Situation–Reaction (Leadership & Events)\nYou are a team leader scheduled to host a convention on Human Resources (HR) issues. Your team has not been able to secure adequate sponsorship in time. What is the most appropriate course of action as the responsible leader?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Postpone the event with a new timeline and support the team to close sponsors

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Event leadership often requires balancing stakeholder expectations with realistic constraints. When sponsorship falls short, the leader must protect brand reputation, employee morale, and attendee experience.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Convention is important but underfunded.
  • Team attempted sponsorship but needs more time.
  • Quality and commitments to partners matter.


Concept / Approach:
Good governance favors feasibility, transparency, and risk mitigation over heroics. A structured postponement with a revised plan maintains integrity and enables proper fundraising.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Assess current sponsor pipeline and budget gap.2) Inform stakeholders proactively about a revised date.3) Provide the team with enablement: sponsor deck, timelines, and roles.4) Relaunch outreach with clear milestones.


Verification / Alternative check:
Investing personal money is risky and unsustainable; proceeding without funds degrades experience; cancellation wastes prior effort. Postponement preserves value and trust.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

(A) Personal funding sets a bad precedent and financial risk.(B) Motivation without plan or time will not close the gap.(D) Cancellation is disproportionate and harms credibility.


Common Pitfalls:
Hiding shortfalls, last-minute vendor defaults, and scope cuts that damage brand experience.


Final Answer:
Postpone the event with a new timeline and support the team to close sponsors.

More Questions from Situation Reaction Test

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion