Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: binary
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Turing machines formalize the notion of computation with a minimal set of operations on symbols written on an infinite tape. The central idea is that complex algorithms can be reduced to simple symbolic manipulations and still retain full computational power. In non-technical summaries, this universality is often illustrated by showing that two symbols (e.g., 0 and 1) are sufficient to express any computable procedure.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
While Turing’s formalism does not require specifically binary symbols (any finite alphabet suffices), it established that a very small alphabet—even two symbols—is adequate. Hence, in popular computing lore, this becomes the claim that “binary” representation can encode any computation, aligned with modern digital computers using bits.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Church–Turing thesis discussions and CS curricula highlight that binary encoding of instructions and data is sufficient and standard in digital computers, reflecting Turing’s universality insight.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Conflating the formal statement (any finite alphabet) with the practical convention (binary); for exam purposes, binary is the expected choice.
Final Answer:
binary
Discussion & Comments