Critical Reasoning — Implicit Assumptions Statement: Traffic jams on most city roads have become a regular feature during monsoon. Assumptions: I. Material used for road construction cannot withstand monsoon, causing innumerable potholes. II. The number of vehicles on roads is much higher in monsoon than in other seasons.

Verbal Reasoning Statement and Assumption Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    Only assumption I is implicit
  • B
    Only assumption II is implicit
  • C
    Either I or II is implicit
  • D
    Neither I nor II is implicit
  • E
    Both I and II are implicit

Answer

Correct Answer: Only assumption I is implicit

Explanation

Introduction / Context:The statement notes a seasonal pattern: frequent traffic jams during monsoon. We must identify which causal belief is being assumed to explain this recurrence.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Observation: jams are regular in monsoon.
  • Assumption I: poor road durability in rains leads to potholes and congestion.
  • Assumption II: traffic volume increases in monsoon vs other seasons.

Concept / Approach:When a statement highlights a seasonal recurrence, typical implicit causes relate to seasonal conditions (rain damage, waterlogging) rather than to counter-seasonal spikes in vehicle count. Monsoon-damaged surfaces slowing traffic is a standard underpinning assumption.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Link monsoon to road condition degradation (water damage → potholes → slower speeds → jams). This causal chain supports the observation. I is therefore implicit.2) The idea that more vehicles are on the road in monsoon is counterintuitive; many people actually travel less in heavy rains. The statement does not rely on a vehicle-count surge. II is not necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:Negate I: roads withstand monsoon perfectly — then jams would require a different explanation; the highlighted seasonal regularity loses a natural cause. Negate II: vehicle numbers do not increase — the statement can still be true due to worse road conditions. Thus only I is needed.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Only II, Either, Both, or Neither: They either introduce an unnecessary condition or ignore the plausible monsoon-specific cause tied to infrastructure.

Common Pitfalls:Assuming every repeated event must be due to demand spikes. Supply-side constraints (road quality) can be the critical seasonal factor.

Final Answer:Only assumption I is implicit

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion