A tells B, "I would like to study the impact of pay revision on job satisfaction of employees." On this basis, which of the following assumptions are implicit? 1. Pay revision may have an impact on the level of job satisfaction among employees. 2. A has the necessary competence and ability to undertake such a study in a meaningful way.

Introduction / Context:
This statement and assumption question is about a proposed study in human resources. A says that he or she would like to study the impact of pay revision on job satisfaction of employees. Assumptions here relate to why this topic is chosen and whether A can carry out such a study. We must identify which assumptions must be true for A s statement to be reasonable and meaningful.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Statement: A says, "I would like to study the impact of pay revision on job satisfaction of employees."
• Assumption 1: Pay revision may influence or affect the job satisfaction levels of employees.
• Assumption 2: A has the necessary competence, knowledge, and resources to undertake such a study.
• The topic connects pay policies with employee attitudes and satisfaction.

Concept / Approach:
When someone chooses a research topic, they typically assume that there is a possible relationship worth exploring. If A did not believe that changes in pay could affect job satisfaction, there would be no point in studying that impact. Therefore Assumption 1 is clearly implicit. In addition, when A expresses the intention to carry out the study personally, it is natural to assume that A believes he or she has or can obtain the competence to do it. If A felt completely incapable, this statement would be unrealistic. So Assumption 2 is also implicit. Our goal is to see that both assumptions are required, not just one.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Consider Assumption 1. A announces an interest in studying how pay revision affects job satisfaction.Step 2: This only makes sense if A believes such impact may exist; otherwise the study would be meaningless and the statement would be pointless.Step 3: Consider Assumption 2. By expressing intent to conduct the study, A implicitly believes that he or she has the ability, skills, or access to data and methods required.Step 4: If A believed that he or she had no competence to carry out such a study, A would either remain silent or suggest that someone else should do the study.Step 5: Hence both assumptions are logically present in the background of A s statement.

Verification / Alternative check:
If Assumption 1 is denied and pay revision is believed to have no relation to job satisfaction at all, the proposed study becomes useless, which contradicts A s interest.If Assumption 2 is denied and A is assumed to lack any competence, the statement about A personally studying the topic loses credibility.Thus, both assumptions are necessary for the statement to be realistic and sensible.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is wrong because it ignores the clear implication that A intends to carry out the study and must see himself or herself as capable.Option B is wrong because it ignores the essential idea that pay revision could affect job satisfaction, which is the core of the intended study.Option C is wrong because it suggests only one assumption is needed, but we have seen that both are required.

Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is to treat researcher competence as separate and not as an assumption when a person volunteers to carry out a study.Another pitfall is to think that only the existence of a relationship is assumed, while ignoring the practical side of who will conduct the research.

Final Answer:
Therefore both assumptions are implicit in A s statement, and the correct answer is Both 1 and 2 follow.