Question 1

You discover that a person whom you call your friend has been cheating you. How should you respond to this situation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question concerns interpersonal relationships and emotional maturity. When you find that someone you consider a friend has been cheating you, your reaction reveals your values, conflict-handling skills and capacity for constructive communication. The situation-reaction test checks whether you can address the issue fairly rather than responding with anger or gossip. Given Data / Assumptions: - The person involved is someone you call your friend.- You have discovered that this friend has been cheating you in some way.- The exact nature of cheating is not specified but is serious enough to matter to you.- You are now deciding how to respond. Concept / Approach: A good response balances self-respect with fairness. It is important not to tolerate ongoing cheating, but it is also important to verify facts and give a chance for clarification or remorse. Immediate revenge or gossip can escalate the situation and damage your own character. Calm confrontation aimed at making the person realise the impact of his behaviour is a mature first step, after which you can decide on future boundaries. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Confirm to yourself that the cheating actually took place and is not a misunderstanding.Step 2: Arrange to speak with your friend privately and calmly, without creating a scene in front of others.Step 3: Explain what you have discovered, how it has affected you and why you feel betrayed.Step 4: Give your friend a chance to explain, apologise or correct the behaviour. Sometimes people act wrongly under pressure or due to poor judgment.Step 5: Make it clear that such cheating is unacceptable and that trust is essential in friendship.Step 6: Depending on the response, you can then decide whether to continue the friendship with clear boundaries or distance yourself in a dignified way. Verification / Alternative check: Breaking relations immediately without any discussion may be justified in extreme cases but often leaves both sides without closure and may be an overreaction if there has been a misunderstanding. Seeking revenge by cheating in return only lowers your own moral standards. Spreading stories about your friend to others can turn into gossip and character assassination, and may reflect poorly on you as well. In contrast, confronting the person calmly with the aim of making him realise his mistake promotes honesty and gives both sides a chance to handle the situation more constructively. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A closes the door without attempting any communication or correction. Option B encourages you to behave in the same unethical way, which is not desirable. Option D focuses on damaging the friend's reputation rather than resolving the issue. Only option C demonstrates maturity, fairness and a willingness to address wrongdoing in a direct yet balanced manner. Common Pitfalls: People often react to betrayal with immediate anger, impulsive social media posts or gossip. These reactions complicate the situation further. A thoughtful approach is to confront the problem directly, express your feelings and observe whether the other person is genuinely remorseful. This way you protect both your dignity and your integrity. Final Answer: You should calmly confront your friend and make him realise his mistake, then decide on the future of the relationship based on his response.

Question 2

You are interviewed for a new job. Which of the following aspects would be most important to you while considering this job opportunity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question explores your priorities and professional values when considering a job. During an interview, what you identify as most important says a lot about whether you are motivated primarily by money, promotion or by the nature of the work itself. Employers often look for candidates who are driven by meaningful contribution rather than only immediate personal gain. Given Data / Assumptions: - You are being interviewed for a new job.- Several attractive aspects are available: promotion opportunities, remuneration and scope to develop and apply ideas.- The interviewer wants to understand which single factor you consider most important. Concept / Approach: While salary and promotion are important, an ideal answer in such tests emphasises long-term professional growth, creativity and the chance to contribute to the organisation's success. When you value the scope to develop and implement ideas, it shows that you are intrinsically motivated, innovative and focused on improving systems rather than only on personal gain. This aligns with what many good organisations look for in future leaders. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Evaluate each option. Remuneration is necessary for financial security but is not the only meaningful criterion for job satisfaction.Step 2: Opportunities for promotion matter, but promotions usually follow from good performance and meaningful contributions, not as a goal in isolation.Step 3: The scope to develop ideas and use them to improve organisational functioning suggests that the company values your creativity and initiative, and that the work will be intellectually satisfying.Step 4: From an employer's perspective, a candidate who prioritises contribution and innovation along with growth is more attractive than someone focused only on pay or position.Step 5: Therefore, choosing the option that highlights scope for ideas and improvement reflects mature and professional priorities. Verification / Alternative check: Suppose you choose salary as the most important factor. This may signal to the interviewer that you would change jobs easily if offered slightly more pay elsewhere. Emphasising promotion alone might suggest that you are more interested in title than in the work itself. Saying that everything is equally important appears indecisive and does not give insight into your core motivation. In contrast, choosing the opportunity to develop and implement ideas shows that you seek challenging work and long-term contribution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A focuses narrowly on promotions, which are a by-product of consistent performance. Option B narrows attention to money, which, although necessary, is not usually presented as the highest ideal in such questions. Option D avoids giving a clear priority and may come across as a safe but non-committal answer. Option C is preferred because it reflects commitment to meaningful work and organisational improvement. Common Pitfalls: Many test takers instinctively choose salary because it seems practical, but these scenario questions aim to reveal broader values. Others try to avoid a firm stand by saying everything matters equally. A thoughtful answer shows that while money and promotions are important, the chance to innovate and contribute significantly is what truly motivates you and benefits the organisation. Final Answer: The most important aspect should be the scope to develop your ideas and use them to improve the working of the organisation.

Question 3

You are in the parking area of a shopping complex when suddenly the electricity fails and there is total darkness. What will you do in this situation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question concerns personal safety, composure and practical problem solving. You are in an underground or covered parking area of a shopping complex when the electricity fails and everything suddenly becomes dark. The test scenario asks how you will respond in such a moment, revealing whether you remain calm and resourceful or react with panic. Given Data / Assumptions: - You are in a parking area of a shopping complex.- There is a sudden power failure leading to total darkness.- Other people are likely to be around, such as shoppers, staff or security guards.- The situation is inconvenient but not described as an immediate life-threatening emergency. Concept / Approach: In such an environment, safety and calm behaviour are more useful than panic. Shopping complexes usually have security staff and emergency lighting or backup arrangements, though these may take a few moments to activate. The best reaction is to stay composed, communicate with people nearby and seek guidance or help, especially from staff who know the layout and procedures of the parking area. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Avoid panicking or making sudden movements that could lead to falls or collisions with vehicles or walls.Step 2: Speak to people near you, such as other customers or attendants, to confirm what has happened.Step 3: If possible, approach a security guard, parking attendant or staff member, who may have a torch, emergency light or knowledge of exit routes.Step 4: Move cautiously with assistance, using any light sources such as mobile phones, emergency lamps or staff torches to navigate toward your vehicle or a safe exit.Step 5: Follow instructions provided by the staff and remain near others rather than isolating yourself in the dark. Verification / Alternative check: Crawling on the ground is unnecessary and may make you more vulnerable to getting hurt if vehicles start moving or other people are walking. Shouting loudly in panic can create chaos and does not automatically solve the problem. Standing still and passively waiting for the lights may be safe for a short while, but it ignores available help around you and does not show proactive thinking. Calmly seeking help from nearby people, especially staff, is both practical and safe. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B is an overreaction and impractical in a parking area. Option C reflects panic rather than composed problem solving. Option D may keep you safe but does not use the resources and people available, and it shows passivity in a manageable situation. Option A best reflects a balanced, sensible response that uses cooperation and calmness to handle the difficulty. Common Pitfalls: Many people instinctively shout or rush when lights fail, which can increase the risk of accidents. Exams like this reward responses that maintain calm, use social support and follow logical steps to ensure safety. Remember that in shared public spaces, staff and fellow users are important resources in any unexpected situation. Final Answer: You should calmly seek help from people around you, especially staff, so that you can safely reach your vehicle or an exit.

Question 4

You are returning home from school. On the way, you find a sealed envelope lying in the street. It is fully addressed and has unused stamps on it. What should you do with this envelope?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with honesty, respect for privacy and civic responsibility. On your way home from school, you find a sealed, fully addressed envelope with valid unused stamps lying on the street. The test asks what you should do, revealing whether you respect other people's correspondence and take simple steps to ensure that it reaches its intended destination. Given Data / Assumptions: - The envelope is sealed.- The envelope is fully addressed and has proper unused stamps on it.- It appears to have been dropped accidentally in the street.- There is a normal postal system functioning in your area. Concept / Approach: Respect for privacy means you should not open other people's sealed letters. Respect for civic duty means you should help ensure that important mail reaches its destination if it is easy for you to do so. The presence of proper stamps and a complete address means the postal system can handle the rest once you place the envelope in a letter box. Therefore, the correct approach is to act as a responsible intermediary without violating privacy. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the envelope clearly belongs to someone else and is meant to be sent through the postal service.Step 2: Do not open the envelope, as opening sealed mail addressed to another person is a violation of privacy and may be legally wrong.Step 3: Check that the address and stamps appear valid and legible.Step 4: Carry the envelope to the nearest letter box or post office on your way home.Step 5: Drop the envelope in the letter box so that the postal department can deliver it to the intended addressee. Verification / Alternative check: Leaving the envelope where it is means it may be lost, damaged or misused by someone else. Removing the stamps for your own use is clearly dishonest and prevents the letter from being delivered at all. Opening the envelope to discover the original sender is unnecessary and interferes with private communication, especially when the postal system can deliver it directly using the address printed on it. Posting the intact sealed envelope is the simplest and most ethical solution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is passive and fails to help, leading to potential loss of important communication. Option B is both dishonest and destructive. Option C, though it sounds helpful, involves opening private mail, which you have no right to do. Option D alone respects the privacy of the correspondence and still ensures that it proceeds through the proper channel toward its destination. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be tempted by the unused stamps or by curiosity about the contents of the envelope. These reactions ignore both ethical and legal standards about mail. Being trustworthy means doing the small right things in daily life, such as posting a found letter intact instead of interfering with it. Final Answer: You should post the sealed envelope in the nearest letter box without opening it so that it reaches its intended addressee.

Question 5

Read the following information carefully and answer the question. There are five men A, B, C, D and E and six women P, Q, R, S, T and U. A, B and R are advocates; C, D, P, Q and S are doctors; and the remaining persons E, T and U are teachers. Some …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a logical team-selection puzzle involving multiple roles and several constraints. You have eleven people divided into men and women, advocates, doctors and teachers. From these, you must form a team of five with a specific composition: two male advocates, two lady doctors and one teacher. Additionally, there are grouping and incompatibility conditions about who must or must not appear together. The aim is to identify the only combination that satisfies all conditions simultaneously. Given Data / Assumptions: - Men: A, B, C, D, E.- Women: P, Q, R, S, T, U.- Advocates: A, B (male advocates) and R (lady advocate).- Doctors: C, D (male doctors) and P, Q, S (lady doctors).- Teachers: E (male teacher), T and U (lady teachers).- Team requirement: exactly two male advocates, two lady doctors and one teacher.- Conditions: A, P and U together; B cannot be with D or R; E and Q together; C and T together; D and P cannot go together; C cannot go with Q. Concept / Approach: First, satisfy the composition requirement. Two male advocates must come from A and B, because R is a female advocate and cannot count as a male advocate. Two lady doctors must be selected from P, Q and S. One teacher must be chosen from E, T and U. After that, apply the conditions that bind certain people together or forbid their co-presence, gradually eliminating impossible teams. The objective is to find the unique set that fits both the composition and all constraints. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Since the team should consist of two male advocates, we must include both A and B.Step 2: Because A is included, and the condition says A, P and U must be together, we must also include P (lady doctor) and U (teacher). This already gives us one lady doctor (P) and the teacher (U).Step 3: Now the team has A (male advocate), B (male advocate), P (lady doctor) and U (teacher). We still need one more lady doctor, which must be chosen from Q or S.Step 4: Consider choosing Q. If Q is included, the condition that E and Q have to be together requires E also to be in the team, but there is only one teacher slot, already occupied by U. Including E would exceed the required team size of five and violate the composition (teachers would then be two). So Q cannot be in the team.Step 5: Therefore, the second lady doctor must be S. This gives the team: A, B, P, S and U.Step 6: Check all constraints: A, P and U are indeed together. B is not with D or R, because neither D nor R is in the team. E and Q are both absent, so their togetherness condition is not violated. C and T are absent, so their togetherness condition is irrelevant. D and P are not together, since D is absent. C is not with Q, as both are absent. Every condition is satisfied. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the derived team A, B, P, S and U with the given options. Option D exactly lists A, B, P, U and S. Option B proposes including Q, which we showed is impossible because it would force inclusion of E and would break the team composition. Options A and C contain either R or E or other combinations that do not match the required role structure of two male advocates, two lady doctors and one teacher while simultaneously satisfying all constraints. Thus, option D is the only valid team. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A includes R, a female advocate, not a male advocate, and fails to include B, so it does not have two male advocates. Option B includes Q, which forces E as well and breaks both composition and size requirements. Option C includes E, Q and R and does not contain both A and B as required male advocates. Only option D meets both the role counts and the conditional constraints. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates forget that A, P and U always come together, so including A without P or U is invalid. Others ignore the extra conditions such as E and Q always together or C and T always together. A structured approach that first fixes the role counts, then applies inclusion and exclusion constraints step by step, makes such puzzles far easier to manage. Final Answer: The required team consists of A, B, P, U and S, which corresponds to option A, B, P, U, S.

Question 6

An angry customer wants to meet the senior manager in order to report a grievance. As a staff member, what should you do in this situation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question examines your customer handling skills, sense of responsibility and respect for organisational hierarchy. An angry customer wants to meet the senior manager to report a grievance. Your reaction should show that you are willing to listen, follow proper channels and address the problem effectively rather than simply avoiding the issue or blocking access. Given Data / Assumptions: - There is an angry customer with a grievance.- The customer specifically wants to meet the senior manager.- You are in a position to respond to the customer's initial request.- The organisation has a system of seniors and a senior manager who handles escalated complaints. Concept / Approach: Effective customer service involves listening to the complaint, trying to resolve it at the earliest level possible, and involving higher authorities when needed. Simply pacifying the customer without addressing the issue, or denying access to the manager, is not good practice. The best course is to take ownership, consult your seniors, and either resolve the issue yourself under their guidance or facilitate an appropriate meeting with the manager if required. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Listen carefully and respectfully to the customer to understand the nature of the grievance.Step 2: Acknowledge the inconvenience faced by the customer and assure him that his problem will be taken seriously.Step 3: Consult your immediate senior or the concerned department to understand what can be done within your authority to resolve the issue.Step 4: Take concrete steps to remove or reduce the customer's inconvenience, following the guidance of your seniors and the organisation's procedures.Step 5: If the matter requires the senior manager's attention, help arrange a proper appointment or escalation while keeping the customer informed. Verification / Alternative check: Merely talking to the customer yourself without taking any action may not satisfy him, especially if his problem requires higher-level approval. Trying only to cool him down without addressing the root cause will likely leave him dissatisfied. Telling him that it is not easy to meet the senior manager appears defensive and unhelpful, and may further increase his frustration. Actively seeking guidance from seniors and working to resolve the grievance demonstrates accountability and customer focus. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A can be interpreted as blocking escalation and may not solve the problem if it is beyond your authority. Option B focuses only on calming the customer, not on solving the issue. Option D discourages access to higher management and portrays the organisation as uncaring. Option C, by contrast, indicates that you will consult seniors, follow proper procedures and genuinely attempt to remove the customer's inconvenience, which is the most constructive response. Common Pitfalls: Some employees become defensive when faced with an angry customer and either argue, ignore or pass the responsibility vaguely. Good customer service combines empathy with action. By involving your seniors and working through the proper channels, you show professionalism and improve the chances of restoring the customer's trust. Final Answer: You should try to remove the customer's inconveniences by consulting your seniors and following proper procedure, arranging a meeting with the senior manager if required.

Question 7

You are playing football in a park. When you kick the ball, it accidentally strikes and breaks the window pane of a nearby house. What should you do in this situation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your honesty, sense of responsibility and willingness to accept the consequences of your actions, even when the damage was accidental. While playing football in a park, your kick breaks the window pane of a nearby house. How you respond shows whether you behave ethically and maturely in everyday situations. Given Data / Assumptions: - You were playing football in a park near residential houses.- Your kick accidentally broke the window of a nearby house.- The damage was not intentional but resulted from your action.- The house owner is likely to be upset by the broken window. Concept / Approach: Even when harm is caused unintentionally, a responsible person acknowledges the mistake and attempts to make amends. Running away, denying responsibility or sneaking back to grab the ball ignores the damage you have caused. A sincere apology and readiness to contribute to the cost of repair demonstrate integrity and respect for others' property. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Accept internally that the broken window is a direct result of your football kick.Step 2: Approach the house politely and ring the bell or call the house owner.Step 3: Honestly explain what happened and express your regret for the accidental damage.Step 4: Offer to contribute to replacing or repairing the glass, either personally or by informing your parents or guardians if you are a child.Step 5: Cooperate with the owner in arranging a reasonable solution and collect your ball only after resolving the situation respectfully. Verification / Alternative check: Demanding your ball back without mentioning the damage is rude and shows no concern for the broken property. Claiming that it was no fault of yours is untruthful because your action caused the incident, even if it was not deliberate. Stealthily retrieving the ball and running away may avoid an uncomfortable conversation but leaves the homeowner to bear the cost unfairly. In contrast, apologising and offering to help with the cost of repair shows honesty and maturity, and may even lead the owner to be more understanding. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is selfish and ignores the damage done. Option B avoids responsibility and is dishonest. Option C involves sneaking and evading accountability. Only option D acknowledges the harm, expresses remorse and offers practical help, which is the behaviour expected of a responsible person. Common Pitfalls: People, especially children, often fear anger or punishment and therefore run away from such situations. However, exams of this type emphasise that facing the consequences of your actions, apologising and making amends are key traits of good character and social responsibility. Final Answer: You should apologise to the house owner and offer to contribute to replacing the broken glass.

Question 8

You find yourself in a situation where you are required to make a PowerPoint presentation for a seminar, but you are already bogged down by too much work as a manager. What should you do?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question tests time management, professional responsibility and leadership behaviour. As a manager, you are required to make a PowerPoint presentation for a seminar but are already overloaded with work. The problem is evaluating how you respond without neglecting important responsibilities or misusing authority. Given Data / Assumptions: - You hold a managerial position.- You are required to make a PowerPoint presentation for a seminar.- You are already heavily loaded with other work.- The seminar and presentation are part of your professional duties. Concept / Approach: Good managers handle multiple responsibilities by prioritising tasks, delegating appropriately and using time efficiently. Avoiding the presentation, canceling the seminar or abruptly shifting all responsibility to a subordinate without guidance may reflect poor leadership. The most appropriate approach is to review your workload, delegate routine tasks where suitable and allocate focused time to prepare the presentation, which is likely an important deliverable. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List your current tasks and evaluate their urgency and importance.Step 2: Identify tasks that can be delegated to capable team members with clear instructions and supervision.Step 3: Block dedicated time slots in your schedule specifically for planning and creating the PowerPoint presentation.Step 4: Use this time efficiently, focusing on the key points of the seminar topic and designing a clear, concise slide deck.Step 5: If needed, you may ask a subordinate to assist in gathering data or preparing draft slides, but overall responsibility remains with you as the presenter. Verification / Alternative check: Choosing an alternative mode of presentation purely to avoid preparation may reduce the effectiveness of your communication, especially if the seminar expects a visual slide-based talk. Canceling or rescheduling the seminar because you are busy sends a poor message about your reliability. Handing everything over to a subordinate just because you are the boss, without proper guidance, may overburden them and reflect negatively on your leadership. Prioritising and scheduling time for the presentation while managing your workload demonstrates professionalism and commitment. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A ignores the requirement and may appear as avoidance rather than flexibility. Option B shows lack of responsibility to commitments and participants. Option C misuses authority and avoids personal accountability. Option D is the only option that addresses the workload problem constructively, showing you are willing to manage your time and responsibilities rather than escaping them. Common Pitfalls: Managers sometimes feel tempted to cancel or delegate fully when overwhelmed, but leadership requires balancing multiple duties. Good time management and selective delegation allow you to meet key obligations like important presentations without sacrificing quality or fairness to your team. Final Answer: You should prioritise your work and organise your schedule so that you can find time to prepare the PowerPoint presentation properly.

Question 9

Three persons A, B and C each wear a shirt and a pair of pants. The shirt colours are White, Black and Blue (not necessarily in that order) and the pant colours are Green, Red and White (not necessarily in that order). No person wears a shirt and pa…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a logical deduction puzzle involving three people and their clothing colours. Each person wears a shirt and a pair of pants, with specific colours available for shirts and pants and several restrictions about who can wear which colour. You must determine the colours of A's pants and shirt, in that order, by systematically applying all the given conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: - Persons: A, B and C.- Shirt colours: White, Black and Blue.- Pant colours: Green, Red and White.- No person wears shirt and pants of the same colour.- A did not wear a Black shirt.- B did not wear a Blue shirt.- C did not wear a White shirt.- A did not wear Green pants.- B wore White pants. Concept / Approach: This is a constraint satisfaction problem. We list the possible colours for each person and eliminate combinations that violate any condition. Since colours are all distinct within shirts and within pants, each colour is used exactly once in each category. By gradually narrowing down the possibilities, we can uniquely identify the shirt and pant colours for each person, especially for A, which the question asks about. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Since B wears White pants, the remaining pant colours Green and Red must go to A and C in some order.Step 2: A did not wear Green pants, so A must wear Red pants. Consequently C must wear Green pants.Step 3: No person can have the same colour for shirt and pants. Since B has White pants, B cannot wear a White shirt. We are also told that B did not wear a Blue shirt. Therefore B must wear a Black shirt.Step 4: With B's shirt fixed as Black, the remaining shirt colours for A and C are White and Blue.Step 5: A did not wear a Black shirt, which is already used by B, so A can be either White or Blue. C did not wear a White shirt, so C must wear Blue.Step 6: If C wears a Blue shirt, A must wear the only remaining shirt colour, which is White.Step 7: Therefore A wears Red pants and a White shirt. Verification / Alternative check: Summarise the final assignment: A wears Red pants and a White shirt, B wears White pants and a Black shirt, and C wears Green pants and a Blue shirt. Check each condition: no one has the same colour for shirt and pants; A does not have Black shirt or Green pants; B does not have Blue shirt and does have White pants; C does not have a White shirt. All constraints are satisfied, confirming the solution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Green and Blue for A fails because A is explicitly said not to wear Green pants. White and Black is impossible because B already uses Black for the shirt and White for the pants, and A's clothes must remain distinct by colour and person. Green and White also assigns Green pants to A, contradicting the condition. Only Red and White matches the deduced combination. Common Pitfalls: Common mistakes include forgetting that each colour is used exactly once for shirts and once for pants, or overlooking the restriction that shirt and pant colours cannot match for any person. Writing out a quick table of possibilities and crossing them off as each condition is applied helps avoid confusion and leads to the unique correct answer. Final Answer: Person A wears Red pants and a White shirt, so the correct option is Red and White.

Question 10

You are a team leader and you are supposed to hold a convention on a human resources issue. However, your team members are unable to get adequate sponsorship for the event. What should you do?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question explores leadership qualities, especially how a team leader handles a challenge related to sponsorship for an important convention. Your team is struggling to obtain sufficient funds, and the test asks whether you will support and motivate them, act impulsively, or simply cancel or finance the event on your own. The scenario reveals your ability to inspire, guide and manage resources. Given Data / Assumptions: - You are the team leader for a convention on a human resources topic.- The event requires sponsorship, and your team is currently unable to secure adequate funds.- The event is planned but depends on sufficient sponsorship.- You have some authority and influence over the team and the planning process. Concept / Approach: Good leaders do not immediately give up or take over all responsibilities themselves. Instead, they encourage and guide their team to overcome difficulties, helping members build confidence and skills. Personally funding the entire event is not sustainable and does not develop the team. Canceling or postponing the event without serious effort demotivates the group. Motivating the team and providing strategic guidance is the most balanced and leadership-oriented response. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Acknowledge the difficulty your team faces in securing sponsorship and understand the reasons behind it.Step 2: Call a meeting with your team members to discuss their efforts so far and to brainstorm alternative sponsors, approaches and networks.Step 3: Motivate them by expressing confidence in their abilities and emphasizing the importance of the convention.Step 4: Provide guidance on how to approach potential sponsors more effectively, such as preparing better proposals or using professional contacts.Step 5: Distribute tasks clearly, follow up on progress and support team members who face specific obstacles. Verification / Alternative check: Putting in your own money may appear self-sacrificing but can set a wrong precedent, suggesting that the leader will always bear the financial burden and removing the learning opportunity for the team. Postponing the event may sometimes be necessary, but doing so prematurely without attempting renewed efforts can harm morale. Canceling the event outright signals defeat and discouragement. Motivating the team and helping them tackle the challenge directly demonstrates true leadership and maximises the chances of eventual success. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is financially risky and does not encourage collective responsibility. Option C may be chosen only after serious attempts and is not the first ideal reaction presented here. Option D is defeatist and undermines the team's confidence and commitment. Option B alone aligns with the role of a team leader who inspires, coaches and believes in the team's ability to deliver. Common Pitfalls: Leaders sometimes rush either to personally solve every problem or to cancel plans when difficulties arise. Both extremes ignore the developmental role of leadership. The exam expects you to support your team in learning how to handle obstacles, which involves motivation, guidance and shared responsibility. Final Answer: You should motivate your team members and guide them so that they feel capable of obtaining the required sponsorship for the convention.

Question 11

You are a sincere and dedicated manager in a reputed five-star hotel. You are appointed as the Chief Manager of the Guwahati branch, which needs to be developed, and your salary has been increased for this role. How should you respond to this new as…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This situation-reaction question evaluates your attitude toward responsibility, career growth and challenging assignments. As a sincere and dedicated manager in a reputed five-star hotel, you are promoted to Chief Manager of a branch that needs development, along with a salary hike. The test asks how you should respond, revealing whether you welcome challenges or avoid them. Given Data / Assumptions: - You already have a reputation for sincerity and dedication.- You are being promoted to Chief Manager of the Guwahati branch.- The Guwahati branch requires development and improvement.- Your salary has been increased to reflect the new responsibilities. Concept / Approach: A promotion that comes with greater responsibility and better pay is both an opportunity and a vote of confidence from your organisation. A committed professional typically responds by accepting the challenge and working hard to justify the trust placed in him. Treating the assignment as a short trial, rejecting it or trying to pass it to someone else contradicts the image of a sincere and dedicated manager and may harm your career prospects. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that being appointed Chief Manager is a sign that the organisation trusts your capabilities.Step 2: Understand that the increased salary compensates you for the additional responsibility and expectations.Step 3: View the task of developing the Guwahati branch as a professional challenge and an opportunity to showcase your leadership, planning and execution skills.Step 4: Accept the assignment confidently and begin by assessing the current state of the branch, identifying areas for improvement and formulating a development plan.Step 5: Work collaboratively with staff and superiors to implement improvements, while regularly monitoring progress. Verification / Alternative check: Agreeing to "try for two months" and then reconsider is half-hearted and does not reflect the commitment expected at a senior level. Accepting another offer immediately after a promotion suggests instability and lack of loyalty to your current organisation. Complaining about limited resources and seeking to avoid the assignment undermines your reputation as a sincere, dedicated manager. By contrast, embracing the role and working to develop the branch demonstrates professionalism and ambition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A indicates uncertainty and a short-term attitude to a long-term leadership role. Option C shows disloyalty and disregard for the new responsibility offered. Option D reflects negativity and avoidance of challenge. Option B is the only option that aligns with your described qualities and the expectations that come with a promotion and salary hike. Common Pitfalls: People sometimes fear new roles in challenging environments and respond defensively or evasively. However, in scenario-based tests, the preferred reaction is to treat new responsibilities as opportunities for growth. Accepting the challenge enthusiastically signals that you are ready for higher positions and complex projects. Final Answer: You should accept the challenge and go ahead with the project to develop the Guwahati branch as its Chief Manager.

Question 12

Three words in bold are given, which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description of these three words: knot, watt and fathom.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal reasoning question tests the ability to identify a common conceptual link between seemingly unrelated words. The three given terms are knot, watt and fathom. At first glance, they seem to come from different domains such as sailing, physics or general measurement. The task is to decide which description best captures what all three words have in common, not just what one or two of them might suggest. Given Data / Assumptions: The three words under consideration are knot, watt and fathom. Each word is a recognised term in English with one or more meanings. We assume standard dictionary meanings, especially those used in science and general knowledge exams. We must choose one description that correctly applies to all three words at the same time. We are not looking for rare or slang meanings, but the most relevant standard usage. Concept / Approach: The best approach is to recall the primary meaning of each word and ask whether that meaning is a unit of some measurable quantity, a job role, an object or some other category. Knot is commonly used as a unit of speed in navigation. Watt is widely known as a unit of power in physics and everyday electricity usage. Fathom is historically used as a unit of length, especially for measuring the depth of water. Seeing them together suggests that they all act as units of measurement for different physical quantities. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that a knot is a unit of speed equal to one nautical mile per hour, used particularly in shipping and aviation. Step 2: Recall that a watt is the SI unit of power, defined as one joule per second, and is commonly used to rate electrical appliances and energy usage. Step 3: Recall that a fathom is a unit of length, equal to six feet, traditionally used to measure the depth of water. Step 4: Check whether all three can be described as units. Knot measures speed, watt measures power, and fathom measures length. Step 5: Examine the options and identify the one that states that these are units of measurement. Step 6: Confirm that none of the other alternatives apply equally well to all three words. Verification / Alternative check: Knot certainly has a common meaning related to rope, but in technical usage, especially in navigation, the important meaning is as a speed unit. Watt has no meaningful connection with rope or sailing; it is purely a measurement unit. Fathom can be tied to rope when measuring depth with a rope, but the term itself stands for the unit of depth. Since all three are recognised units in measurement systems, the description that they are units of measurement remains consistently correct for each term. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The suggestion that they are used by sailors is only clearly true for knot and possibly fathom, but not for watt. The idea that they are used for installing electricity fits watt, but not knot or fathom. The idea that all three are connected with rope might fit knot and sometimes fathom, but watt has no such connection. Common Pitfalls: Many students focus on the everyday meaning of knot as tied rope and forget its technical meaning as a speed unit. Others may see the nautical connection and choose the sailors option without checking watt properly. The safest method is to look for a category that fits all three words equally well, rather than one or two of them. Always verify each word against the option before deciding. Final Answer: The three words knot, watt and fathom are all units of measurement.

Question 13

Three words in bold are given, which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description of these three words: voodoo, sorcery and necromancy.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your awareness of specialised vocabulary related to the occult and supernatural beliefs. The three given words are voodoo, sorcery and necromancy. All of them appear in literature, folklore and discussions about magic or supernatural practices. The task is to identify the description that correctly captures what they all have in common, not just something that applies to one of them in isolation. Given Data / Assumptions: The three terms are voodoo, sorcery and necromancy. We assume their standard, widely accepted meanings in English. Each word is connected to some kind of magical or supernatural practice. We are looking for a broad category that includes all three practices. The correct option must apply clearly and directly to each of the three words. Concept / Approach: The best way to approach this question is to recall the domain in which each word is typically used. Voodoo is known as a form of religious and magical practice, often associated with rituals, spells and spirits. Sorcery is a general term for the use of magic, especially for harmful or selfish purposes. Necromancy is specifically the practice of communicating with or summoning the dead, often seen as a form of dark or forbidden magic. The common thread is that all three terms are linked to black magic or dark occult practices. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that voodoo involves ritualistic magic, spells and spirit worship, often portrayed as dark or dangerous in popular culture. Step 2: Recall that sorcery refers broadly to the practice of magic, especially when used to influence events or people in mysterious or harmful ways. Step 3: Recall that necromancy specifically focuses on contact with the dead, raising spirits and predicting the future through them, which is treated as a form of black magic. Step 4: Examine whether any of the given options describe a category that covers voodoo, sorcery and necromancy together. Step 5: The description that they are terms connected with black magic clearly unites all three, since each involves occult, forbidden or dark magical practices. Step 6: Confirm that no other option fits all three words at the same time. Verification / Alternative check: The other options can be quickly tested. None of these words is the name of an ancient script; scripts refer to writing systems like hieroglyphics or cuneiform, not magical practices. They are also not arts found in sculptures, although some sculptures may depict scenes inspired by such practices. Finally, they are not means of communication in the sense of languages or signals used in daily life; rather, they describe occult practices that attempt supernatural influence or communication with spirits. Hence, the only fully accurate category is that they are terms related to black magic. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Calling them ancient arts found in sculptures confuses practice with depiction. Sculptures may show magical scenes, but the terms themselves are not sculptural arts. Referring to them as ancient scripts is incorrect because they do not refer to writing systems or alphabets. Describing them as prehistoric means of communication is also wrong, since they are not languages but magical practices. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to rely on partial knowledge and assume that voodoo alone defines the set, without fully considering sorcery and necromancy. Another mistake is to overthink the historical or artistic angle, even though the words clearly belong to the domain of occult magic. Whenever three words of this type appear, it is useful to zoom out and ask which broad area of knowledge they all share, rather than focusing on the exact rituals or regions associated with each practice individually. Final Answer: Voodoo, sorcery and necromancy are all terms connected with black magic.

Question 14

Three words in bold are given, which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description of these three words: knight, rook and bishop.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about recognising the common context of three names: knight, rook and bishop. Each of these words can have multiple meanings in English, including historical, religious and strategic uses. The challenge is to decide which description captures their most important shared identity in a typical reasoning question, which usually comes from a familiar game or structured activity. Given Data / Assumptions: The words under consideration are knight, rook and bishop. We assume well known dictionary meanings rather than rare or highly specialised uses. Each word appears as the name of a piece in a popular board game. We must choose the option that correctly describes all three words together. The correct answer should match the everyday exam context, which often includes chess. Concept / Approach: Knight, rook and bishop are all names of pieces in the game of chess. While knight and bishop also occur as social or religious titles in history, and rook may suggest a bird or a tower, the joint appearance of all three together strongly signals the chess meaning. Reasoning questions frequently expect recognition of this link, since chess is a standard reference for logic and strategy. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the word knight. In chess, the knight is the piece that moves in an L shape and can jump over other pieces. Step 2: Consider the word rook. In chess, the rook is the piece that moves any number of squares horizontally or vertically along ranks and files and is sometimes called the castle. Step 3: Consider the word bishop. In chess, the bishop moves diagonally across the board and represents a religious figure in the design of traditional sets. Step 4: Note that all three words appear together on the chessboard as specific, named pieces with defined moves. Step 5: Look at the options and identify which one describes this shared identity. The option saying that these are chess pieces fits all three clearly. Step 6: Confirm that no other option simultaneously applies to knight, rook and bishop in the same strong way. Verification / Alternative check: It is true that knight can be a medieval warrior and bishop is a senior church official. However, rook is not used as a title for a religious person or a missionary. Moreover, all three names appear together only in the context of chess rules and strategy diagrams. This makes the chess interpretation uniquely suitable. Reasoning questions tend to rely on such well known game terminology because it is widely recognised by students and adults alike. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Calling them missionaries is incorrect because rook has no such meaning, and knight is primarily a warrior rather than a missionary. Describing them as churchmen fits bishop but not knight or rook. Referring to them as military ranks is only loosely appropriate for knight, and again does not cover rook or bishop accurately. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates are misled by the religious meaning of bishop and overlook the chess context. Others may not be familiar with the name rook and therefore guess based on knight alone. The safest strategy is to think of contexts where all three names appear together in a single system or rule set. Chess is the only strong and widely known system that uses all three terms as official piece names, which makes the correct answer clear once that connection is recognised. Final Answer: Knight, rook and bishop are all chess pieces.

Question 15

Three place names in bold are given, which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description of these three places: Rourkela, Bokaro and Durgapur.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests general awareness of important industrial towns in India. The three places mentioned are Rourkela, Bokaro and Durgapur. Each of these locations is significant in the context of heavy industry and economic development. The task is to choose the description that best captures what all three towns are particularly known for in Indian economic and industrial geography. Given Data / Assumptions: The places listed are Rourkela, Bokaro and Durgapur. All three are well known industrial centres in India. The options mention steel plants, coal mines, atomic power plants and sea coast locations. We assume standard school-level knowledge of Indian industries and geography. The correct description must apply clearly and specifically to all three towns. Concept / Approach: Rourkela, Bokaro and Durgapur are all famous for large steel plants that played a key role in India's industrialisation after independence. Rourkela Steel Plant is in Odisha, Bokaro Steel Plant is in Jharkhand, and Durgapur Steel Plant is in West Bengal. These plants form part of the public sector steel network and are regularly cited in textbooks. While some of these areas may also have coal or other resources nearby, their strongest and most direct common association is with the steel industry. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Rourkela in Odisha hosts the Rourkela Steel Plant, one of the early public sector integrated steel plants of India. Step 2: Recall that Bokaro in Jharkhand is home to the Bokaro Steel Plant, another major integrated steel plant. Step 3: Recall that Durgapur in West Bengal houses the Durgapur Steel Plant, again a prominent public sector steel unit. Step 4: Notice that steel production is a strong and direct common feature of all three towns. Step 5: Look at the options and identify that the one referring to major steel plants matches all three locations correctly. Step 6: Check that the other options either do not apply to all three places or are not their principal and famous identity. Verification / Alternative check: Though coal mines exist in parts of eastern India, not all of these towns are primarily known for coal mining. Atomic power plants are located at other sites such as Tarapur, Rawatbhata or Kalpakkam, not typically at Rourkela, Bokaro or Durgapur. Also, none of these towns is situated directly on the sea coast; they are inland industrial centres. Standard geography references consistently group these three as examples of major steel plant locations in India, confirming the steel plant option as accurate and unique. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Coal mines may exist in nearby regions but are not the central identity of all three towns, and not each place is directly famous among students as a coal mining centre. Atomic power plants are not located at all three of these places, so that description is incorrect. These towns are not on the sea coast; they are inland, so the coastal description does not apply. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to associate eastern Indian towns too quickly with coal because of famous coalfields in the region. However, exam questions focus on the most prominent identity of each town. Another mistake is to answer based on partial memory of just one town rather than checking the commonality across all three. It is always better to recall what school textbooks emphasise when grouping such place names together in a single question, which in this case is clearly their steel plants. Final Answer: Rourkela, Bokaro and Durgapur are all famous for their major steel plants.

Question 16

Three place names in bold are given, which have something in common among themselves. Out of the four given alternatives, choose the most appropriate description of these three places: Barauni, Digboi and Ankleshwar.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your knowledge of important petroleum producing and refining centres in India. The three places mentioned are Barauni, Digboi and Ankleshwar. Each plays a significant role in the country's oil industry. You are asked to select the description that best explains what these three locations have in common, based on standard school-level geography and general knowledge. Given Data / Assumptions: The places listed are Barauni, Digboi and Ankleshwar. All three are Indian towns associated with the petroleum industry. The options mention oil fields, religious places, South Indian tourist spots and handlooms. We assume knowledge of where major oil fields and refineries are located in India. The correct answer must apply clearly to all three locations at once. Concept / Approach: Barauni in Bihar is known for its oil refinery. Digboi in Assam is historically one of the earliest oil fields in Asia and has an old refinery as well. Ankleshwar in Gujarat is a prominent onshore oil field area. When these three names appear together in an exam question, the common idea is that they are important petroleum centres, either for oil extraction, refining, or both. None of the other options unites all three towns in such a clear way. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Barauni has a major oil refinery and is an important petroleum hub in Bihar. Step 2: Recall that Digboi in Assam is one of the earliest places where oil was discovered and drilled in India and is famous for its old refinery. Step 3: Recall that Ankleshwar in Gujarat is an important onshore oil field region, contributing significantly to crude oil production. Step 4: Note that all three places share a direct connection with the petroleum industry through oil fields and refineries. Step 5: Examine the options and identify the one that correctly refers to oil fields and refineries. Step 6: Confirm that the other options, related to religion, tourism in South India or handlooms, do not describe all three locations together. Verification / Alternative check: None of these towns is primarily introduced in school textbooks as a religious centre, although they may have local temples or places of worship. They are also not grouped as South Indian tourist destinations, since Digboi is in Assam and Barauni is in Bihar, both in the eastern or northeastern part of India. Handlooms are associated with specific textile centres, which these places are not predominantly known for. On the other hand, multiple reputable geography sources consistently identify these towns as key petroleum locations, confirming the oil fields and refineries option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The description of famous religious places does not match their primary identity in educational contexts, where their industrial role is emphasised. Calling them tourist places of South India is geographically incorrect, because two are not in South India and they are not widely promoted as main tourist hubs. Handlooms may be present in some regions, but these towns are not famous across India as handloom centres. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misremember one place correctly and then assume that the others share the same feature without checking. Another pitfall is confusing petroleum centres with coal or other mineral locations. To avoid such mistakes, it helps to remember that exam compilers often group classic textbook examples together: Digboi and Ankleshwar are standard names in Indian petroleum geography, and Barauni is a textbook example of an oil refinery town. Final Answer: Barauni, Digboi and Ankleshwar are all famous for oil fields and refineries.

Situation Reaction Test Questions