English Grammar — Error Spotting (Articles / Redundancy) Identify the part that contains a grammatical error. If there is no error, choose 'No error'. Full sentence: The future is yet to come but you have a a lot from us in future.

Introduction / Context:
This question targets article usage and redundancy. English avoids duplicated articles and requires "the" before "future" in temporal references like "in the future."

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Sentence: "The future is yet to come but you have a a lot from us in future."
• Task: Identify the erroneous fragment A–D.

Concept / Approach:

Two issues appear in D: (1) redundant article "a a"; (2) idiomatic requirement "in the future," not "in future" in standard formal English (although "in future" exists in some varieties, the exam standard prefers "in the future").

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Spot duplicated article: "a a".2) Correct temporal phrase: "in the future".3) A possible full correction: "…but you have a lot to learn from us in the future."4) Therefore, part D contains the error.

Verification / Alternative check:

Rewritten: "The future is yet to come, but you have a lot to learn from us in the future." This reads naturally and formally.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

A: Fine as a subject phrase.B: Acceptable idiom meaning something has not happened yet.C: "but you have a" anticipates a noun phrase and is okay before correction in D.E: Not valid because D has errors.

Common Pitfalls:

Accidental duplication of articles in fast drafting is common. Also note variety differences: some dialects permit "in future"; standardized tests often expect "in the future."

Final Answer:

a lot from us in future.