Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should all the youngsters below 21 years of age be disallowed room going to a beer bar? Argument: I. No. it is not correct to prevent matured youngsters above 18 years of age who can vote, from having fun. II. Yes. The entry fees to such pubs should also be hiked. III. No. There is no such curb in western countries IV.Yes. This will help in preventing youngsters from getting into company and imbibing bad habits

Correct Answer: Only I and IV are strong

Explanation:

Clearly, our constitution considers youngsters above 18 years of age, mature enough to exercise their decisive power in Government by voting. This implies that such individuals can also judge what is good or bad for them. Thus, argument I holds strong. However, at such places, youngsters may be lead astray by certain indecent guys and swayed from the right path into bad indulgences. So, IV also holds strong. Hiking the entry fees is no way to disallow them, and also the idea of imitating the western countries holds no relevance. So, neither II nor III holds strong.


← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion