Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only assumption I is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question asks you to identify assumptions behind a general observation about school students. The statement says that school students are more influenced by their faculty nowadays. You need to check which proposed assumptions are taken for granted when making this claim. This involves understanding what must be true in the background for the statement to be meaningful and reasonable.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
When we say that one group is more influenced by another, it usually implies that they look up to that group, respect them, or at least give weight to their words and actions. That is very close to the idea of seeing them as role models. On the other hand, simply spending more time somewhere does not automatically mean influence; quality and type of interaction matter. An assumption is implicit only if the statement would lose its strength or meaning without it.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: The statement focuses on influence, not directly on time spent in school.Step 2: For faculty to influence students significantly, it is reasonable to assume that students regard them as important figures whose behaviour and advice are worth copying or following.Step 3: Assumption I states that school students consider their faculty as role models. This fits naturally: if faculty influence students more, they are likely being seen as models to emulate.Step 4: Without this assumption, the claim of strong influence would be weak. If students did not respect or look up to their teachers in any way, saying that they are more influenced by them would sound odd.Step 5: Assumption II says that more time is spent at schools by students. The statement does not discuss time and does not require that students spend more time at school than before.Step 6: Influence can increase through changes in teaching style, social media presence of teachers, mentorship programs, or other factors even if time spent at school stays the same.Step 7: Therefore, while Assumption II might be true in some contexts, it is not necessary for the statement that students are more influenced by faculty nowadays.
Verification / Alternative check:
Imagine a scenario where students spend the same number of hours in school as in the past, but the school has invested in better teacher training, mentoring, and counselling. Faculty now interact more effectively with students and are admired by them. In this case, influence grows without any increase in time spent at school, so Assumption II is clearly not essential. Conversely, if students did not see faculty as role models, even long hours together would not necessarily translate into positive influence, confirming that Assumption I is the more fundamental one.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit: school students consider their faculty as role models.
Discussion & Comments