Curioustab Logo Curioustab
Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly? Argument: I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all. II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion. III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not. IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.

Correct Answer: Only I and IV are strong

Explanation:

Clearly, the rule has been devised or the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two-wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to head injury and finally death. And the objective of a rule cannot be fulfilled until it is followed by all and this required strict enforcement. Thus, both I and IV hold strong, while III does not. Besides, it is the basic duty of the Government to look after the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the direction of the individuals. So, argument II does not hold strong.


← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion