Argument Evaluation Claim: Television convinces viewers that the likelihood of becoming a victim of violent crime is extremely high and, by its nature, persuades viewers to passively accept whatever happens to them. Which conclusion best captures the.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The statement criticizes television for inflating perceived risk and fostering passivity. We must select the conclusion that directly reflects this causal claim without exaggeration. Given Data / Assumptions: TV amplifies fear of victimization. TV encourages passive acceptance. We seek the conclusion that integrates both: fear + passivity → helplessness. Concept / Approach: A good conclusion paraphrases the main claim, not a new claim (e.g., that TV causes crime) or a policy prescription (e.g., ban TV). Step-by-Step Solution: Map “high risk perception” + “passive acceptance” = “feeling of helpless vulnerability.”Choose the option that best expresses this synthesis. Verification / Alternative check: Option d mirrors the author’s thrust precisely. Other options either overreach causally or introduce new claims. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a: Says TV promotes crime—unstated. b: Compares viewers to others without evidence. c: Policy recommendation not in the premise. e: Redundant, as a clear matching option exists. Common Pitfalls: Confusing descriptive critique with prescriptive advice or causal claims not present. Final Answer: TV promotes a feeling of helpless vulnerability in viewers.

Argument Evaluation Claim: Television convinces viewers that the likelihood of becoming a victim of violent crime is extremely high and, by its nature, persuades viewers to passively accept whatever happens to them. Which conclusion best captures the author’s point?

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments