Question 1

Arrange the following English words in dictionary order (alphabetical order): 1. Fraudulent 2. Fraught 3. Fraternity 4. Franchise 5. Frantic.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Alphabetical or dictionary order questions test your ability to compare words based on standard lexicographic rules. You must look at each letter from left to right and decide which words come first, just as they would appear in an English dictionary. This particular question involves several words that share a common prefix, making it important to compare letters beyond the first few positions. Given Data / Assumptions: - The words to be ordered are: Fraudulent, Fraught, Fraternity, Franchise and Frantic. - The words are labeled as 1. Fraudulent, 2. Fraught, 3. Fraternity, 4. Franchise and 5. Frantic. - We must arrange these words in standard English dictionary order and then match the correct sequence of labels. Concept / Approach: Dictionary order compares words character by character from left to right. When letters are equal up to a certain point, the first position where they differ determines the order. All words here begin with the same three letters F, R and A, so we must examine further letters carefully. Comparing the fourth and subsequent letters will reveal the ordering. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Write the words with their positions: 1. Fraudulent, 2. Fraught, 3. Fraternity, 4. Franchise, 5. Frantic. Step 2: Note that the first three letters FR A are the same in all words. Step 3: Compare the fourth letters: Franchise has N, Fraternity has T, Frantic has N, Fraudulent has U, Fraught has U. Step 4: Since N comes before T and U in the alphabet, words with N as the fourth letter will come before those with T or U. Step 5: Among the words with N as the fourth letter (Franchise and Frantic), compare the next letters. Franchise begins FRAN C and Frantic begins FRAN T. The letter C comes before T, so Franchise comes before Frantic. Step 6: The next word after the N group is Fraternity, because T (in FRAT) comes before U (in FRAU). Step 7: Now compare Fraudulent and Fraught, both starting with FRAU. After FRAU, Fraudulent has D and Fraught has G. The letter D comes before G, so Fraudulent comes before Fraught. Step 8: Thus, the full dictionary order is: Franchise, Fraternity, Frantic, Fraudulent, Fraught, which corresponds to labels 4, 3, 5, 1, 2. Verification / Alternative Check: You can verify the order by imagining how these words would appear in an actual dictionary or by using an alphabetical list on a computer. They will indeed be arranged as Franchise, Fraternity, Frantic, Fraudulent and then Fraught. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B and D propose different sequences that either misorder words with the same prefix (for example, placing Fraught before Fraudulent) or misplace Fraternity relative to the N group words (Franchise and Frantic). Any deviation from the careful letter by letter comparison results in an incorrect dictionary order. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to stop comparing too early, for example using only the first four letters and ignoring later differences, or to arrange words by perceived meaning rather than strict alphabetical rules. When several words share a long common prefix, always continue comparing until you hit the first differing letter. Final Answer: The correct dictionary order is 4,3,5,1,2, which corresponds to Franchise, Fraternity, Frantic, Fraudulent and Fraught.

Question 2

In an arithmetic reasoning puzzle, four boxes have weights 100 kg, 90 kg, 80 kg and 40 kg. For these four box weights, which of the following values cannot be obtained as the total weight, in kilograms, of any combination if in a combination each bo…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This arithmetic reasoning question is about selecting valid combinations of box weights. You are given four different box weights and several possible totals. The task is to find which total weight cannot be formed by adding some or all of the boxes, with the condition that each box can be used at most once. Such problems are common in aptitude tests to check understanding of combinations, systematic listing, and basic arithmetic operations. Given Data / Assumptions: - Box weights available: 100 kg, 90 kg, 80 kg and 40 kg. - Each box can be used at most once in any combination. - We can choose one, two, three or all four boxes. - We must identify which given total weight cannot be obtained from any such combination. - Options given are 200 kg, 310 kg, 230 kg, 210 kg and 270 kg. Concept / Approach: The core concept is to list all distinct possible sums using the given weights under the rule of using each weight at most once. Because there are only four boxes, the total number of possible non empty subsets is limited, so a systematic enumeration is feasible. By comparing the resulting list of achievable totals with the options, we can identify which option is not present in the list. This direct enumeration approach is reliable and avoids missing any valid combination. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List single box totals: 40, 80, 90 and 100 kilograms. Step 2: List all pairwise sums: 100 + 90 = 190, 100 + 80 = 180, 100 + 40 = 140, 90 + 80 = 170, 90 + 40 = 130, 80 + 40 = 120. Step 3: List triple box sums: 100 + 90 + 80 = 270, 100 + 90 + 40 = 230, 100 + 80 + 40 = 220, 90 + 80 + 40 = 210. Step 4: List the sum of all four boxes: 100 + 90 + 80 + 40 = 310. Step 5: Collect all distinct achievable totals: 40, 80, 90, 100, 120, 130, 140, 170, 180, 190, 210, 220, 230, 270 and 310. Step 6: Compare with the options: 200, 310, 230, 210 and 270. We see that 310, 230, 210 and 270 appear in the achievable list, but 200 does not appear. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to reason whether 200 can be formed using the available weights. Try forming 200 kilograms: 100 + 90 = 190, so adding any other box exceeds 200. Using 100 + 80 = 180, adding 40 gives 220, which is too large. Using 90 + 80 = 170 and adding 40 gives 210, again not equal to 200. No single weight equals 200, and no pair or triple sum equals 200. Therefore, 200 kilograms is impossible to obtain, confirming the earlier enumeration result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 310 kilograms is achievable using all four boxes together: 100 + 90 + 80 + 40. - 230 kilograms is achievable using 100 + 90 + 40. - 210 kilograms is achievable using 90 + 80 + 40. - 270 kilograms is achievable using 100 + 90 + 80. Since these totals can be formed by valid combinations, they are not correct answers to the question asking for an impossible total. Common Pitfalls: Many test takers forget to list all combinations systematically and may miss a valid total. Another common mistake is to accidentally reuse a box weight more than once, which violates the given condition. Some candidates also try to guess by intuition instead of carefully listing possibilities, which can lead to wrong answers when numbers are close together. It is important to proceed methodically, especially when the number of items is small enough to allow full enumeration. Final Answer: The total weight that cannot be formed by any combination of the four boxes, with each box used at most once, is 200 kilograms.

Question 3

In an arithmetic reasoning question, four boxes have weights 30 kg, 40 kg, 50 kg and 100 kg. For these four box weights, which of the following values cannot be obtained as the total weight, in kilograms, of any combination if in a combination each …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem is another example of a box weight combination question that appears frequently in aptitude tests. You are provided with four specific box weights and several candidate totals. The objective is to find the total weight that cannot be formed by adding together some or all of the boxes, using each box at most once. This tests the ability to reason systematically about combinations and simple arithmetic sums. Given Data / Assumptions: - Box weights: 30 kg, 40 kg, 50 kg and 100 kg. - Each box can either be chosen or not chosen, but cannot be repeated. - We can form totals using one, two, three or all four boxes. - Options given are 190 kg, 180 kg, 160 kg, 140 kg and 220 kg. - We must find which of these totals is impossible to obtain. Concept / Approach: The standard approach is to list all possible distinct sums using the four given weights. Because 4 items have a manageable number of subsets, enumeration is practical and reliable. After listing all sums, we compare them with the answer options. Any option that does not appear in the list of achievable totals is the answer. This method avoids guesswork and ensures that no valid combination is overlooked. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Single box totals: 30, 40, 50 and 100 kilograms. Step 2: Pairwise sums: 30 + 40 = 70, 30 + 50 = 80, 30 + 100 = 130, 40 + 50 = 90, 40 + 100 = 140, 50 + 100 = 150. Step 3: Triple box sums: 30 + 40 + 50 = 120, 30 + 40 + 100 = 170, 30 + 50 + 100 = 180, 40 + 50 + 100 = 190. Step 4: Sum of all four boxes: 30 + 40 + 50 + 100 = 220. Step 5: Collect achievable totals: 30, 40, 50, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, 130, 140, 150, 170, 180, 190 and 220. Step 6: Compare with the options: 190, 180, 160, 140 and 220. The only value that does not appear in the achievable list is 160 kilograms. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, specifically search for a combination that could produce 160 kg. Try 100 + 50 = 150, which is too small, and adding 30 or 40 would exceed 160. Using 50 + 40 = 90, adding 30 gives 120, and adding 100 gives 190. No combination using any subset of the four weights equals 160. Therefore, 160 kilograms is impossible to form and must be the correct answer. This confirms the earlier enumeration. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 190 kilograms is achievable with 40 + 50 + 100. - 180 kilograms is achievable with 30 + 50 + 100. - 140 kilograms is achievable with 40 + 100. - 220 kilograms is achievable with all four boxes: 30 + 40 + 50 + 100. Since each of these totals can be formed, they are not the required impossible total. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to perform mental calculations without a structured list, which often leads to missing a combination. Some candidates may also mistakenly allow repetition of a box, which violates the condition that a box can be used only once. Another pitfall is to assume that the largest or the smallest option is automatically the answer, which is not necessarily true. Systematic enumeration remains the safest strategy. Final Answer: The total weight that cannot be formed by any combination of the four boxes, with each box used at most once, is 160 kilograms.

Question 4

In the equation 7 x 9 + 5 = 68 given in an arithmetic reasoning puzzle, which of the following interchanges of signs and digits will make the equation mathematically correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question involves correcting a wrong arithmetic equation by interchanging signs and digits. Such problems test logical thinking about how arithmetic operations and numbers interact. You are given a false equation, 7 x 9 + 5 = 68, and several options specifying which pair of signs and which pair of digits should be interchanged to make the equation true. Correct interpretation of the option statements and careful evaluation of the resulting expressions are essential. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original equation: 7 x 9 + 5 = 68. - Standard arithmetic precedence applies, with multiplication performed before addition. - Each option specifies two signs and two digits to interchange. - Interchanging digits means swapping their positions wherever they appear in the equation. - We must find the option that leads to a correct numerical equality. Concept / Approach: The strategy is to interpret each option as a set of swaps, apply those swaps to the equation, and then check if the resulting equation becomes numerically correct. When swapping signs, multiplication and addition symbols change places. When swapping digits, the indicated digits exchange positions wherever they occur. By evaluating each transformed equation, we can identify which one satisfies the equality. Because the numbers are small, direct calculation is convenient and accurate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider option c: interchange x and +, and interchange digits 5 and 7. Step 2: First interchange x and + in the original equation 7 x 9 + 5 = 68. This gives 7 + 9 x 5 = 68. Step 3: Now interchange digits 5 and 7 in this new expression. Wherever 7 appears, write 5, and wherever 5 appears, write 7. The expression becomes 5 + 9 x 7 = 68. Step 4: Evaluate 5 + 9 x 7 using precedence (multiplication first). We have 9 x 7 = 63, then 5 + 63 = 68. Step 5: Therefore, after these interchanges, the equation 5 + 9 x 7 = 68 is true, so option c achieves a correct equality. Step 6: Briefly test other options: they do not yield a true equation when their prescribed swaps are applied, so they can be rejected. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify option c directly by rechecking operations. Starting with 5 + 9 x 7, applying multiplication first gives 63, and adding 5 results in 68, exactly matching the right hand side. For comparison, if we try option d, which interchanges x and +, and 7 and 9, we get 9 + 7 x 5 = 68, which evaluates to 9 + 35 = 44, not 68. Similarly, options a and b lead to equations that are clearly false. This confirms that option c is uniquely correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Option a (+ and =, 5 and 6) produces an equation that results in unequal sides when evaluated. - Option b (+ and =, 7 and 9) also fails to balance the two sides of the equation. - Option d (x and +, 7 and 9) leads to 9 + 7 x 5 = 68, which is numerically 44, not 68. - Option e is a distractor and likewise does not produce a valid equality. None of these options transforms the original equation into a true statement. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes ignore the order of operations and treat addition and multiplication as if they occur left to right without precedence. Others misinterpret what interchanging digits means and may replace a digit in only one place instead of consistently. Another frequent error is to assume that swapping only signs will be sufficient, while this problem clearly needs both sign and digit changes. Careful reading and methodical checking of each option prevent these errors. Final Answer: The interchange that makes the equation correct is interchanging x and +, and interchanging digits 5 and 7, which corresponds to option c.

Question 5

Five students P, Q, R, S and T are sitting in a row on a bench. Q is seated to the left of P and to the right of T. S is at the extreme right end of the row, and R is seated immediately to the left of S. Who is sitting third from the left end?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal reasoning question tests understanding of linear seating arrangements. Five students are seated in a row, and several relative position clues are given. By interpreting and combining these clues, you need to determine who occupies the third position from the left. Such arrangement problems are common in competitive exams and require careful logical deduction. Given Data / Assumptions: - Students: P, Q, R, S and T. - All five students are sitting in a single straight row with no empty seats. - Q is to the left of P and to the right of T, so the sequence T, Q, P must hold from left to right. - S is at the extreme right end of the row. - R is immediately to the left of S. - We must identify who is sitting third from the left end. Concept / Approach: The approach is to convert the verbal clues into positional relationships and then arrange the students accordingly. Because there are exactly five people and several strong constraints, the final arrangement is uniquely determined. First, we note the fixed segment T, Q, P, which must appear consecutively in that order from left to right. Next, we place S at the extreme right and R immediately to its left. Finally, we check how these two groups can fit together into a row of five seats. Consistency checks ensure that all clues are satisfied simultaneously. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From the condition that Q is to the left of P and right of T, we deduce the mini sequence T, Q, P in that order from left to right. Step 2: From the statement that S is at the extreme right end, place S in the fifth position from the left. Step 3: Because R is immediately to the left of S, R must occupy the fourth position from the left. Step 4: Now all five positions are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Positions 4 and 5 are R and S respectively. The triple T, Q, P must fit in the remaining three positions 1, 2 and 3, in that order. Step 5: Therefore, the final arrangement from left to right is T in position 1, Q in position 2, P in position 3, R in position 4, and S in position 5. Step 6: The third position from the left is occupied by P. Verification / Alternative check: Recheck each clue against the final order T, Q, P, R, S. Q is indeed to the left of P and to the right of T. S is at the extreme right end in position 5. R is immediately to the left of S in position 4. All given conditions are satisfied. There is no alternative arrangement that respects all clues simultaneously, so the solution is unique. This confirms that our reasoning is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Q sits in the second position from the left, not the third. - R sits in the fourth position from the left. - T sits in the first position from the left. - S sits in the fifth and extreme right position. Because only P occupies the third seat from the left, all other options are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to ignore the phrase immediately to the left when placing R relative to S. Some candidates also misinterpret the two sided relation for Q, placing Q correctly between T and P but failing to maintain the correct order T, Q, P. Another error is to draw several partial arrangements without ensuring that all clues are satisfied together. Drawing a single clear row and filling it step by step is the safest strategy. Final Answer: The student sitting third from the left end of the row is P.

Question 6

In a row of swimmers, Manish is 23rd from the left end. Ramesh stands 11 ranks to the left of Manish. If Ramesh is 16th from the right end, how many swimmers are there in the row in total?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This arithmetic reasoning question involves positions in a row and the relationship between left and right rankings. You are given the positions of two swimmers, Manish and Ramesh, from different ends and relative to each other. The objective is to find the total number of swimmers in the row. Such problems are standard in aptitude tests and rely on the formula connecting left rank, right rank and total number of people. Given Data / Assumptions: - Manish is 23rd from the left end of the row. - Ramesh is 11 ranks to the left of Manish. - Ramesh is 16th from the right end. - All swimmers stand in a single straight row with no gaps. - We must determine the total number of swimmers in the row. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the relationship: position from left + position from right - 1 = total number of people in the row. First, we use the information about relative positions to find Ramesh's position from the left. Then we use the formula with his left and right positions to compute the total number. Careful interpretation of the phrase 11 ranks to the left is important to avoid adding instead of subtracting. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Manish is 23rd from the left. That means his position from the left end is 23. Step 2: Ramesh is 11 ranks to the left of Manish. Therefore, Ramesh's position from the left is 23 - 11 = 12. Step 3: We are given that Ramesh is 16th from the right end. So his position from the right is 16. Step 4: Apply the standard formula: total number of swimmers = position from left + position from right - 1. Step 5: Substitute values: total = 12 + 16 - 1. Step 6: Compute 12 + 16 = 28, then subtract 1 to get total = 27. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, imagine numbering positions from 1 to 27 from the left. Ramesh is at position 12 from the left. From the right, his position would be 27 - 12 + 1 = 16, which matches the given information. Manish is 11 positions to the right of Ramesh, so his position from the left is 12 + 11 = 23, matching the original statement. Since all conditions are satisfied with a total of 27 swimmers, the answer is consistent and correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - If there were 28 swimmers, Ramesh at 12th from the left would be 17th from the right, not 16th. - If there were 29 or 30 swimmers, Ramesh's right rank would be even larger, again incorrect. - A total of 26 swimmers would make his left and right positions inconsistent with the formula. Only 27 swimmers satisfy the relationship between the left and right positions given in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students often misinterpret 11 ranks to the left and incorrectly add instead of subtracting. Another common mistake is to forget to subtract 1 in the formula and instead use left rank plus right rank directly. It is also easy to mix up whose positions are being used, especially in multi person questions. Always write down the formula clearly and plug in values carefully to avoid such errors. Final Answer: The total number of swimmers standing in the row is 27.

Question 7

A prime number between 10 and 50 remains unchanged when its digits are reversed to form a two digit number again. The square of this two digit prime number is equal to which of the following values?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question combines basic number theory with place value understanding. You are asked to find a two digit prime number between 10 and 50 that remains the same when its digits are reversed, and then compute its square. Such a number is a palindromic prime in the two digit range. Once the number is identified, squaring it is straightforward arithmetic. Given Data / Assumptions: - The number is a prime number. - It lies strictly between 10 and 50. - Reversing its digits yields the same number, so it is a two digit palindrome. - We must find the square of this number and match it with the given options. Concept / Approach: A two digit number that remains unchanged when its digits are reversed must have the same tens and units digit, so it is of the form 11, 22, 33, 44 and so on. Within the interval 10 to 50, such palindromes are 11, 22, 33 and 44. Among these, we need the one that is prime. A prime number has exactly two positive divisors, 1 and itself. We test each candidate for primality and then compute the square of the correct one. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List two digit palindromes between 10 and 50: 11, 22, 33 and 44. Step 2: Check primality of 11. It is divisible only by 1 and 11, so it is prime. Step 3: Check 22. It is divisible by 2 and 11, so it is composite. Step 4: Check 33. It is divisible by 3 and 11, so it is composite. Step 5: Check 44. It is divisible by 2 and 11, so it is composite. Step 6: Therefore, 11 is the only two digit palindromic prime between 10 and 50. Step 7: Compute its square: 11 * 11 = 121. Verification / Alternative check: You can confirm the squaring operation by using distributive multiplication. Think of 11 as 10 + 1. Then 11^2 = (10 + 1) * (10 + 1) = 10 * 10 + 2 * 10 * 1 + 1 * 1 = 100 + 20 + 1 = 121. This quick mental check confirms that the square of 11 is indeed 121. No other two digit palindrome in the given range is prime, so the result is unique. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 484 is 22^2, but 22 is not prime. - 1089 is 33^2, and 33 is composite. - 1936 is 44^2, and 44 is composite. - 729 is 27^2 or 3^6, and 27 is not the required palindromic prime. These values do not correspond to the square of a palindromic prime between 10 and 50. Common Pitfalls: Some students mistakenly consider any prime between 10 and 50, without ensuring that it is a palindrome. Others miscompute squares in a hurry, especially when dealing with mental calculations. It is also easy to overlook the fact that 11 is both prime and palindromic. Listing all palindromes in the range first, and then checking primality, is the safest method. Final Answer: The square of the two digit palindromic prime between 10 and 50 is 121.

Question 8

In a row of boys, Punit has position 33rd from the left end and Ankit has position 25th from the right end. After the two boys interchange their positions, Punit becomes 45th from the left end. How many boys are there in the row in total?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about the relationship between left and right positions in a row and how these positions change when two people interchange places. You are given the positions of Punit and Ankit from different ends, before and after they swap places. The goal is to find the total number of boys in the row. These types of problems test understanding of rank formulas and careful handling of position data. Given Data / Assumptions: - Initially, Punit is 33rd from the left end. - Initially, Ankit is 25th from the right end. - After they interchange their positions, Punit becomes 45th from the left end. - All boys stand in a single straight row with consecutive positions and no gaps. - We must determine the total number of boys in the row. Concept / Approach: The central idea is that when two people swap positions, each takes the other person's original position. After interchange, Punit stands where Ankit originally stood. Therefore, Punit's new left position equals Ankit's original left position. Once we know a boy's position from both ends, we can use the formula total number = left position + right position - 1. We will first calculate Ankit's original position from the left, and then use this formula. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let the total number of boys be N. Step 2: Initially, Ankit is 25th from the right end. Therefore, his position from the left is N - 25 + 1, which simplifies to N - 24. Step 3: After they interchange positions, Punit stands at Ankit's original place. We are told that Punit then becomes 45th from the left. Step 4: Therefore, Ankit's original left position equals 45. So N - 24 = 45. Step 5: Solve for N: N = 45 + 24 = 69. Step 6: Hence, the total number of boys in the row is 69. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by reconstructing positions. If N = 69, Ankit's original left position is 69 - 25 + 1 = 45, which matches the condition that after swapping Punit becomes 45th from the left. Punit's original position from the left is 33, so after swapping Ankit will stand at position 33 from the left. From the right, Ankit's new position would be 69 - 33 + 1 = 37, which does not need to match any given data and creates no contradiction. Therefore, N = 69 is consistent with all information. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - If N were 70 or 71, Ankit's original left position would not be 45, so Punit could not become 45th from the left after swapping. - Values such as 68 or 74 similarly fail when we apply the formulas for left and right positions. Only N = 69 satisfies all the given conditions simultaneously. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes forget that after swapping places, each person takes the other's original position. Another common error is misusing the formula for converting right rank to left rank, by forgetting to add or subtract 1. Confusing which boy's position is being referred to after swapping also causes mistakes. Writing down the symbolic expressions carefully and solving step by step helps avoid these issues. Final Answer: The total number of boys standing in the row is 69.

Question 9

In a group of 50 students, 25 play hockey, 30 play football and 8 play neither of these games. Using basic set theory and Venn diagram reasoning, what is the number of students who play both hockey and football?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is a classic application of set theory and Venn diagrams in aptitude tests. You are given the total number of students in a group, the number who play hockey, the number who play football and the number who play neither game. The objective is to find how many students play both hockey and football. Understanding the inclusion exclusion principle is essential for solving such problems efficiently. Given Data / Assumptions: - Total number of students in the group is 50. - Students who play hockey: 25. - Students who play football: 30. - Students who play neither hockey nor football: 8. - Each student can play none, one or both of the two games. - We must find the number of students who play both hockey and football. Concept / Approach: Let H be the set of students who play hockey and F be the set of students who play football. The number of students who play at least one of the two games is the size of the union H ∪ F. From set theory, n(H ∪ F) = n(H) + n(F) - n(H ∩ F), where H ∩ F represents students who play both games. Additionally, students who play at least one game plus students who play neither must equal the total number of students. Using these relationships, we first compute n(H ∪ F) and then solve for n(H ∩ F). Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let x be the number of students who play both hockey and football, that is x = n(H ∩ F). Step 2: Number of students who play at least one game is n(H ∪ F) = total students - students who play neither = 50 - 8 = 42. Step 3: Use the inclusion exclusion formula: n(H ∪ F) = n(H) + n(F) - n(H ∩ F). Step 4: Substitute known values: 42 = 25 + 30 - x. Step 5: Simplify the right side: 25 + 30 = 55, so 42 = 55 - x. Step 6: Rearrange to find x: x = 55 - 42 = 13. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by reconstructing the Venn diagram numerically. In the hockey circle there are 25 students, of which 13 also play football. Therefore, only hockey players count is 25 - 13 = 12. In the football circle there are 30 students, of which 13 also play hockey. Therefore, only football players count is 30 - 13 = 17. Now total students who play at least one game should be 12 + 13 + 17 = 42, which matches 50 - 8. Adding 8 students who play neither gives 42 + 8 = 50, the total group size. All numbers are consistent, confirming that 13 is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - If 10, 11 or 12 students played both games, the count of students who play at least one game would not equal 42 and would conflict with the given data. - If 9 students played both games, the union size would be 25 + 30 - 9 = 46, which is inconsistent with 50 total students and 8 non participants. Only 13 makes all counts align with the total and the given numbers for each game. Common Pitfalls: A major mistake is to add the two game counts directly, 25 + 30, without subtracting the intersection. This double counts students who play both games. Another common error is to confuse students who play neither with students who play exactly one game. Drawing a simple Venn diagram and labeling the regions with variables often makes the relationships much clearer and reduces the chance of algebra mistakes. Final Answer: The number of students who play both hockey and football is 13.

Question 10

Six members of a panel, A, B, C, D, E and F, are sitting in a row. A is to the right of C but to the left of B. E is sitting to the left of C and to the right of D, and D is sitting to the right of F. Based on this seating arrangement, which two mem…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a linear seating arrangement problem involving six panel members. You are given a set of positional relationships among A, B, C, D, E and F sitting in a single row. The question asks which two members occupy the two ends of the row. These puzzles are standard in verbal reasoning and require converting verbal clues into an ordered sequence. Given Data / Assumptions: - Members: A, B, C, D, E and F. - All six are sitting in a straight row with consecutive seats. - A is to the right of C but to the left of B, so C, A, B appear in that order from left to right. - E is left of C and right of D, so D, E, C appear in that order from left to right. - D is to the right of F, so F appears to the left of D. - We must identify the two members sitting at the extreme left and extreme right ends. Concept / Approach: The approach is to build a single consistent order that satisfies all constraints simultaneously. We start by forming smaller ordered segments like C, A, B and D, E, C. Then we place these segments relative to F using the condition that F is to the left of D. Because all six members must fit into one row, the constraints will force a unique sequence. The members at the two ends of this sequence are the answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From A is to the right of C but left of B, we obtain the ordered segment C, A, B from left to right. Step 2: From E is left of C and right of D, we obtain the segment D, E, C from left to right. Step 3: Combining the segments D, E, C and C, A, B gives the longer ordered chain D, E, C, A, B. Step 4: The remaining member is F. From D is to the right of F, we know F must sit somewhere to the left of D. Step 5: Therefore, F must come before D in the overall left to right order, giving F, D, E, C, A, B. Step 6: Now we have a complete, consistent sequence of all six members: F at the extreme left end and B at the extreme right end. Verification / Alternative check: Check each original condition against the derived order F, D, E, C, A, B. A is to the right of C and to the left of B, which is satisfied as C, A, B appear in that order. E is to the left of C and to the right of D, which holds as D, E, C occur consecutively. D is to the right of F, which is satisfied since F is at the extreme left. There is no way to place any member differently without violating at least one condition, so this sequence is unique and correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Options involving D at an end, such as D, F or D, B, contradict the condition that D must have F to its left. - Option A, B suggests A and B at the ends, but this ignores the members D, E, C and F and does not satisfy all relative positions. - Option C, F places C at an end, which conflicts with its required neighbors E and A in the center of the row. Only F, B correctly represent the extreme left and right members of the valid arrangement. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to treat each condition in isolation and not merge them into a single coherent order. Some students also misinterpret to the right of and to the left of as meaning immediate neighbors, which is not stated here. Others may forget to include F in the arrangement correctly. Drawing the row explicitly and progressively inserting each member according to the clues minimizes such mistakes. Final Answer: The two members sitting at the ends of the row are F at the extreme left and B at the extreme right.

Question 11

A word series is given with one term missing: Pension, Aptitude, Captain, Tropical, Survive, ?. Choose the correct alternative from the given options that logically completes this series.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal reasoning question presents a series of English words with one term missing and asks you to identify the word that best continues the pattern. The given series is Pension, Aptitude, Captain, Tropical, Survive, followed by a question mark. You must examine the structure of these words to identify a consistent pattern that can be extended to pick the correct option. Pattern recognition in sequences is a common theme in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - Series: Pension, Aptitude, Captain, Tropical, Survive, ? - Options: Parrot, Apply, Trap, Tetrapod and Temple. - All words are meaningful English words. - We assume the series follows some regular structural rule, such as word length or letter arrangement. - We must choose the option that best fits the observed pattern. Concept / Approach: One effective approach is to analyze the word lengths and see if a length based pattern appears. Count the letters in each word. Pension has 7 letters, Aptitude has 8 letters, Captain has 7 letters, Tropical has 8 letters and Survive has 7 letters. The pattern alternates between 7 letter and 8 letter words: 7, 8, 7, 8, 7. Therefore, the next word in the series should naturally be an 8 letter word to continue this alternating pattern. Next, we check which of the options is an 8 letter word. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Count letters in each series word: Pension (7), Aptitude (8), Captain (7), Tropical (8), Survive (7). Step 2: Observe the pattern 7, 8, 7, 8, 7, indicating alternation between 7 and 8 letters. Step 3: Therefore, the sixth word in the sequence should have 8 letters to maintain the alternation. Step 4: Examine options for word length: Parrot (6 letters), Apply (5 letters), Trap (4 letters), Tetrapod (8 letters), Temple (6 letters). Step 5: Only Tetrapod has 8 letters. Step 6: Hence, Tetrapod is the unique choice that fits the length based pattern and should complete the series. Verification / Alternative check: As an additional check, verify that there is no other consistent, stronger pattern using starting or ending letters that would favor a different option. The first letters of the given words are P, A, C, T, S, which do not indicate a clear alphabetic or mnemonic sequence. The last letters also do not form a consistent pattern. Among the options, Tetrapod is the only word that maintains the length alternation in a clear and simple way. Since reasoning with word length is a common device in such questions, this supports our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Parrot has only 6 letters and breaks the 7, 8 alternation rule. - Apply has 5 letters, also violating the established pattern. - Trap has 4 letters, which does not fit any reasonable extension of the sequence. - Temple has 6 letters and again fails to preserve the pattern of alternating 7 and 8 letters. None of these options except Tetrapod matches the length based rule. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to search for advanced or obscure semantic connections among the words and overlook simple features like word length. Another pitfall is to attempt to form acronyms or phrases from the words, which is unnecessary here. In many verbal series questions, the simplest observable pattern is the intended one, so always check lengths and basic letter arrangements first. Final Answer: The word that logically completes the series is Tetrapod.

Question 12

The weights of four boxes are 80 kg, 60 kg, 90 kg and 70 kg. Which of the following values cannot be the total weight, in kilograms, of any combination of these boxes if in a combination a box can be used only once?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem is another example of a box weight combination question from arithmetic reasoning. You are given four box weights and several possible total weights. The task is to determine which total cannot be achieved by adding the weights of some or all of the boxes, with the condition that each box can be used at most once. Such questions assess systematic thinking and arithmetic accuracy. Given Data / Assumptions: - Box weights: 80 kg, 60 kg, 90 kg and 70 kg. - Each box may either be included or excluded from a combination, but cannot be repeated. - We can form totals using one, two, three or all four boxes. - Options: 300 kg, 230 kg, 220 kg, 290 kg and 210 kg. - We must identify the total weight that is impossible to obtain. Concept / Approach: The straightforward method is to list all distinct sums obtainable from the given weights. With only four boxes, the number of subsets is small, and full enumeration is practical. After generating all possible totals, we compare them with the answer options. Any option absent from the list of achievable totals is the correct answer. This method prevents oversight and ensures accuracy. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Single box totals are simply: 60, 70, 80 and 90 kilograms. Step 2: Two box combinations and their sums: - 80 + 60 = 140 - 80 + 90 = 170 - 80 + 70 = 150 - 60 + 90 = 150 - 60 + 70 = 130 - 90 + 70 = 160 Step 3: Three box sums: - 80 + 60 + 90 = 230 - 80 + 60 + 70 = 210 - 80 + 90 + 70 = 240 - 60 + 90 + 70 = 220 Step 4: Four box sum: 80 + 60 + 90 + 70 = 300. Step 5: Collect achievable totals: 60, 70, 80, 90, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 210, 220, 230, 240 and 300. Step 6: Compare with options: 300, 230, 220, 290 and 210. We see that 300, 230, 220 and 210 appear in the achievable list, but 290 does not. Verification / Alternative check: Try to construct 290 kg explicitly. The total weight of all boxes is only 300 kg, so 290 kg would require leaving out 10 kg. However, none of the box weights equals 10 kg, so you cannot obtain 290 kg by excluding a single box. Check other possibilities: any sum of three boxes is at most 240 kg and any sum of two boxes is at most 170 kg. Therefore, no subset of the given weights sums to 290 kg. This confirms that 290 kg is impossible to achieve. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 300 kilograms is achievable with all four boxes together: 80 + 60 + 90 + 70. - 230 kilograms is achievable with 80 + 60 + 90. - 220 kilograms is achievable with 60 + 90 + 70. - 210 kilograms is achievable with 80 + 60 + 70. Since these totals appear among the computed sums, they do not satisfy the requirement of being impossible. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to attempt mental calculation without writing down all combinations, leading to omitted sums. Some candidates also incorrectly assume that the largest or smallest option must be the impossible one without checking. Others mistakenly reuse a box weight, violating the rule that each box can be used only once. Listing combinations systematically is the safest method for these problems. Final Answer: The total weight that cannot be formed by any combination of the four boxes, using each box at most once, is 290 kilograms.

Question 13

A general of an army wants to form his 36562 soldiers into the largest possible perfect square formation. After arranging them in this square, some army men remain unused. How many soldiers remain unused outside the square formation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This arithmetic reasoning question deals with square numbers and remainders. The general has 36562 soldiers and wants to arrange them in a perfect square formation, which requires the same number of soldiers in each row and each column. However, the total number of soldiers is not itself a perfect square, so some soldiers will remain unused. The task is to find how many soldiers are left over after forming the largest possible square. Given Data / Assumptions: - Total number of soldiers: 36562. - Soldiers are to be arranged in a perfect square grid. - Each side of the square must contain the same integer number of soldiers. - The general wants to use as many soldiers as possible in the square. - We must find the number of soldiers who remain outside this largest possible square. Concept / Approach: To solve this, we find the largest perfect square less than or equal to 36562. If k^2 is this largest square, then k soldiers stand in each row and k soldiers stand in each column, using k^2 soldiers in total. The number of unused soldiers is then the difference 36562 - k^2. Therefore, we need to approximate the square root of 36562, find the nearest integer k such that k^2 is less than or equal to 36562, and compute the remainder. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Estimate the square root of 36562. We know 190^2 = 36100 and 200^2 = 40000, so the square root lies between 190 and 200. Step 2: Compute squares around this range more precisely. Calculate 191^2 and 192^2. Step 3: 191^2 = 191 * 191 = 36481. Step 4: 192^2 = 192 * 192 = 36864, which is greater than 36562. Step 5: Therefore, 191^2 is the largest perfect square less than 36562. Step 6: Find the remainder: 36562 - 36481 = 81. These 81 soldiers cannot fit into the square and remain unused. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify the calculations. First, recompute 191^2 using (190 + 1)^2 = 190^2 + 2 * 190 * 1 + 1^2. This gives 190^2 = 36100, 2 * 190 = 380 and 1^2 = 1, so 36100 + 380 + 1 = 36481, confirming 191^2. Next, verify that 192^2 is larger than the total number of soldiers; with 36864 it clearly exceeds 36562, so any larger k would also be invalid. Finally, verify the subtraction 36562 - 36481. Subtracting 36481 from 36562 yields 81, confirming our remainder. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - 36, 65 and 72 are all smaller than the actual remainder and do not satisfy 36562 - k^2 for any integer k near the square root. - 97 is larger than the true remainder and would correspond to a smaller square than 191^2, which contradicts the requirement for the largest possible square formation. Only 81 matches the difference between the total soldiers and the largest perfect square not exceeding that total. Common Pitfalls: Many students make mistakes in squaring large numbers or estimating the square root too roughly. Some may use 190^2 = 36100 and forget to check 191^2 or 192^2, leading to an incorrect remainder. Others subtract in the wrong order and get negative or inconsistent results. Using algebraic identities for squaring and performing subtraction carefully help avoid such errors. Final Answer: After forming the largest possible square with 36562 soldiers, the number of soldiers remaining unused is 81.

Question 14

Natu and Buchku each have a certain number of oranges. Natu tells Buchku that if Buchku gives Natu 10 of his oranges, then Natu will have twice as many oranges as Buchku has left. Buchku replies that if Natu gives Buchku 10 oranges, then Buchku will…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This arithmetic reasoning puzzle involves forming and solving linear equations from a word problem. Two people, Natu and Buchku, have some oranges. They describe how their numbers of oranges would change if they gave 10 oranges to each other under two different scenarios. You must translate these statements into equations and solve for the two unknown quantities, representing the oranges each person has initially. Given Data / Assumptions: - Let N be the number of oranges that Natu has initially. - Let B be the number of oranges that Buchku has initially. - Scenario 1: Buchku gives 10 oranges to Natu. Then Natu has N + 10, and Buchku has B - 10. - According to Natu, in scenario 1, N + 10 equals twice the oranges left with Buchku, so N + 10 = 2 * (B - 10). - Scenario 2: Natu gives 10 oranges to Buchku. Then Natu has N - 10, and Buchku has B + 10. - According to Buchku, in scenario 2, B + 10 equals N - 10, so B + 10 = N - 10. Concept / Approach: The approach is to express the verbal conditions as algebraic equations in N and B, then solve the simultaneous equations. The first equation comes from the condition in which Natu has twice as many oranges as Buchku after receiving 10. The second equation comes from the condition in which Buchku and Natu have equal numbers after Buchku receives 10. Once the equations are set up correctly, we solve them by substitution or elimination to find N and B. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From scenario 1, write the equation: N + 10 = 2 * (B - 10). Step 2: Simplify this equation: N + 10 = 2B - 20, so N = 2B - 30. Step 3: From scenario 2, write the equation: B + 10 = N - 10. Step 4: Rearrange scenario 2 equation to express N: N = B + 20. Step 5: Now we have two expressions for N: N = 2B - 30 and N = B + 20. Set them equal: 2B - 30 = B + 20. Step 6: Solve for B: 2B - B = 20 + 30, so B = 50. Step 7: Substitute B = 50 into N = B + 20 to get N = 50 + 20 = 70. Verification / Alternative check: Verify the numbers in both scenarios. Initially, Natu has 70 oranges and Buchku has 50 oranges. In scenario 1, Buchku gives 10 oranges to Natu, so Natu has 80 and Buchku has 40. Twice 40 is 80, which matches Natu's count, so the first condition holds. In scenario 2, Natu gives 10 oranges to Buchku, so Natu has 60 and Buchku has 60. They have equal numbers, so the second condition holds as well. This confirms that N = 70 and B = 50 satisfy both conditions exactly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - For 50, 20 or 20, 50, the equations N + 10 = 2 * (B - 10) and B + 10 = N - 10 do not hold simultaneously. - For 50, 70, the person with fewer oranges would incorrectly end up with more after exchange in one of the scenarios. - The option 40, 10 also fails to satisfy both equations when tested. Only the pair 70, 50 satisfies both conditions at the same time. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to reverse the roles of giver and receiver and write the equations incorrectly. Some candidates forget that the new quantities after giving or receiving 10 must be used in the equations, not the original values. Others attempt to solve by trial and error without properly translating the word problem into algebra, which can become confusing. Systematically defining variables and writing equations from each statement is the most reliable approach. Final Answer: The number of oranges with Natu and Buchku, respectively, is 70 and 50.

Question 15

In a standard deck of 52 playing cards, how many cards are black, that is, belong to the suits of clubs and spades?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In many aptitude and reasoning tests, basic questions about a standard deck of playing cards are used to check memory, attention to detail, and comfort with simple counting. This question asks how many black cards are present when we consider a full standard deck of 52 playing cards. Knowing the structure of the deck is essential for later topics such as probability, permutations, and combinations. Given Data / Assumptions: We have a standard deck with exactly 52 cards. The four suits are clubs, spades, hearts, and diamonds. Clubs and spades are black suits. Hearts and diamonds are red suits. Each suit contains the same number of cards. Concept / Approach: A standard playing card deck is evenly divided among four suits. Since the deck is uniform, each suit contains an equal share of the total cards. We use the fact that there are 52 cards and 4 suits to find the number of cards in each suit, and then we use the number of black suits to find the number of black cards in total. The problem is a straightforward application of division and multiplication, and it reinforces the idea of equal partitioning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Total number of cards in the deck is 52. Step 2: There are 4 suits in the deck, so cards per suit = 52 / 4 = 13. Step 3: Clubs and spades are the two black suits, so number of black suits = 2. Step 4: Number of black cards = cards per suit * number of black suits = 13 * 2. Step 5: Therefore, total black cards = 26. Verification / Alternative check: We can also think of the deck in terms of red and black halves. There are two red suits and two black suits. Because the deck is symmetrical, the total of 52 cards splits into 26 red cards and 26 black cards. This provides the same answer without explicitly calculating cards per suit first, and confirms that the result 26 is consistent with the symmetry of the deck. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 13: This would be correct only if there were a single black suit. However, there are two black suits, so this undercounts by a factor of two. 39: This would correspond to three black suits out of four, which is not the structure of a standard deck. 52: This would mean every card is black, which is clearly incorrect because there are also red suits. 24: This suggests an incorrect calculation of cards per suit or an assumption of non uniform distribution; it does not match the standard structure of the deck. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the total number of cards with the number of cards of a specific color, or to forget that each suit has exactly 13 cards. Some learners also forget that there are exactly two black suits and two red suits, which leads to wrong multiplication factors. Carefully recalling the structure of the deck avoids these errors. Final Answer: The total number of black cards in a standard deck of 52 playing cards is 26.

Question 16

In basic data handling and statistics, the process of collecting, organizing, and analyzing data in order to draw meaningful conclusions is called what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Many verbal and arithmetic reasoning questions test awareness of basic terminology from statistics and data handling. The present question asks for the correct term used for the overall process of collecting, organizing, and analyzing data, with the goal of drawing useful conclusions or making decisions. Understanding this term helps learners in many subjects such as economics, social sciences, business decisions, and research methods. Given Data / Assumptions: We deal with numerical or categorical data gathered from the real world. The process described has three key stages: collection, organization, and analysis of data. The goal is to interpret the data meaningfully, identify patterns, and support conclusions or predictions. We assume standard textbook definitions of basic data related terms. Concept / Approach: The discipline that deals with the full life cycle of data, from collection through presentation and analysis to interpretation, is called statistics. Data collection is only the first part. Probability is a branch of mathematics that deals with chances of events, and although related to statistics, it is not the complete name for the full process described. The key to answering the question correctly is to recognize that the wording collects several activities into one integrated process, which is the domain of statistics as a field. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the tasks mentioned in the question: collecting, organizing, and analyzing data. Step 2: Recall that statistics deals with methods for data collection, tabulation, graphical presentation, summary measures, and inference. Step 3: Note that data collection on its own is only one step of this larger process. Step 4: Recognize that probability is concerned with chances of events and is a branch within mathematics and statistics, not the general process itself. Step 5: Conclude that the complete process described is correctly named statistics. Verification / Alternative check: We can cross check by thinking of a typical study. First, data is collected by surveys or experiments. Then it is organized in tables or charts, and finally analyzed to compute averages, percentages, and to test hypotheses. All of these steps are covered in an introductory course in statistics, which confirms that statistics is the umbrella term for this workflow. No other listed option covers all three stages in a standard textbook sense. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Data collection: This refers only to the gathering stage and does not include organizing and analyzing, so it is too narrow. Probability: This focuses on the likelihood of events and random phenomena, not on the entire pipeline from raw data to interpretation. Systematic evaluation: This is a general phrase and not a standard technical term in data handling. It lacks the precise meaning expected in quantitative subjects. Data mining: This refers more specifically to automated discovery of patterns in large data sets using algorithms, which is a specialized sub area, not the basic foundational process described in the question. Common Pitfalls: Learners may confuse probability with statistics, or they may think that data collection alone defines the entire process. Another common error is selecting a vague sounding phrase such as systematic evaluation because it feels intuitively correct, even though it is not the standard technical term. Always match the exact wording of definition based questions with the accepted textbook terminology. Final Answer: The process of collecting, organizing, and analyzing data in order to draw conclusions is called Statistics.

Question 17

In Euclidean geometry, consider the statement Every square is a rhombus. Is this statement correct or incorrect for all squares?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Geometry questions in reasoning tests often check understanding of definitions and relationships between standard shapes. This question examines how squares and rhombuses are related. Specifically, it asks whether every square can be classified as a rhombus. To answer correctly, we must recall the formal definitions of both shapes and see whether one definition automatically satisfies the other. Given Data / Assumptions: A square is a quadrilateral with four equal sides and four angles of 90 degrees. A rhombus is a quadrilateral with four equal sides, but its angles need not be right angles. We work in standard Euclidean geometry with usual plane figures. The statement under review is: Every square is a rhombus. Concept / Approach: To see whether every square is a rhombus, we check if a square satisfies the rhombus definition. The definition of a rhombus requires only that all sides are equal. The definition of a square goes further by adding the extra condition that all interior angles are right angles. Thus, a square satisfies all the conditions of a rhombus, and more. This means that a square is a special case of a rhombus that has extra angle properties, so the statement under consideration is correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall rhombus definition: a quadrilateral with all four sides equal. Step 2: Recall square definition: a quadrilateral with all four sides equal and all four angles equal to 90 degrees. Step 3: Compare the two definitions. Every square has four equal sides, so it automatically satisfies the rhombus side condition. Step 4: The extra condition of right angles in a square does not violate the rhombus definition. It only makes the square a more specific case. Step 5: Therefore the statement Every square is a rhombus is correct for all squares. Verification / Alternative check: You can imagine the family tree of quadrilaterals. At the top is the general quadrilateral. A rhombus is a special type where all sides are equal. A square is an even more specialized rhombus that also has four right angles. So, the inclusion chain is: quadrilateral, then rhombus, then square. From this hierarchy it is clear that each square is automatically included in the set of rhombuses, which confirms that the statement is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect, a square is never a rhombus: This is false because a square fulfils the rhombus side condition of four equal sides. Correct only for some squares, not for all: There is no such restriction. Every square has equal sides, so the relationship is universal, not partial. Cannot be decided from the given information: The definitions are standard and sufficient, so the truth of the statement can be decided clearly. The statement is reversed because every rhombus is a square: This is wrong. A rhombus does not need to have right angles, so many rhombuses are not squares. The reverse statement is false. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to confuse the conditions and think that because a square has right angles, it must be different from a rhombus. Another confusion is reversing the subset relationship and assuming that if all sides are equal, then it must be a square, which is not correct. Always pay attention to which shape adds more conditions and which shape has looser conditions. Final Answer: The statement is Correct; every square is indeed a special type of rhombus with right angles.

Question 18

A person has a height of 5 feet 4 inches. If this height is expressed only in inches, how many inches tall is the person?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Conversion questions test the ability to move between different units of measurement. In many entrance and competitive exams, candidates are expected to convert between feet and inches quickly and accurately. Here we are given a mixed height in feet and inches and asked to express it entirely in inches, which is a direct application of the relation between feet and inches. Given Data / Assumptions: Height is 5 feet 4 inches. We use the standard relation 1 foot = 12 inches. We assume no rounding is required since all values are whole numbers. We need to express the entire height only in inches. Concept / Approach: To convert a mixed measurement like feet and inches into only inches, multiply the number of feet by 12 to obtain the inch equivalent, and then add the remaining inches. The formula used is total inches = feet * 12 + extra inches. This type of conversion appears frequently in questions about height, length, and in geometry problems that require a single unit for further calculations. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the height as 5 feet plus 4 inches. Step 2: Use the relation 1 foot = 12 inches. Step 3: Convert the feet part into inches: 5 * 12 = 60 inches. Step 4: Add the extra 4 inches to the 60 inches already calculated. Step 5: Total height in inches = 60 + 4 = 64 inches. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by considering nearby heights. A height of 5 feet exactly would be 5 * 12 = 60 inches. Adding 4 more inches must give a number a little above 60, so 64 inches makes sense. Also, none of the other answer choices match this logic when we check them in reverse by subtracting a multiple of 12 and seeing if the remainder is 4 inches. For example, 62 inches corresponds to 5 feet 2 inches, not 5 feet 4 inches. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 66: This would work out to 5 feet 6 inches if converted back, which is taller than the given height. 62: This corresponds to 5 feet 2 inches, not 5 feet 4 inches. 60: This is exactly 5 feet and misses the extra 4 inches stated in the question. 68: This is 5 feet 8 inches, again taller than the stated height. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to multiply incorrectly or to forget to add the extra inches after converting feet. Some learners also confuse the direction of conversion and divide when they should multiply. Always remember that a larger unit contains more smaller units, so we multiply feet by 12 to get inches. Writing a small side calculation, such as 5 * 12 = 60, helps prevent miscalculation under exam pressure. Final Answer: A height of 5 feet 4 inches is equal to 64 inches when expressed only in inches.

Question 19

In personal finance, what does the term compounding frequency refer to for an interest bearing account such as a savings account or fixed deposit?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Finance based reasoning questions often test understanding of basic interest related terms. Compounding frequency is an important concept, because it affects how quickly the money in a savings or investment account grows. The question asks what compounding frequency actually refers to, so we must identify the correct conceptual meaning rather than a numerical value. Given Data / Assumptions: We are dealing with an interest bearing account, such as a savings account or deposit. The account offers compound interest rather than pure simple interest. The term in question is compounding frequency. We assume standard banking usage of this term. Concept / Approach: Under compound interest, interest is periodically added to the principal, so future interest is earned not only on the initial amount but also on previously credited interest. Compounding frequency describes how many times per year this addition happens. Common frequencies are yearly, half yearly, quarterly, monthly, or even daily. A higher compounding frequency generally increases the effective annual yield when the nominal rate is the same. The key idea is that frequency refers to how often interest is computed and reinvested, not the rate itself or the lock in period. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that in compound interest, interest is periodically added to the principal amount. Step 2: Compounding frequency answers the question How many times in a year is this calculation and addition carried out. Step 3: Examples include annual compounding, quarterly compounding, and monthly compounding, each indicating how often the interest is credited. Step 4: The type of interest, for example simple versus compound, is a different concept and is not what frequency describes. Step 5: Therefore, compounding frequency specifically refers to how often interest is calculated and added back into the account balance. Verification / Alternative check: Consider two accounts that both advertise a rate of 10 percent per year. One compounds once per year, while the other compounds monthly. The monthly compounding account calculates and credits interest 12 times in a year, which is exactly what the frequency describes. When you calculate the effective annual return, the monthly account yields slightly more than 10 percent, which shows the practical effect of frequency. This confirms that frequency concerns the number of compounding periods and is not about the nominal rate or deposit type. Why Other Options Are Wrong: What type of interest your account earns: This describes whether the bank uses simple or compound interest, not how often compounding happens. What interest rate you can expect from your account: This is the nominal interest rate, usually expressed as a percentage per annum, which is separate from frequency. How easily and quickly you can add fresh money into your account: This refers to account flexibility or liquidity, not to compounding. The total time period for which money is locked in the account: This is the tenure or maturity period, again different from compounding frequency. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes mix up interest rate with compounding frequency, thinking both are just aspects of the same parameter. Others confuse the time period of the investment with the frequency of interest credit. To avoid this, remember that frequency answers the question How many times, whereas rate answers the question How much percent, and tenure answers the question For how long. Final Answer: Compounding frequency refers to how often the interest is calculated and added back into your account balance.

Question 20

In a triangle, the orthocentre is defined as the point where all three altitudes meet. If the orthocentre of a triangle lies on one of its sides, what can you conclude about the position of the orthocentre in that triangle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of special points in a triangle, especially the orthocentre, which is the intersection of the three altitudes. The position of the orthocentre changes depending on whether the triangle is acute, right angled, or obtuse. Understanding these patterns is important for many geometry problems in competitive exams and helps build intuition about triangle centers. Given Data / Assumptions: The orthocentre is the common intersection point of the three altitudes of a triangle. We are told that the orthocentre lies on one of the sides of the triangle. We work in standard Euclidean geometry. No additional special conditions about the triangle are provided. Concept / Approach: In an acute triangle, the orthocentre lies inside the triangle. In a right angled triangle, the orthocentre coincides with the right angled vertex. In an obtuse triangle, the orthocentre lies outside the triangle. The only time the orthocentre is said to lie on the boundary of the triangle, that is on a side, is when it coincides with a vertex, because every vertex lies on two sides. Thus, the condition that the orthocentre lies on a side strongly suggests that it is at one of the triangle vertices, as happens in a right angled triangle at the right angle vertex. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that in an acute triangle, all altitudes meet inside the triangle, so the orthocentre is interior. Step 2: Recall that in an obtuse triangle, the altitudes from acute angles intersect outside, so the orthocentre is exterior. Step 3: In a right angled triangle, the altitude from the right angle lies along one of the sides, and the other two altitudes intersect at the right angled vertex. Step 4: Therefore, in a right angled triangle, the orthocentre is located exactly at the right angled vertex. Step 5: A vertex lies on two sides of the triangle, so the statement that the orthocentre lies on one of the sides implies that it coincides with a vertex. Verification / Alternative check: We can sketch the three types of triangles. When we draw an acute triangle and its altitudes, the intersection point is clearly inside the triangle, not on a side. For an obtuse triangle, extending the altitudes shows the orthocentre outside the triangle. Only when we sketch a right angled triangle and draw all altitudes do we see that they meet at the right angle vertex, which lies on the two sides forming that right angle. This confirms that the given condition of the orthocentre lying on a side is satisfied when it coincides with a vertex. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The circumcentre necessarily lies outside the triangle: This happens only for obtuse triangles. In the current situation, the orthocentre is on a side, which is characteristic of a right angled triangle, not an obtuse one. The circumcentre lies on the same side as the orthocentre: This is not a standard property and does not follow from the given condition. The centroid always coincides with the orthocentre: The centroid is the intersection of medians and lies inside the triangle for all triangle types. It coincides with the orthocentre only in an equilateral triangle where the orthocentre is also inside, not on a side. The incentre always coincides with the orthocentre: The incentre is the intersection of angle bisectors and is always inside the triangle. It does not coincide with the orthocentre in the general case implied by the question. Common Pitfalls: Students often mix up the properties of different triangle centers, such as centroid, circumcentre, incentre, and orthocentre. Another common error is to assume that lying on a side always means being in the middle of that side, whereas here it clearly refers to coincidence with a vertex. Carefully reviewing the positions of triangle centers in acute, right, and obtuse cases prevents such confusion. Final Answer: If the orthocentre lies on a side of the triangle, it must lie exactly at a vertex; thus the correct conclusion is the orthocentre lies exactly at a vertex of the triangle.

Arithmetic Reasoning Questions