In automatic speech recognition, which approach most effectively avoids errors due to coarticulation and context-dependent pronunciation variations by requiring pauses between words?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Isolated word recognition

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Human speech exhibits coarticulation—sounds influence each other depending on their neighbors, speaking rate, and prosody. This makes automatic speech recognition difficult because the same word can sound different in different contexts. Recognition strategies differ in how they handle such variability and the timing between words.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The goal is to avoid errors caused by context-dependent pronunciation and coarticulation.
  • We compare isolated, connected, and continuous recognition modes (and a speaker dependency setting).
  • We assume a standard microphone input and typical acoustic models.


Concept / Approach:
Isolated word recognition requires the speaker to pause between each word. The pause allows the system to segment the audio cleanly and model each word without strong coarticulation influences from adjacent words. By contrast, connected word recognition permits short pauses and retains some coarticulation, and continuous speech recognition attempts to model fully fluent speech, which maximizes coarticulation and contextual variation. Speaker-dependent systems are trained on one speaker but still face coarticulation in connected or continuous modes.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the source of difficulty: coarticulation between adjacent words. Select the approach that enforces clear boundaries: isolated word recognition with pauses. Eliminate approaches that retain coarticulation (connected, continuous). Note that speaker dependence is orthogonal to segmentation and does not eliminate coarticulation.


Verification / Alternative check:
Classical systems and early voice-command products often required the user to speak one word at a time specifically to simplify segmentation and reduce coarticulation effects, validating the choice.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Connected: still has reduced but present coarticulation.
  • Continuous: has the most coarticulation and contextual variability.
  • Speaker-dependent: does not inherently remove coarticulation.
  • None: incorrect because isolated word recognition is the precise fit.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming speaker-dependent systems eliminate all variability; they personalize models but still contend with continuous-speech dynamics if used in that mode.


Final Answer:
Isolated word recognition

More Questions from Artificial Intelligence

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion