Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 84
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This sequence is built from additive jumps that follow a powers-of-two pattern. One term breaks the pattern by using an incorrect increment. Detecting the intended differences is the key here.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute differences and look for a recognizable sequence. Doubling increments (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, …) are common and fit the early and late parts of this series well.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Intended differences should be: +2, +4, +8, +16, +32, +64.Apply from 56: 56→58 (+2), 58→62 (+4), 62→70 (+8), 70→86 (+16 expected), 86→118 (+32), 118→182 (+64).But the given fourth term is 84 instead of 86, so the +16 step was mistakenly taken as +14.
Verification / Alternative check:
After correcting 84 to 86, all later terms align perfectly with +32 and +64, confirming that a single misstep occurred at the +16 stage.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
84
Discussion & Comments