The “Turing Machine” result in computability theory showed that any algorithmic procedure can be programmed using a very simple formal system; in popular summaries this is often described as using a _____ representation to express any computable task.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: binary

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Turing machines formalize the notion of computation with a minimal set of operations on symbols written on an infinite tape. The central idea is that complex algorithms can be reduced to simple symbolic manipulations and still retain full computational power. In non-technical summaries, this universality is often illustrated by showing that two symbols (e.g., 0 and 1) are sufficient to express any computable procedure.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The question seeks the commonly stated minimal representation used to encode any algorithmic task.
  • We assume the popular binary encoding perspective of computability results.
  • Distractors include unrelated physical or linguistic characterizations.


Concept / Approach:
While Turing’s formalism does not require specifically binary symbols (any finite alphabet suffices), it established that a very small alphabet—even two symbols—is adequate. Hence, in popular computing lore, this becomes the claim that “binary” representation can encode any computation, aligned with modern digital computers using bits.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recognize the universality of Turing machines and coding of algorithms as symbol strings. Recall that two symbols suffice to represent arbitrary computations. Map this to the common term used in computing practice → binary. Select “binary” as the widely accepted answer.


Verification / Alternative check:
Church–Turing thesis discussions and CS curricula highlight that binary encoding of instructions and data is sufficient and standard in digital computers, reflecting Turing’s universality insight.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Electro-chemical: a physical substrate, not a symbolic representation.
  • Recursive: a property of functions/definitions; not the minimal code alphabet.
  • Semantic: relates to meaning, not representation alphabet.
  • None: incorrect because binary captures the intended idea.


Common Pitfalls:
Conflating the formal statement (any finite alphabet) with the practical convention (binary); for exam purposes, binary is the expected choice.


Final Answer:
binary

More Questions from Artificial Intelligence

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion