Reinforced concrete beam (b = 25 cm, effective depth d = 70 cm): The extreme-fiber stresses are 62.5 kg/cm² in concrete (compression) and 250 kg/cm² in steel (tension). Using modular ratio m = 15 and elastic theory, determine the depth of the neutral axis from the top compression face.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 55 cm (approximately)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Neutral axis depth in a singly reinforced concrete beam under working-stress (elastic) theory is obtained from strain compatibility between concrete and steel using the modular ratio m. This problem tests the direct use of the steel-to-concrete stress ratio to find the neutral axis without needing the steel area.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Beam breadth b = 25 cm, effective depth d = 70 cm.
  • Concrete stress at top σc = 62.5 kg/cm² (compression).
  • Steel stress σs = 250 kg/cm² (tension).
  • Modular ratio m = 15.
  • Elastic theory (linear strain distribution) and concentric bending; concrete in tension ignored.


Concept / Approach:

From similar triangles in the strain diagram and Hooke’s law: σs/σc = m * ( (d − x) / x ), where x is the neutral-axis (NA) depth from the top compression face. Rearranging gives x in terms of m, d, and the stress ratio σs/σc.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute stress ratio: σs/σc = 250 / 62.5 = 4.Use compatibility: 4 = m * (d − x) / x = 15 * (d − x) / x.Solve: (d − x) / x = 4 / 15 → d = x * (1 + 4/15) = x * (19/15).Therefore x = (15/19) * d = (15/19) * 70 ≈ 55.3 cm.


Verification / Alternative check:

You can also write x = m d / ( (σs/σc) + m ) = 15 * 70 / (4 + 15) = 1050 / 19 ≈ 55.3 cm, confirming the result.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

25–40 cm and 30–35 cm are far smaller than the computed 55.3 cm using the given stresses and m; they contradict the compatibility equation.


Common Pitfalls:

Mixing effective depth with overall depth; forgetting to apply m; using force equilibrium that requires As (not provided) instead of direct strain compatibility.


Final Answer:

55 cm (approximately)

More Questions from RCC Structures Design

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion