Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India? Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases II. No. Each individual should have right to choose what he wants. III. No. There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effect on human body. IV. Yes. It is banned inn many other countries also.

Correct Answer: Only III is strong

Explanation:

The use of 'only' in I makes it invalid. Also, it is the duty of the government to save its citizens from intakes of any harmful products, even if they like them. So, II does not hold strong. Besides, a product must not be banned unless ll its harmful effect have been proved. So, III hold strong. Lastly, we cannot blindly follow the decisions taken by other countries. So, IV also does not hold.


← Previous Question Next Question→

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion