Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should the Government bring the prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO)? Arguments: I. No, POTO endangers several constitutionally and internationally accepted human rights standards. II. Yes, terrorism has become a major threat and existing laws have proved insufficient to combat terrorism.

Correct Answer:

Explanation:

Both I and II are strong. Infringement of constitutionally and internationally accepted human rights standards can 't be ignored. Hence I is strong . Argument II is also strong because insufficiency of existing laws gives rise to the need to bring new laws.


← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion