In human–computer interaction and communication theory, which modality represents the primary interactive method that humans use to exchange information in real time with other people?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: speaking

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Communication can be carried out through many modalities such as speaking, writing, and reading. In everyday human–human interaction, one modality dominates for immediate, interactive exchange: spontaneous speech. This question probes your understanding of the primary, real-time channel humans naturally rely on to coordinate, persuade, instruct, and collaborate.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • We are comparing common human modalities: speaking, writing, and reading.
  • “Primary interactive” emphasizes real-time, two-way exchange with low latency.
  • Cultural and technological contexts may vary, but the biological and developmental basis of speech remains universal.


Concept / Approach:
Speaking is the default human modality acquired early in life without formal instruction. It supports duplex (turn-taking) conversation, rapid feedback (prosody, intonation), and efficient error correction. Writing and reading are powerful but generally slower, learned skills best suited to persistence, archival, and asynchronous communication. Therefore, for interactive communication in real time, speaking is primary.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify which modality humans acquire first and use most naturally for live dialogue: speaking.Consider immediacy and feedback: speech enables instant clarification.Contrast with writing/reading: valuable but typically asynchronous and slower.Select the choice that reflects real-time primacy: speaking.


Verification / Alternative check:
Observationally, emergency coordination, spontaneous teaching, and informal collaboration are speech-led. Even in digital platforms, live voice (and video with voice) remains the fastest path to mutual understanding when speed matters.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Reading: critical for learning, but not a production modality for two-way exchange.
  • Writing: excellent for permanence and precision, but slower and often asynchronous.
  • All of the above: overbroad; only one modality is primary for real-time interaction.
  • None of the above: incorrect because speaking fits the criterion.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating importance with primacy; writing and reading are essential, but the question asks about the primary interactive method, not the most accurate or permanent one.


Final Answer:
speaking

More Questions from Artificial Intelligence

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion