Meeting Flow — Professional Interaction Ordering Arrange the following activities in the logical order they occur in a formal meeting: 1. Presentation 2. Recommendation 3. Arrival 4. Discussion 5. Introduction

Introduction / Context:
This sequence problem mirrors the structure of a professional meeting. Understanding the order helps in managerial reasoning and workplace etiquette questions commonly seen in aptitude tests.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• 3 = Arrival, 5 = Introduction, 1 = Presentation, 4 = Discussion, 2 = Recommendation.
• We assume a typical agenda-driven meeting.

Concept / Approach:
Attendees first arrive, then introduce themselves and the meeting purpose. The main Presentation follows to share data or proposals. A Discussion is then held to analyze the content. Finally, the group forms a Recommendation or decision to conclude the session.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Compare with standard meeting agendas: opening formalities, presentation(s), discussion, then action items or recommendations. The selected order is consistent with professional practice.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• B, C, D: These mix presentation/discussion/recommendation in nonstandard ways, e.g., recommending before discussing.
• None of the above: Not needed because a suitable, conventional sequence exists.

Common Pitfalls:
Swapping introduction and presentation or jumping to recommendations before a discussion occurs. Always allow information → analysis → decision flow.

Final Answer:
3, 5, 1, 4, 2