In the following question, a statement about rock shows at tourist places is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You must assume the statement to be true and then decide which argument or arguments are strong. Statement: Should rock shows be allowed to run till midnight at tourist places? Argument I: Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for the local economy. Argument II: No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism. Choose the option that correctly identifies which argument or arguments are strong.

Introduction / Context:
This is a statement and argument question about whether rock shows should be allowed to run till midnight at tourist places. Your task is to judge the strength of two arguments, one in favour and one against the idea. A strong argument is relevant, logical, and touches significant consequences of the decision.

Given Data / Assumptions:
We consider the following.

• Statement: Should rock shows be allowed to run till midnight at tourist places?
• Argument I: Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for the local economy.
• Argument II: No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism.

Concept / Approach:
An argument is strong if it gives a clear, reasonable, and significant reason related to the statement. It should not be trivial or completely unrelated. We examine whether each argument directly addresses the policy question and whether it deals with meaningful effects on society.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Notice that the two arguments present two sides of a real policy debate. Argument I focuses on economic benefit, while argument II focuses on cultural harm. Both deal with substantial consequences that a decision maker would weigh. Neither argument is trivial, personal, or entirely emotional without reasoning.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A says only argument I is strong, ignoring the serious concern about cultural harm in argument II. Option B says only argument II is strong and overlooks the clear economic logic in argument I. Option D claims neither argument is strong, which is inconsistent with the practical relevance of both economic and cultural impacts.

Common Pitfalls:
Some test takers think that only arguments with statistics or very detailed reasoning are strong. In exam questions, however, an argument can be strong even if it is concise, as long as it is directly relevant and based on a reasonable cause and effect link.

Final Answer:
Both arguments present important and relevant reasons, so the correct choice is “Both arguments I and II are strong.”