Systems thinking sequence: Select the most appropriate top-down sequence for analyzing a system from goals to design components.

Introduction / Context:
Systems analysis is most effective when approached top-down: define what the system must achieve before deciding how it will achieve it. Establishing a logical sequence prevents premature design decisions and ensures alignment with organizational goals.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We seek a sequence that starts from purposes and ends with implementation and control.
• “Transformation” denotes processes that convert inputs to outputs.
• “Information processor” is the mechanism (manual or automated) performing the transformation.

Concept / Approach:
A common top-down flow is: objectives (why) → outputs (what results) → inputs (what resources/data are needed) → transformation/information processor (how) → management (control/feedback). This aligns with requirements-first design and classic control loops.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Systems engineering and structured analysis methods advocate requirements and outputs before process design, validating this order.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Sequences that begin with outputs or management without objectives invert priorities.
• Placing inputs after management or outputs after inputs disrupts the logic of requirement derivation.

Common Pitfalls:
Jumping straight to technology (“information processor”) before clarifying objectives and outputs leads to misaligned systems.

Final Answer:
objectives → outputs → inputs → transformation (information processor) → management