tRNA tertiary structure — Which statements about the 3D architecture of yeast tRNA (and most tRNAs) are accurate?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of the above

Explanation:


Introduction:
tRNAs adopt a conserved tertiary architecture that enables precise positioning in the ribosome during translation. Yeast tRNA was among the first solved RNA 3D structures and serves as a model for tRNA folding principles.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • tRNAs fold into an L-shaped 3D structure from a cloverleaf secondary structure.
  • Stacking and noncanonical base pairs contribute substantially to stability.
  • Tertiary interactions bridge distant loops and stems.


Concept / Approach:
Evaluate each statement against known structural features: base stacking, conserved L-shape across tRNAs, and many non–Watson–Crick interactions (e.g., G•U wobble, base triples) that maintain the compact fold and correct geometry for ribosomal binding.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Base stacking between adjacent bases stabilizes helical stems and coaxial stacking.2) Comparative structures show most tRNAs share an L-shaped fold suited for A- and P-site fit.3) Noncanonical pairs and tertiary contacts (e.g., D loop–TψC loop interactions) are crucial for the final 3D shape.


Verification / Alternative check:
X-ray and cryo-EM data of multiple tRNAs and tRNA–ribosome complexes confirm all three features consistently.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

e) tRNAs are not unfolded in vivo; they are highly structured for function.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming only Watson–Crick pairing matters; overlooking stacking and tertiary contacts in RNA folding.


Final Answer:
All of the above.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion