English Grammar — Error Spotting (Spelling of Technical/Policy Terms) Identify the part that contains a grammatical or spelling error. If there is no error, choose 'All correct'. Full sentence: Social security and poverty alleviation programmes are not implimented with required seriousness.

Introduction / Context:
Policy and governance vocabulary often contains words with Latin roots that attract spelling errors. Recognising correct forms is essential for clarity in formal writing. Here, the suspected error lies in the verb spelling within fragment C.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Sentence: “Social security and poverty alleviation programmes are not implimented with required seriousness.”
• British English spellings like “programmes” are acceptable.
• Exactly one fragment is erroneous.

Concept / Approach:

The correct spelling is “implemented,” derived from “implement” + “-ed.” The misspelling “implimented” replaces “e” with “i.” All other fragments are standard and idiomatic in development-policy contexts.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify the verb: implemented.2) Compare with fragment C: “implimented” × → “implemented” ✓.3) Confirm the rest of the sentence is fine.4) Mark C as the error.

Verification / Alternative check:

Recast: “programmes are not implemented …” reads correctly and is widely used in official reports.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

A, B, D: Lexically and grammatically acceptable.

Common Pitfalls:

Vowel swaps in multi-syllable verbs: maintain “implement/implementation” consistently.

Final Answer:

programmes are not implimented