English grammar error-spotting (choice of object phrase with ‘‘harmful’’ and welfare wording): Read the sentence segments and locate the error; select ‘‘No error’’ only if everything is correct. Consider precise idiom in object of ‘‘harmful’’: ‘‘Happily, zoos were / unwilling to cooperate / in a scheme that was potentially harmful to animal welfare / No error.’
-
AHappily, zoos were
-
Bunwilling to cooperate
-
Cin a scheme that was potentially harmful to animal welfare
-
DNo error.
Answer
Correct Answer: in a scheme that was potentially harmful to animal welfare
Explanation
Given data
- C: ‘‘in a scheme that was potentially harmful to animal welfare’’
Concept / ApproachIn formal exam style, it is more idiomatic to make living beings the object of harm: ‘‘harmful to animals’’ or ‘‘harmful to the welfare of animals’’. The abstract compound ‘‘animal welfare’’ is typically used as a field/sector noun (e.g., ‘‘animal-welfare policy’’) rather than as the direct patient of ‘‘harmful to’’ in this structure.
Step-by-step correction reasoningReplace C with a concrete object: ‘‘… harmful to animals’’ / ‘‘… harmful to the welfare of animals’’.
Corrected version‘‘Happily, zoos were unwilling to cooperate in a scheme that was potentially harmful to the welfare of animals.’’
Common pitfalls
- Choosing overly abstract objects where a concrete patient is expected after ‘‘harmful to …’’
Final Answerin a scheme that was potentially harmful to animal welfare