Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 12
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Interleaved (alternating) sequences are common in reasoning tests. Here, the even-positioned terms follow a simple repeating increment pattern, and the odd-positioned terms should mirror it. One odd-position term breaks the expected rule.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Split into two subsequences: Odd positions and even positions. Check if each is an arithmetic progression with a small repeating step pattern (for example, +4 then +2). Identify the first violation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Even positions: 5, 9, 11, 15, 17 → increments +4, +2, +4, +2 (a neat repeat).Odd positions: 1, 5, 7, 11, 12 → intended increments should match +4, +2, +4, +2 to stay parallel: 1→5 (+4), 5→7 (+2), 7→11 (+4), 11→13 (+2 expected). The series shows 12 instead of 13.Thus, 12 is the only term that breaks the clean alternating +4, +2 motif.
Verification / Alternative check:
Correcting 12 to 13 yields two perfectly matched alternating-progressions across odd and even positions, confirming a single localized error.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
12
Discussion & Comments