In software engineering practice, which of the following are standard software development tools that assist programmers in creating, testing, and maintaining code?

Introduction / Context:
Professional software development relies on a toolchain that supports the full lifecycle: writing source code, translating it to executable form, running and testing it, and diagnosing defects. Understanding which tools are considered standard in this toolchain helps clarify roles and workflow in any development environment.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We are identifying generic categories of development tools, not brand names.
• Editors support authoring; compilers/assemblers/interpreters translate; debuggers find and fix defects.
• Each option represents a distinct, common stage in development.

Concept / Approach:
A typical pipeline is: editor or IDE for authoring; assembler/compiler/interpreter to convert source to machine-executable semantics; debugger to step through execution, inspect state, and resolve bugs. These tools integrate into CI systems, version control, and testing frameworks, but the foundational triad remains central to daily developer workflows across languages and platforms.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Most IDEs bundle or integrate all of these capabilities. Even in minimal setups, developers use a text editor, a language toolchain (compiler or interpreter), and a debugger such as a language-provided or OS-level tool.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Each single category is correct but incomplete.
• None of the above is false because all listed categories are textbook examples of dev tools.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing deployment or operations tools (e.g., containers, monitoring) with core development tools; forgetting that interpreted languages still benefit from debuggers and editors.

Final Answer:
All of the above