Question 1

Statement — Officials say paucity of funds has led to the pathetic condition of a brilliant architectural structure. Courses of Action: I. Design a new architectural structure for the building. II. Find out the reasons for the poor condition of the …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:When heritage or notable architecture deteriorates, the priority is conservation, not replacement. Investigation plus funding typically form the core response.Given Data / Assumptions:Paucity of funds cited as cause.I: Create a new structure (replacement).II: Diagnose reasons (funding, maintenance lapses, leakage).III: Provide grants for conservation/restoration.Concept / Approach:II ensures accurate problem framing (is it only funds, or also governance?). III addresses the immediate need for restoration. I discards the asset and its heritage value and does not solve maintenance systems.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Conduct structural audit and maintenance/finance review.2) Allocate grants with conservation plans and accountability.3) Establish O&M funding streams and monitoring.Verification / Alternative check:Conservation best practices favor repair and restoration.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Irrelevant to saving the existing structure. Single-option choices are incomplete.Common Pitfalls:Replacing instead of preserving cultural assets.Final Answer:Both II and III follow.

Question 2

Statement — In the Teacher’s Day function, Shri Sharma, a State Awardee and retired Principal, questioned the celebration of Teacher’s Day in today’s materialistic world. Courses of Action: I. Reduce the expenditure on Teacher’s Day celebrations. II…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The concern questions the relevance/substance of celebrations in a “materialistic” era. The appropriate response is to reflect on the profession’s role, expectations, and support systems rather than arbitrarily raising or cutting budgets.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Cut celebration spend.II: Increase celebration spend.III: Revisit teachers’ role/responsibilities today.Concept / Approach:Without a diagnostic framework, changing budgets (I/II) is symbolic and may miss the issue. III addresses the core: aligning pedagogy, ethics, technology use, workload, recognition, and community trust with current realities.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Convene stakeholders to define today’s teacher roles.2) Translate into training, evaluation, and support.3) Adjust celebrations later to reflect substance over form.Verification / Alternative check:Policy reviews begin with purpose and role clarity; budgets follow.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I/II/C: Budget moves without analysis. A/B: extreme. D is correct.Common Pitfalls:Confusing optics (events) with systemic improvement (role clarity).Final Answer:Only III follows.

Question 3

Statement — Members of two local clubs occasionally fight with each other on the main road and block traffic. Courses of Action: I. Deploy police personnel round the clock on the main road. II. Identify those involved in fighting and put them behind…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Public disorder that blocks traffic warrants targeted law-and-order action. Responses should be proportionate and focus on offenders rather than imposing excessive, continuous policing or dismantling private associations without due process.Given Data / Assumptions:I: 24×7 deployment on the road.II: Identify and prosecute offenders.III: Disband club managements.Concept / Approach:Action II directly addresses culpable individuals and deters recurrence through legal consequences. I is resource-intensive and disproportionate for “occasional” clashes; targeted patrolling at peak times may suffice but round-the-clock is unnecessary. III violates associative rights and lacks due process; the clubs as entities are not inherently criminal.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Use CCTV/witness accounts to identify offenders.2) File cases for rioting/public nuisance; impose penalties/bonds.3) Warn club managements to enforce codes; escalate only if non-compliant.Verification / Alternative check:Standard policing emphasizes offender accountability over blanket continuous deployment.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Overbroad. III: punitive without due process. Combined options including I/III are excessive.Common Pitfalls:Over-securitizing routine civic disputes.Final Answer:Only II follows.

Question 4

Statement — Incessant rain for several days has caused overflowing and flood risk because the river bed is full of silt and mud. Courses of Action: I. Shift people residing near the river to safer places. II. Warn people immediately through radio/te…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:With imminent flood risk due to silted river beds, immediate life-safety and communication measures are essential, followed by medium-term mitigation (desilting).Given Data / Assumptions:I: Evacuate vulnerable populations.II: Issue mass alerts via radio/TV.III: Desilt post-flood to restore capacity.Concept / Approach:Evacuation and alerts reduce casualties; desilting increases carrying capacity and reduces future risk.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Trigger staged evacuation.2) Broadcast warnings and safety guidance.3) Plan desilting after water recedes, with environmental safeguards.Verification / Alternative check:Disaster protocols support all three actions.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Partial choices ignore either immediate safety or future prevention.Final Answer:All follow.

Question 5

Statement — In the city, over 75% of people live in slums and substandard houses, reflecting on the Government’s housing and urban development policies. Courses of Action: I. Create a separate department for housing and urban development. II. Review…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:A massive slum population indicates policy failures in supply, affordability, land use, and services. Institutional proliferation (I) may not help; policy review and reform (II, III) are central.Given Data / Assumptions:I: New department.II: Review urban housing policies.III: Review rural housing too.Concept / Approach:Effective action focuses on enabling affordable supply (zoning, FSI, PPPs), rental reforms, slum upgradation, and infrastructure financing. A new department adds bureaucracy without guaranteed impact.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Audit urban housing policy; remove bottlenecks.2) Strengthen rural housing to prevent future slum migration.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: structure without strategy. D: “either” understates the need for both.Final Answer:Both II and III follow.

Question 6

Statement — Lack of coordination between the university, its colleges, and authorities has resulted in students ousted from one college seeking migration to another. Courses of Action: I. If a student is ousted from a college, the information should…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The issue is admissions-related coordination failure, not general student misconduct. Actions should tighten information flows and governance around admissions decisions.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Notify all colleges of ouster events.II: Centralize admissions under the university.III: Create a section for anti-social behaviour actions.Concept / Approach:I prevents re-admission by concealment; II standardizes criteria and oversight. III targets a different problem and does not fix admissions coordination.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Build a shared admissions/migration registry.2) Implement centralized or common entrance/portal.3) Keep discipline mechanisms separate from admissions.Final Answer:Both I and II follow.

Question 7

Statement — The institute has fixed a one-year validity period for transfer forms for some listed schemes. Courses of Action: I. Consult investors before fixing the validity period. II. Duly inform investors about the validity period. III. Communica…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Policy clarity and disclosure are essential in financial schemes. Mandatory consultation is optional; disclosure is non-negotiable.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Pre-decision consultation.II: Inform investors about validity.III: Communicate covered schemes.Concept / Approach:Investor protection requires clear, timely notices (II) and precise scope (III). Consultation (I) is desirable but not necessary for validity.Final Answer:Both II and III follow.

Question 8

Statement — Some strains of mosquitoes have become resistant to chloroquine, a widely used antimalarial. Courses of Action: I. Stop selling chloroquine. II. Researchers should develop new medicines for patients affected by such mosquitoes. III. All …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Drug resistance necessitates therapeutic innovation and better diagnostics, not wholesale withdrawal of an otherwise useful drug where it still works.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Ban/stop chloroquine sales.II: Develop new antimalarials or effective combinations.III: Identify causal species/likely resistance profile before treatment.Concept / Approach:I is overbroad; chloroquine may still be effective for non-resistant infections/regions. II is essential to overcome resistance. III improves case management (species test/RDTs, clinical algorithms) enabling appropriate drugs.Final Answer:Both II and III follow.

Question 9

Statement — A blast injured many when night-shift workers at an ordnance factory were handling “fox signalling explosive”. Courses of Action: I. Train staff thoroughly on safety aspects of handling such explosives. II. Terminate the night-shift supe…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Industrial incidents call for systemic safety improvements. Knee-jerk punitive or blanket bans may not address root causes.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Comprehensive safety training (SOPs, PPE, storage, handling, ESD controls).II: Immediate termination of night-shift supervisor.III: Stop night operations.Concept / Approach:I is universally warranted. II requires investigation; summary termination without due process is improper. III may impair essential operations; risk can be managed by improved procedures and supervision.Final Answer:Only I follows.

Question 10

Statement — Any further increase in city pollution from industrial effluent and automobile exhaust will pose a severe threat to inhabitants. Courses of Action: I. Close all factories in the city immediately. II. Allow automobiles to ply only four ho…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:When further increases will be critical, proportionate, lawful controls are appropriate. Extreme blanket closures or four-hour caps are impractical and economically damaging.Given Data / Assumptions:I: Shut all factories.II: Limit all vehicles to four hours/day.III: Restrict fresh licenses (growth control), alongside standards.Concept / Approach:III curbs additional load while authorities tighten compliance (emission standards, inspection, fuel quality) on existing sources. I and II are disproportionate and likely unlawful absent emergency powers.Final Answer:Only III follows.

Question 11

Statement: Cholera has recently broken out across multiple cities, killing a large number of people and affecting hundreds of households. Courses of Action: I. Initiate an immediate inquiry to identify the root cause(s) of the outbreak. II. Use mass…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Cholera is a water/food-borne disease that can spread quickly in urban clusters with unsafe water or sanitation. Effective response balances urgent containment with medium-term system fixes. The statement reports widespread cases and fatalities across many cities, implying a systemic failure, not a localized incident.Given Data / Assumptions:Multiple urban centers affected; deaths already reported.Likely causes: contaminated water supply, poor chlorination, sewage ingress, unsafe street food.Civic authorities and health systems are operational but overwhelmed.Concept / Approach:Outbreak control requires: (1) Identify and interrupt transmission (cause inquiry, water testing, chlorination); (2) Risk communication (hand hygiene, boiled water, ORS use); (3) Clinical response (rehydration points, antibiotics per protocol); (4) Surveillance.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Launch an immediate inquiry: map cases, test water sources, audit chlorination and pipeline integrity.2) Start mass-media messaging: boil water, wash hands with soap, use ORS, avoid unsafe food.3) Set up ORS corners and rapid rehydration camps; ensure IV fluids/antibiotics availability.4) Intensify chlorination, tanker water quality checks, and temporary closures of unsafe vendors.Verification / Alternative check:Public instructions (II) reduce immediate risk at household level; the cause inquiry (I) prevents recurrence by fixing upstream failures. Paramilitary deployment (III) is not intrinsic to epidemiological control; logistics can be managed via health, civic, and disaster-response teams unless law-and-order issues arise.Why Other Options Are Wrong:None follows: ignores urgent needs. Only II: treats symptom, not cause. Only I: lacks community-level behavior change. All follow: unnecessary militarization (III) without evidence.Common Pitfalls:Focusing only on hospital care; under-communicating ORS use; delayed water-quality remediation.Final Answer:Both I and II follow.

Question 12

Statement: India’s leadership in black pepper is threatened as newer producer countries—using root stocks sourced from India—are outperforming by adopting modern cultivation practices. Courses of Action: I. Immediately stop supplying black pepper ro…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement highlights a competitiveness gap: rival nations are using better agronomic practices and outperforming India in yield/quality despite India’s genetic contributions (root stocks). Sustainable leadership requires productivity, quality, and reliability—primarily through modern cultivation, post-harvest handling, and supply-chain upgrades.Given Data / Assumptions:Competitors have adopted superior practices (trellising, drip irrigation, disease management, improved curing).India’s issue is not genetic material scarcity, but agronomic efficiency.Global prices are demand–supply driven; undercutting price may hurt farmer incomes.Concept / Approach:Comparative advantage should be rebuilt via technology: high-density planting, precision fertigation, integrated pest/disease management, better drying/curing for quality grades, and certification (residue, traceability). Export bans on root stocks (I) are backward-looking and hard to enforce; price cuts (III) erode margins without addressing productivity.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Disseminate modern agronomy via extension; subsidise drip/fertigation and disease-resistant varieties.2) Upgrade post-harvest: solar dryers, moisture control, clean grading to hit premium specs.3) Build GI branding and traceability to command better prices.Verification / Alternative check:Yield/quality improvements raise farm-gate incomes and export competitiveness without race-to-the-bottom pricing.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Reactive and impractical; knowledge already diffused. III: Price-only competition undermines sustainability.Common Pitfalls:Ignoring post-harvest losses; relying solely on MSP/price policy.Final Answer:Only II follows.

Question 13

Statement: A large private bank plans to retrench one-third of its employees after heavy losses over the past three quarters. Courses of Action: I. The Government should notify the public to immediately stop all transactions with the bank. II. The G…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:A planned retrenchment of one-third workforce signals severe financial/operational distress in a private bank. The appropriate response must protect financial stability and depositors while avoiding panic and undue executive interference.Given Data / Assumptions:Losses across three quarters suggest persistent issues (asset quality, provisioning, cost structure).Systemic risk depends on size and interconnectedness.The central bank (prudential regulator) is the proper authority for supervision.Concept / Approach:I (urge public to stop transactions) would trigger a run, harming depositors and the system. II (block retrenchment) is heavy-handed and may impede a viable restructuring. III proposes a supervisory inquiry—proportionate, standard, and stabilizing—leading to a corrective action plan.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Central bank conducts targeted inspection: capital adequacy, NPA recognition, ALM gaps, governance.2) If needed, impose Prompt Corrective Action and time-bound recovery steps.3) Communicate to prevent panic while safeguarding depositor interests.Verification / Alternative check:Supervisory oversight addresses root causes without sparking runs or political overreach.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Incites panic and systemic risk. II: Interferes with corporate decisions absent regulatory findings.Common Pitfalls:Speculative media leaks; delayed supervisory action.Final Answer:Only III follows.

Question 14

Statement: Without active cooperation between the proprietor and the employees, the mill cannot remain profitable for long. Courses of Action: I. Close down the mill. II. Ask workers to cooperate with the owners. III. Ask the owner to cooperate with…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement asserts mutual cooperation as a prerequisite for sustained profitability. Therefore, the proper actions are those that foster cooperation on both sides rather than precipitating shutdowns.Given Data / Assumptions:Profitability is deteriorating due to strained relations.Owners and employees can negotiate productivity-linked improvements.Closure is a last resort with high social/economic costs.Concept / Approach:Industrial relations improve through two-way engagement: transparent financials, clear productivity metrics, safety and welfare measures, and grievance redressal. One-sided exhortations are inadequate.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Establish joint consultative committees to align targets and incentives.2) Implement skill upgradation and lean process improvements.3) Periodic, data-backed reviews to build trust and accountability.Verification / Alternative check:Where cooperation improved, mills often recover through higher throughput and lower rework/accidents.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Closure contradicts the premise that cooperation sustains profitability. “All follow” wrongly includes closure.Common Pitfalls:Top-down directives without participative mechanisms; ignoring shop-floor safety.Final Answer:Both II and III follow.

Question 15

Statement: Many students of a local school fell ill for the fourth time in six months after eating food from the school canteen. Courses of Action: I. Immediately terminate the canteen’s contract and seek compensation as per terms. II. Advise studen…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Repeated food-borne illness indicates systemic hygiene failures. Immediate risk elimination and contractual accountability are warranted; criminal action requires due process and evidence.Given Data / Assumptions:Four incidents in six months imply persistent non-compliance.Contract terms likely include hygiene standards and penalties.Student safety is paramount.Concept / Approach:I terminates the unsafe vendor and seeks damages for breach. II protects students while a compliant vendor is onboarded or in-house kitchen is remediated. III (immediate arrest) is premature without investigation; health department and food safety authorities must first establish violations.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Suspend operations; collect samples; notify food safety authority for inspection.2) Terminate contract per clause; blacklist if regulations permit; arrange safe interim food.3) Educate students on food hygiene and reporting symptoms promptly.Verification / Alternative check:Terminating and advising abstinence immediately remove exposure; arrest is a legal outcome only after findings.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II: leaves accountability unaddressed. Only III: skips due process. None/All: ignore proportionality.Common Pitfalls:Reopening without clearance; inadequate vendor vetting thereafter.Final Answer:Both I and II follow.

Question 16

Statement: A major railway accident involving a mail train was averted due to the presence of mind of a signalman at a wayside cabin. Courses of Action: I. Clear 50 km of track ahead of every mail train, keeping it traffic-free. II. Immediately make…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:A near-miss underscores human vigilance within layered safety. Rational actions are those that reinforce effective behaviors and adopt feasible improvements without imposing unrealistic blanket rules.Given Data / Assumptions:Incident was prevented by a vigilant signalman.Network capacity is high; tracks are shared and scheduled tightly.Automation upgrades take time, investment, and testing.Concept / Approach:I (keep 50 km traffic-free ahead of every mail train) is operationally infeasible and would cripple throughput. II (immediately make signalling fully automatic) is desirable long-term but cannot be done “immediately” across a vast network; staged upgrades are realistic. III (reward) is proportionate and builds a culture of safety.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Commend and reward the signalman; share the case as a learning note.2) Audit that section: interlocking, fail-safes, communication protocols; plan targeted automation upgrades.3) Refresher training stressing vigilance and escalation.Verification / Alternative check:Recognition improves morale and attentiveness across staff, while measured tech upgrades address systemic risks.Why Other Options Are Wrong:I: Logistically impossible; harms service. II: Unrealistic immediacy.Common Pitfalls:Knee-jerk blanket rules; underfunded, rushed automation.Final Answer:Only III follows.

Question 17

Statement: There has been a surge in internet hacking in recent months, creating panic among users. Courses of Action: I. The Government should make all-out efforts to identify and prosecute the culprits. II. Users should be advised to stay away fro…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Cyber incidents require law-enforcement action and improved cyber hygiene. Advising citizens to avoid the internet is impractical and economically harmful.Given Data / Assumptions:Multiple hacking incidents reported.Cybercrime units and CERT-type bodies exist.Citizens depend on internet services for work and life.Concept / Approach:I focuses on investigation, attribution, takedowns, and prosecution, while parallel public advisories can promote MFA, updates, and safe practices—without abandoning internet use. II is counterproductive and unrealistic.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Activate cyber cells and incident response; coordinate with ISPs/hosting for evidence and blocks.2) Issue best-practice advisories (patching, MFA, password managers, backups).3) Pursue international cooperation for cross-border actors.Verification / Alternative check:Sustained enforcement plus hygiene reduces future incidents while preserving digital economy activity.Why Other Options Are Wrong:II would paralyse normal life and does not address root causes.Common Pitfalls:Victim-blaming; delayed breach notifications.Final Answer:Only I follows.

Question 18

Statement: There is an unprecedented increase in successful candidates in this year’s school-leaving certificate examination. Courses of Action: I. Increase seats in existing intermediate courses immediately to accommodate demand. II. Open new colle…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:A sudden, seasonal surge in successful candidates creates immediate seat pressure. The suitable response addresses the current intake swiftly using available capacity.Given Data / Assumptions:Demand spike pertains to the current admission cycle.Expanding capacity in existing institutions (evening shifts/additional divisions) is quicker.Opening new colleges requires approvals, infrastructure, staffing, and is time-consuming.Concept / Approach:I is a near-term, feasible measure. II is a long-term policy question that cannot serve the current cohort’s immediate needs, though it may be considered separately.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Add temporary sections, extend hours, and optimise classroom utilisation.2) Encourage nearby institutions to share capacity via seat pooling.3) Review longer-term infrastructure planning for sustained trends.Verification / Alternative check:Seat increases ease immediate pressure; new colleges cannot be commissioned in weeks.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II/Either/Both: II is not timely for the present cycle.Common Pitfalls:Overcommitting beyond faculty capacity; neglecting quality controls.Final Answer:Only I follows.

Question 19

Statement: A very large number of students failed in the final high-school examinations due to wrong questions in one subject. Courses of Action: I. Allow all affected students to take a supplementary examination for that subject. II. Suspend those …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Wrong questions invalidate fair assessment. The response must restore equity to students and ensure accountability to prevent recurrence.Given Data / Assumptions:Failure is linked to an identified paper defect.Boards have mechanisms for moderation/supplementary exams.Responsibility may lie with paper setters, moderators, or quality control.Concept / Approach:I provides an immediate remedy—retesting or moderated re-evaluation—so no candidate is unfairly penalised. II ensures process correction via inquiry and proportionate action.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Announce supplementary exam with clear timelines; consider grace/normalisation if appropriate.2) Set up an independent inquiry; revise SOPs for paper setting and vetting.3) Communicate transparently to students and parents.Verification / Alternative check:Both fairness and deterrence are needed; either alone is insufficient.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only I: no systemic fix. Only II: students remain harmed.Common Pitfalls:Delays in scheduling; inadequate communication.Final Answer:Both I and II follow.

Question 20

Statement: Prices of foodgrains and vegetables have risen sharply due to a prolonged strike by the truck owners’ association. Courses of Action: I. Immediately arrange alternative logistics to ensure adequate market supplies. II. Cancel licences of …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Supply-chain disruptions inflate prices. Priority is restoring movement of essentials, not punitive actions that escalate conflict.Given Data / Assumptions:Cause is logistics stoppage, not crop failure.Government can mobilise railways, alternate fleets, or essential-services exemptions.Punitive cancellation could worsen shortages.Concept / Approach:I addresses scarcity by rerouting supplies (rail, waterways where possible, government-run fleets, or emergency contracting). II aggravates the standoff and reduces carrier capacity further.Step-by-Step Solution:1) Declare essentials; enable escorted movement; engage army supply corps if needed.2) Negotiate with association while keeping supplies flowing.3) Monitor prices and act against hoarding.Verification / Alternative check:Price stability follows restoration of supply; licence cancellation extends disruption.Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II/Either/Both: II is counterproductive.Common Pitfalls:Ignoring last-mile distribution; inadequate enforcement against profiteering.Final Answer:Only I follows.

Course of Action Questions

Questions

Practice smarter