of rents be a matter between landlords and tenants? Arguments : I. Yes, it is the sole right of landlords to fix rents according to his/her investment to carry livelihood and any intervention in this regard would violate Article 21 of the Constitution. II. No, this would increase the miseries of tenants because if landlords are give free hand they will start extorting money from their tenants.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion